It's too late, but cheers!
Here is what GPT-J 6B know about purple CIA files:
the CIA purple files are about aliens as well as government cover-up of UFO facts. But there are more files in that huge storehouse that I need to see and read about.
They all involve US government cover-up of UFO facts, and the secret of what is being covered up.
And that’s the key.
What kind of secret would the CIA have about an UFO?
And the same goes for the NSA, the FBI and the army.
And the FBI?
And the military?
What would any of them do to hide such a secret?
Looks like GPT-J 6B is more sensitive, worried and sincere. :)
Really, there is nothing common with AI at all. Еxaggerating, it is just a program that runs over giant database and try to find most relevant continuation for the previous phrase.
As for GPT-3 model, sooner or later it will inevitable leak out, so you will have a chance to play with it.
You also could get an opensource standalone text completion program with GPT-2 model from the same place - https://bellard.org/libnc/gpt2tc.html
Fabrice Bellard is definitely outstanding programming genius. Every time he release something he prove that all modern software is awfully slow overbloated pile of useless shit.
Don't know about this exact one, but if yout want to play with GPT models - https://bellard.org/textsynth/
GPT-J 6B is larger than GPT-3.
This is what it make me to the "Most mice love cactus" seed phrase:
Most mice love cactus. It’s the best source of fiber, calcium, iron, and magnesium. And its crunchy seeds contain protein, zinc, potassium, and vitamin E.
But not all mice eat cactus. And if you’ve ever tried to feed cactus seeds to your pet, you probably know what they look like before they’re put in your mouth. They are so sharp and spiny, you wouldn’t want to eat them, even if your pet enjoys them. And most people don’t have much trouble imagining doing that, since we know that they can sometimes have a very bitter taste.
The problem is that the cactus seed does have a bitter taste. And because of that, these seeds are not good for your pet. For example, if you give your pet a handful of the cactus seeds, he or she may not even know that he or she has eaten them. But because they have a bitter taste, they
Looks legit. Spike protein is not the only protein T-cells could learn about. It is even not a preferred one. F.e. T-cells attack adenoviruses mostly on penton protein which is a capsid one resided in places where spikes connected to capsid. Rinoviruses also successfully attacked via capsid proteines.
That is why 15-20% (or may be much more) of people can't get SARS-CoV-2 at all, even if such coronavirus exists. They just have T-cells that perfectly know how to deal with coronaviruses, and it is not a spike protein that is for some shady reason forced as only and most important protein that this coronavirus have.
Small note: Since everything about coronaviruses now is highly politicised and it is hard to find something objective, you could easily search same info on adenoviruses instead of coronaviruses, they are very similar, the main difference if a shape of capsid. Adenoviruses also has spikes, and all other stuff.
Nobody stops you from checking your theory. If you believe that you can't win without centralization - go for it. I'll be very glad if it will appear that I was wrong and you will win, and will celebrate you and your friends as new Founders. And it will be very sad if you fail because I was right.
allows Christianity to continue?
It does not. It silently change Christianity into something weird and cultist, more some kind a bunch of rithuals of worshiping to church and state authorities idols, than soul religion as a way to know the God.
F.e. they change Bible easily to fit their narrative, and so-called Christians continue to believe that crap.
Simplest illustration:
You definitely know that "there is no authority which is not of God, and all authorities are ordered by God."
But this is an absolute lie. If you take Greek, Latin or ancient Russain texts, you will find that really written
"οὐ γὰρ ἔστιν ἐξουσία εἰ μὴ ὑπὸ Θεοῦ, αἱ δὲ οὖσαι ὑπὸ Θεοῦ τεταγμέναι εἰσίν."
"non est enim potestas nisi a Deo guae autem sunt a Deo ordinatae sunt"
"несть бо власть аще не от Бога, сущия же власти от Бога учинены суть"
all that translated directly to "Not an authory if not of God, real autorities are ordered by God". Check it, find literal translations of every word, and you will find that modern Bible is not the real one, but a lying product of "the cult controlling the world".
And so it goes.
