I can't locate the links right now, but apparently as part of the overall Neo-Imperialist program in Ukraine, they spent a lot of effort radicalizing the nationalists--even indoctrinating children--along the lines of ethnic supremacy.
The way one article summed it up, the feelings of most Russians are, "This is a brotherly war which we should not be fighting at all. We are fellow Slavs!" But given the way many of these radicals have been indoctrinated, their response is, "Fuck you, you've been polluted by generations of race-mixing. You're no Slavs at all!"
It seems hard to believe, but somehow the Russian leadership did not appreciate how far this had been taken in the years leading up to the SMO, and it was the cause of some of the early problems. It wasn't just that the Neo-Nazis themselves were radicalized and had become fanatics, but that they would threaten and retaliate against any fellow Ukrainians that showed the slightest sympathy for the Russians. Everyone was a potential collaborator, was treated as such, and behaved accordingly to that threat.
Dredging up an analysis of an event that seems so long ago, the Circular Error Probable of Iranian missiles could be as low as 7m:
If that applies to these missiles along with their evasion of existing air defenses, it's gotta be causing some "recalculations".
Well this Christina Pushaw is an obvious spook. It makes you think that talent (or at least the scum that rises to the top in such circles) is actually very thin.
In addition to what's covered in the article, we find:
While an undergrad, she volunteered for John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign.
In 2011, Pushaw studied abroad in Moscow, Russia.
In Bologna, she worked as a research assistant at the Center for Constitutional Studies and Democratic Development, researching Ukrainian constitutional reform and democratic development in Central Asia.
In spring 2017, she spent time in Kyiv, Ukraine to research for her graduate thesis, titled "The status of Crimean Tatars under Russian occupation".
In 2008, Pushaw developed an interest in Georgia, in the Transcaucasus, after hearing presidential candidate John McCain speak about it. She researched Georgia, and was impressed by the accomplishments of then-president, Mikheil Saakashvili.
From October 2013 to June 2015, she lived in Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia.... Pushaw also worked at an exchange program that organized for Georgian students to study abroad in America, called My World Foundation. She managed the program with Giorgi Arveladze, a former Minister of Economy of Georgia that served under Saakashvili. Arveladze also worked for Yulia Tymoshenko, a former Prime Minister of Ukraine.
From June 2017 to August 2019, Pushaw worked in Washington, D.C. for Stand Together, a philanthropic organization founded by Charles Koch.
When Pushaw started working for Saakashvili, he had recently been stripped of his Ukrainian citizenship and was living stateless in the Netherlands. He revoked his Georgian citizenship in 2015 and had outstanding criminal charges in Georgia. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a close ally of Saakashvili, restored his Ukrainian citizenship in May 2019. Saakashvili led the 2003 Rose Revolution, is pro-NATO, and strengthened ties with the United States while he was president.
All in all, a fairly impressive resume for a young Company field officer. Executive timber!
There was this short passage in The Sun article:
“We know nothing about the crash,” he continued. “We are talking to the FAA now. … I’ve got to keep the line clear.”
Just my judgement, but this sounds like a guy who is entirely mystified and doesn't have the slightest clue what's going on. That is, anyone who's alert to a situation, if not "in the game" themselves, has spent time thinking about it and this will usually show up in their comments.
So if Rumpel had any idea his family was in danger and this was a hit, he would say something like, "I don't know anything yet, but I'm going to find out how this happened." See the subtle difference? He was never threatened and just has no idea what's happening
The amount of money donated was very small (for rich people) and Trump has never had any trouble raising funds, so the message isn't even to potential donors directly but to Trump himself. The easiest way to stop Trump is for Trump to stop, get it?
I would agree but on the flip side we have incidents like AF447 and that GermanWings flight. Those also looked like remote hijackings, and I don't recall anyone even guessing why They would do it.
That leaves three possibilities. One, they took out plane loads of people just to hit one or a small number, lost in the rest of the crowd. Two, they were maybe tests not of the technology itself, but whether they could crash planes and people would buy cockamamie theories about why. Three, we live in a world where planes fall out of the sky for cockamamie reasons.
I think we always have to keep in mind this quote from former Pentagon CID Investigator Gene Wheaton:
The covert operators that I ran with would blow up a 747 with 300 people to kill one person. They are total sociopaths with no conscience whatsoever.
