0
SuspendBeforeYouBan 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm not relocating.

Do you want a fuck-toy who only stays with you because she’s been engrained to believe that the man is god of the house and only exists to pleasure you physically

Yes.

Or do you want to do as God intended and find a woman who builds you up emotionally, spiritually, and admires you because she chooses to because you show her that you’re worth her admiration

No.

1
SuspendBeforeYouBan 1 point ago +2 / -1

Fair but I do find women's demeanor about it is different depending on where they come from.

If all women are same then what's the difference between South American and Asian? Doesn't seem to be any tbh.

1
SuspendBeforeYouBan 1 point ago +2 / -1

I haven't found that at all. I find South American women to be too independent and strong willed. They're just feminists that are fine with cooking. I find the Southeast Asian women to be much more feminine and submissive/obedient. I think central america could be better for price/value for escorts perhaps but for a wife I'm not convinced on South America at all.

12
SuspendBeforeYouBan 12 points ago +14 / -2

I really wish I could leave my country. I'd like to book a trip to southeast Asia and try to find a decent wife. The women in Canada are trash. This ban is impacting my ability to have a fulfilling life. I feel like the travel ban is a crime against humanity.

-4
SuspendBeforeYouBan -4 points ago +1 / -5

But they're consuming significantly more now. Also why bring in immigrants if trying to reduce pop and consumption?

-3
SuspendBeforeYouBan -3 points ago +2 / -5

They sent women to work to lower wages and increase consumption. It also reduced the birthrate.

But like isn't this counter to the whole "useless eaters" conspiracy? Like, if you reduce consumption then they aren't useless?

4
SuspendBeforeYouBan 4 points ago +9 / -5

They left. Those men are no longer in the military. They either never joined or were pushed out.

Keep in mind a standing federal military is inherently degenerative. You're basically a mercenary for the government. This whole concept of "nationalism" and having a standing army is brand new to the world and it's not a good one. The true warriors in society that would live by honor and a good moral code would never join the military of any nation given the way it organizes. In the middle ages, the actual knight societies were separate from government, they weren't the government. That's what our founding fathers desires with having standing militias. In ancient times you had city states not giant federal mercenary armies like now. Mercenaries never lived by a code. National armies are glorified mercenaries. If you want justice you need true warriors like Knights that no longer exist. The actual warriors of society aren't in the military.

0
SuspendBeforeYouBan 0 points ago +1 / -1

People still had respect for monarchies back then. Hitler was actually a good guy who had a code of honor that he followed. Every action by the Germans indicate this. That is why Patton for example said the Bolsheviks were mongrels but the Germans were good people. Even the way POWs were treated by the Germans was with class. Of course he didn't bomb the queen, that's dishonorable of a move.

1
SuspendBeforeYouBan 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is kind of what I was getting at. You can easily create any narrative after the fact. The amount of uncertainties during WWII though mean there's no way it was all orchestrated and planned. I think the closest that could make sense is that Hitler was originally funded and promoted by British/Jewish interest (which is true. Zionist Jews actually supported Hitler deporting Jews because they felt it would force rich Jews to create an Israel) but it doesn't mean everything he did was their bidding.

3
SuspendBeforeYouBan 3 points ago +4 / -1

Modern Ukrainian Nazis, yes. Hitler Nazis weren't on the Jewish side but the Jews won the war so of course in hindsight it's as if Nazis must have been Jewish but that's only because they lost.

2
SuspendBeforeYouBan 2 points ago +3 / -1

If a man is stealing your TV and you punch him, did you start the fight?

You can try to do some mental gymnastics and blame the guy who threw the first punch but that's a leftist worldview. In reality, good people know a punch never would have occured if the thief didn't try stealing the TV. Therefore the thief started it.

2
SuspendBeforeYouBan 2 points ago +3 / -1

I have access to all media. I even speak a little Russian and know people on Russia. I've chatted with Ukrianians in Ukraine. I still don't really know what the truth is regarding the war.