We probably all understand the "culture creation" program where Christmas was "invented" in consciously directed ways, piece by piece, over time, and I recently ran across one of those pieces. What was compelling was the identity (and associations) of who invented it.
It came here, in "A Mayflower Christmas":
The Pilgrims celebrated a Mayflower Christmas in 1620 with holly, ivy, plum pudding and a gift exchange with Indian children – at least according to a romanticized version written by suffragist Elizabeth Cady Stanton of all people.
The preposterous Christmas on the Mayflower story was published by Woman’s Journal in 1900. Stanton had done plenty of writing by then — speeches, books, documents and letters, all serious stuff.
I included that last sentence as an indication that this wasn't something some old granny just happened to come up with. "They" put it out through this prominent woman to make sure it would get attention. It's a prime example of how They create culture.
Did you recognize the name? In addition to suffragism and abolitionism, Elizabeth Cady Stanton was perhaps the main progenitor of what came to be called Second Wave Feminism, beginning in 1848. Again, do you see how our culture is created? Yes, they were doing it a century before the CIA and Netflix ever came along.
I will close with mention of a woman only infrequently noted publicly even though she was Stanton's partner in that Seneca Falls Conference: Lucretia Mott. Well, Mott was almost certainly the one behind this creation of culture that is still the source of much social engineering.
You see, Lucretia Mott was born Lucretia Coffin, on Nantucket Island. Always note mention of that place. From there, we can connect far more directly than you might imagine to Benjamin Franklin, the (fake) Salem Witch Trials, the (fake) Manson murders, Starbucks coffee, Folgers coffee, the theft of Hawaii, the Underground Railroad, the (fake) Lincoln Assassination, the (fake) Vegas massacre, and many other topics.
Intriguing? I find the connections of the very tiny group that shapes the world in which we find ourselves to be fascinating, illuminating, and damning, but I fear it's not quite spicy and TikTok-y enough for most.
Stories for another day, perhaps.
No one owes a fanatic an explanation about anything. Indeed, requiring one of others is a demonstration of that very fanaticism. What kind of maniac would think he's convincing anyone of anything with any of your "doctrine"?
Going to lecture others about repentance or some such, but cannot follow the one simple instruction to leave in peace? How very characteristic of the aggressively deluded. Far too egocentric to listen, only to hear how correct you are in your own sight. Other people don't really exist to you, only props in the drama playing out in your head where you are the hero.
It's frightening and disgusting. God save us all from such people as are certain they are saved. What shall they see as fit to do with others they judge as not? What have they seen fit to do throughout history? Indeed, Satan himself finds good tools of such "Elect".
Jesus told others to depart as I told you, yet you did not. We all see how far from Jesus you really are, one who proclaims to show others the way. What a sick joke.
(Print all this out and show it to your pastor to demonstrate your saintly and brave campaign of lunacy and certitude on behalf of whatever you consider God. You won't.)
You display a distinct incapacity for self-reflection. Here you are insisting on winning a dumb bullshit argument on the Internet to protect your own ego, casting stones all along the way. Quite embarrassing.
It's such a completely ridiculous display. No wonder people get so turned off to Christianity, getting pontificated to by pompous jerks. Who wants that message or that messenger?
All the leftists and the Jews and the commies and the atheists that everybody around here complains about were all just as certain as you are of their correctness and superiority, which makes you all exactly the same. You should find this disturbing but you will not.
You don't see the problem, and I suspect you will not because you cannot. Know for a fact that you have nothing to offer someone like me, and we will all see if you can simply depart in peace.
I forbid you to read anything I post in the future.
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
It's like people don't actually read this book. You'll have to guess which one I got it from. People just like to beat each other over the head with it.
Regrettable, and I reject such action. And don't bother replaying with, "That's what you just did!" because it will just make everyone laugh.
The way I see it, this current round even more so than the others, has little to do with technology and nothing to do with scientific principle. The old saying is, "spot me one miracle and I can prove the rest".
