Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

10
Is Quantum Mechanics bullshit? Anon sure thinks so... (media.communities.win)
posted 3 years ago by clemaneuverers 3 years ago by clemaneuverers +17 / -7
22 comments download share
22 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– clemaneuverers [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Please forgive my anonymous letter but I consider myself a whistleblower.

All I can tell you about me is that I am a theoretical physicist and I have discovered something that affects everyone in the scientific community with equal importance.

There is no easy way to say this but quantum mechanics is a fever dream fantasy of untestable theories, imagined by scientists working by candlelight because it was hundreds of years ago.

There is no evidence of any aspect of practical applications for quantum mechanics other than assumption and the entire field is fraudulent and relies on pseudoscience to appear valid.

A really good example of the fabrication of data etc. by organizations with a vested commercial interest in quantum is the LIGO investigation, dozens of scientists all working together throwing random numbers at their simulations until they appear viable.

This timeline begins primarily with Einstein and his paper on the photoelectric effect, there were competing theories from other scientists but politics awarded Einstein with the Nobel Prize for an untestable theory he had that couldn’t be criticized as it would have been considered anti sematic as Einstein was Jewish.

The main reason for such a miscarriage of the peer review process was because of the coinciding world wars which had all available physicists being hired to work on the Manhattan project etc., nonmilitary physics was essentially abandoned for several decades.

The thing is Einstein didn’t know about background cosmic radiation as it wasn’t discovered until the mid-1960s, so all of Einstein’s theories on the propagation of light had been desperate workaround solutions that offered no real answers

The truth is we don’t have any working quantum technology and we never have. The modern quantum hoax is that we apparently have working quantum computers. But the problem with that idea is that we do not.

The truth is we don’t have any working quantum technology and we never have. The modern quantum hoax is that we apparently have working quantum computers. But the problem with that idea is that we do not. There are no working quantum computers unless we cheat and use modified definitions of words such as "working” and “computer” as these machines don’t actually do anything

If you would like to know how this could have possibly gotten so out of hand the answer is some quantum mechanical interpretations offer a working system containing a God, so quantum mechanics has been embraced by religious leaders all over the world as a fundamental belief system, the Vatican has a quantum research lab for example

Now this is where it gets ridiculous. There is still no viable process to peer review quantum physics research papers. What this means is that you can publish gibberish quantum research papers and they still get published. The best example of this is the bognadof controversy. Two brothers wrote a satirical PhD thesis and were awarded doctorates in physics. Another example is the sokal affair with gibberish papers being published intentionally to criticize the peer review process.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy