That's been a strong possibility in my opinion as well. There's no way we live in a giant cosmic ocean and just happen to hang on to survival by a series of impossibly large coincidences.
Another possibility is that we are in a simulation. Whether we are NPC's or actual players inserting ourselves into this world to try different experiences , who knows?
Whatever the truth is, the evidence of our artificial existence is everywhere. Whether we are in an open lab experiment or a simulation, there is too much evidence that some kind of higher intelligence is managing the rules and information in this system. Left to our own devices, we would have wiped ourselves out by now.
Lol, but they are AI! They aren't programmed with talking points!
You would have to be nuts to post online with your real information. I suppose people that are trying to monetize content don't have a lot of choices, (thought there are some choices still), it leaves you wide open for tactics like getting cancelled if you like the wrong tweet or post. In this case, it leaves you open to state harassment.
What are we going to call belly buttons that stick out then? Belly horns?
This was mostly in regards to the evil villain conspiracy theory where people running the world have private islands where technological innovation moves much faster due to endless funding and zero oversight. I know what you mean regarding the human element being required for the constant maintenance of any kind of mechanized workforce. In this scenario the humans who survive the culling would be the janitors of the robotic workforce. All of the random fluff jobs you see today that exist solely to give people something to do would be gone. In this new world order there would be a much greater emphasis on using robotics in the acquisition of raw materials, manufacturing, and logistics. AI more advanced than the chatbots we see from the public side of things would be ubiquitous with the management and maintenance of the robot workforce.
This is more of a what-if fringe conspiracy theory, along the lines of what I would have been doing if I had been one of these world controllers for the last century. Humans are volatile and dangerous components to the governing equation. If but a small fraction of them became organized and mutinied against the status quo, there is a greater chance of disrupting the power imbalance. Even with all of the measures in place to pacify and restrain humans from such a scenario, the chance is still there. With a much smaller population governed over using technology, such as described in 1984, the chance of a successful revolution are greatly diminished.
I think all of the Dr. Evil's hiding behind world banks have far more advanced robots than these to handle human labor.
Yeah, I want details on what makes him so sure he is dying, and why he took the jab in the first place.
Kind of reminds me of the conspiracy to make people rise up against their governments after they realize they've been poisoned.
I wonder what the average lifespan of a SS agent is? How many of them live to retirement and enjoy their twilight years? Seems like it would leave too many loose ends.
Install the Wayback Machine Chrome extension in your browser. Go to a page you want to archive, click the icon in your toolbar, and select Save Page Now. We will save the page and give you a permanent URL.
More info here:
Clearly you do care or you wouldn't be here. It's clear to everyone who and what you are at this point, and you've been on these boards long enough to know what this community thinks of you and yours.
Has he recently declared that he is in good health and is not suicidal? lol.
Time to get a Putin flesh mask out.
Definitely someone else pulling the strings (like usual).
Sounds like Russian Roulette, lol. How do they find people willing to participate in this crap? I guess parents that don't like their kids and offer them up to science(TM)
Challenge accepted.
I didn't take the mRNA nanotech reports too seriously, but damn if they wouldn't make a great tool for controlling meat puppets. Anyone with the nanites would be like people jacked into the matrix that could be taken over by agents at any time.
I read somewhere recently that they encourage donating blood for yourself before a surgery in certain circumstances. It was only for rare situations.
Unfortunately, hospitals really fight anyone trying to pick the blood they receive. I've had family where one of the family members wanted blood from their sibling because they were unvaxxed and the hospital refused to allow the person to donate the blood for a specific recipient.
The end result of this technology is becoming the Borg. A centralized hive mind with Epsilon level drones taking care of the day-to-day work.
Here's a pretty close article to the video:
https://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/allwarsarebankerwars.php
I give the information in the video an 11/10. The presentation would be a 2. There should be an epilepsy warning. I would suggest posting an alternate link to the article.
Thanks for sharing.
It was an interesting show, but my main gripe came down to how they portray advanced alien civilizations using something as primitive as cultivating humans for immortality when they should be able to just modify their dna to make themselves immortal. With the kind of technology they were displaying, they definitely should have had the science to make themselves immortal via biological modifications.
They definitely want to scare the shit out of anyone who dares to question the narrative; and this narrative is more leaky than the Titanic.
Here's a comment on the article I found interesting:
Karma is related to thought, intention, and action. So, if a person commits a crime once, there's probably not a whole lot of karma there. If a person lives a life of crime, then there is a whole lot of karma there. If you live a life in which you were raised in neglect and poverty, and turned to a life of crime because it was easier, then there's a pattern of behavior involving intention, thought, and action related to crime - that pattern is karma (Karma is not "do a good thing, and good will come back to you/ do a bad thing, bad things will happen to you" - there is an element of that, but it's much more complicated). In any case, many people extract themselves from a life of crime. How? They decide to change their lives - in this way, they are breaking a karmic pattern. There are many ways to do it, but one way to break a karmic pattern is to meditate, see clearly one's thoughts and actions, and in the stillness, let go of negative thoughts that might keep one in a certain (in this case, a life of crime) karmic cycle. But again, intention is involved: if a person doesn't have an intention to change, no amount of meditation will help. Shorter answer: yes, Buddhism (not me) says that a person can meditate on their karmic situation, and seeing it clearly, they can let go, and thus, at least to some degree, change their karma with present thought, intention, and action.
Sapolsky was raised in an Orthodox Jewish household in Brooklyn, the son of immigrants from the former Soviet Union.
Sounds like an interesting character. He makes some good points. There's a reason many of us refer to the general populace as NPC's. How much agency do people have who are so easily manipulated by the media and their authority figures? They are almost certainly living their lives by a script and make very few (if any) choices that are outside of their programming.
You may have had the uncanny experience of talking about an upcoming camping trip with a friend, only to find yourself served with ads for tents on social media later. Your phone didn’t record your conversation, even if that’s what it feels like. It’s just that the collective record of your likes, clicks, searches and shares paints such a detailed picture of your preferences and decision-making patterns that algorithms can predict — often with unsettling accuracy — what you are going to do.
This is another great example of how predictable a human is.
However, I do think there is a line that some people cross into sentience. It seems like our species has been flirting with the idea of sentience for thousands of years, and occasionally someone breaks through into relative sentience. Eventually, our entire species will become sentient, but I think the majority are as easy to understand as any animal that you can observe in the wild.
The FBI hasn't changed much since Hoover was running it, lol.