Oof... Salty loser... Spamming is not cool, mkay
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (111)
sorted by:
Well just for starters I know there are schisms about how applicable the laws in old testament are, and there are versus supporting both sides of the argument.
And it really just boils down to whatever sect the reader is, or in your case, whatever your subjective feeling is on which side to pick.
For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you (1 Cor. 11:9 KJV).
Heresy/haireisthai/hairein - "to choose"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/heresy#etymonline_v_9184
So all doctrines require consent by choice, while choosing implies heresy...
Approval; commendations, sanctions are given by choice, right?
Don't be shy. Share one example already.
I will wait.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_views_on_the_Old_Covenant
There's a whole wikipedia page on the numerous sects that disagree on that issue dude. If you wanna have an honest discussion we can, but dont waste my time with homework assignments or demands for citations on things that are common fucking knowledge, while you avoid addressing the point that in fact there are differing interpretations of scripture and you've offered no objective method for coming to the correct one.
Oh, no... A WIKI PAGE?!?
Wow... And here am I quoting the Bible...
Also, wow... You wasted so much words to play the victim... Jewish, are you? (I mean fake jew, who constantly plays the victim)
I will allow you to form an argument, not a baseless wiki accusation.
I'll wait.
Present yourself better than a 3rd-grader this time, if possible for you. As I said - I will wait.
I'm not gonna entertain this game where you pretend like there are no Christians who disagree on this fundamental question of biblical interpretation. You're a waste of time, and an even bigger waste of space.
Filioque.
Moralism aka good vs bad...