▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

So, one of the main goals of NWO - to create single indistinguishable "gray race" already completed?

by pkvi
▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

But where they outsource engineering? At the time, Russia outsource it to the West. In the form of good engineers emigration and supressing local R&D by stupid economic and other stuff. Now West outsourcing engineering. To where?

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Following the same logic, Jews does not exist. Ones who talk about some Jewish heritage are exactly same mixed race dumbfucks as all other people. So all that Jewish superiority craps like "antisemitism", "diffamation" or "holocaust" are completely obsolete. Same with blacks.

Nice. :) Will buy two.

by pkvi
▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whatever, as you wish. :) Just thought that Alaska or California FortRoss should be more logical for 1/16 Russian than New Jersey/ :)

by pkvi
▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why 1/16? And why New Jersey? :)

by pkvi
▲ 7 ▼
CrazyRussian 7 points ago +7 / -0

You want to say that now US lost not only high quality manufacturing abilities that was traded for cheap china labour, but also high quality engineering skills it was famous for. Pity. Same happened with Russia decades ago and it is not good at all. So who is developing all modern high-tech stuff now?

by pkvi
▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is it a compliment or suspicion? :)

Really I often mix up all that "past, past perfect, present perfect" and other times and confused with articles. Also, since in Russian order of words does not matter I often speak in Yoda style. And I have awful Russian accent. Not because I can't correctly pronounce all that "th" and "r" English-specific sounds, Soviet curriculum based on Oxford textbooks included correct pronounce, but because I'm to lazy to do it right way. :)

by pkvi
▲ 17 ▼
CrazyRussian 17 points ago +17 / -0

If he is really "Lead Engineer in Global Defence Group", then the destiny of that "Global Defence Group" is doomed. If Lead Engineer have no ability on figuring out connections between causes and effects, then it is a bad and completely incompetent Engineer. :)

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't know about Windows, but I routinely change few lines of Linux code from time to time. Since 2.2.X kernels. Never meet any problems with that. Yes, it is a large and complex project, but it is perfectly self-documented and it is not hard to understand how it works and what exactly you need to change to get what you want.

I find it naive to believe human can edit book that is 133 astronomic units long

That's not that scary. 3 billion nucleotide pairs is ~750Mb of data. 1 nucleotide pair is 2 bits, so 4 nucleotide pairs is a byte. Not a simple task, but not completely impossible too.

Also it is not very rational to start from human DNA. There is much simpler beings, there is complete plants with flowers, roots and all that stuff (not some chlorella cells) with DNA length of only ~160M pairs, it is 40Mb of data. Chlorella is ~30M pairs or 7.5Mb. Going to bacteria, there is species with ~160k pairs or 40kb of data. Absolutely possible things to start the journey. When you completely get how that 40kb of code works, it will be much easier to go further. May be there will be some regularities or heavily used identical sequences and you will be able to split larger code into "standard libraries" and the main program, that will make further progress easier.

Linux kenel 5.10 is 1.1Gb of code unpacked, meanwhile.

Its very admirable to have faith in humanity, but I find it impossible to buy in gene editing yet

Me too. I don't buy in their gene editing. But I don't see anything wrong in starting the long road of real science and studying of gene editing in the sane and scientific way.

I don't try to tell that we have to edit our plants, pets or ourselves right now in hurry. I just try to point out that gene editing is not some pure evil that should be hated and thrown out. We should study it, get all possible knowledge about it and then, use it for our needs if necessary.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't need authority or expert to trust. Really, there are no things in the world that sane person could not comprehend.

As for the discussed CRISPR technology there is nothing complex at all. Special proteine split DNA and compare one strand with provided short RNA If RNA is complement to splitted part of DNA this proteine cuts/change nucleotide/whatever at that position. It is some kind of text search function in programming. You have a word, you have a text, you search a word in a text, if found, do something with text at that position - replace a word, letter or delete something. Simple, isn't it, if you get rid of all that biomedical slang?

