Hiroshima and Nagasaki were likely the result of firebombing campaigns (napalm), similar to what happened in Dresden. USA was in control of Japan for a full year before the days of the alleged bombings, they had control over the narrative. Likely the "cities" were destroyed over a number of days in firebombing campaigns, rather than in an instant with nukes.
there are 2 good boks on the topic:
Hiroshima Revisited
Death Object: Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax
However, nuclear energy is very real. It is only instantaneous, explosive nuclear fission for use as a bomb that is in question. I've read that as the nukes were designed, they would just melt in a horrible nuclear, highly radioactive blob - rather than create a massive radioactive explosion The concept of a chain reaction of atomic fission that creates a massive explosion is the myth part.
Incidentally, found the quote in this long article on Unlimited Hangout:
But the author is only focused, it seems, on Bill Gates authority over the UK Gov and his apparent profit mongering:
His comments reveal that the UK government was simply following the orders issued by the network of “Bill Gates type people.” The UK state designed a crucial national policy at behest of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). They were acting under the instruction of a private, tax exempt foundation.
Tom Bearden discussed in at least 2 books how LRAD can be used to make people very sick - sick enough to kill them, and could be used to fake epidemic/pandemic disease. He wrote this years ago. I have not read the books, but I learned this from this recent presentation from the Martin Fleishman Memorial Project:
Personally Identifying tags were removed. Give the UN people RCMP patches maybe? They stick on by velcro, very simple really. Wouldn't put it past Trudeau.
It's just a network error. It happens sometimes, I'm seeing it too. When it happens just use www.catbox.moe to upload the image, it will embed here as a post.
The source is a research website specially dedicated to analyzing the nano components/molecules found in the jabs (by multiple, independent researchers in different places around the world) and matching them to known experimental nano stuff in the publicly available scientific literature:
Dr. Antony Kidman [father of Nicole] died Friday after fleeing Australia when accused of the sexual abuse and murder of children in an elite Sydney pedophile ring. A month prior Fiona Barnett had filed a complaint with the Australian NSW police and Child Abuse Royal Commission alleging Kidman’s sexual and physical assaults on her throughout childhood. When the Commission opened an investigation the clinical psychologist suddenly left his 43 years with the Sydney University of Technology and Royal North Shore Hospital to stay in Singapore until he died. The family has refused to comment and Singapore police opened an investigation on what they termed as an unnatural death.
Yesterday Barnett released her own theory about Kidman’s death,” The main perpetrator of my child sexual abuse, Antony Kidman, is dead after I filed formal complaints accusing him of the rape, torture and murder of children in an exclusive Sydney pedophile ring. As a child victim of mind control I feel he’s been sacrificed for failing to adequately program me.”
While it does appear that Klaus is Jewish on his birth mothers side, this family tree is just plain wrong - his birth mother was not a Rothschild, nor his stepmother. I actually think this graphic was made to intentionally mislead. It does the rounds on 4chan.
I found these in-dept articles into his lineage, which he does try and obscure:
https://silview.media/2021/02/28/pulitzer-worthy-someone-finally-traced-klaus-schwabs-nazi-roots/
https://fitzinfo.net/2021/12/20/wefs-klaus-schwab-is-jewish/
I have the impression a dirty bomb would be created using nuclear waste from nuclear energy generation (rather than especially formulated material) - which was actively being researched for commercial use at the beginning of the 40's by Argonne National Laboratory (according to wikipedia) - which to my mind means it was probably already being utilized by the military industrial complex in a non-commercial way, and then they would have access already to waste by the time they are doing test detonations...
You may say but then the radio-activty would be too weak... but then there is evidence that the radioactivity measured at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was very weak, or even non-existent.
shadows on a wall
It's one of those things thats so well known and such a striking visual of the nuclear detonation, without actually depicting detonation, that I wonder if those images depicting it were faked or perhaps even just caused by someone completely on fire falling against the wall. We are told they are shadows, but they are not sharp, clearly defined shadows, and they also look like they could be carbon soot on the wall in a vaguely human shape.
There were trees left standing at "ground zero" in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The shadows in the images are left on concrete, the concrete was otherwise unscathed - not vaporized. There is a bridge directly under the detonation location, brick and mortar, still standing. Only the wooden structures burnt. The brick and mortar of the buildings remained standing, intact, just stripped of any wooden parts.
