▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Europe did it to themselves by becoming dependent on everything from everyone.

Europe is as rich in resources as others they depend on. They just don't want to develop them, thinking all others will forever supply them one way or another without a need for Europe to touch their precious aristocratic realty.

There are tons of uranium ore right near Paris. Enormous amount of copper and rare earths on the south of Italy, in Greece and Cyprus. Enormous amount of gas and oil on the north, Norway, Britain, Sweden. Coal in Poland and Germany. And so on. They just don't want to mine all that stuff. by their precious elven hands on their precious elven land.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Crypto wallet is just a private key - long sequence of random byles. Key word - private. That means nobody except you know that private key byte sequence. To operate your wallet you have to know private key. If your wallet is "operated" by whatever third party, it is not your wallet anymore.

That simple. Crypto wallet is not much different from normal wallet. If you give your normal wallet to somebody to "operate", it is not your normal wallet anymore.

And, meanwhile, what's the point of giving out your money for "operating" by someone else? What prevents you to "operate" your own money in the same way by yourself? Why banks or corporations are needed to "operate" your money?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

After a while the cops will change their policies on stopping cars. Its inevitable.

Why do you think they want to lose their job? If cops don't do what is in their orders and instructions, they lose their job.

Of course the Constitution and all laws written in the Common Law handbook.

Authorities don't care about Constitution or Common Law. If it would be necessary, they will easily change them.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Things are totally different in court when you represent yourself.

That does not mean you don't have to know laws better than judge, prosecutor and lawyer together.

Otherwise, court will trick you easily.

We know how to work the cops.

No doubts cops could be worked. But it will be a sad and boring life dedicated to work the cops.

I'll prefer variant where cops don't stop my car at all, so I don't have to spend my time in talks with cops and working them in courts.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

You don’t need a lawyer and you are more powerful without one.

You don't need a lawyer, but you have to perfectly know laws, law enforcing internal instructions and regulations and way of thinking of law enforcing dudes to successfully stand against them,

You can explain yourself to the cop every time.

Yes you do. You will do this to every cop you met.

When enough people do this, cops will learn.

No, they don't. They work by orders and regulations. If they have to check a car without license plate according to internal instructions, then they will do that regardless of understanding, even if they will know that it will end with nothing, because their job and salary depends not on the understanding, but on how they follow orders and instructions.

Those cops then lose their badge.

No, they don't, if they properly followed orders and instructions. State/county will pay you your millions. Law enforcing systems created that way, to protect cops from such cases.

That could work to some extent if police will be a private business.

However, the result of such "if enough people will do it" thing will be not the one you think. If this become more or less noticeable, above noise level to the system, then authorities will just ussue a law or change constitution or whatever highest law in a country to remove the loophole in their laws you use.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

You need to be rich to have time for all that courts you certainly win and receive a good lawyer education to avoid all road police tricks they will certainly try on you.

Also, without number plates, I think, you will be constantly stopped by almost every road police car you meet. Absent number plate will attract attention, and even if you will be able to go free without ticket, it will be just annoying and time consuming talks with not always pleasant persons.

If you are just for your privacy - then just make false identity, register car to it and get fake driver license (or legal one, but recieved with that false identity).

If you are for anti-system things, then you will need much more money and time to spend to stay free. It is perfectly possible, but expensive.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

So that have nothing to do with device itself. It's not very different from stealing a car with a few regular old-style smoke detectors (they have radioactive americium inside) occasionally being in a trunk. Or with thoriated TIG welding electrodes in glovebox.

Nothing above need hazmat suited team.

Or, may be, at the same time, at the same place there was another, undisclosed accident, with something much more serious than road density meter, that really needed hazmat team to clean up.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

First reports say it's a tool that contains radioactive material, but why did the driver start shooting at the cops before the chase?

Looks like Troxler density measurement devices for road materials have a price around tens of thousand bucks per unit.

How about something like - Dude stole this expensive device from roadworkers who carelessly left it on the road without supervision, they called police, police stopped thief, he start to shoot, they chased him.