The problem with that extremely simple thing is that to do something sensible you have to know exactly what you want to change and what will be the result. And that is the problem.

Really, things are not complex too. DNA is a program. 3 pairs of nucleotides (codons) progam an aminoacid. Some codons program stop or start condition for reader. Proteins built from aminoacids, so sequence of codons from start to stop encode a protein. And so on. The problem is that nearly nobody really try to reverse engineer that programming language and system. Most just do random changes in the hope to get the needed result.

It is like some webmonkey, trying to get modern fancy web2.0 site at the deadline insert random pieces of code into some big project using Ctrl+V Ctrl+C (CRISPR) without any understanding how all that things work and what he is doing in the hope to get something that will look like needed website and will be paid by emplyer. Obviously, the result is awful for end user, but profitable for webmonkey and employer.

Sane programmer will study how computer works, how it execute code and what that code do, and then will change exactly what he need. But nobody do that. Evetually, there are no books "gene editing for beginners" or "complete apple DNA documentation".

That is the problem with gene editing, not your inability to understand how things work.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you want to use GMO foods

Meanwhile, about GMO. I hate GMO not because it is GMO. Being an engineer I perfectly understand that every apple or beef we grow and eat for centuries are literally genetically modified by selection process. If you ever tried to eat wild apples you know what I'm talking about. And I don't even know if there somwhere still exist a genetically unmodified wild cow.

I hate GMO and strongly against it because it is their GMO. Nobody knows what they really changed, for what purposes except profit and what real side effects could be. That is the danger of GMO, not the GMO itself.

Something like that.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like KISS principle and follow it where possible. I see no need in many novelties too. But I slightly more optimistic about humans. :)

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd rather not mess with my stock settings.

Reasonable, me, probably, too. At least to the moment I will get a full and complete documentation on every possible setting. But why make a taboo from it? Bad guys (? transgender inhumans?) don't care about your taboos and will do that in any case.

I need material to learn on and from experience, making mistakes and dealing with consequences is path to improve.

This. Older civilisation - more consequences to deal with. You will have to deal with consequences of gene editing usage. For now, you already have to deal with consequences of mRNA gene editing. And how you will fix it if you deny gene editing technology as whole?

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can not define what is good or bad.

Who told you that? Why do you so underestimate humans?

Isn't it a core purpose of a human being - to decide what is good and what is bad and do what is good and not do what is bad?

Denying technology never worked out. You could find numerous examples of communities that denied technology and none of that communities is a winner.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lemons are not a winter fruit.

Cherries and melons too. But there are varians perfectly growing in high latitudes selectioned more than 50 years ago.

There are no any reasons to not to have lemons that grow in high latitudes. The question is only will you spend decades if not centuries to achieve necessary gene changes, or will it be hours to make it.

We can't be patient about having certain things during seasonal periods so, lets break nature apart and hope the consequences are tolerable.

You just touched one of the biggest rabbit holes. Do you understand that current climate is completely unnatural for our planet? Earth should be green from pole to pole with modrate warm climate under greenhouse effect with 1200ppm of CO2 in atmosphere, as it was hundreds millions of years in eocene, f.e. You keep temperature and humidity in your home exactly at average temperature and humidity of eocene. To grow perfect crop you have to copy eocene climete up to that 1200 ppm CO2.

So, trying to prevent "climate change" you break nature apart, not by creating lemons that could survive the -20°C.

There is no long term study to show gene editing consequences

And there is no such studies because they don't care. When you want to use something for your purpose, I think you study the consequences first, and then use that something with wisdom. Not like them. That is the difference. That is why technology should be taken away from elites.

If you want to use GMO foods as an example, do you know how many variants have come and gone by experiment and failed and poisoned soil and animals and insects. Monsanto has a horrible history of having to decontaminate soil from having tested different strains.

Because Monsanto don't care about things you will care about. That is why Monsanto using gene editing is bad and you using gene editing is good. You care. You will figure out how things works and will not use something you don't know about even if it promise billions in profit. You and Monsanto have completely opposite goals.