The LLM tech and anything else they care to point their fingers at are only to dazzle the population long enough to get that one free miracle. If you can get headhunters to believe that your Bic lighter is the power of fire given to you by the gods, the real power that gives you is limited only by your imagination.
The key observation of the miracle is apophatic: they carefully fail to define what "AI" is, and never even describe it's distinguishing characteristics. "AI" is that which they point to when they say "AI", having those properties that they declare it to have at that time. None can say differently by definition because, recall, there never was a definition.
So many people talk about occult magic: symbolism and dusty old books and what various fake-ass personas had to say. But they fail to see magic being done right before their eyes in 2023. Seriously, does magic need to be more "real" than what I just described?
80% of what doctors, lawyers and accountants do
You may want to look into the history of what were termed (<- past tense because no one talks about them any more) "expert systems":
Thus, in the late 1950s, right after the information age had fully arrived, researchers started experimenting with the prospect of using computer technology to emulate human decision making.
Here we are three-quarters of a century later. I sure didn't get a discount from my lawyer because he was using an expert system plugged into the wall doing the work for him.
I recall a professor talking a little about the development of these systems. Specifically, they would ask experts about their thought process and then replicate that in the machine One of the phenomena they uncovered was that the more proficient an expert was, the less able they were to articulate it. That suggests that, in principle, machines would never be able to do what people did. Time has borne that out.
They avoid writing it up in an explicit way, but expert systems were the fallback after the complete failure to develop artificial general intelligence. They spin the long history of failure as "AI winter", blaming it all on "lack of enthusiasm". It's pathetic.
Just like the Big Lie technique, these grifts are always more audacious than anyone suspects, and that's a big part of why they get away with them.
I'm just waiting for the day BidenBot 3000 whips out what appears to be a Magic 8 Ball, turns it over, and says America has to bomb Iran. Then everyone turns to each other and says, "What, are we not supposed to do what Artificial Intelligence tells us?"
Anyone who thinks that the Rockefellers, George Soros, and Bill Gates call any shots and actually set policy has not done nearly enough research. It's so far off it can be considered disinformation at this point.
An elderly Hungarian Nazi-collaborator Jew billionaire thinks Black Lives Matter goes to the top of his list of things to take care of before he kicks it? It's laughable.
I think we always have to keep in mind that the number of people pushing this degeneracy is very, very small. Everybody else is just along for the ride. Demonstrably, none of them ever thought it up by themselves.
My point is that if the force of this tiny group went away, everything would return back to normal. I would even go so far as to say that society would steadily improve, given that most people are inherently good and that numerous people work in the spirit of enlightenment and universal beneficence.
Yes, that was the series I watched in it's entirety and that I think comprises the bulk of her work. Fomenko isn't the focus, but comes up a lot as you're trying to put back together WTH really happened on this planet in the past.
Definitely "must-see" videos, in my book.
It finally crystallized for me just this morning that the purpose of this entire recent "AI" phenomenon is solely to convince everyone that "artificial intelligence" exists. Inherent in that is the sense that AI is or can be made to be superior to human intelligence.
You see, after that it's a direct move to "let the machines run everything". The idea sells itself. Jillions of people, both normies and the "awake", will go right along with it, having never developed enough human intellect to see through it for themselves.
Of course, after that, whatever catastrophes result can be explained quite simply: "Can you imagine how bad it would have been if the machines had not been in charge? Those who criticize SkyNet endanger us all!"
For anyone that cares to weigh in with some reply which is an elaboration along the lines of, "No, you're all wrong, AI does exist, and it is superior," then I welcome it as a perfect illustration of my point.
"They" have been planning this for quite some time, really since the dawn of modern "thinking machines". Here's something from half a century ago:
I like to think
(it has to be!)
of a cybernetic ecology
where we are free of our labors
and joined back to nature,
returned to our mammal
brothers and sisters,
and all watched over
by machines of loving grace.
"All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace" by Richard Brautigan (1967)
Not directly. Only through Sylvie Ivanowa's work, with one exception.