PS: amount of radioactive isotope in such devices is tiny and there is nothing that need hazmat suits and such. Also, there is same purpose devices without anything radioactive at all, they work like microwave radars, not radioactive probes. Troxler made them too and they look similar with nuclear ones. Мodel is not specified, may be there was nothing radioactive at all. But who will miss an opportunity for hype today?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yet another bullshit. Who the fuck produce that bullshit videos? I will never believe that some dude just wake up and decided to create a video using random footage with ranodm description that have nothing to do with video and reality. I found at least 4 videos on different platforms with same footage and same bullshit description added in different layout and design dated August 2025.

That's not some weird dude posting bullshit. That's some campaign from one source with different shills creating and posting same crap using same content and text. Search for "Russian journalist disappeared after leaking this video online back in 2012" and you will get multiple bullshit videos with same footage in different ornament but same text on different platforms.

Poisoning a well, clearly and obviously.

First. This video is from some Moldova TV channel, around 2008. Here is full version - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZrk2xUYQ-o story was about birds migrating back to Moldova at spring, actually. :)

Second. This girl is perfectly alive and didn't disappear, her name is Olesya Kaireak, she is from Moldova and today she is working at Canal5 Moldova - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoK67EigvjU

Yes, she speaks Russian, just like more than half of Moldova. Moldova have a lot of TV channels, radio stations and internet content in Russian.

As for footage itself - it's in my "Unexplained/Useless" folder. Too little data to make any sensible conclusion. Even if it is a real thing, TV camera stuff and reporter girl just didn't collect any useful data more than this footage. Yet another "once, I saw something weird" thing.

IDK, if anybody really interested, just ask her, looks like she have accounts on every social media platform. Search "ОлСся ΠšΠ°ΠΉΡ€ΡΠΊ" or "Olesya Kaireak".

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Influencers" are media. They are all, without single exception get their money from the same (((sources))).

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting. They can revoke vaccine mandates, but somehow can't revoke vaccine manufacturers legal immunity.

I think former have no any sense without the latter. BigPharma will just increase fearmongering ads and bribes for doctors for pushing kid's vaccines onto parents brains. It will not be mandated, but fooled parents will ask for them willingly.

Only severe punishment, from huge payments for damage up to confiscations and jailtime for top mangers who participated in bringing imperfect medicine to market for any medicine damaging side effect will change something.

Interesting, that as I heard, in US you could get a huge compensation for too hot coffee served, or product that does not do something advertised, but at the same time you can't sue pharma manufacturer for medicine that does not work or even do harm.

Also, it should be noted, that software manufacturers also allowed to include same irresponsibility in their EULA. Even those who sell very critical software like OSes, different machinery control software and CADs that do strength calculations for architecture, bridges, railways and so on.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's easy - you could personally come and check my desk existence, if you need a proof of that. If you couldn't do that practically, for any fair reason, you could only have an unverified theory about my desk existence. It's up to you then, to somehow use that theory in a building of your world view or not.

There could be situation, when something you could personally check is impossible without my desk existence, then, you will have to accept that theory that my desk exists is correct to be able to move further. You could later find a theory how thing you could personnaly check is possible without my desk existence, but until that, you have to hold to the unverified theory that my desk exists. This does not work in opposite way - you can't prove non-existence of my desk disproving theory that depends on existing of my desk.

You can't prove non-existence, but you can exclude existence of something from being a foundation of anything else in your picture of reality.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just think what "most powerful and richest" have to do, to "feed fake data" of that kind, that is realtime, consistent with cloud pattern you see from below, and coming from something that is 800km above you moving with the speed around 7km/s. :)

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I question and challenge everything. That's how conscious humans receive knowledge. Only way to find out truth is reproduceable experiment. If you, personally, can't reproduce experiment, that proves something, then, it can't be accounted as truth. That simple.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Undoubtedly I has them. Otherwise, I would have already reformed science into what it should be, from the point of scientific method, that demand proving anything by real, actual, reproduceable experiment. If you can't set an experiment to check your theory, then it is not theory, but unfounded hypothesis, that does not deserve attention.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bullshit. You could easily receive realtime images of Earth from multiple meteo satellies directly, using only simple receiver and antenna, without any interference from any space agency. Completely unaltered and direct.

