▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am confused, what do you mean no breakthroughs or inventions since the 70's?

Name me a single invention or discovery made after 70s that is similar in significance to, say, laser, semiconductors, nuclear reactors, etc.

In what field, exactly?

In all of them.

Because there have been countless breakthroughs and inventions since then in pretty much every field.

Name me single one that is not just technological improvement of things invented/discoveried before 70s.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

But what is the point!?

IDK, but possibly the cutting of further development. Since 1970s there was no any breakthrough inventions and discoveries at all.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

but that calculation is a crap. you have to assume the sun is far away for that experiment to make sense...but thats now how science works.

Exactly. It is absolutely scientific to suppose that Sun is very far away since it visible diameter does not change when it travel over your head. Using one scientific and proven assumption you could scientifically use it in another scientific research. That is how science works. Everything should be connected and if something is contradicts with your model, then your model is wrong.

I have looked at things far away with binoculars. then i checked the distances and did the math.

It was windows in a girl, not a guy room in neighbouring house, i hope?

I look at the sun and sunset and use my knowledge of how parallel light vs local light work

Did you ever heard about the thing named "perspective"? You could easily study it on a closest railway. Or you will insist that rails on railway are not parallel and when train moves they became wider closer to the train? And same is with straight highways and other stuff.

Your "understanding" of "observations" is as retarded, as your attempts to make a thing from a nothingburger named "flat earth".

Especially interesting, that for your miserable area of activity, it is really does not matter at all, what model of earth you will use. In your case there are absolutely no any reasons to bother with the shape of earth. Not a single one. So, it is not your own necessity, to discuss a question that absolutely have no any use for you, but somebody else. It's like somebody with total lactose intolerance who are flaiming in threads about nuances of cheese taste. Unlike me, in your life you never met and will never meet the need to somehow account Earth curvature. But for the unknown reason you spend months trolling here about shit you have no any need to care about. :) Name that reason or GTFO.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

No one has even been able to measure the curve. You can't, brilliant scientists can't. No possible way.

Nice try, but Earth curvature was measured even B.C.. :)

And if you can detect any curve, I will personally send you $1000.

And how you will do it under current anti-Russia sanctions? You can't send me $, and know it, but make false promise you could not fulfill. :) Nice try again.

And why do you think I need $? Don't you have something more trustful and stable?

(Yes, I have done my own experiments and scientific observations)

You mean reading propaganda papers and watching YouTube? Sorry to disappoint you, but that is not "doing my own experiments and scientific observations".

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks, but you should stop believing in photos from space. High altitude planes

Show me a plane that could fly 7.5km/s at alsitude 800km or in case of geostationary at 3km/s at 35000km. And only then come back.

Go ahead, Measure the curve. 8 inches per mile squared, convert to metric or use the trig chart.

I'm fucking with that fucking 8 inches per mile each time when I have to establish long-range radiolink between two points. All that fucking masts and roofs to go above that fucking curvature. Oh, how I want the Earth be flat - put antennas above the trees, and get unlimited range. But no, that fucking Earth is round as fuck, and you have to build high towers and masts for fucking miserable 30km.

So, don't even try to tell me about how you can't measure Earth curvature.

Shut the fuck up, take a laser and go to lake or river and measure your curvature as long as you wish. Also, you could measure distances using any long-range ToF device between 3 distant points and sum the angles of measured triangle. Suddenly, you will inevitably get more than 180°.

Either way, you cant use pictures to prove the globe theory.

I can. It is you who can't find out anything by yourself and continously copypasting dumb shit.

You personally did absolutely nothing to find out the answer on the question you so concerned about. Why?

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Take a used satellite dish, $20 RTL-SDR USB dongle, used 3G irradiator, some coaxial cable and any PC you have around. Receive realtime perfectly curved full-globe images of rotating Earth every 15-30 minutes from GOES/FENGYUN/Electro satellites with resolution 4km/px (or even 1km/px) that allow you easily compare cloud pattern over your head with one you see on the fresh image.

You are so concerned about shape of Earth, why don't you do anything to resolve that so inportant to you problem?

