1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

You need to go back to GAW where people believe Trump speaking in context about what could only possibly be the vaccines actually means ivm and hxc. Your cult beliefs don't fly here

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not who you responded to but I'm inclined to believe this little "hero's quest" by CIA Tucker is just part of narrative control. They don't want people going outside their gatekeepers so they've rebranded Tucker, Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, and reignited the popularity of Alex Jones. And funny enough all these people repeatedly speak highly of each other, it's a network

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump is the selection, this doesn't matter

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

On a conspiracy forum pushing the duality of modern American politics hardcore. I realized they were both wheels on the same train when I was literally 14, not because anyone told me (in fact anyone I told was very angry or dismissive) but because it was the only way to make sense of the world around me.

Point being, I question how and why you're here if you can't see beyond the "if you don't like MY guy you just like the OTHER guy" paradigm. It's day 1 conspiracy stuff

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

The mods are definitely on an epic power trip over there. Whether they're true believers or gatekeepers the result is the same

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah I'm also permabanned because I dared to ask for proof about the supposed "ten year lockdowns" they always prattle on about when it comes to the vaccine when all available evidence suggests that was never in the cards. They could never answer but the last straw was apparently when I posted about Milei's visit to the rabbi's grave

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

The users generally seem like good people but it's not exactly full of logical or critical thinkers... Making this meme feel like a situation where one in a glass house is throwing stones

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

In fairness, whether a theory is being used to denigrate conspiracy theorists is not a good way to evaluate its validity. 9/11 conspiracy theories were once used to denigrate theorists. Also (particularly pre-covid scam) a little phrase called "anti-vaxx".

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

So in other words, Trump isn't the mega genius Q-branded savior then if a little conversation with Billy Boy could make him shrug his shoulders about vaccines

4
VeilOfReality 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't know if there's room to talk coming from GAW.

Not a flat earther for what it's worth

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Presumably by being conspicuously propped up by the media (who pretends to be against him yet can't stop speaking about him) as a savior figure to the populace.

But sorry saying something negative about your precious musk made you get so defensive that you took three days to come up with a reply you believe to be a real slam dunk

5
VeilOfReality 5 points ago +5 / -0

I imagine it's mostly the same people who trusted it the first time

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

You'd know all about it as it's the number of questions and arguments you've addressed

Sidenote: Tiktok which has a larger reach than Twitter also has a greater degree of free speech. So this mantra you keep repeating is as inaccurate as it is inane

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're implying you need these people to not be a blind sheep, that means you're still a blind sheep. That's exactly why you have these people swallowing up the counter culture movements. And if you read the SPARS and Operation Lockstep documents you'd know the end result of a preplanned pandemic scenario is loss of faith in institutions while the "elites" look to install new systems. Definitely need people to shepherd those disillusioned by the systems for that otherwise they might make their own solutions. Since you can't see that yourself this video may have actually helped you but you leap to the defense of men you'll never know and who don't give a shit about you, you yourself proving why these shepherd figures are useful.

Tons of people were against the pharmaceutical industry from the beginning of the COVID sham, why do you think Joe Rogan, who was comparatively late to the party, became the "face of pharmaceutical liberty"? Why do you think he was being blasted out on all the media outlets? Though from the way you speak you may believe no one could be against these things without the guidance of a savior figure in which case having someone to shepherd those people might make no sense to you and so you MUST believe it's organic because no one could be against this stuff without Joe Rogan. Still I want to know what you think beyond my assumptions based on what you just wrote. So I'll ask again, why do you think the media was so invested in blasting out Rogan AS that so-called face?

Or maybe you'll dodge these actual questions like you dodged my other question. This is why people think you're disingenuous

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

How so? Do you think it's Palestinians trying to take out a Zionist

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

So one guy was saying he was going to kill a bunch of different prominent figures while having a psychotic episode where he had no intentions of doing such things, and one man made general vague threats towards a Tesla event and obviously wanted to be arrested, similar to people who commit suicide by cop.

But good ol grifter Zionist Technocrat Musk spins this as two actual attempts on his life and people post it here as though bad guys are trying to assassinate him or something (otherwise, it's not a conspiracy and doesn't belong here).

Newsflash, Musk is one of the "bad guys"

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just watch the first fifteen minutes, it's basically a thesis statement. That will tell you whether you want to continue. Super tl;dw is a deconstruction of the NeoRight (Joe Rogan, Alex Jones, Elon Musk) and how they're pushing forward the technocratic agenda

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

The "exposé autistic nerds" have to go after these people because of people like you who are apparently more easily swayed by emotion than observation, so they want to pile on the evidence to show the deception occurring.

The fact you can't even consider the possibility of those guys being bad because they sometimes say things you agree with is why these "exposé autistic nerds" feel the need to do what they do. Elon Musk is the face of the technocratic initiative, brain chipping people, world blanketing inescapable Internet, and has said IN HIS OWN WORDS he envisions "X" as a Chinese-style everything app. The reason "exposé autistic nerds" heap on this evidence is because people like yourself can't see how this is an issue because Elon tweets things about voter fraud. The hope is to help people see the truth and avoid them being led astray by false shepherds.

Since you have a problem, what would you rather they investigate instead?

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Vaccine die off?

Biologically enhanced deadly weapon?

Media hype just like last time?

No matter what it's an excuse for them to try to get rid of backyard chickens, one of the easiest ways to source your own food there is

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›