The "call no man your father" argument is a word-concept fallacy and I've also argued that with you. You do your interpretation and go on saying there's no interpretation involved, when every text is subject to it. Does the word "father" have multiple meanings? If so, how do you determine which is the correct meaning the word is used in this context and how is that not your interpretation?
Then we have the figures of speech Jesus uses constantly like metaphors and hyperboles. What about this mined quote tells you Jesus literally means not to call any man father? Don't protestants have biological fathers and how do they call them? Birthing person 1?
Love the drama.
The "call no man your father" argument is a word-concept fallacy and I've also argued that with you. You do your interpretation and go on saying there's no interpretation involved, when every text is subject to it. Does the word "father" have multiple meanings? If so, how do you determine which is the correct meaning the word is used in this context and how is that not your interpretation?
Then we have the figures of speech Jesus uses constantly like metaphors and hyperboles. What about this mined quote tells you Jesus literally means not to call any man father? Don't protestants have biological fathers and how do they call them? Birthing person 1?