The plot is definitely thicker than the old "died suddenly", although I suspect they will sell that as the explanation. Even conspiracy theorists will stop there because they can blame the vaxx. Shills will sell it, and actual conspiracists will buy it because they love to "know the answer".
Three data points appear to rule out that explanation. First, according to the flight data shown in this story, the plane made a U-turn:
DC Boom Mystery Deepens: Reports Jets Scrambled for Plane Headed to Nation’s Capital; Plane Later Crashed in Rural Virginia (The Gateway Pundit)
I haven't yet read anywhere whether the pilot filed a flight plan and, if so, what the destination was, but the U-turn was over the southwestern end of Long Island then back towards DC. This alone rules out a plane just tooling along on autopilot.
Second, and worse, the F-16 sent after the plane. The fighter went screaming out there causing a huge sonic boom and lots of panic on the ground then... what? The F-16 should have been able to get a look into the cockpit and also see people at the cabin windows, but notice there's absolutely no information about this and the issue is not even raised.
Third, and worst, the linked article from The Sun twice repeats the pilot "reportedly lost consciousness". Reportedly? Reported by who? A tweet linked in the GWP story mentioned NORDO so it was not anyone else in the plane. And that line comes from "investigators" who have neither names nor organizations. This story was clearly fabricated and planted in the The Sun.
So what did happen? Working theory: remote hijack with disconnection of radio systems. I'd guess the plan was for the aircraft to fly over restricted airspace then be shot down very spectacularly and very publicly near DC. Maybe the military refused to play their little part in this so the plane was just intentionally crashed.
Why? This is warning to Trump that supporters will be murdered, families will not be immune, and the blood is on him.
There have been a number of these fake pregnancies, with Beyonce's coming to mind as one of the lamest. It all sounds pretty "out there" and the very idea seems to signal how fake and ghey the world has become.
But it looks like the world has been fake and ghey for a long time. One data point is that there was or still is a rite to confirm that Papal candidates are intact biological males: Does the Pope have to prove he has testicles before he takes office?
There's some controversy over whether it actually exists and I've certainly never been present at such a rite, so everyone will have to decide for themselves.
You'd think maybe it was some homoerotic shenanigans some closeted cardinal instituted along the line, but it actually sounds reasonable because, you got it, one did slip by way back when: Pope Joan.
Certainly a lot of history has been phonied up so maybe one simply concludes it's all manufactured, but then if so, you'd still have to conclude they made up some pretty weird stuff.
Since this comes out of WaPo, it's obviously a limited hangout but I still find it a strange admission. So the CIA fools the entire world for half a century, not even excepting the Soviets and China who never penetrated the operation but simply distrusted it. What's the purpose?
The reason I find it so bizarre, and part of why I think "They" are losing control, is that the first thought that came to my mind was, "If this was really all working so swimmingly after a couple of decades, I wonder if it occurred to anyone to franchise the same idea into something like a 'secret' kind of 'money' to which they had backdoor access?"
I'm guessing that no, that was not the intended messaging.
If I had to guess, I'd say this was just made up as part of the current Sinophobia program, which went from pro forma to reality since China turned against the Empire last fall.
The story makes more sense when you see it as a creative writing exercise. Take this sentence, chosen essentially at random:
Two officials told USA Today that security at some military bases has indeed been beefed up in response to the threat.
You're supposed to think, "Ooooh yes, that's what they should do for sure. Two of them, so it's confirmed. Damn chinks!"
But wouldn't such information come as formal announcements by press officer who, you know, has a name? Is it a secret? Would the Chinese not be able to guess that security would be elevated in response to a penetration? If it's supposed to be some big secret, didn't these two officials just violate opsec, requiring investigation and potential courts martial? Again, these are questions raised from a single sentence.
Oh yeah, and why does USA Today get the scoop? Aren't any other outlets pissed off at this? Actually, these are two questions I can answer: USA Today is a Mockingbird propaganda outlet which is why they print the story, and the others are Mockingbird propaganda outlets, which is why they stay silent.
Well, maybe, except drooping of the eye is not listed an as effect of dystonia. For the record, the closest according to wiki are:
Blepharospasm: The patient experiences rapid blinking of the eyes or even their forced closure causing functional blindness.
