Who's the real creator and how do you have knowledge of him?
Only etnic Jews made a deal with God and so was obliged to be Judaists who they wasn't. No other etnicity had this obligation.
That was the OT. Christ's testament is with all people who follow Him.
Christianity is the fulfilment and the continuation of the OT worship practices and commandments. Anyone who has red the OT knows very well that while thew were God's chosen people they often disobeyed Him and got punished for it. What is described in the OT, the commandments, the tabernacle, the temple, etc is in effect proto-Christianity and not judaism.
Judaism as we know it today (rabbinic talmudism) is an aberration and a heresy of the religion described in the OT. This is exactly why Jesus argued against the pharisees and the sadducees and their oral tradition which twisted the meaning of the Torah. They were the true ancestors to the talmudic judaism we know today (which is a heresy and NOT a continuation of the religion of the OT). That's why they are of the Synagoge of Satan, because they don't worship the one true God, who is only worshipped through Christ and the Trinity.
This is the context of Rev. 3:9 - without this in mind, there is no way to correctly interpret what is meant by it.
A jew inverts this by suggesting males to "give it all you got" and females "you can take it...you are just as strong as them". This is how you'll get incels and sluts...the former draining themselves in isolation, and the latter getting filled up in company.
That's spot on.
to have sex
How could one have/own/possess...sex/seco/divide...if it implies a separation from one another?
So inceldom?
I'm not Catholic but the RCC obviously is a religious establishment and it has a long standing tradition of 2000 years. They were part of the Church Christ established for half of that time but officially fell out in 1054. At least they were within the Apostolic Church at one time while prots aren't even aware that such a historic Church existed, still exists and will exist until the end of times. They think the Church was established 15 centuries after Christ during the jewish led Reformation.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-44209971
"They don't want you to know that and that's why the msm wrote hundreds of articles about it". I mean it's true but still the NWO agenda seeks to destroy traditional religion, not bolster it. Also, when did the RCC "openly kill gays for heresy"? Do you know what heresy means?
But 8. already happened during the coof
The extermination is attempted through medical tyranny (forced vaccinations), assassinations and mass murder (democide).
And they still deny they caused any harm or forced people to get the shots which sounds like 9.
They run this script all the time at different scale. We may be in the early stages looking at the big picture but we're already on 9. considering the plandemic.
(2) Remember the Protocols, like the many other playbooks, are just vague, amorphous plans in plain sight that can be used as touchstones later regardless of how well or ill they planned. Their nominal tie to the human shields doesn't reflect any commitment by the actual multiethnic deep state. Paul Harvey's "If I Were The Devil" is a sample playbook for the enemy but written by our side; however, their imaginations are of exactly the same caliber and thus are just fictional callouts of hopes without true basis. Movies.
That's a good point. The fabian cabal - H.G. Wells, B. Russel, G.B. Shaw, Bernays, Lippman, the Huxleys, Salk, Klaus, Brzezinski, Attali - tends to get wild with their writing about the future. Anyone can write a book envisioning a future technocracy. I'd say what makes the difference is seeing those plans coming to fruition in the years after those books are published. This is the same reason why the Protocols are legit and not made up and Henry Ford among many others saw that. It's hard to imagine how insane most of this stuff sounded a 100 years ago because we're so used to the degenerate and indoctrinated state of the world now.
It should be obvious to any Christian that those people are vessels of ideas much bigger than them and their fleeting life here on Earth. They are slaves to the dark principalities.
Doesn't sound too far fetched. I don't know how they will achieve it exactly but they will bring about the One world religion and instantiate the One world government under the rule of the Antichrist, who will be of the seed of David and who will be crowned in the New temple of Solomon.
The point is man can thrive without carbohydrates in their diet because both fats and proteins can be metabolized into sugars for energy (ketogenesis). You can't live, let alone thrive without fats and proteins though.
People can live perfectly well without eating any sugar and carbs at all. In fact this (keto) is the best diet there is.
That's word-concept fallacy. Israel refers to Abraham and his people in the OT, but when Christ comes He declares Israel to be the Eternal Kingdom of God, which is His Church. There's no ethnicity involved as it is universal. The seven thousand you speak of followed Christ - the rest became sectarian judaizes and rabbis and went on to write the Talmud and in our days - to create the state of Israel.
People will believe literally anything if it's shown on a TV screen with some Tavistock boomer puppet narrating a script at the background.
AI predicted some random shit 15 years ago so it must be true. People have already been conditioned with this bs. We're in Minority report.
Pokemon Go was an obvious psy op by the social engineers. Remember Gangnam style? This is pure science.
That's a curious way to go about it. I just look if such a theory adheres to the scientific method and no, evo theory is not a scientific theory because there has never been an experiment that confirms the hypothesis. It's nothing more than speculation and begging the question.
Do you believe in evo theory?
It's always nice to have non-Christians explain to me what the Christian faith and history is. How many Churches did Jesus establish? Have you heard of the apostolic Church of the first millennia? There was only one Church before the Great schism of 1054 and as far as Orthodox Christians are concerned - it still continues to be one, because the Church, being the body of Christ, isn't subject to change and division. Those who seceded and adopted heterodox teachings fell away from the Church - be it Aryans, Manicheans, Nestorians, Gnostics, Muslims, Talmudic jews, Catholics, Protestants, etc.
