Speaking of Typhoid Mary, that incident was a psyop too, and they all but admit it right on Mary Mallon's wiki page :
Mallon herself never believed that she was a carrier. With the help of a friend, she sent several samples to an independent New York laboratory. All came back negative for typhoid.
If They declare you're a disease-ridden human resource who killed 50 grandmas and They're gonna lock you away, then dear brother or sister, you're gonna get locked away. They did it 120 years ago and They're doing it now. On a much grander scale, of course.
I wonder how they settled the issue about when a "mass of cells" becomes an adult?
Ha, as if! Typical trick question by conservatives! The answer is "whenever is convenient to the liberal claim at hand, but better left undefined, and better left unrecognized".
I would guess that for a number that rounds up to 100% of the readers (well, those who don't realize NYMag is anything other than propaganda and social engineering) all their cognitive processes halted as soon as they hit "right-wing" in the subhead.
How many of them stopped right there to consider: "If children do not in some sense 'belong' to parents who would then exercise a level of control over them, to whom would they belong? Are they just like wild animals belonging to no one? What other candidates are there? Passersby? Highest bidders? Ah, of course, the only other reasonable candidate is the State. Children are not property, and thus belong to the State. Wait--is that right?"
Through this "reductio ad absurdum" we can see that these people cannot possibly be exercising rational cognitive processes. We should all stop silently assuming they do.
so whatever washed up on the beach in florida is evidence of something the mainstream media told you happened on the bottom of the ocean?
cast iron reasoning, and yet conspiracy theorists still wonder at how the public is so easily deceived.
What's weird is a fact about the case that seems to have been erased from history, Maybe it got Mandela'd!
After Foster raised his rifle at Perry....
The night of the incident, I recall a short twitter video where you hear three or so loud shots from a rifle, then several softer shots from a pistol before Perry drives off. People were arguing about it but I remember thinking, "Case closed". Those rifle shots evidently no longer exist.
I'll throw this in to remind everyone that, at the time, there was a lot of discussion of the evidence that the event was staged. Off the top of my head, I remember someone showing that underwater video of the leak showed two distinctly different wellheads.
And, of course, they made a feature film about it. For me, at this point, that seals it as fake and ghey.
I theorized it might have universal appeal, so I looked for a long time before I finally ran across someone that hated the smell of bacon cooking. Maybe there are more advanced beings among us who "get it" on a much deeper level?
Here's where I first read about the idea: Domestic Pig is hybrid of Human and Wild Boar genetics (6/5/2012)
I forgot to mention the third strange anomalous data point that plugs into this theory. Apparently human meat is known in certain circles as "long pig", because it smells just like pork while cooking. You can't even make this shit up.
There's a theory floating around that takes the same observations described in the article and accounts for them in a different way. It's one of the most disturbing things I've ever heard and I've never researched it in depth because I don't really like thinking about it, but here it is....
The Anunnaki and their offspring, the Nephilim, were cannibalistic. That is, they ate humans, and humans are genetically part-Anunnaki and part-primate. So many of the old stories of human sacrifice may not have been for strictly ceremonial purposes, or even for consumption of loosh, but for consumption of human flesh.
At some point and in some circumstance of which I do not know, a compromise or substitute was developed. Through genetic engineering, wild hogs were crossed with humans to create domestic pigs. The Anunnaki or Nephilim could eat these freely without people getting upset at all the human sacrifice and cannibalism.
As crazy as this thesis sounds, it precisely addresses two very disparate items:
First, the paper suggest the cross was due to some fucking in the forest by wild pigs and primates. Does that seem even remotely plausible? Not to me. Interestingly, Robert Sepehr has mentioned some hybrid primates that are not much different from either parent species, but are socially rejected by both.
Second, did you ever wonder where the Jews' very strong taboo against pork came from? People wave their hands around about parasites and trichonosis or whatever, but others have been safely consuming pork for a very long time. I'm pretty sure that if there was a safe way to do it, hungry people would find it.