Again, it is only a question of who is using technology and for what.

You use internet to share your thoughts with friends and to get answers for your questions. They use internet to create sheeple. Does that make internet bad?

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whose genetic program and for what purpose? That is the key question.

When it is completely up to you, say, you want to have a renewable teeth (just new one grow if something wrong with old) and you have exact map of what nucleotide sequence responsible for and change one that responsible for growing new tooth instead old one - what is the problem? It is your decision, you do it by yourself and no corporation could insert something unintended into your DNA. You just get always perfect teeth and will never have to pay dentist. Why could it be something wrong?

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

We don't need gene editing. It is 100% unnecessary.

So, how to create a winterproof variety of lemons? You can't do it without changing lemon genes. The question is only in how you will do it - by natural selection, by random gamma-rays shooting or by direct editing.

All that smokescreens around genetic is just a smokescreen. This thing is similar to computer programming - you have a "program" written as DNA code. Different parts do different things. That's all. As you know exactly how it works, you are free to do anything you want.

Ethic questions about human gene editing also not as simple as you think. Of course when some elite bastards want to change your DNA with murky goals that is absolutely unacceptible. Or when they want to grow dumb brainless clones to replace us. But from the other side it is a question of what making us those who we are. If it is DNA - than it is unacceptible to interfere with our DNA. Changing DNA we will become something different. But if it is something else and we are spiritual beings in the vessels of our bodies, then who cares if we change our vessel in the way we want? As long as it is our own decision, it should be OK. Of course there will be some dumbfucks that will grow horns and tails, but most people will use this ability to fix errors or for other utilitarian things. Nowdays we already have few freaks who do some weird and disgusting things with their bodies. But nobody think that fixing teeth or repairing wounds is something satanic.

Even moving to theological things, it is not as simple as it seems. If God create us and give us an ability to change ouselves, may be He do it with purpose. And since God create us by His own likeness, it means that we have the right not only use life, but change it too. And may be even create it, in the likeness of God. Also, f.e., humanity become taller, and it is genetic thing. Yes, our genes changing making us taller. Is it against God or is it along His plan? I think it is up to us - use that ability or not and how to use it.

Shortly it depends on who and with what purpose doing that "scary" gene editing. And it does not matter how they do it. CRISPR - is about "how", not about "who" or "with what purposes".

Question everything. It could be at least interesting.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Find me a willing American farmer who WANTS to grow CRISPR bred beef

Not an american farmer, but it would be interesting for me to use CRISPR for making my livestock better. Say, make it invulnerable for the shit government/corporations could use to kill it. Or convert them to a breed with better output.

I see nothing bad in using technology in the way I want with complete understanding of what I am doing. That is completely different from the situation when that technology used by some third-party satanic elite bastards to make you compliant and controlled.

CRISPR is just a technology. The question is who use it and for what purpose. We change genes when doing controlled selection and other stuff. CRISPR is just a method to do the same thing faster. If you have an example of some cool and delisious variety of berries, but can't obtain seeds (or they extremely expensive, or prohibited by government), using CRISPR you could make that delicious variety from your regular berries without long selection process. Find dfiferencies between your berries DNA and delicious berries DNA, then use CRISPR to do replacements.

Throw out some decent way to resist to NWO just because NWO use it to fuck you, does not look sane for me. I'll prefer to fuck NWO with it.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

You could easily check it reading alleles studies and other scientific antropological stuff.

Also, if you are so dumb to read something about DNA sequences and body structure differences, i have something with extremely simple pictures for you - https://rusfact-ru.translate.goog/node/7388?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

you realize most people in the world are mixed right?

That is a blatant lie. Most people in the world are single race and not mixed. You have billions of Chinese, billions of Indians, billion of europeans, billion of blacks - all are clearly not mixed race at all.

F.e. Russians never in the history have any close relations with negroes. Russians can't be mixed with negroes at all. Every single rare case of such mixes are in historic books as outstanding events.