All your examples is not about modern times. They build all that surveillance and other stuff everywhere to prevent or control any possible unapproved centralization. There could not be any Founders anymore. Literally. All of them would be neutralised long before they even will begin to make real steps to centralization.
Trying to project historic precedents over the modern time is a direct way to loose. The treats pattern for rebellion is completely different now. You could not publish Fokischer Beobachter, organize Boston tea party or even just save community money in Switzerland bank. You will not have international support from nearly all first-world countries. And even third-world will not support you. Times changed. You lost an option to centralize.
I don't think you understand what the word centralization means.
Any centralization means inevitable existence of single point of failure. Dot.
It was George Washington's army, not individual militia patriots, that won the Revolutionary War.
Result seems to be at least questionable now.
it was their decentralization that led to them losing.
But it still exists. It is more importarnt to exist than to win.
Same goes for about every successful vs failed revolution.
Every successfull revolution was controlled by TPTB and immidiately after win it eated nearly all rebels.
The only reason there is no viruses for Linux is because not enough people use it to make it worth the time to create them.
Nice. Do you know that nearly all Internet servers running Linux? And you tell me, that some dude windows PC is much preferrable target than Internet server? Tell that story to some sheeple, may be they believe it. In reality, Windows is so bad written and designed OS, that even scholar could write a virus for it. So they just do it. That is why there a tons of viruses for Windows and no any really working virus for Linux. Linux was written by professionals for ourselves for doing job, and Windows by cheap workforce for taking money from sheeple. The result is clearly visible.
Peer-to-peer needs to be in person, to build connections.
No. You don't need to know your peer in person at all.
Seems that this happened much earlier, in 1970s
An organized minority will always win against an unorganized majority.
Organization have nothing to do with centralization. You could easily have a perfectly organized and fully decentralized community.
And torrenting is a niche thing where most people end up with a virus on their computer.
I'm waiting for more than 20 years to see any working virus for Linux. Still waiting without any result. May be a problem is not in torrents? May be you just should not use proprietary OS where you have a need to download proprietary software in binary form from murky sources, and everything will be OK? How torrents could be connected with your wrong choice of OS?
Most people use torrents to share music, movies and books and not software.
You are basically saying the way to fight back is to create a black market.
Exactly. It is just a necessary part on the way to win. In any case you will need some kind of goods exchange in your community. If trade for f.e. unvaxxed or conservatives become outlawed, there will be no any other way except creating black market. So why don't you want to create working solition without a hurry and thoroughly tune it to the needs of community before it become an urgent necessity?
That doesn't get you political power.
All and every political power was literally bought on black market. Obviously you can't go to some legal shop and officially buy some political power.
He's trying to build a parallel economy. That doesn't happen around decentralized platforms.
It is orthogonal things. You could build parallel economy on any platform. Crypto+illegal things economy build completely on decentralised platform and works perfectly.
this is often why leftists win. They aren't afraid to centralize and plan
Don't even know where to start....
- Current leftists (or better say "leftists") win only because TPTB want that. Without TPTB support we wouldn't even hear something about all that SJWs, marxists, fags and other crap.
- Independent leftists win or stand only when used decentralized resistance tactics. (f.e. Zapatista)
- Planning have nothing to do with centralization at all. In case of modern TPTB leftists planning is done for them by TPTB.
Torba could be a nice guy, trying to do something good and make some money. There is nothing bad in that, but unfortunately his platform have a giant inevitable vulnerability right in its core. If somehow he change his mind or would be destroyed by TPTB or appear to be not who he is, all his platform will be immidiately taken over with all its participants.
That is why distributed things are much preferrable now. Corporations try to destroy torrents over 20 years without any success. It is a very good result for a technology.
There is no way around some centralization for a platform such as gab
Seriously?
So, perhaps we obviously should forget about existense of different Mastodon, PeerTube, Diaspora, Zeronet, Tox and other decentralized and absolutely uncontrolled things.
I began to think that all that crap with centralized and closedsourced "new freespeech platforms" is continously happens only to distract people from really working distributed solutions by any means.
Every time, sheeple who was banned from one centralised platform just go and register on another one, again and again. Mice cried, pricked, but continue to chew the cactus.
It's insane. Absolutely insane. It gives even worse loss of belief in humans than coronahoax.
I see nothing bad in calling kikes, bug tech, pedos, fags, whatever. That does not mean anything. The only thing that matter is that Gab is centralised. That is an absolute no-go for such platform.
Agree, it is scam with no doubt. Such building will be so expensive and so complex to build that it will be no any sense to build it ever.
My wager is its an over estimate so they get denied then call out racist so they can then pitch another w/o burden.
That's it!. Indeed. Good theory.
You could make it stable making its foundation at least as wide as widest floor of building and positioning center of mass directly over the center of foundation. From the point of view of ground load it will not differ from any ordinary skyscraper. Something like an adjustable table lamp. It is perfectly stable on any surface, if projection of its center of mass to the base is close to base center.
But the beams that will hold such shape above the ground should be enormously strong. It will be definitely most expensive building ever. And the math needed to calculate them all, don't forget about that racist math!
Really, I think it will end with nothing. They will make few loud presentations, gather some donations and everything will be forgotten forever.
Found http://forteans.com.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/
Looks not very alive, though...
They just forgot to renew certificate. It is expired few hours ago. Just wait, somebody from admins will finally wake up and fix it.
It is definitely possible to build such building in spite of extreme high cost, but even if you have enough money, you still have to do a lot of math in strength of material area. But math is racist, you know. :)
I began to think that all that thoroughly created "fact-checkers" network could be a good source of interesting facts. :) Just search for "falsed" facts and with high probability you will find something intersting.
Interesting, do they understand that they build a complex and expensive system that could easily be used not in the way they planned? :)
Another thought was about the facts that "fact-checkers" will try to avoid checking by any means, just to not attract any attention. That would be very interesting things too.
Do they know about very simple thing named "backups"? :) People do them half a century, it is not a shame to do backups at all! Why do they need to "determine what information the data contained" instead of replacing compromised server with new one and restoring it from backup? :)
Sometimes looks like I could become a billionare just telling that stupid companies about backups. Unfortunately that really have nothing with ransomware or cyberattacks, just an easy way to take out company money...
I'm in. Does that foundation or ancestors still exists officially, could we use its name?
shit just doesn't leak
Yes. but diarrhea do. :)
Really it is unknown is it a intentional leak or occasional. But you could check if it is aligned with reality or not.
You already have some picture or model of what happened with ivermectin in your imagination build on facts you already check, so just check if that leak fits in your model and how it change it.
If it fits and does not change model, it has high probability to be true.
If it fits, but change model, check if model still aligned with known facts. May be it will even fit better and explain things that was not clear earlier.
If it does not fit, may be you need another model that aligned with known facts and siutable for fitting that leak.
If it is impossible to build another model due to inherent contradictions with known facts, leak is a lie intentionally made in attempt to damage model you build.
You are the liar spreading the lie. Masks significantly lower oxygen levels. Why don't you want to get an oxygen sensor and objectively measure that simple fact by yourself? Are you so dumb that you can't take a multimeter and measure voltage between two pins of the sensor? OK, you could buy ready-to-use oxygen level meter and measure. You don't believe in electricity? Or may be you can't read digits from LCD? What is your problem, tell us please, we will try to help.
No. I replied only here.
Philosopher AI is not a philosopher and not an AI. It is interface to simple neural network that is pre-teached to predict next word in a sentence. It is just a text syntesizer. It is trained on many texts and result of that training named GPT-3. OpenAI (not open and not AI) sell this closed pre-trained model for money using modern hype about AI.
There are another Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models, open and free, f.e. GPT-2 and GPT-J you could easily play with. GPT-J 6B is larger than GPT-3. GPT-J 6B is a GPT-J transform model that has 6 billion trainable parameters. https://huggingface.co/EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B
You are not limited in length here - https://bellard.org/textsynth/
You have to spend some time to get something not "nonsense" from any GPT. Examples that you saw about Philosopher AI (GPT-3) is just a little part selected from a huge pile of nonsense answers. Marketing, you know...