If any of this has put anyone off pork to any extent, I'm staring a club.
“It is time to end this war and stop being silent.”
He supposedly defected in October, six months ago. So he felt strongly enough to defect, but not strongly enough to tell the press? Who writes this nonsense?
Although I suppose a better question is, who believes this nonsense?
From what you just wrote, I can see you're just missing the element of the Anunnaki. Take my word for it if you care to, but a lot of things will crystallize for you once you include them. Frankly, they are the framework on which human history and society is based.
If you don't believe me about their importance, try this instead: whenever the subject of the Anunnaki comes up with one of these popular researchers, pay extremely close attention to how it is handled. They will almost all ridicule it and quickly divert back to their narrative. This is how They keep you away from it.
One exception I've found is Clif High, who has a special technique. When someone mentions the Anunnaki, he says, "Oh yes, very important. But you know what's much more important is the Nommo. Let me tell you about them...." Once you're attentive to it, it's quite transparent.
Well, study their teaching all you like, but I doubt you'll find anything of any value. What you want is what might be described as "actionable intel", but as far as I can tell virtually all of this occult "doctrine" is simply made up nonsense. For example, I think you could read everything ever published by Scientologists, and not a bit of it would ever lead you to uncover Operation Snow White.
Same goes for Masonry. I remember Cecil Rhodes, a guy who I take was hip to a lot of how things really worked, made some very disparaging comment about it, something that added up to, "What a load of bullshit." When I heard that it confirmed my feeling that there was nothing important to be discovered about their doctrine.
Really, it could be counted on one hand the number of important items I've come across from all these flavors of "secret societies". And none of them are things that you would find explicitly written in their documentation. You have to abstract a level to see that that how they're really going about their business.
With Masonry, for example, throw out everything they say about themselves and realize that each has sworn a secret oath. All nefarious associations aside, how could any of them be trusted to keep any public oath? That's all you need to know about how Masonry really works.
Another example would be how the real deep Zionists/Talmudists/Kabalists think that non-Jews don't really have souls, are like animals, and may be treated as such. Yeah, okay, they wrote that down in several ways in the Talmud but that was millennia ago. All of them are way more circumspect about saying such things now. But it's still how they act, isn't it?
I've long believed the Gnostics were an early disinfo-based social engineering project. As disinfo, they have to give you some truth, and in this case I am certain the truth given was that there are the three types of human consciousness that you describe.
I believe there is something to be learned from the Gnostics as to the characteristics of these types, but everything further I've ever come across from them seems like superstitious nonsense with no basis in fact. Maybe there's more to be learned from them, but it never looked promising to me.
At a guess, I think the main idea of the Gnostic project was to off-ramp people from the increasingly popular ideas that would eventually become Christianity.
Part of what I've noticed about people attracted to Gnosticism in the modern day is that a lot of them are stoner/hippie types that have been left with a bad taste in their mouths over something to do with Christianity. It seems they are attracted to it because they can be literally "in the know" without exercising discipline, and also feel gratification that the Church "really was wrong" and not them.
The Essenes (and there's evidence to indicate that Jesus was one of them) also wrote about these three types. They referred to them as "sleeping", "drowsy", and "awake". IIRC, the Essenes taught that that the awake should not try to awaken the sleeping, but they did have a responsibility for protecting and caring for them. The awake should also stand ready to welcome and guide the drowsy as they roused from their slumber.
It struck me that, yeah, that seemed like something Jesus would teach.
I believe it is as you say. I have no direct evidence, but circumstantially They have never shown 1% of the concern They would have had if crypto--as understood--posed any threat to Their death grip on power through control of money.
But They (specifically through the NSA) were the ones that first released it, right? Reasoning backwards, I believe They must have either known about a flaw or developed a backdoor significant enough to render all crypto harmless if need be (or confiscate or deactivate it at will or whatever).
