4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hmm, almost like posting to Meta is causing more spam? Now that I think about it, I can't remember the last time Imp posted in Conspiracies before the current drama started up...

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

And you win, do you? Are you the mayor of Tranny-town?

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Aww, are you all salty that your EBT shut down?

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

You lazy fucking kike, lol

You are literally complaining about not getting free money from the government. Not having the government wipe you ass is "harm" now...

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oh man, if only there were an institution where people could have sex, without worrying about birth control, because they've committed to each other in case of pregnancy...

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +4 / -1

Children that aren't yours are the only thing keeping your useless ass alive. You're welcome, parasite.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/

Considering the above, yeah, I would. Even if they work, all the cost/benefit calculations are right out the window. The whole thing should be suspended until we figure out what exactly is happening.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +5 / -1

Well, I'm not Catholic, if it's any consolation.

Have you considered that it's just the Jews? Including the corrupted Catholic Church?

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why don't you start, then everyone else can join in if they like?

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +4 / -2

No, what they're saying is that if trends cause people to doubt their families (like you're trying to do right now), society breaks down.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Everyone I don't like is Nazis!!"

Yes, yes we are, and mods don't care.

"Oh...well, everyone I don't like is also pedos!!"

Mods: get banned, faggot

0
WeedleTLiar 0 points ago +3 / -3

She isn't arguing in good faith. She just tries to discredit every conspiracy theory involving Jews (read: all of them) and tries to push theories with no Jews in them. Unfortunately for her, those do not exist; it's easier to find an insidious organization without a single man than it is to find one without a single Jew.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +6 / -1

You didn't mention the National Children's Board that Kering and Balenciaga (directly) partnered to create.

https://wwd.com/fashion-news/designer-luxury/balenciaga-kering-foundation-national-childrens-alliance-partnership-three-year-program-ad-scandal-1235511682/

Their first president was literally a subject of a lawsuit alleging she took children from their parents without due cause when working for child services.

Because you hate kids.

I also notice that there are men on the Kering board of directors; checkmate, chud.

Didn't find anything at all about the JKR/Watson connection. In fact, if you go to the Kering site:

https://www.kering.com/en/group/our-governance/board-of-directors/

...no Emma Watson...

But check out the nose on Serge Weinberg, there. 2% of the population, 8% of Kering Foundation board members...

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good, I hope they take a good look at it.

I read it a few weeks ago and it seemed to me like both a readable (in layman's terms) and incontrovertible study. Correlation is totally clear so it's a matter of finding cause, but regardless we need to seriously reconsider the entire vaccination schedule, immediately, because even if these shots work (and I think they generally do) it may not be worth it to prevent deaths in some children (99%+ children who contract measles, for example, are not even hospitalized, much less die) if the cost is childhood diabetes and learning disabilities for all children.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I read that, so basically it isn't even internally self-consistent.

Clearly, the people nearby should be befriended first and if there is a conflict the people nearby take priority. There is a hierarchy of who to care about.

So how do you square that with the idea of loving everyone equally? You still slaughter them and despoil their lands but, what, feel bad about it later?

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

I generally agree, and don't really play much these days anyway, but it's not just about video games, it's about culture.

Like it or not, video games are the prime vehicle for our culture and the most insidious. With movies or tv or books, you are observing and you can objectively say, while watching "I agree with this" or not. With video games, you're actually doing. Many times, moral actions (or facimilies thereof) are required to progress, and get that sweet dopamine hit. How many times have you put a game down because it required you to do something morally wrong?

That's not to say that shooting a kid in a video game is the same as doing so in real life, but it does compartmentalise the choice and reduces it's importance in relation to, say, getting some job done. Over time, I think people get to the point that most of them completely atrophy their moral compass in favour of the progression of their own status quo.

This is far broader than the current issue, but this is why I think video games (and the culture war generally) are important even if we don't participate. It's all well and good to chop wood (and I prefer it) but everyone not as self-possessed as you is currently falling into these traps.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

looked up value of property

gained access to bank accounts

ordered a chest freezer for head storage

I guess this guy doesn't subscribe to "Africa time"...

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is that a problem? That's kinda why I watch out for conspiracies; because of the horrible consequences that I want to avoid.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

She has a side profile identical to the kikess running Mexico right now.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

But she also won't publish donor records, right?

7
WeedleTLiar 7 points ago +8 / -1

Every horror from the "Holocaust" is something a Jew would like to do to your family.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mozi tried to replace what he considered to be the long-entrenched Chinese ideal of strong attachments to family and clan structures with the concept of "impartial caring" or "universal love" (兼愛, jiān ài). He argued directly against Confucians, who had philosophized that it was natural and correct for people to care about different people in different degrees.

Hard pass

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oil wars are a myth. If you want to extract oil and process it, you need a functioning society with infrastructure, workers, safe transport etc. War creates the opposite situation, therefore going to war in a country "for it's oil" is non-sensical.

These are Jew wars, all of them. Iraq, Libya, and Syria all oppose Israel and Afghanistan is right on Iran's border. Nobody ever invaded Venezuela or Canada for oil.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›