Find me a willing American farmer who WANTS to grow CRISPR bred beef
Not an american farmer, but it would be interesting for me to use CRISPR for making my livestock better. Say, make it invulnerable for the shit government/corporations could use to kill it. Or convert them to a breed with better output.
I see nothing bad in using technology in the way I want with complete understanding of what I am doing. That is completely different from the situation when that technology used by some third-party satanic elite bastards to make you compliant and controlled.
CRISPR is just a technology. The question is who use it and for what purpose. We change genes when doing controlled selection and other stuff. CRISPR is just a method to do the same thing faster. If you have an example of some cool and delisious variety of berries, but can't obtain seeds (or they extremely expensive, or prohibited by government), using CRISPR you could make that delicious variety from your regular berries without long selection process. Find dfiferencies between your berries DNA and delicious berries DNA, then use CRISPR to do replacements.
Throw out some decent way to resist to NWO just because NWO use it to fuck you, does not look sane for me. I'll prefer to fuck NWO with it.
We don't need gene editing. It is 100% unnecessary.
So, how to create a winterproof variety of lemons? You can't do it without changing lemon genes. The question is only in how you will do it - by natural selection, by random gamma-rays shooting or by direct editing.
All that smokescreens around genetic is just a smokescreen. This thing is similar to computer programming - you have a "program" written as DNA code. Different parts do different things. That's all. As you know exactly how it works, you are free to do anything you want.
Ethic questions about human gene editing also not as simple as you think. Of course when some elite bastards want to change your DNA with murky goals that is absolutely unacceptible. Or when they want to grow dumb brainless clones to replace us. But from the other side it is a question of what making us those who we are. If it is DNA - than it is unacceptible to interfere with our DNA. Changing DNA we will become something different. But if it is something else and we are spiritual beings in the vessels of our bodies, then who cares if we change our vessel in the way we want? As long as it is our own decision, it should be OK. Of course there will be some dumbfucks that will grow horns and tails, but most people will use this ability to fix errors or for other utilitarian things. Nowdays we already have few freaks who do some weird and disgusting things with their bodies. But nobody think that fixing teeth or repairing wounds is something satanic.
Even moving to theological things, it is not as simple as it seems. If God create us and give us an ability to change ouselves, may be He do it with purpose. And since God create us by His own likeness, it means that we have the right not only use life, but change it too. And may be even create it, in the likeness of God. Also, f.e., humanity become taller, and it is genetic thing. Yes, our genes changing making us taller. Is it against God or is it along His plan? I think it is up to us - use that ability or not and how to use it.
Shortly it depends on who and with what purpose doing that "scary" gene editing. And it does not matter how they do it. CRISPR - is about "how", not about "who" or "with what purposes".
Question everything. It could be at least interesting.
Meanwhile, about GMO. I hate GMO not because it is GMO. Being an engineer I perfectly understand that every apple or beef we grow and eat for centuries are literally genetically modified by selection process. If you ever tried to eat wild apples you know what I'm talking about. And I don't even know if there somwhere still exist a genetically unmodified wild cow.
I hate GMO and strongly against it because it is their GMO. Nobody knows what they really changed, for what purposes except profit and what real side effects could be. That is the danger of GMO, not the GMO itself.
Not an american farmer, but it would be interesting for me to use CRISPR for making my livestock better. Say, make it invulnerable for the shit government/corporations could use to kill it. Or convert them to a breed with better output.
I see nothing bad in using technology in the way I want with complete understanding of what I am doing. That is completely different from the situation when that technology used by some third-party satanic elite bastards to make you compliant and controlled.
CRISPR is just a technology. The question is who use it and for what purpose. We change genes when doing controlled selection and other stuff. CRISPR is just a method to do the same thing faster. If you have an example of some cool and delisious variety of berries, but can't obtain seeds (or they extremely expensive, or prohibited by government), using CRISPR you could make that delicious variety from your regular berries without long selection process. Find dfiferencies between your berries DNA and delicious berries DNA, then use CRISPR to do replacements.
Throw out some decent way to resist to NWO just because NWO use it to fuck you, does not look sane for me. I'll prefer to fuck NWO with it.
So, how to create a winterproof variety of lemons? You can't do it without changing lemon genes. The question is only in how you will do it - by natural selection, by random gamma-rays shooting or by direct editing.
All that smokescreens around genetic is just a smokescreen. This thing is similar to computer programming - you have a "program" written as DNA code. Different parts do different things. That's all. As you know exactly how it works, you are free to do anything you want.
Ethic questions about human gene editing also not as simple as you think. Of course when some elite bastards want to change your DNA with murky goals that is absolutely unacceptible. Or when they want to grow dumb brainless clones to replace us. But from the other side it is a question of what making us those who we are. If it is DNA - than it is unacceptible to interfere with our DNA. Changing DNA we will become something different. But if it is something else and we are spiritual beings in the vessels of our bodies, then who cares if we change our vessel in the way we want? As long as it is our own decision, it should be OK. Of course there will be some dumbfucks that will grow horns and tails, but most people will use this ability to fix errors or for other utilitarian things. Nowdays we already have few freaks who do some weird and disgusting things with their bodies. But nobody think that fixing teeth or repairing wounds is something satanic.
Even moving to theological things, it is not as simple as it seems. If God create us and give us an ability to change ouselves, may be He do it with purpose. And since God create us by His own likeness, it means that we have the right not only use life, but change it too. And may be even create it, in the likeness of God. Also, f.e., humanity become taller, and it is genetic thing. Yes, our genes changing making us taller. Is it against God or is it along His plan? I think it is up to us - use that ability or not and how to use it.
Shortly it depends on who and with what purpose doing that "scary" gene editing. And it does not matter how they do it. CRISPR - is about "how", not about "who" or "with what purposes".
Question everything. It could be at least interesting.
Meanwhile, about GMO. I hate GMO not because it is GMO. Being an engineer I perfectly understand that every apple or beef we grow and eat for centuries are literally genetically modified by selection process. If you ever tried to eat wild apples you know what I'm talking about. And I don't even know if there somwhere still exist a genetically unmodified wild cow.
I hate GMO and strongly against it because it is their GMO. Nobody knows what they really changed, for what purposes except profit and what real side effects could be. That is the danger of GMO, not the GMO itself.
Something like that.