At least a dozen of satellites continiously transmit realtime unaltered images of Earth form space, from the altitudes from ~800 km to 30k km in open formats (including analog ones) right now, right from above you, available to anyone who want to receive them. If you are too dumb and ignorant to receive them by yourself, using DIY stuff, that absolutely does not mean that there are no such images.

Your bullshit is as dumb as denying existence of some radio station, just because you don't want to tune to it and listen.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even geology is nowhere near reality.

I wouldn't be so radiacal, but I will definitely insist on experimentally checking absolutely everything that accounted as a "settled science" in geology with available today methods, tools and knowledge.

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Somehow Star of David is missing. Suddenly. Every Single Time.

Fuck Jews, and fuck their stupid propaganda.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

We know the Military Industrial Complex was getting rid of old equipment to generate demand and supply for new equipment.

I'm trying to find out at least a name/model of that misterious "US/NATO MIC new equipment" for a long time, but nothing pop up, except some BabylonBee-like reports about US copy of Russian Geran drones which is a copy of Iranian Shakhed drones.

I think there is no any real "new US/NATO weapons", only promises, prospects and weird CGI to back state money spending.

Looks like everything is fake, just pure money laundering, again, BabylonBee-like, because there is no any sense to launder money that exponentialy loosing its past glory of world reserve currency.

Was Ukraine picked due to how many research facilities existed there? Not destroy but use?

There was a lot of reserarch facilities of soviet era in Ukraine, but all of them, including manufacturer of world's largest plane AN-224 or shipyard specialized in mass-production of hydrofoil ships and several spaceship factories was destroyed by post-USSR Ukrainian government. Basically they was just sold to local oligarchs for symbolic price who then destroy everything to clean up territory for "offices for rent" under the local MSM hooting about "desroying disgusting soviet legacy". Current research facilities was built by Western companies nearly from scratch, sometimes using suitable buildings of soviet era like in case of biolabs.

PS: This factory was a completely new manufacturing facility of MIC contractor Flex, who rised mostly on manufacturing flexible cables and flexible circuits, so the name. Since around 2024 this factory manufactured electronic modules for Ukrainian drones. Eventually nothing left from that factory. Trump should be glad, actually. I mean that "return manufacturing to US" thing, you know... :)

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was lightning detection map with history somewhere in internet. I tried to find it again, but only realtime lightning strikes maps pop up, that show lightning strikes that happens right now without history. IDK, may be I missed something or historical data was paywalled, but, honestly, I didn't search hard.

Try to find lightning strikes map with historical archive, and you will get perfectly backed answer to your question.

That things looks like that - https://map.blitzortung.org

Very entertaining thing, I would say.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

it takes a multi million dollar company to create your own payment processor.

It does not. Adding processing crypto payments to your online shop cost nearly nothing (one working day of one not very skilled programmer) for the company.

Crypto is payment processor by itself. You absolutely don't need any "multi million dollar company" to use it. You should be smashing the one who told you that shit in the face until bloody snot and broken nose. You just create your own wallet on your server, and for each purchase just generate a new address in your own wallet, show it to customer, then check blockchain network for confirmation of transaction to that address of invoiced amount. If transaction is confirmed and amount is correct, then payment is done and money is in your own wallet irreversably. That's all. You can mark invoice as paid and ship goods or provide service to customer. Simple script around opensource crypto client. You don't need to mine anything and even don't need to store whole blockchain data for that.

Crypto is not some fucking asset. It is a distributed payment system. Those who try to use or pose it as an asset either degenerates, either fucking cheaters.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is always way out. There is no any problems to avoid absolute dependence on some shitty payment system. Just like there is no any problems to circumvent any state sanctions.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is absolutely no any difference in censorship due to state sanctions and due to wishes of some payment system bosses. There is exactly same people ("people") and intentions behind both, state and payment systems.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›