We've known this for a while. I mean the coof woke up everyone who could have woken up to the jibby jabs. It's getting boring at this point.
That's a man, baby.
Do you think slavery does not exist in our modern day regimes?
Their noses and methods don't lie though.
I know your works, tribulation, and poverty (but you are rich); and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
Those empires were Christian and that's a historical fact so it's a pointless question.
So, are nations that are engaging in slavery Christian yes or no?
Yes, they can be obviously. Slavery was part of the social order and was not condemned by the Church.
Do you mean they lie about being jewish?
Did most of those evil people happen to be jewish?
That's a loaded question. I already made the argument that it doesn't contradict Christianity and that's what matters. Your initial argument presupposed slavery and Christianity don't mix and I proved you wrong.
The disgusting shill lies again, what a shocker.
Slavery remained a major institution in Russia until 1723, when Peter the Great converted the household slaves into house serfs. The government of Tsar Feodor III had formally converted Russian agricultural slaves into serfs earlier, in 1679.
Serfdom is not slavery, dumbass.
Slavery was common in the early Roman Empire and Classical Greece. It was legal in the Byzantine Empire but it was transformed significantly from the 4th century onward as slavery came to play a diminished role in the economy. Laws gradually diminished the power of slaveholders and improved the rights of slaves by restricting a master's right to abuse, prostitute, expose, and murder slaves.[1] Slavery became rare after the first half of 7th century.[2] From 11th century, semi-feudal relations largely replaced slavery.[3] Under the influence of Christianity, views of slavery shifted: by the 10th century slaves were viewed as potential citizens (the slave as a subject), rather than property or chattel (the slave as an object).[4] Slavery was also seen as "an evil contrary to nature, created by man's selfishness", although it remained legal.[5]
Regardless I don't even grant you slavery contradicts the Christian faith to begin with since it's recognized as an institution in the Bible and it's not condemned. You're just projecting your modern day liberal humanist sensibilities to Christianity:
In Paul's letters to the Ephesians, Paul motivates early Christian servants to remain loyal and obedient to their masters like they are to Christ. In Ephesians 6:5–8, Paul states "Slaves, be obedient to your human masters with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ".[96] Similar statements regarding obedient slaves can be found in Colossians 3:22–24, 1 Timothy 6:1–2, and Titus 2:9–10.[97][98][99] In Col 4:1, Paul advises members of the church, who are slave masters, to "treat your slaves justly and fairly, realizing that you too have a Master in heaven."[100] Adding to Paul's advice to masters and slaves, he uses slavery as a metaphor. In Romans 1:1, Paul calls himself "a slave of Christ Jesus" and later in Romans 6:18, Paul writes "You have been set free from sin and become slaves to righteousness."[101][102] Also in Galatians, Paul writes on the nature of slavery within the kingdom of God. Galatians 3:28 states: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus."[103] Similar patterns of speech and understanding about slavery are found in Peter's epistles. In 1 Peter 2:18, Saint Peter writes "Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse."[104] In 1 Timothy 1:10, Paul condemns the sexually immoral, abusers of themselves with mankind, liars, perjurers, those that kidnap innocents and sell them into slavery,[105] and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine.
So yet again, you fail at your deboonking because you're not as smart as you think you are.
This is why guys like you shouldn't read the Bible. You're quote mining things and doing freestyle interpretation out of context.
Salvation is of the jews means it's from the jews because the prophecy was that Christ will come from the tribes of Israel. But when Christ came He made a covenant with the people of all nations and established His Kingdom, defying the jewish priests (the pharisees) - the Eternal Israel, which is the Church. Thus, salvation belongs to everyone and not to the jews only, God is a Trinity, became a man and was resurrected, fulfilling the prophesies, and Israel is not a ethnic state but the otherworldly Kingdom of God.
Christianity is the opposite of Judaism in every sense. Get educated before parroting bs about things you have superficial understanding on. Islam was not a psy op initially but a poorly sawn together demented religion full of contradictions based on gnosticism, arian heresy and talmudic judaism. It only became a psy op when tptb realized it can be a useful tool for subverting traditional society and Christian culture in the West in the 20th century through globalism, diversity and immigration.
The Byzantine and the Russian Empire didn't have colonies and slavery was eventually abolished in both, you're projecting western phenomena because you lack knowledge of what was going on in the East... Go read a history book and come deboonking me later.
A country governed by the Christian worldview where the majority of people and its culture adheres to the Christian faith (there are historical examples of such countries most notably some of the largest and long-lasting empires like Byzantium and The Russian Empire). Christianity isn't a form of government but in a Christian country, it will inform government and laws. In Orthodoxy, such a monarchical government was called simfonia.
Sure there are. I guess that's is why we live in the most degenerate apostate times since Babylon. There is not a single Christian country in existence.
Love the drama.
The "call no man your father" argument is a word-concept fallacy and I've also argued that with you. You do your interpretation and go on saying there's no interpretation involved, when every text is subject to it. Does the word "father" have multiple meanings? If so, how do you determine which is the correct meaning the word is used in this context and how is that not your interpretation?
Then we have the figures of speech Jesus uses constantly like metaphors and hyperboles. What about this mined quote tells you Jesus literally means not to call any man father? Don't protestants have biological fathers and how do they call them? Birthing person 1?
Since the fall of man. We're told Satan is the master of this world.
Yet they reject Christ as their messiah. Also He was Hebrew and had nothing to do with Talmudic rabbinical Judaism (Oral Torah) that jews follow. Modern day jews (ashkenazi) come from the Khazarian khaganate and are ethnically turkic. They have nothing to do with the hebrews of the Bible. This is Adam Green level of stupidity and ignorance.
Church fathers like Irenaeus:
"Additionally, he stated that the antichrist would be of the tribe of Dan, evoking Jeremiah 8:16. This would correlate to the Talmudic view of the Jewish Messiah coming from the tribe of Dan on his maternal line."
This and SS Liberty
They are in charge ("they" is not only limited to one family though). It's a matter of steering it in the direction they and their master want humanity ultimately - away from God and into total depravity and slavery.
He will crush the Antichrist and Satan's army in an instance then He'll destroy the world He created, assume His throne in the heavens and judge every human soul in His final judgment - both the dead and the remaining living (who won't be many at that point).
I know a thing or two about anatomy and this is not how a female body looks like under any circumstances: https://www.grammy.com/news/justin-bieber-songs-journals-anniversary-hits-baby
Compare to this aberration: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/jun/10/elliot-page-juno-hollywoods-dark-side-coming-out-twice
It's all a look - he goes after the pretty boy look of his teen years. Here he has a stache and it's obvious he can grow a beard: https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/justin-biebers-houses-real-estate-portfolio-singer-and-wife-hailey
He has pretty broad shoulders and a manly physique too, he's just slender. Idk what you're on about. There are probably trans public figures like Big Mike and Macron's wife but this is obviously not one.
There are people lurking here and lots of them are Christian.
OP, that's a good message. I've made the argument that lying could be worse than murder in many cases. People have a knee jerk reaction but when they think about it they tend to agree. That's because modern society promotes and excuses lying and there's little stigma about it anymore. If people didn't tolerate lies we would never get apparent psy ops and false flags like 9/11 and the plandemic.
He missed his regular morning coffee at the panorama restaurant of the North tower that day. Such a lucky guy.