The Hiroshima and Nagasaki destruction doesn't look much different to the firebombing of Dresden, except that there were far more brick and mortar buildings in Dresden. Napalm dropped on buildings would burn away all the wooden ones (and wooden parts) which were the majority of the buildings in these fishing "cities" Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
A nuclear blast should be indiscriminate - it would vaporize all the wood, including the tress, not just the human structures made from wood. A Human directed firebombing campaign however, would target human structures and not necessarily be too concerned with burning down the trees that line the streets.
There is another book about Hiroshima and Nagasaki specifically which tackles the issue based on the medical evidence of effects on victims - Hiroshima Revisited
This book examines the scientific and medical evidence to determine whether the conventional story of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki can be true. It concludes that
no nuclear detonations took place,
the cities were destroyed with conventional explosives and napalm,
the victims were killed not with radiation but with mustard gas, and also with napalm.
While most of the book deals with the medical and the physical evidence, the final two chapters also examine the wider historic and political implications.
That author believes real nukes were developed later, so it disagrees on that with the other book I've linked to.
Looking briefly at wikipedia - both events occurred during the early days of development of the bomb
The core was intended for use in a possible third nuclear weapon to be dropped on Japan, but when Japan's surrender made this unnecessary, it was repurposed for testing
It sounds like another aspect of the propaganda, to drum up fear of the non-functioning bomb, specifically fear of trying to replicate it. Yes, these guys probably died, perhaps from radiation, probably murder: does this prove that controlled, explosive instantaneous nuclear fission is possible? No.
It's particularly annoying if you're blocking scripts - even if you allow java for this site, the twitter embeds still wont load. Probably because twitter java doesn't also get allowed? I don't know, But since I started using a script blocker, I have to open the link in a new tab and then click again to open the twitter page - I hardly bother anymore.
The witness statements about x-rays and seeing through their hands are likely the very well-known phenomenon of witnesses elaborating fictitiously and adding to their memories with information they learned later.
Nuclear weapons are indeed very real, and once the shroud of mystery disappears around them
while a lot about the original nukes were supposed to work is known, the exact equations and precise function of nukes are top secret and very few people have access to that info. This is very convenient, because they don't function. Private independent individuals have in the interim tried to figure out exactly how they work, There is actually far more information available in various books and memoirs than you might realize. But even so, there is no way to produce, in a controlled fashion or accidentally, a so called "nuclear fission explosion". The concept is absurd. These so called bombs would melt, after a small explosion caused by the conventional explosives that have always been part of the function of alleged nukes: they could never explode through fission. It's a myth, atrocity propaganda declared fact.
Read the book; your assertions are baseless other than "authorities say they are real so they are real". Film and photo evidence is of large amounts of conventional explosives; and even so many of those images are doctored or even faked entirely, to make the explosions appear larger.
You've misunderstood the argument since you leap to the conclusion that it's wrong without considering what people actually mean beyond "nukes are fake".
It doesn't mean that all the test explosions that happened didn't happen. It's about how the explosions were not nuclear in nature ie. not explosive instantaneous nuclear fission, because that is not possible.
Instead, very large amounts of conventional (and perhaps not so conventional) explosives were detonated, and they threw in some nuclear waste with those explosives. They were some of the biggest explosives ever detonated. And of course there are many witnesses.
Ask yourself, who came up with the concept of a dirty bomb potentially being used by terrorists? The terrorists who first used them back in the forties, that's who.
Death Object Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax
It's entertainingly written and concise and doesn't make any outlandish claims. In fact you'll see if you read it that controlled, explosive, instantaneous nuclear fission is the outlandish claim.
you don't need a nuclear blast to leave radioactivity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_bomb
They include this quote on that page, just in case people go there with doubts about the reality of nuclear explosives:
It is, however, not to be confused with a nuclear explosion, such as a fission bomb, which by releasing nuclear energy produces blast effects far in excess of what is achievable by the use of conventional explosives.
Thanks wikipedia, I'll never question the reality of Nukes again...
But if anyone else feels like questioning them, they could do worse than reading "Death Object: Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax"
Looking at your account it appears to be you who is "obsessed" with Jews.
