Cherries and melons too. But there are varians perfectly growing in high latitudes selectioned more than 50 years ago.
There are no any reasons to not to have lemons that grow in high latitudes. The question is only will you spend decades if not centuries to achieve necessary gene changes, or will it be hours to make it.
We can't be patient about having certain things during seasonal periods so, lets break nature apart and hope the consequences are tolerable.
You just touched one of the biggest rabbit holes. Do you understand that current climate is completely unnatural for our planet? Earth should be green from pole to pole with modrate warm climate under greenhouse effect with 1200ppm of CO2 in atmosphere, as it was hundreds millions of years in eocene, f.e. You keep temperature and humidity in your home exactly at average temperature and humidity of eocene. To grow perfect crop you have to copy eocene climete up to that 1200 ppm CO2.
So, trying to prevent "climate change" you break nature apart, not by creating lemons that could survive the -20°C.
There is no long term study to show gene editing consequences
And there is no such studies because they don't care. When you want to use something for your purpose, I think you study the consequences first, and then use that something with wisdom. Not like them. That is the difference. That is why technology should be taken away from elites.
If you want to use GMO foods as an example, do you know how many variants have come and gone by experiment and failed and poisoned soil and animals and insects. Monsanto has a horrible history of having to decontaminate soil from having tested different strains.
Because Monsanto don't care about things you will care about. That is why Monsanto using gene editing is bad and you using gene editing is good. You care. You will figure out how things works and will not use something you don't know about even if it promise billions in profit. You and Monsanto have completely opposite goals.
Again, it is only a question of who is using technology and for what.
You use internet to share your thoughts with friends and to get answers for your questions. They use internet to create sheeple. Does that make internet bad?
Cherries and melons too. But there are varians perfectly growing in high latitudes selectioned more than 50 years ago.
There are no any reasons to not to have lemons that grow in high latitudes. The question is only will you spend decades if not centuries to achieve necessary gene changes, or will it be hours to make it.
You just touched one of the biggest rabbit holes. Do you understand that current climate is completely unnatural for our planet? Earth should be green from pole to pole with modrate warm climate under greenhouse effect with 1200ppm of CO2 in atmosphere, as it was hundreds millions of years in eocene, f.e. You keep temperature and humidity in your home exactly at average temperature and humidity of eocene. To grow perfect crop you have to copy eocene climete up to that 1200 ppm CO2.
So, trying to prevent "climate change" you break nature apart, not by creating lemons that could survive the -20°C.
And there is no such studies because they don't care. When you want to use something for your purpose, I think you study the consequences first, and then use that something with wisdom. Not like them. That is the difference. That is why technology should be taken away from elites.
Because Monsanto don't care about things you will care about. That is why Monsanto using gene editing is bad and you using gene editing is good. You care. You will figure out how things works and will not use something you don't know about even if it promise billions in profit. You and Monsanto have completely opposite goals.
Again, it is only a question of who is using technology and for what.
You use internet to share your thoughts with friends and to get answers for your questions. They use internet to create sheeple. Does that make internet bad?