Mixed race people are insignificant minority in the population of the whole Earth. Some race mixes like negroes with asians are rare as fuck.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

SlimBrowser is just an envelope for a Microsoft Internet Explorer Trident engine. So, it is basically old IE with new face. With all telemetry and probes from IE.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, each currency have specific "currency code" that is used in banking system. One country could have multiple "currency codes" for publicly only and single country currency. Same currency, say, "US dollar" or "Russian rouble" could have different properties (including, f.e. does it backed with gold or not) when used inside banking system with different "currency codes". When you withdraw money from banking system it is only one, public "currency code". You can't withdraw money with non-public "currency codes", but banks, stocks and other elite entities could easily operate in that non-public code.

F.e. I found not only regular "US dollar" with 840 code, but also some other "US dollars" with codes 997 and 998. May be there exist another "US dollars", including that lawful money "US dollar". Intersting what they are, how they differ from 840 USD, what their specific properties and could you withdraw or exchange your regular "US dollars" to that another "US dollars".

As I understand, you have FOIA and could demand an answer to that tricky questions, interesting if anybody tried to request info about currency codes used in US banking system with description and reasons for existence.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I figured simpliest possible explanation of that trick:

Working, you create some value. That value does not change and is dependent only on amount of your personal labour/efforts/intellect/wisdom.

Elites can't easily manipulate with that real value. So, there is at least two currencies - one that represent real, unchangeable value of your labour, and it is for elites only, and another, public fake currency to pay you for your labour.

That is how elites expropriate real value you create - paying you with paper/digits that represent not a real worth of your labor/efforts, but their idea of what part of that value they want to expropriate.

Could sound like something marxist, but that is completely different. Marxism intentioanlly lead you to the wrong direction, hiding real beneficiars of system behind false dichotomy of employee and employer, excluding the important work of employer on creating and organization of business from the term "labour". The intention of that marxist trick is to destroy any private and independent from elite business, and tie workers directly to elites.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Technically incorrect. Bluetooth does not have MAC address. It have addresses named BD_ADDR, not MAC. It is also a 48-bit value, like Ethernet MAC (Media Access Control) address, but it is different thing and have different structure. MAC address contains Unicast/Multicast, Global/Local bits in MSB, vendor ID and adapter ID. BD_ADDR consists of NAP (Non-significant Address Part, used for frequency sync, it could change) , UAP (Upper Address Part, seed for encryption) and LAP (Lower Address Part, device address itself). Google it if want to know deeper details.

When you scan for Bluetooth devices you see Bluetooth addresses, not MACs.

To see MAC addresses you have to scan for WiFi packets device exchange with local WiFi Access Point, f.e.

Also, as some *winner mentioned, it is barely possible to unnoticeably implant BT device into human body due to size and power demands.

However, IIRC there was some efforts to push mobile apps that show proximity to vaxxed/unvaxxed persons mobiles, and that really could be used to check if there are any vaxxed around to some extent. You need to reverse engineer that app to find a way it obtain vaxx status information for Bluetooth addresses it find around. I think it is some requests to an internet server with a database.

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

That could be much deeper than you think. Check my comment https://conspiracies.win/p/15HIFH3Eai/x/c/4OVycN17wzB

Shortly - there is two or more currencies - one or more fake for plebs, and another, real for elite. Plebs does not have an access to real one. When regular person create goods with real worth of, say, 100oz of gold, regular person receives fake money with little and changing rate of 1oz of gold, but if that fake money enters banking system this fake money turned into real ones, that represent real worth of goods created by regular person and elite getting their profits in real money, not fake ones. If regular person want to exchange his labor to the gold by bying gold with fake money, there will be 1oz. If elite want to buy gold equivalent of regular person labor it will be 100oz.

Look for currency codes of US dollar in bank bills, recipes, excerpts, cheques, contracts and other stuff. If you pay in currency code 840 (regular USD) and then that currency code changes, or money (or bank fee) evetually go to the US Dollar account with another currency code - that is a huge red flag.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›