The coronacircus psyop is more sophisticated than meets the eye. The Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, Fauci, CNN narrative is the thesis. The Fox News, Sky News Australia, “China did it” narrative is the anti-thesis. The synthesis has yet to become fully apparent.
I think the disquiet in the aftermath /running-down of the pandemic is fully expected and being intentionally worsened - for example by Schwab lackey Trudeau and his enactment of emergency powers in Canada. It's deeply unpopular with the people, so very strange for a not-so-popular politician to carry through with something that will ruin his already minor amount of popularity and very likely bring down his government... unless he's following an agenda. Schwab has hinted at the synthesis agenda when he lamented people not trusting their governments anymore, and that his "socially inclusive" WEF and Great Reset holds the answer in it's "stakeholder capitalism" model of global governance.
These are communities that you subscribe to if you want. You don't even have to participate in the community to subscribe. You're only a "member" of the entire website, by making an account.
Aside from that, Not sure I understand what you are asking?
It was a real reddit thing for mods to ban users from a subreddit for their activity on other subreddits. I hope it doesn't become a thing on this website. Saying that as a mod here BTW.
Someone has now set up a dedicated FE community:
Most of Big Tech algorithms are now written by quantum computers.
Google has quantum computers, IBM has them, and so does pretty much everyone else. They've been used in consumer facing products for at least 5-6 years now.
This just makes me less confident that everything is as they say it is.
Read through "Hoaxfag" s replies there to get more about his point of view. I guess he was the OP, I don't know why he posted the text as an image though. Anyway, he expounds more in the replies.
Please forgive my anonymous letter but I consider myself a whistleblower.
All I can tell you about me is that I am a theoretical physicist and I have discovered something that affects everyone in the scientific community with equal importance.
There is no easy way to say this but quantum mechanics is a fever dream fantasy of untestable theories, imagined by scientists working by candlelight because it was hundreds of years ago.
There is no evidence of any aspect of practical applications for quantum mechanics other than assumption and the entire field is fraudulent and relies on pseudoscience to appear valid.
A really good example of the fabrication of data etc. by organizations with a vested commercial interest in quantum is the LIGO investigation, dozens of scientists all working together throwing random numbers at their simulations until they appear viable.
This timeline begins primarily with Einstein and his paper on the photoelectric effect, there were competing theories from other scientists but politics awarded Einstein with the Nobel Prize for an untestable theory he had that couldn’t be criticized as it would have been considered anti sematic as Einstein was Jewish.
The main reason for such a miscarriage of the peer review process was because of the coinciding world wars which had all available physicists being hired to work on the Manhattan project etc., nonmilitary physics was essentially abandoned for several decades.
The thing is Einstein didn’t know about background cosmic radiation as it wasn’t discovered until the mid-1960s, so all of Einstein’s theories on the propagation of light had been desperate workaround solutions that offered no real answers
The truth is we don’t have any working quantum technology and we never have. The modern quantum hoax is that we apparently have working quantum computers. But the problem with that idea is that we do not.
The truth is we don’t have any working quantum technology and we never have. The modern quantum hoax is that we apparently have working quantum computers. But the problem with that idea is that we do not. There are no working quantum computers unless we cheat and use modified definitions of words such as "working” and “computer” as these machines don’t actually do anything
If you would like to know how this could have possibly gotten so out of hand the answer is some quantum mechanical interpretations offer a working system containing a God, so quantum mechanics has been embraced by religious leaders all over the world as a fundamental belief system, the Vatican has a quantum research lab for example
Now this is where it gets ridiculous. There is still no viable process to peer review quantum physics research papers. What this means is that you can publish gibberish quantum research papers and they still get published. The best example of this is the bognadof controversy. Two brothers wrote a satirical PhD thesis and were awarded doctorates in physics. Another example is the sokal affair with gibberish papers being published intentionally to criticize the peer review process.
I've not looked into it, but I am inclined to agree since I know particle physics is very similarly bullshit.
Source:
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/12523471#p12523905
Actually, I found it on 4chan/x/ but I searched for the original source, and this on /sci/ is the earliest i could find (from 2020)
RC is certainly possible but it doesn't explain everything.