Oculogyric crisis: An extreme and sustained (usually) upward deviation of the eyes often with convergence causing diplopia (double vision). It is frequently associated with backward and lateral flexion of the neck and either widely opened mouth or jaw clenching. Frequently a result of antiemetics such as the neuroleptics (e.g., prochlorperazine) or metoclopramide. Can be caused by Chlorpromazine.
Neither of these seem at all like what he's got. But then again, I'm not a doctor so I'm not even sure he's a dude. Also, we're in the phase of history where we just wave our hands about and that which we say is true, is true, and that which we say is false, is false.
I would back up and start from the proposition that the entire Cold War was staged. I mean, real events and even struggles went on, but it was all managed from a higher level. (Just think of two NFL teams beating the shit out of each other on Sunday, but all managed by a cartel of 32 owners with tax breaks from the government.)
It sounds like a tall, conspiratorial claim, but it's one of those open conspiracies no one seems to be aware of. You can see it stated plainly on the wiki of mainstream academic and researcher Antony C. Sutton:
At the Hoover Institution, he wrote the study Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development (in three volumes), arguing that the West played a major role in developing the Soviet Union from its beginnings until the then-present year of 1970. Sutton argued that the Soviet Union's technological and manufacturing base, which was then engaged in supplying North Vietnam during the Vietnam War, was built by United States corporations and largely funded by US taxpayers.
Wow, some Cold War, huh? I recall one of his findings was that the entire Soviet Union would have collapsed just a few years after inception without Western support.
So fast-forward to Gladio and I would say that what we have is a "wheels within wheels" situation. First, what is Gladio really? A covert network of money, trained men, armaments, and support. Who cares what it's supposed to be for, because the CIA is going to use it for it's own ends. So yeah, they did a lot of (what was on the surface at least) anti-Commie stuff.
But it looks to me like they played the other side too, particularly through an organization called the Red Brigades. But remember that Gladio was essentially a network, and the only thing that made it different than the RB was what it's supposed goals were. So take this article, for instance:
The Italian Job: Operation GLADIO (4/24/2014)
The communist group Red Brigades was originally blamed until, in 1984, Vincenzo Vinciguerra – a fascist terrorist who claimed to have been supported by the GLADIO network – confessed. It is suspected that the Red Brigades’ assassination of Christian Democrat Prime Minister Aldo Moro in 1978 was also a “false flag”....
And remember Steve Pieczenik? He was wrapped up in the Moro Incident, and you can try to unsnarl this: Role of Steve Pieczenik
I mean, it's insane! The Red Brigades (CIA?) also kidnapped US Army Brigadier General James L. Dozier, NATO Deputy Chief of Staff. Even that looks like it might have been staged, because he was miraculously "rescued" without anyone firing a shot, including the kidnapper specifically assigned to kill him: Kidnapping of Brigadier General Dozier.
So I guess this is all a long way of saying that my bias is that if the CIA did something good, it was accidental, unavoidable, or the only cover they could come up with... lol
I am entertained by the thought that you somehow believe that each of these outlets "saw this with their own eyes" or something. Sorry for not being able to put it into words, but the thought itself is undefined. Repetition does indeed form truth, for many.
We all get to believe whatever we want, and almost everyone does. Enjoy it while lasts!
It turns out there are 4 levels to this particular issue, and there's one level deeper than where this paper is at. To quickly summarize:
-
"Who cares? I've got to get the kids to school and get to work."
-
"The CIA is involved in intelligence gathering, not modern art."
-
(this paper) "The CIA fought a secret and brave battle against the Commies as part of the Cold War using Modern Art as a weapon." Seriously, though, does anyone still believe the CIA fought bravely against Communism or anything else bad in this world?
-
"The CIA fought against the uplift and inspiration of humanity by destroying art itself." Sounds more like it, right? You can read all the detail here:
The Cultural Cold War (15-page PDF)
All the caveats for "Miles Mathis" apply. Here's a bonus note for advanced students of how we're all being fucked:
The mainstream admitted the CIA's involvement in Modern Art long ago. Mathis' paper focuses on Frances Stonor Saunders and her 1995 article in the London Independent and her 1999 book "Who Paid the Piper? The Cultural Cold War". Fast-forward to 2020 and the JStor article never mentions Saunders.
To quote a work with which I'm sure we're all familiar:
Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.
You know, I had actually written out a prediction that you would never answer any of the questions I posed, but I removed it at the last minute as being too obviously implying a lack of intellectual and rational ability. Turns out I should have left it in.