Try to do something, instead of dumb copypasting stupud and false statements. Are you so handass, that anything more than Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V is something unachievable for you?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would be like referring to the ukraine war as a dual country event.

It is mostly US/UK/EU-Russia event. Still local. I'm in doubt that that shit is really touches Brasil, Zimbabve, India or even China.

I think that most things that could seem to be consequences of that war, really was inevitable, war just create a push for them, but was not the cause, even if MSM says so. Especially if MSM says so.

9/11 provoked loss of life and destabilization of multiple middle east countries aswell as policies world wide.

They was already pretty much destabilised. All that Taliban/AlQaeda was created long before 9/11 and US rush to bath Israel in protection and money also was not new thing. Iraq/Iran also was under US interference already. US had clashes on ME long before 9/11.

9/11 was used to screw US population. Most of the Earth population didn't care at all. As I said, terrorist hoax started few years earlier, so staged "terror attacks" on civilians already was all over the world. Even in Russia wave of "terrorist attacks" that was used to screw up the people was conducted in Sep 1999, exactly two years earlier than this was staged in US, Sep 2001.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

AFAIK, founder of Flat Earth Society (1956) was, suddenly, also a member of Royal Astronomical and Royal Geographical Societies of Britain. You know, all that strange British aristocratic stuff. I think it was some kind of British psyop, may be developed as an attempt to discredit upcoming USSR space program, may be as a tool of "poisoning a well" against "unwanted" scientific research, or may be as experiment on population conditioning.

IDK, but seems that this shit comes from UK agencies.

That stuff significantly declined in mid-70s, and was nearly dead until sudden reborn in late 90s, as peasants become regular internet users. Authorities meet with a threat of uncontrolled exchange of ideas, knowledge and theories, so they ressurect almost dead "Flat Earth" to mitigate the risks. At that time, I think, it was mostly US agencies job of "poisoning a well".

As far, as I remember, that shit was noticeably deployed for the first time on the scientific boards where Einstein relativity was questioned. In a few days after discussion start (yes, internet discussions lasted months or even years at the time) there appeared few new users without any other posts that began to push flat earth nonsense, ruining discussion. Later, they never post anything even if were not banned.

Interesting, that at the same time conspiracy and UFO boards was not a target for flat-eathers. Only scientific boards. May be their masters thought that conspiracy theories and UFO stuff looked fringe enough to not bother. But today, when nearly every conspiracy theory becomes proven fact in matter of months, they are everywhere.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Some kind of ETH marketing. BTC bad, ETH good. PoW bad, PoS good.

If you throw out all that stupid references to $ from article, then there will be only question of energy left. But choosing between total PoS fraud and relatively working PoW crypto with some energy needed to support network, I'll definitely choose PoW, until new iteration of crypto experiment will evetually roll out. Fuck energy economy. Who the fuck will care about energy like beggars among crypto users?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, of course they could. Then Satoshi is an intelligence agency, so Satishi is definitely exists.

Did you ever been curious about how opensource software created? Single persons, hackers collectives, agencies and corporations write something and sometimes for whatever reason publish code under some nickname. In any case they are exist.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is Satoshi even real?

Of course. Somebody wrote the concept and code. Whoever did that, he/she/they is/are Satoshi. Concept and code can't appear out of thin air.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm receiving realtime pictures of Earth from Russian satellites without any problems. Without any NASA, Internet, YouTube, whatever.

Those who don't want to do their own research could whine about lying NASA for decades doing absolutely nothing except copying flat-earth crap here and there again and again. Is it some kind of boring job?

▲ 8 ▼
CrazyRussian 8 points ago +8 / -0

our "planet" has a tilt while it rotates, meaning the visible sky should also tilt with the planet as it travels around the sun

No.

the stars are in the same spot no matter what

No.

Tilt of Earth axis to the plane of Earth orbit is fixed. Rotation around a sun does not change this tilt. However we look at stars from different places in different seasons, so closest are slightly change positions during the year. It is named parallax and that is how we know distances to the stars. There is another thing named precession, but it is a very slow process with a 26000 years period. So, no, stars are not in the same places around the year. Usual things for rotating bodies you could easily observe by yourself. Didn't you play with a humming top in childhood?