The comparative approach you adopt assumes any likeness between two religious traditions is due to cultural influence and seeks to prove one originates from another based on this which is a genetic fallacy. It's also a word-concept fallacy because it assumes the same words and symbols used refer to the same or similar concepts and share similar meaning (no, Christ is not a "Sun god" or Sol Invictus, but the Son - the second person of the only God who is Trinity; the greek logos is not the Christian Logos nor is the teaching of the soul; the Egyptian idea of afterlife has nothing to do with the Heavenly Kingdom of God).
Science? The Savage frowned. He knew the word. But what it exactly signified he could not say. Shakespeare and the old men of the pueblo had never mentioned science, and from Linda he had only gathered the vaguest hints: science was something you made helicopters with, some thing that caused you to laugh at the Corn Dances, something that prevented you from being wrinkled and losing your teeth. He made a desperate effort to take the Controller’s meaning.
“Yes,” Mustapha Mond was saying, “that’s another item in the cost of stability. It isn’t only art that’s incompatible with happiness; it’s also science. Science is dangerous; we have to keep it most carefully chained and muzzled.”
“What?” said Helmholtz, in astonishment. “But we’re always saying that science is everything. It’s a hypnopædic platitude.”
“Three times a week between thirteen and seventeen,” put in Bemard.
“And all the science propaganda we do at the College .”
“Yes; but what sort of science?” asked Mustapha Mond sarcastically. “You’ve had no scientific training, so you can’t judge. I was a pretty good physicist in my time. Too good-good enough to realize that all our science is just a cookery book, with an orthodox theory of cooking that nobody’s allowed to question, and a list of recipes that mustn’t be added to except by special permission from the head cook. I’m the head cook now. But I was an inquisitive young scullion once. I started doing a bit of cooking on my own. Unort
- No one needed to slaughter the protestants as they did it themselves for hundreds of years after the Reformation because the different sects couldn't reconcile their differences. The Christian promotion of zionism was 19c invention by John Darby.
Although I agree the Catholic Church is compromised and veered away from the original faith, communism has little to do with RC and at worst is an indirect consequence of bad theology and masonic infiltration by jesuits. That being said, the Vatican openly promotes ecumenism and the future One world religion since Vatican II, along with other NWO agenda like stabbies and climate change. If you consider those communism, then sure, but that pushes the boundaries of what communism as an ideology is.
- I generalized what the majority of non-religious people who subscribe to materialism and evolutionism believe. There are other "spiritual non-religious" pagans and new agers who don't reject metaphysics and usually assume an Eastern religious worldview like monism ("we're all one, dude, like, there should be no distinctions and borders at all!"), reincarnation, karma, zen, yoga, tantra, veganism, shamanism, enlightenment through drug use, etc. The promotion of Eastern philosophy in the West under the guise of it representing emancipation from the oppressive and rigid Christian dogma and tradition is a well known psy op too and was unleashed on the masses during the CIA/Tavistock ran 60's counterculture movement.
The curious thing is that there is an overlap between the first and the second group because materialism and evolutionism are ancient beliefs themselves (Democritus and Hindu teachings) that have zero scientific evidence to support them. They are falsely presented to the gullible masses as scientific facts because they are useful for furthering the masonic Royal Society agenda, even though no one has proven them through the scientific method. But it's easy to take things for granted when you're indoctrinated through media and education from a very early age into the scientismo cult.
You have to try to find out. Why don't you answer my question?
Wrong again. Protestants tend to be the most liberal and pro-zionist of all denominations. I don't belong to a sect but to the Orthodox Church which is the only Church Christ established and has always been opposed to Talmudic judaism (which is a sect denounced by Christ in the face of the pharisees and their "oral tradition"). I wouldn't consider the top NWO people atheists since they are luciferian freemasons and talmudic jews. Materialism and naturalism is pushed on the masses as a psy op for demoralization: "Man is just a more evolved animal, a meatsack computer which evolved by accident, insignificant in the vastness of the space and time void; there is no purpose or meaning to anything ultimately and you're going to die and dissolve into nothingness so what you do with your life doesn't really matter in the grand scale of things. Just follow your desires, be a hedonist coomsoomer and do as thou wilt - there's no good and evil, no final justice so who cares what you do?". All of the proponents of that demonic worldview are either jews or freemasons.
But no, Christianity is putting people down even though what I described is the most depressing and nihilistic outlook anyone could have. This is what THEY want you to think reality is. Compare that to what the Christian teaching about man and the world is. Everything else is irrelevant - "you will know them by their fruits". Atheists hardly even reproduce, that's how depraved and nihilistic this worldview is. Even from an evolutionary standpoint atheism is a loosing strategy.
I'm not surprised a degenerate atheist like yourself has gay stuff on their coomer mind instead of actual arguments.
Debanking ganja peddlers and prostitutes sounds based though. Also, I wonder why that Horowitz guy is against islamiation? I'm sure it has nothing to do with the ethnostate's interest.