I read Chapter 1 of 'Tsar of the Slavs', which I found very rigorous and completely convincing of the facts that the Nativity was in what we call 1152 AD and the Crucifixion was in what we call 1185 AD. (I started to read Chapter 2 but it seemed way off and I didn't know if it was him or me so I just gave up.)
I matched exactly that work with other research by Sylvain Tristan and his book, "Re-Dating Ancient Greece: 500 BC = 1300 AD?" I watched a two-hour video presentation/interview on it someone posted here a bit ago, and that was enough for the penny to drop.
I would contend that the 1800 year gap that Tristan is seeing actually the gap from 600 BC to the time of Christ, ~1200 AD in Fomenko's new dating. All of real history got copypasta'd and misdated and jumbled throughout that period, but the point is that I already knew 600 BC was an extremely pivotal time in human history. There's no way that time gap is a coincidence.
Much, much longer story about 600 BC, but I almost never post about this stuff because you can see you have to have a decent grasp on a few things most people have never even heard of.
FWIW: I only ever saw one video on the "Ghost Cities" many years ago, so I wouldn't die on this hill, but the new construction was very, very shoddy. Totally unacceptable by American standards. If the superficial finish residential stuff I saw was bad, the more demanding infrastructure would have been significantly worse.
I think that even though their standards may be lower there, I suspect that if real people had ever actually relocated to them to any extent, we would have heard at least a small amount of, "Chinese complain their brand new cities suck dead donkey dick."
All this is a long way of saying I believe they were always just an enormous fascist grift by the (Communist In Name Only) CCP and developers and builders. No one was ever going to live there and no one ever did. Later, the corrupt fucks took their money, ran off to America, and are living in my neighborhood.
I would take this opportunity to add that The World's Most Horrible Dictator Since Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, is on to this grift and will not put up with it:
President Xi Chaired The July Politburo Meeting Today: Here's What Happened (ZeroHedge 7/28/2022)
On property, the statement restated "housing is for living in, not for speculation"... and highlighted that local governments should take responsibilities in "guaranteeing the delivery of homes",...
So now we start to see why They want you to think Xi is The World's Most Horrible Dictator Since Donald Trump.
Puts me in mind of this classic of classics from Orwell:
Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten... every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered... History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.
Long, long story--and you'll have to trust that I wouldn't say it unless I believed it and had the backup--but I recently came to the conclusion that all of "recorded history", from Herodotus to the present, has taken place in the last 850 years or so.
I found it so disturbing when Morpheus told Neo they didn't really know what year it was, but now I come to find out that Reality is literally more disturbing than the Matrix. You can only laugh at this point!
I have concluded it's not possible even to formulate an educated guess. People fantasize and fear, but that's about it.
You see, I've come to realize that the Satanic agenda weights over the globe like a person wearing a full set of knight's armor, and underneath it a bodysuit made of those lead dentist's X-ray drapes. It's like asking, "How fast can this person run a mile with some training?"
Pressing the same analogy without all the extra weight, it's still difficult to tell. Younger people won't remember this being a live question, but it was doubted by many that a human being could ever run a four minute mile. Then someone finally did. The odd thing is that now talented high-school runners can do it.
Maybe mid to late 90's or so. I saw this guy walking through the mall with a denim skirt, a Barbie backpack, a completely ill-fitting blonde wig (IDK if "ill-fitting" is the right term, because it was just sort of atop his head like a hat), and about 5 days of stubble.
I knew just from that experience that it was about something other than people wishing to snap their fingers and "become a woman" in a way undetectable to others.
Some years ago--researching a topic I don't remember--I stumbled on data which caused me to fundamentally distrust all these types of population stats. I write this up because it's a little different angle and a little easier to digest than the linked post.
Everyone thinks, "Well, maybe these numbers are not exact, but we can all agree there's some sound basis to them. Nope, I think they're just making a lot of them up at this point. They all have to be viewed through the lens of, "This is what They would have you believe," or "This is what They will admit to."