Thanks for your useless and garbled advice. Good luck, with this or anything else.
(To everyone else, maybe what we have just witnessed it AI promoting a planted story about the capabilities of AI. Can you really put it beyond where we're at now? Alternatively, is it better or worse news if some humans are able to function no better than ChatGPT?)
How about we start with this apparent contradiction: the drone requires operator permission to engage the target, but does not require permission to engage the operator?
Pushing further, did you ever ask yourself how the drone would know the location of the operator? And once located, how a drone outfitted for a SEAD mission (and almost certainly with anti-radiation missiles) would target whatever facility the operator was located in? How close do you think operators of remotely piloted vehicles need to be to intended targets? I suspect that, no, you never thought these issues through for yourself.
No need to thank me for the lesson, but do you really need to outsource your thinking so publicly like this? When challenged (and I suspect you interpreted what I wrote as a challenge), your first reaction should have been to carefully reexamine your own reasoning for flaws, not move to justify it. As I mentioned, the results of this little experiment are not encouraging.
If this all comes off as unnecessarily harsh, all I can say is that to get to the truth, you need to be harsher on your own thinking than anyone else in the world. Guess how I know?
The article is pretty obviously fabricated, and not a good job of it at all. I actually checked to see if it was dated April 1.
I can't quite figure out why it was fabricated, though. My best guess is that it's a test to see who among the readership and general population can detect such a bogus story. The results do not make me optimistic.
Two things:
-
He very clearly does it on purpose. (I don't believe he reached up to scratch his nose and then just forgot to do it.) Everyone has to try to figure out for themselves what the explanation for that is.
-
No one has commented on this issue, but I've noticed that RFK Jr.'s left eye is drooping significantly these days. You can see in this video from almost three years ago that his left eye is--if anything--very slightly higher than the right. I don't know what that may mean, but it just makes me think that people don't study the world around them very closely.
I actually never looked into it for much information because many years ago I stumbled across a video regarding cocaine production. I had always thought coke was some sort of native "artisanal" product. No way.
They showed a processing lab in the jungle, palm frond roofs and everything. That's fine, but the actual process was horrible, at one point involving something like diesel fuel as a solvent. It looked like everyone who worked there was going to get cancer. Just, no thanks, you know? Same goes triple for any drug that was invented in a government lab. Now they're trying to GMO the hell out of weed (or into it, eh?).
Our vices are going to make us crazy or kill us, only maybe not in exactly the way we thought.
Yeah, I was mentally collecting all the evidence against them the other day and it quickly became a pile way too big to write off.
It also finalizes the explanation for JFK's very public murder instead of a faked death or the old "died suddenly", and why the ritual murder had to be so graphic. One of their own princes had turned against them, and it had to be made known that such was intolerable.
Awww, why the sudden change of subject? Was the discussion of your low self-esteem, abandonment issues, and failure to confront your failure as a human being making you uncomfortable? You can run away from me, but you can't run away from yourself. Admitting the disaster you've let yourself become is the first step on the road to recovery.
I think you know my now that interacting with me just makes you feel even weaker and more insignificant. If you think you're helping yourself, well, that's an indication of how big your problems really are.
(Haha, "Russkie". Can anyone really be that lame in 2023? Guess so!)
You just can't control yourself, can you? Shameful. I think everyone sees that you hate yourself. None of us blame you.
BTW, did I trigger you by posting about solitary confinement? Did it remind you of being sent to your room? It hurts mommy to do that more than it does you. You should think about what you've done.
What shall we bet that you'll have to reply to this to alleviate the rage you feel inside? Isn't there a dog you can kick? Did Mommy get rid of the dog? Probably for the best.
Retard.
Ah yes, is that considered well-mannered in your country? Then I guess your country and you can fuck right off.
Plus, I believe I banned you from reading anything I post. Again, what an incredible lack of respect. Keep yourself, your comments, and all such behavior away from me and my country in the future to prevent our degradation.
Disgusting.
I find it so odd that Gingrich has on occasion been permitted to lift the curtain slightly, yet has still not committed suicide.
GINGRICH: ESTABLISHMENT SCARED OF TRUMP BECAUSE HE “DIDN’T BELONG TO THE SECRET SOCIETY” (Infowars 3/4/2016)