We are to believe this loose woman who lied to her boyfriend in order to do coke with a celebrity, who is seen all over CCTV kissing him (and others), was not going to have sex with him? A woman like that would give it up to a 6/10 nobody with a bag of drugs, let alone a celebrity.
This video explains the evidence against her -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8s33jaioVY
They also have witnesses (one of her co-workers) who saw her right after the alleged event and said she was fine. So if she got beat up, that was all set up later for a payday.
Yes I agree Conor McGregor is an immoral person, but for reasons other than rape.
So inceldom?
a) IN (being within) CELIBATE (unbound aka free) DOM (dominance aka in-between boundary)...being implies free (life) withing dominance (inception towards death).
b) Suggested inceldom hides "involuntary" aka by ones own free will of choice. Why? Because ones consent to a suggestion implies shirking ones free will of choice to another, hence binding self to another.
c) To bring this back to male/female balance aka giving/taking...male needs to resist taking; female needs to resist giving. Neither can abstain the temptation of the other. Hence self sustenance implying a struggle.
A jew inverts this by suggesting males to "give it all you got" and females "you can take it...you are just as strong as them". This is how you'll get incels and sluts...the former draining themselves in isolation, and the latter getting filled up in company.
tl;dr: An ongoing division cannot be possessed by parts within, and pretending to be free from boundaries to one another (inceldom) only distracts from the original division of whole into partials...a division (inception towards death) which inspires resistance (life).
That's spot on.