2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +3 / -1

you asked for "one example" of a schism. you got it.

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Start by affirming Truth exists and should be pursued. That means there must be a way to find it reliably despite our faulty sensors.

I did, and I determined that the way to find truth is to demonstrate it empirically, not to merely assert it without evidence.

That is the reason I'm now an atheist, and don't believe god is real at all.

Everyone knows what it's like to speak honestly, they know when someone is speaking in truth and in spirit.

Cool.... Time for you to demonstrate spirits are real now.

0
XxxRDTPRNxxX 0 points ago +2 / -2

I'm not gonna entertain this game where you pretend like there are no Christians who disagree on this fundamental question of biblical interpretation. You're a waste of time, and an even bigger waste of space.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

And when your annoying litter brother goes in for surgery, he gets the crappy 3rd party controller from Blockbuster.

3
XxxRDTPRNxxX 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_views_on_the_Old_Covenant

There's a whole wikipedia page on the numerous sects that disagree on that issue dude. If you wanna have an honest discussion we can, but dont waste my time with homework assignments or demands for citations on things that are common fucking knowledge, while you avoid addressing the point that in fact there are differing interpretations of scripture and you've offered no objective method for coming to the correct one.

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +3 / -1

Well just for starters I know there are schisms about how applicable the laws in old testament are, and there are versus supporting both sides of the argument.

And it really just boils down to whatever sect the reader is, or in your case, whatever your subjective feeling is on which side to pick.

3
XxxRDTPRNxxX 3 points ago +3 / -0

I tried to interpret your comment and struggle to decipher your intended meaning.

I don't don't think it gets any easier when the cryptic nonsense was written 2000 years ago by dead authors, who can't take questions.

3
XxxRDTPRNxxX 3 points ago +4 / -1

If everyone is just going by "bible only" do you think it's a problem if people read the same thing and come away with conflicting interpretations?

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

To all the gamers out there, how many times have you died in a video game due entirely to your controller acting up? Bet it's more than 0.

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

At least performing surgery is something an AI could actually learn to do better than a human.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

if they were actually blind they wouldn't so consistently try and pull us in the wrong direction. sometimes they would accidentally do something right. no they see just fine, they simply hate the country and the people in it. they are enemies, not misguided allies.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Instead of giving your cell number almost all sites give you the option to use an authenticator app instead.

You sync the app with your account one time, and then it constantly generates a code that changes every 30 seconds. That code becomes your 2FA and it works even if your phone is offline.

Use an app called Aegis instead of Google Authenticator because aegis lets you encrypt tokens so it requires a password to view your codes. Also Aegis lets you backup and save your tokens as an encrypted file, which lets you retain access even if you lose your phone.

Just don't forget your Aegis password or you are shit outta luck, since there is no recovery and you are responsible for maintaining access to your own file.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just turn off your screen and stop frequenting sites filled with a bunch of racist nonsense

Boom!

Suddenly you'll find there are no jews stopping you from going in your garage and inventing whatever you please.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

How does freedom equate to building megastructures? More freedom sounds like a negative in that case since all the workers can just nope out, critics can be like "why are we wasting so much resources on a giant triangle?", and so on.

Sure you could entice people to work with money, but then where does the money come from? Unless there's a clear opportunity to profit nobody's going to invest the money to build another pyramid.

It seems a lot more practical to just have a king force everyone to do it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›