I was just reading the same post and a similar one over on Reddit, and there was an incredible number of people posting how this guy was full of it and it was all bullshit and upvoting each other and slamming anyone who said anything to the contrary. That in itself should tell everyone something about the information's legitimacy (but I won't give away what I think it means!)
That being said, is there going to be some nuclear Armageddon? No.
Russia is already aware of a potential imminent false flag of exactly this nature and has an impressive capability to defeat such attack if launched.
Past that--and it's a much longer and deeper story--it seems the maniacs running the US do not have access to nuclear weapons. Their lackeys that do apparently will not provide access either, because they have no willingness to get annihilated in service to the Empire.
Nukes have already been used by Russia a number of times in the current conflict in Ukraine, so if the West wanted to point to a Russian "nuclear provocation", they could have simply done that. So whatever loony idea this guy may have come across, it's not going to start a nuclear war.
Finally, that bit about the "anti-LGBT pro-white Christian" program is totally bizarre and there's no evidence anywhere to connect it to. My thought is that some CIA maniac decided to circulate this bit of disinfo just in case They need to smoke a bunch of gays and trannies and blame it on white conservatives.
Looks like this guy just innocently accepted it, and one is reminded of Bill Cooper, who came to suspect phony UFO-related documents were being planted in front of him as disinfo.
Tactical nukes where. Come on. Like the lowest yields on the biggest munitions storages. That way nobody cares. No. Why aren't they using them everywhere else? Literally. Look it's a cluster of Ukrainians in tanks and stuff. Tactical strike. No other risk as you put it. A number of times now. No fallout either.
Where have the nukes been used? Why was there no other fallout reported? Why aren't they being used everywhere? Only used according to yourself selectively on the munition storages?
It was the said event you're quoting, the big factory that plumed last month with the depleted shells, a month or two before the fuel depot and the anti aircraft? Those weren't nukes. Neither was the mall in Kiev or the bunker in Lviv.
Indeed it is. But I have come to understand that few have the ability to keep up. It's still a bit counterintuitive to me, but there are some that wish to proclaim this fact, as they believe it somehow demonstrates their superiority. A strange thing to witness, but there we have it.
Keep researching. Or don't, but there's no need to bother me about it with lame-ass rhetoric.
No you. Nukes have a very distinctive signature and leave behind radiation.
I provided the examples of your assumption. You turn around and produce ignorance. Read it. It doesn't make you clever blaming me or turning this debate into how I need to research your claim. I cited 5 examples of detonations you're possibly presuming.
There is a supposed debate on the depleted shells, except a radiation reading was there prior to any detonation, despite of it being there afterwards, and it wasn't a tactical signature. There was two missile hits. If a nuke why double tap. Neither were the distinct blast
The signature of a distinctive flash, the flash being incredibly bright, and then the blast wave, shock wave, travelling outwards. Like at the mall. However there are other munitions that also cause a shock wave. Like vacuum and thermobaric. It was incendiary. Because it hit flammable materials and munitions. Like it did at the railway factory fuel depot.
So where asshole, read that bullshit, so matter of fact. When. Where. How. You claimed. I asked. I didn't ask for nonsense.
If they're using nukes so brazenly why has it been localised to explosions with ignitable compounds. Munition storage, and fuel depots? They leave plumes, and clouds. Incendiary materials do. Check out American disasters this year, railway crash, the milking factory, fertiliser storage. All had mushroom clouds, and plumes.
If you're quoting the hypersonic hits like Lviv, or the recent one somewhere in Donetsk, something something cannot pronounce it, near Bakhmut somewhere. Neither had radiation readings. The mall didn't either. They would be screaming, until he was blue in the face calling for nuclear missiles to reign down on Russia, begging for the nukes.
Again the probability is almost zero, because it would get a huge response. We'd hear no end of it. Our ears would fall off. The press would incite WW3, because Zelenskyy would be screaming for a nuclear football.
Really expending a tremendous amount of effort on this specific issue, aren't you? A few will be astute enough to note this, and draw the proper conclusions.
BTW, you got so overexcited you replied to your own post.
I was just reading the same post and a similar one over on Reddit, and there was an incredible number of people posting how this guy was full of it and it was all bullshit and upvoting each other and slamming anyone who said anything to the contrary. That in itself should tell everyone something about the information's legitimacy (but I won't give away what I think it means!)
