I don't think you understand what the word centralization means.
Any centralization means inevitable existence of single point of failure. Dot.
It was George Washington's army, not individual militia patriots, that won the Revolutionary War.
Result seems to be at least questionable now.
it was their decentralization that led to them losing.
But it still exists. It is more importarnt to exist than to win.
Same goes for about every successful vs failed revolution.
Every successfull revolution was controlled by TPTB and immidiately after win it eated nearly all rebels.
The only reason there is no viruses for Linux is because not enough people use it to make it worth the time to create them.
Nice. Do you know that nearly all Internet servers running Linux? And you tell me, that some dude windows PC is much preferrable target than Internet server? Tell that story to some sheeple, may be they believe it. In reality, Windows is so bad written and designed OS, that even scholar could write a virus for it. So they just do it. That is why there a tons of viruses for Windows and no any really working virus for Linux. Linux was written by professionals for ourselves for doing job, and Windows by cheap workforce for taking money from sheeple. The result is clearly visible.
Peer-to-peer needs to be in person, to build connections.
No. You don't need to know your peer in person at all.
Dude, you keep moving your goalposts from your original points of "decentralization for the win" are you even aware of it? Now you're saying as a way to discredit that a centralized standing army was necessary to win the American Revolution, that 200+ years later America is cucked. Well, that's not a response to the original point, now is it? Some centralization is necessary, too much is bad. The Founders knew this an limited the central government, but later generations fucked that up.
And just because Windows is somewhat shitty and has a path dependency leading to a larger than deserved share of the marketplace...that doesn't make Linux some wonderkind either. Linux is niche, you know it's niche too, but hey, if it's your preferred brand, I'm not shitting on it just describing something accurately.
Lastly, your an-cap version of life is, well, unrealistic. People build reputational networks of friendship, coworkers and family relationships in communities that make them resilient.
What do you say to the fact that much of the world operates on person to person networking? You wanna get involved in stocks, banking and finance...best move to a big city, especially NY. You want to work in the automotive industry, it's Detroit for America mostly. Fashion industry? NY or Paris. The film industry, well, you'd better move to Hollywood. Porn? The San Fran Valley. Etc. etc. etc.
All your examples is not about modern times. They build all that surveillance and other stuff everywhere to prevent or control any possible unapproved centralization. There could not be any Founders anymore. Literally. All of them would be neutralised long before they even will begin to make real steps to centralization.
Trying to project historic precedents over the modern time is a direct way to loose. The treats pattern for rebellion is completely different now. You could not publish Fokischer Beobachter, organize Boston tea party or even just save community money in Switzerland bank. You will not have international support from nearly all first-world countries. And even third-world will not support you. Times changed. You lost an option to centralize.
There is nothing new under the sun. Hitler would have learned well from Napoleon in his invasion of Russia, and so on.
And there is already a lot of centralization that is against the NWO. For starters, entire US. states where, get this, patriots mobilized, organized, and won political power.
The Soviet Union and the East Germans had a surveillance state that makes ours pale in comparison. That evaporated like water in the summer sun. Just one day, it went poof.
The Founders understood this, that's why the states had to "unite or die".
Nobody stops you from checking your theory. If you believe that you can't win without centralization - go for it. I'll be very glad if it will appear that I was wrong and you will win, and will celebrate you and your friends as new Founders. And it will be very sad if you fail because I was right.
Any centralization means inevitable existence of single point of failure. Dot.
Result seems to be at least questionable now.
But it still exists. It is more importarnt to exist than to win.
Every successfull revolution was controlled by TPTB and immidiately after win it eated nearly all rebels.
Nice. Do you know that nearly all Internet servers running Linux? And you tell me, that some dude windows PC is much preferrable target than Internet server? Tell that story to some sheeple, may be they believe it. In reality, Windows is so bad written and designed OS, that even scholar could write a virus for it. So they just do it. That is why there a tons of viruses for Windows and no any really working virus for Linux. Linux was written by professionals for ourselves for doing job, and Windows by cheap workforce for taking money from sheeple. The result is clearly visible.
No. You don't need to know your peer in person at all.
Dude, you keep moving your goalposts from your original points of "decentralization for the win" are you even aware of it? Now you're saying as a way to discredit that a centralized standing army was necessary to win the American Revolution, that 200+ years later America is cucked. Well, that's not a response to the original point, now is it? Some centralization is necessary, too much is bad. The Founders knew this an limited the central government, but later generations fucked that up.
And just because Windows is somewhat shitty and has a path dependency leading to a larger than deserved share of the marketplace...that doesn't make Linux some wonderkind either. Linux is niche, you know it's niche too, but hey, if it's your preferred brand, I'm not shitting on it just describing something accurately.
Lastly, your an-cap version of life is, well, unrealistic. People build reputational networks of friendship, coworkers and family relationships in communities that make them resilient.
What do you say to the fact that much of the world operates on person to person networking? You wanna get involved in stocks, banking and finance...best move to a big city, especially NY. You want to work in the automotive industry, it's Detroit for America mostly. Fashion industry? NY or Paris. The film industry, well, you'd better move to Hollywood. Porn? The San Fran Valley. Etc. etc. etc.
All your examples is not about modern times. They build all that surveillance and other stuff everywhere to prevent or control any possible unapproved centralization. There could not be any Founders anymore. Literally. All of them would be neutralised long before they even will begin to make real steps to centralization.
Trying to project historic precedents over the modern time is a direct way to loose. The treats pattern for rebellion is completely different now. You could not publish Fokischer Beobachter, organize Boston tea party or even just save community money in Switzerland bank. You will not have international support from nearly all first-world countries. And even third-world will not support you. Times changed. You lost an option to centralize.
There is nothing new under the sun. Hitler would have learned well from Napoleon in his invasion of Russia, and so on.
And there is already a lot of centralization that is against the NWO. For starters, entire US. states where, get this, patriots mobilized, organized, and won political power.
The Soviet Union and the East Germans had a surveillance state that makes ours pale in comparison. That evaporated like water in the summer sun. Just one day, it went poof.
The Founders understood this, that's why the states had to "unite or die".
Nobody stops you from checking your theory. If you believe that you can't win without centralization - go for it. I'll be very glad if it will appear that I was wrong and you will win, and will celebrate you and your friends as new Founders. And it will be very sad if you fail because I was right.