Being aware of the exact nature of the flaw, They can simply monitor the space to see if anyone seems to be sniffing around at the flaw, or working on developing something that would close off their backdoor. If deemed serious enough, they are made to go away.
Since the plan is ultimately to control tens of trillions of dollars worth of global currency, virtually any amount of resources could be justified towards this project. And They certainly have no rules about "tragic accidents" that may or may not occur.
For years now, my working theory has been that all crypto is, ultimately and at the deepest level, originated and controlled by the Cabal. But as with any big, complex system, there was always the danger that a few smart and capable people could start to turn it around and empower the people, sealing off the backdoors and creating systems outside the control of the Cabal.
I suspect that what we are seeing now is the Cabal very quietly and judiciously removing the handful of real threats without raising any alarms.
I can't get over the fact that AJ is Bill Hicks, so that puts him in the category of what I call "Simulant". This type of person is not an Intelligence legend, which is entirely fabricated. Also, he's not just an ordinary person. Like, don't you get a little bit of a weird feeling when you find out the first name of someone you know isn't their real first name, but they go by their middle name for whatever reason?
The weird feeling is precisely because we trust one another implicitly, and real fakery or deception is so uncommon. So AJ can tell an authentic and convincing story about his youth because it probably happened almost exactly that way, but we have to keep in mind he's definitely not an ordinary person.
The trans agenda of the Establishment is alive and well. Witness them burying Hale's manifesto.
(Which in itself is strange. The event was fake, so didn't they write the manifesto themselves beforehand and arrange it's release? If somehow it really existed and is authentic, why not just declare it was a "diary with unimportant ramblings"? Makes me think these hoaxes are not as tightly controlled as we all assume them to be.)
As you say, though, the tide seems to be shifting. And also as you say, the NPCs get their programming from the media. But they also absorb other material on a subconscious basis from the environment, and the Establishment cannot (yet) shield NPCs from that completely.
I would say that there has been such an accumulation of negative associations with trannies and transsexualism and the trans agenda that it has finally begun to overbalance the scales in the minds of NPCs.
Of course, they would be unaware of this. None will say, "I was wrong and I've changed my mind." They won't say anything, really, other than just a vague, "I think it all may be going too far," or, "Well, it seems like some of these people have problems."
Same thing happened with all the rioting a couple of years ago. Notice how there aren't any NPCs saying "BLM 4eva!" No, they all got enough dirty looks and absorbed the message.
Make of this what you will, but I'd say the name is a reference to Pazuzu:
Pazuzu is a fictional character who is the main antagonist in The Exorcist horror novels and film series, created by William Peter Blatty. Blatty derived the character from Assyrian and Babylonian mythology, where the mythic Pazuzu was considered the king of the demons of the wind, and the son of the god Hanbi. In The Exorcist, Pazuzu appears as a demon who possesses Regan MacNeil.
We also find for the mentioned Hanbi that:
In Sumerian and Akkadian mythology (and Mesopotamian mythology in general) Hanbi or Hanpa (more commonly known in western text) was the god of evil, god of all evil forces and the father of Pazuzu and Humbaba.
An association between AOC and the child of the god of evil? Who saw that coming? Surely a coincidence!
I have dispensed with the idea that any but a handful of the visible decision makers in the West actually make decisions. Really, for me it's only a shorthand to say, "Biden wants this", or "Ursula von der Leyen believes that", or "Zelensky said whatever". All mere puppets there to say the lines and not bump into the scenery.
That's at the the tip of the iceberg, but I've heard something consistent from a number of journalists who have had occasion to meet or interview politicians and various leaders. They all say a version of, "These people are not like what you imagine from seeing them on TV. They are almost all mediocre people, and some are obviously stupid and ignorant."
The modern Western political sphere has largely become a sort of open-air kabuki. I believe it deepens insight to conceptualize it this way, which is why I'm posting this.