8
WeedleTLiar 8 points ago +8 / -0

My message to her is the same as to everyone else espousing the "we have too many people" rhetoric:

Kill yourself, bitch

by pkvi
-1
WeedleTLiar -1 points ago +3 / -4

So he wants to move away from globalization to hyperlocalization where technology will enable us to build small, insular communities, largely independent of the outside world?

Oh no...

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right? Article is technically true, but also applies to birds, rocks, bus stations, etc.

The vaxxed should just self-quarantine indefinitely.

by DrLeaks
2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or is it in the sense that the only reason Nazis became a thing is because the American political establishment ground the German people into the dirt after WW1 and Nazism was how they recovered some dignity?

Like, once again, cruel and arrogant American policy is driving people towards Nazism and we're going to die because of it?

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why don't they save everyone's time and just say "Everyone except straight, white, hetero, cis men who aren't fucked in the head".

by pkvi
5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, I don't get how all this censorship is immediately over just because they signed the deal.

Like, was there a big switch on the wall at twitter that says "Faggotry On/Off" that they flicked?

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Only one way to find out, obviously.

Frankly, I'd settle for rules that are clear and consistently enforced. Elon wants to ban race stats, whatever. So long as all race stats are banned and we all have to speak assuming anything we say about race is conjecture.

The reason twitter, youtube, facebook, etc are so bad is that their rules only apply to people they don't like.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

How exactly are they modelling transmission? Something like:

Likelyhood of vaxxed spread: 0% Likelyhood of unvaxxed spread: 100%

I mean, is there even a difference in spread rates between these populations? The case numbers don't suggest it.

Edit: Fun fact, two of the three authors have done work for Public Health.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +6 / -1

That's what it looks like to me.

It's just really weird that all his acheivements have furthered the cause of Globohomo.

First he works on the team that gets e-commerce started: more surveillance of transactions and global labour force.

Then Tesla: EV cars that are controlled by the manufacturer.

SpaceX: Starts private space flights and talks about colonizing Mars -> lifeboat for the rich

Neuralink: duh-doy

Twitter: we'll see, private ownership could make it even easier for the government to use twitter, especially with the owner being neck deep in governmenr contracts.

I think he's a true believer; not one of the cabal creating globalist institutions for their own advantage but someone who actually believes that globalism will raise all boats.

9
WeedleTLiar 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yeah, this is really nothing in the bigger picture.

My city paid to erect a 6 foot fence around the local skate park for an entire summer so kids couldn't play on it. They also put gates on the basketball courts in the park but not those at the school.

One day I saw a couple of kids open the fence (wasn't locked) so they could skateboard. Some asshole called the cops on them; they sent 3 officers to deal with it.

I made sure to point it out to my kids so that they know exactly what the government thinks of us.

9
WeedleTLiar 9 points ago +9 / -0

We simulated a spectrum of patterns of mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups

So they didn't actually study anything. They took some data, ran it through a model based on totally unbiased assumptions, and it turns out everything is in line with what Public Health would like it to be (whom they coincidentally work for).

At this point the question is not "Can I trust this study?" but "Can I trust any study?"

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

They do disclose it in the study. One of the other authors, Ashleigh Tuite, works or worked for Public Health.

Regardless, it's extremely biased.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, the article doesn't say how many Australians are vaxxed in total.

I suspect that these numbers reflect population sizes; 80% of deaths are vaxxed because 80% of people are vaxxed and the jab simply has no effect.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Robots are only better when they're cheaper, and they always need someone to troubleshoot issues and do setup.

If you can pay 20 salaries for the price of maintaining a robot for the year, why wouldn't you use humans?

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's why there's so much immigration.

Women working or importing immigrants acheives the same goal: flood the labour market and drive down prices.

I don't think they're trying to kill everyone, they're trying to eliminate free men. Women, as a population, will inevitably give up control and the countries immigrants come from are already largely enslaved (as in the default behaviour is obedience).

The covid scare isn't about killing people (the virus barely does), it's about wealth transfer. Our governments just gave people like Bill Gates trillions of our dollars for snake oil. Snake oil we didn't even need.

They bankrupted our countries, cause inflation, bring in immigrants to keep wages down, and constantly try to pass laws to give themselves tyrannical powers. All the while encouraging our mpst degenerate behaviours until Joe Shmoe starts to think it would be better if we were all dead, and certainly beleives we deserve to be enslaved.

They don't want to kill us; they want to see how cheap we can be kept alive.

by pkvi
4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pretty much.

Blaming crypto for identifying you is like blaming the phone system for ratting you out because the government tapped your calls.

by pkvi
2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's the point of NFTs. I couldn't figure it out until now.

by DrLeaks
1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something to look into further, could as easily be the ramblings of a crack head to his exasperated sister.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah, I still have it because I don't care enough to get rid of it. There are a few things they have that I like, and I watch so little TV (compared to most people) that I don't get bored.

But with prices going up and all the woke garbage on there (especially in the kids section), I'll probably start hopping services every few months and recording anything I want to watch again.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

So it has come full circle.

First, we dealt only with sex.

Then "gender" was invented to define behaviour.

Then gender was conflated with sex.

Now gender is meaningless and, vicariously, so is sex.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Give up, pede. Submit.

by pkvi
2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

"We are pleased to announce that every living human now has a digital ID"

by pkvi
3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

that they know of

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Considering how hard it is to determine if this is real or not, I'd assume it's an attempt to see what they can get away with.

If a kid, or parent, complains; hey, that was a test, and you passed.

If not, you do the next class.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›