Hey OP,
Care to debunk this university study that directly refutes your arguements? Your assumptions rely on the NIST simulation which is shown to be inaccurate and incomplete....
Refutation of NIST models
Here's a peer reviewed paper from university of Fairbanks alaska outlining the issues with nist modeling....
I encourage you to at the very least read the paper I posted....
Greta / pizza connection:
When that lab In Boston or wherever releases their 80% kill rate version of covid, you'd better believe a lot of people will get vaccinated. Not enough people are awake yet. They are still retarded.
It's gonna take something much much bigger to wake everyone up all at once...
Also I know lots of people that got vaccinated just so they could travel. Those same people STILL don't have a clue about anything....
Generally speaking, I agree with you. The alternative media that is allowed on major platforms does seem to either be not dangerous in their opinions or as you say they never go far enough and therefore act as controlled opposition.
Any links to a graph you've seen?
I guess I'll have to go trolling the Chans..... Problem is their graphs mostly just identify Jews in the organization without much hierarchy
Sure the ISP can see your traffic go to the VPN provider, they can't track beyond that without gov agency assistance.
Go thru some proxies or tor if you are extra paranoid.
If you are trying to hide from state level actors you need a whole different level of opsec
The study was a peer reviewed study from university of Alaska Fairbanks. A credible institution.
You didnt address the source of the argument, that NIST left out key structural elwments in their simulation, that if included proves that the building could not physically have collapsed in the manner it did.
You can dismiss the source out of hand if you want, but it does come from a university, and is peer reviewed, not sure how much more credible you need.
People who cant argue against facts usually try to discredit the source instead of the material.