Remember when covid was responsible for everything under the sun and yet no one had myocarditis from it until after the vaccine rollout?
A lot of people just don't care enough. They are accustomed to their standard of living and recognize if they stand up there's a possibility of discomfort. As someone who has stood up to large company unethical behavior both about business practices and vaccinations, and even got into a spat in the past in a public forum with a well known CEO I can say with a clear conscience most people are cowards. They'll quietly tell you they supported what you were doing but will not stand up beside you for fear of possible inconvenience
Yeah I notice I don't draw quite as much ire when questioning him anymore
Those people have always specified farm land
Now just imagine they are able to combine this with the genetic profile they have on so many people through 23 and me and the possibilities are pretty much endless.
That's fair, since we'd be gagging the same sociopolitical annihilation in both scenarios
But do you? Do you realize what force the government will bring down and the masses of people who will be supporting/begging for it if mass vax death comes to pass and the majority can be convinced it's a new virus?
Paramilitary force of the state.
Misguided youths yearning for justice led astray due to their passion for food
According to some, they're the same picture
Stay nitpicking parts of my posts instead of trying to respond to them in whole. And mad
But once you open the door, it does not end there. To think it will is ignorant of how censoring declared falsehoods always goes. If the arguments fail under scrutiny, as I tend to agree although am still open minded for alternative hypothesis, the people at large will not fall victim to it.
How do you determine what else is objective truth? It's a dangerous precedent no matter how much flat earthers trigger you
Yes I am arguing for that. With freedom comes danger and the need for people to take responsibility for themselves. In an open forum the truth will win even with liars pushing their own agenda. Giving someone the power to decide what can and can't be spoken about because something is "fact" sets an incredibly dangerous precedent
When the idea is to find truth, removing the ability to speak on a certain topic is counterintuitive. And why do you have such an extreme reaction to flat earth (it can't be spoken of because it might encourage people to explore the idea!)?
Your examples miss the point of this specific issue and instead focus on the question I posed in general, without addressing the more nuanced questions posed directly after. Removing people who've committed violence is done to protect society from reoffense. If you are likening that to this particular situation, you're essentially taking on the viewpoint that speech is violence and dangerous.
Similarly with CRT the issue with that is not the idea itself (as it would be outcompeted in a marketplace of ideas since it is a flawed one) but rather the use of an institution to force CRT on people as truth and compelling what is "right" to speak and the way in which you must speak about it. I would argue that type of institutionalized forcing of "rightthink" is very similar to what is being proposed now, albeit through the implementation of a blacklist as opposed to a whitelist
Nay. If the board is being spammed by particular users drowning out all other discussion that's one thing but to ban talking about the topic is not something I could support and frankly am surprised others here support.
If we are so convinced round earth is true what good would it do to corral the people who believe otherwise in one place? Isn't the point of this open discussion to change minds? What about lurkers, who make up most traffic on the internet? If they're interested in learning more about flat earth and they go to the echo chamber aren't they more likely to become "misguided"?
I'm having trouble understanding the logic here besides thinking flat earthers are annoying which does not represent justification to ban the topic
How about the millions they are burning because they might maybe have the avian flu?
Graduates of the prestigious MKU
Lol yes if I don't drop to my knees for le based brain chip man I'm a fed. Expertly done
The amount of Elon simping I see around the. wins and 4chan really throws up some (additional) red flags
I never understood the idea of Kamala for 10 years since it was proposed. Everybody hated her and she's not really notable in any way. The democrats could always run someone else, it's not like she confers any type of advantage.
But in a metaphysical sense maybe that's exactly the point. No one wanted her, democrats, republicans, or independents. So in a sense, if we do nothing about it, we deserve all that's coming
But is it really copious amounts of toxic metals that's the problem? That was the old vaccines. Glossing over the mrna seems like a huge oversight. Also it didn't originate in the west coast to our knowledge.
Any info on this?
You need to look into your statistics on officers "gunning down black people". Per police interaction (not per capita, because most people do not commit crimes) white people are actually shot and killed more by police than black people. You've bought into a state run narrative friend
To be fair it seems like a lot of it is. You can pretty much lead it to any conclusion you want. Now to put any percentages on it is absurd