That being said, is there going to be some nuclear Armageddon? No.
Russia is already aware of a potential imminent false flag of exactly this nature and has an impressive capability to defeat such attack if launched.
Past that--and it's a much longer and deeper story--it seems the maniacs running the US do not have access to nuclear weapons. Their lackeys that do apparently will not provide access either, because they have no willingness to get annihilated in service to the Empire.
Nukes have already been used by Russia a number of times in the current conflict in Ukraine, so if the West wanted to point to a Russian "nuclear provocation", they could have simply done that. So whatever loony idea this guy may have come across, it's not going to start a nuclear war.
Finally, that bit about the "anti-LGBT pro-white Christian" program is totally bizarre and there's no evidence anywhere to connect it to. My thought is that some CIA maniac decided to circulate this bit of disinfo just in case They need to smoke a bunch of gays and trannies and blame it on white conservatives.
Looks like this guy just innocently accepted it, and one is reminded of Bill Cooper, who came to suspect phony UFO-related documents were being planted in front of him as disinfo.
We live in a wilderness of mirrors.
Nukes, hahaha. No. What. Where. When?
Nukes? You cite that, so matter of fact.
Tactical nukes where. Come on. Like the lowest yields on the biggest munitions storages. That way nobody cares. No. Why aren't they using them everywhere else? Literally. Look it's a cluster of Ukrainians in tanks and stuff. Tactical strike. No other risk as you put it. A number of times now. No fallout either.
Where have the nukes been used? Why was there no other fallout reported? Why aren't they being used everywhere? Only used according to yourself selectively on the munition storages?
It was the said event you're quoting, the big factory that plumed last month with the depleted shells, a month or two before the fuel depot and the anti aircraft? Those weren't nukes. Neither was the mall in Kiev or the bunker in Lviv.
Indeed it is. But I have come to understand that few have the ability to keep up. It's still a bit counterintuitive to me, but there are some that wish to proclaim this fact, as they believe it somehow demonstrates their superiority. A strange thing to witness, but there we have it.
Keep researching. Or don't, but there's no need to bother me about it with lame-ass rhetoric.
No you. Nukes have a very distinctive signature and leave behind radiation.
I provided the examples of your assumption. You turn around and produce ignorance. Read it. It doesn't make you clever blaming me or turning this debate into how I need to research your claim. I cited 5 examples of detonations you're possibly presuming.
There is a supposed debate on the depleted shells, except a radiation reading was there prior to any detonation, despite of it being there afterwards, and it wasn't a tactical signature. There was two missile hits. If a nuke why double tap. Neither were the distinct blast
The signature of a distinctive flash, the flash being incredibly bright, and then the blast wave, shock wave, travelling outwards. Like at the mall. However there are other munitions that also cause a shock wave. Like vacuum and thermobaric. It was incendiary. Because it hit flammable materials and munitions. Like it did at the railway factory fuel depot.
So where asshole, read that bullshit, so matter of fact. When. Where. How. You claimed. I asked. I didn't ask for nonsense.
If they're using nukes so brazenly why has it been localised to explosions with ignitable compounds. Munition storage, and fuel depots? They leave plumes, and clouds. Incendiary materials do. Check out American disasters this year, railway crash, the milking factory, fertiliser storage. All had mushroom clouds, and plumes.
If you're quoting the hypersonic hits like Lviv, or the recent one somewhere in Donetsk, something something cannot pronounce it, near Bakhmut somewhere. Neither had radiation readings. The mall didn't either. They would be screaming, until he was blue in the face calling for nuclear missiles to reign down on Russia, begging for the nukes.
Again the probability is almost zero, because it would get a huge response. We'd hear no end of it. Our ears would fall off. The press would incite WW3, because Zelenskyy would be screaming for a nuclear football.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/03/europe/zelensky-ukraine-putin-erin-burnett-interview-intl-cmd/index.html
Here example of blue in the face. You know counter offensive is badly. Because he's screaming. https://liveuamap.com/en
But if nukes our ears would fall off.
Somehow I doubt defenses last forever. They haven't in any other war. How indeed does it conclude. Because there's always nukes.
Really expending a tremendous amount of effort on this specific issue, aren't you? A few will be astute enough to note this, and draw the proper conclusions.
BTW, you got so overexcited you replied to your own post.