Maybe they're indigenous; they were given an exemption to protest under the act.
Except that one lady...
So our unvaxxed population is actually closer to 30% than to <20% like we've been told? No kidding.
My message to her is the same as to everyone else espousing the "we have too many people" rhetoric:
Kill yourself, bitch
So he wants to move away from globalization to hyperlocalization where technology will enable us to build small, insular communities, largely independent of the outside world?
Oh no...
Right? Article is technically true, but also applies to birds, rocks, bus stations, etc.
The vaxxed should just self-quarantine indefinitely.
Or is it in the sense that the only reason Nazis became a thing is because the American political establishment ground the German people into the dirt after WW1 and Nazism was how they recovered some dignity?
Like, once again, cruel and arrogant American policy is driving people towards Nazism and we're going to die because of it?
Why don't they save everyone's time and just say "Everyone except straight, white, hetero, cis men who aren't fucked in the head".
Yeah, I don't get how all this censorship is immediately over just because they signed the deal.
Like, was there a big switch on the wall at twitter that says "Faggotry On/Off" that they flicked?
Only one way to find out, obviously.
Frankly, I'd settle for rules that are clear and consistently enforced. Elon wants to ban race stats, whatever. So long as all race stats are banned and we all have to speak assuming anything we say about race is conjecture.
The reason twitter, youtube, facebook, etc are so bad is that their rules only apply to people they don't like.
How exactly are they modelling transmission? Something like:
Likelyhood of vaxxed spread: 0% Likelyhood of unvaxxed spread: 100%
I mean, is there even a difference in spread rates between these populations? The case numbers don't suggest it.
Edit: Fun fact, two of the three authors have done work for Public Health.
That's what it looks like to me.
It's just really weird that all his acheivements have furthered the cause of Globohomo.
First he works on the team that gets e-commerce started: more surveillance of transactions and global labour force.
Then Tesla: EV cars that are controlled by the manufacturer.
SpaceX: Starts private space flights and talks about colonizing Mars -> lifeboat for the rich
Neuralink: duh-doy
Twitter: we'll see, private ownership could make it even easier for the government to use twitter, especially with the owner being neck deep in governmenr contracts.
I think he's a true believer; not one of the cabal creating globalist institutions for their own advantage but someone who actually believes that globalism will raise all boats.
Yeah, this is really nothing in the bigger picture.
My city paid to erect a 6 foot fence around the local skate park for an entire summer so kids couldn't play on it. They also put gates on the basketball courts in the park but not those at the school.
One day I saw a couple of kids open the fence (wasn't locked) so they could skateboard. Some asshole called the cops on them; they sent 3 officers to deal with it.
I made sure to point it out to my kids so that they know exactly what the government thinks of us.
We simulated a spectrum of patterns of mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups
So they didn't actually study anything. They took some data, ran it through a model based on totally unbiased assumptions, and it turns out everything is in line with what Public Health would like it to be (whom they coincidentally work for).
At this point the question is not "Can I trust this study?" but "Can I trust any study?"
They do disclose it in the study. One of the other authors, Ashleigh Tuite, works or worked for Public Health.
Regardless, it's extremely biased.
Unfortunately, the article doesn't say how many Australians are vaxxed in total.
I suspect that these numbers reflect population sizes; 80% of deaths are vaxxed because 80% of people are vaxxed and the jab simply has no effect.
Robots are only better when they're cheaper, and they always need someone to troubleshoot issues and do setup.
If you can pay 20 salaries for the price of maintaining a robot for the year, why wouldn't you use humans?
That's why there's so much immigration.
Women working or importing immigrants acheives the same goal: flood the labour market and drive down prices.
I don't think they're trying to kill everyone, they're trying to eliminate free men. Women, as a population, will inevitably give up control and the countries immigrants come from are already largely enslaved (as in the default behaviour is obedience).
The covid scare isn't about killing people (the virus barely does), it's about wealth transfer. Our governments just gave people like Bill Gates trillions of our dollars for snake oil. Snake oil we didn't even need.
They bankrupted our countries, cause inflation, bring in immigrants to keep wages down, and constantly try to pass laws to give themselves tyrannical powers. All the while encouraging our mpst degenerate behaviours until Joe Shmoe starts to think it would be better if we were all dead, and certainly beleives we deserve to be enslaved.
They don't want to kill us; they want to see how cheap we can be kept alive.
Pretty much.
Blaming crypto for identifying you is like blaming the phone system for ratting you out because the government tapped your calls.
That's the point of NFTs. I couldn't figure it out until now.
Yeah, if the MSM the enemy, why are they running this story? Why not just ignore it like usual?
More game playing...
Something to look into further, could as easily be the ramblings of a crack head to his exasperated sister.
Yeah, I still have it because I don't care enough to get rid of it. There are a few things they have that I like, and I watch so little TV (compared to most people) that I don't get bored.
But with prices going up and all the woke garbage on there (especially in the kids section), I'll probably start hopping services every few months and recording anything I want to watch again.
So it has come full circle.
First, we dealt only with sex.
Then "gender" was invented to define behaviour.
Then gender was conflated with sex.
Now gender is meaningless and, vicariously, so is sex.
Give up, pede. Submit.
Not really.
In the 90s, no one cared about race, sex, whatever. Being a racist was also much less of a big deal and people didn't get cancelled for jokes.
In the mid-2010s the progressives realized that black and hispanic areas were shitholes compared to white areas and women didn't want to work like men.
So they decided that we needed racism back, otherwise they wouldn't have anything to bitch about; an unacceptable situation.
Look at the most racist event of the 90s: the Rodney King beating. Some asshole has a go at the cops and they put the boot to him; that's nothing (although it didn't stop the blacks from rioting cause nogs gonna nog).
Today our schools are actually segregating blacks and telling them that they will never succeed because wypepo.
I think we actually got to a post-racist society for a brief instant, but then (((someone))) started stirring the pot again. Racism is their battlecry; they want us to be fighting blacks and spics so we get ourselves dirty wrestling pigs and don't focus on the real threat.