Interesting, why every single flat-eather never ever did his own research, never played with a telescope, satellite receiver, powerful laser, whatever, only copypasting same false statements and links to shitty fake videos for years?

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

They scared people with "acid rains" for a long time, but since that never happened, they want to create that "acid rains" by themselves. Familiar pattern.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting timing for this accident. I would not be surprised if it is not just an accident. US 9/11 is one of the core, basic hoaxes modern US politics build on. Destruction of the basis is a very good strategy.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

As a asset for that stupid stock games for that dumb gamblers - yes, will be gone. And it is a very good thing.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is nothing to finance in development of slightly modified fork of well-known opensource concept. Literally, it is a job for few nerds who don't know what to do on vacations.

Also, it is impossible to "finance" anything with coins in genesis block because that coins cost literally nothing at start and you can't have any clue or guarantees that your coin will succeed. Except financing yourself, as creator of that block when you going to fool the users into your shit and stole all value they will bring into your coin.

Also, that’s not what “hoax” means you dumb fuck.

May be I'm dumbfuck, or have poor English language knowledge, but isn't supposed Moon landing named a hoax because creators fooled other people and then harvested fooled people hopes, faith and rise of spirit that was created by that fooling? Show me any difference between Moon hoax and ETH hoax.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, all that stupid "law"-abiding gamblers will disappear from exchanges and BTC will become more stable. So why we should care?

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

With high probability you already have it in form of DIY kit at home. Named "microwave oven". You just need to apply some hands to make "microwave gun" from it. Check "horn antenna microwave gun".

▲ 9 ▼
CrazyRussian 9 points ago +9 / -0

Check also "acetylcisteinum". It is a part of glutathione synthesis so, your body will be able to make gluthatione by itself. And it is assimilated better by your guts than glutathione.

May be it is cheaper or more accessible. And result should be the same with less amount.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Used long ago in university when I had to remember a lot of info before exams. Don't know did it work out, was it a placebo, or I just did it by myself, but successfully passed exams. :) No side effects noticed. Theoretically it could help with short memorising, but no hard evidences of positive effects hit my eyes since then.

At least it is not harmful.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

No cosmetics could make a nice sane girl from fat stupid bitch.

Really I saw completely opposite tendentions with all that feminism and other woke shit. Now women don't have a right to be attractive for men, it is declared intolerant, racist, mysoginic, offensive for ugly fat bitches and whatever.

I see cosmetic industry rush for more advertising described by that Anonymous as an attempt to save profits of industry on the wave of purchases decline due to feminist propaganda.

Women always used cosmetic since the ancient times, and today is definitely not a peak of cosmetic usage on millenia scale.

The goal of feminism pushed propaganda of women ugliness is to reduce man-woman interactions that potentially could lead to family creation. Women have to be ugly to reduce men's interest, men have to be punished for interest in women. No initial attractions, no further relations. It is as dangerous for humankind as LGBTXYZ propaganda and other crap.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bitcoin has an unfair advantage to the beginners too though. ... Early adopters could mine easily.

Just like with real gold, new tech, actually like with any new business trend. Those who first have advantage over those who come later. Don't see anything bad in that. And ponzi scheme means that those who come first receive money of those who come later. That is not the case with bitcoin. You could start mining even now without paying anything to those who start earlier.

Those who find a will to overcome the fear to be first, receive a keys to the gifts of fortune. I think it is fair.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't know, I get to know about him some time after I registered that nickname here. Some user give me a link to a channel with similar name. He was not Russian at all. (found that thread - https://conspiracies.win/p/13zg536AB3/x/c/4JFpBLUZMlJ ) Really, there are numerous "Crazy Russian"s on YT, but most are Russian-speaking.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

The main thing in quantum mechanics is that it operates with probabilities, not some exact values. Qubits could have a different probabilities being in 1 or 0,, not different levels or whatever.

For non-binary computers check Soviet tertiary computes of Setun family. They operated with trits, each could have -1, 0 or +1 state, or, in other terms true, unknown, false, or whatever. They was more effective than binary computers of the time, but development was shut down in 70s when binary computers was forced by unknown reason.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›