At that time, I wanted to know how prevalent Catholicism was in France, and I found this:
Roman Catholic 83%-88%
It stuck in my mind because, of course, I had always thought of Italy as the preeminent Catholic country. I don't remember what I found for Italy at the time, but it was significantly less.
When I went to search for that same stat a few years later, I found this:
Religion Facts: Religion in France
Christian (overwhelmingly Roman Catholic) 63-66%
Did it really fall that far in a couple of years? Seems unlikely. But if you look now in the Book of Knowledge, you'll find this:
Roman Catholicism (47%)
Down forty points in a decade? No, no population changes religion that fast, even if all the old people dying off were Catholic and all the young people were atheists.
"They" want to destroy organized religion, as well as the cultures into which such religions are integrated. Part of the war against them is to make them less popular, and the primary and easiest method of psychological warfare to achieve that is simply to tell everyone they're less popular.
Final observation: Note that the first number, probably closest to correct, was from the CIA itself. So over the course of the last 10-15 years, their lies have gotten much more egregious. I always claim that "They" are getting more desperate just in the recent past, and this is one more small, concrete reflection of that.
I found this to be shocking. Gotta be even more so for ((others))):
Most young Americans want Israel given to Hamas – poll: A survey has found that two-thirds of US adults under age 25 see Jews as “oppressors” (RT 12/16/2023)
I don't recall if I saw that one, but over the recent past there have been a number of "strange" stories involving the homeless disappearing (old links, may not work):
Is Denver "Disappearing" the Homeless?
Sudden disappearance of hundreds of homeless people from Salt Lake City
The Great Disappearance of 2009
This is just what I've collected very casually over time. Reeeeeeal creepy vibe when you put it all in a row like that, like the start of a horror movie. Joke's on us, though, we're living in it.
There's somewhat related to the last thing you said. I try to put up a low-key resistance to Simulation Theory. and I keep it low-key because--let's be honest--people don't want to hear about things they don't already believe.
But there's a huge problem: if we're in a simulation, then there can be no morality. At best "morality" would simply be what was arbitrated by the designers of the Simulation, and could be altered at any time in any fashion.
I've smoked hundreds of thousands of Stormtroopers and Covenant and Flood, but I don't feel bad because it was only a game. Nothing really counts. If They can persuade people that Reality itself is just a big game and nothing really counts, what then?
I would just put the finer point on it and say that it's not AI that's going to kill us, it will be the next genocidal ploy They are going to pull on us--whatever that may be--after which They'll say, "Uh, it was AI!"
And then all the dumb jerkoffs will say, "Called it!"
Quite odd. Maybe They finally sacrificed him, and this is Their disgusting little occult way of announcing it.
But since Gosch ushered in the "milk carton kids" program, let me use this opportunity to point something out I've never seen discussed elsewhere. These ads are not common any more, but the next time you see one take a good, close look at all the information on it.
I've noticed the strangest indications that make me think most or all of these are fake. For example, a 12yo that has been missing for 8 years, shown with an age-progressed photo. People change substantially over those years. How could they possibly do better than a potentially misleading guess? This is particularly true with women, due to what can be drastic changes in hair length, style, and color.
Not convinced? How about an ad for a girl missing since she was 20, and has been gone 40 years? Uhhh, pretty sure she'd be back by now if she was ever coming back, right? She never had the chance to ask someone for help in four decades, but someone's going to spot her on the street? Really?
And the thing is, aren't there any children that went missing yesterday, or last week, or last month? Aren't the chances of finding them astronomically higher?
Well, it all makes sense if no one is actually looking for these children (or adults and seniors, as we have seen), and this is all just a subtle part of the phony world people accept as Reality.
For those of an open and adventurous curiosity, I refer you to this article:
Military Raids NIH Biolab in Montana (RRN 12/8/2023)
The informant told the general’s office that he had seen NIH employees escorting a busload of “hypnotized homeless” into the secure compound. He assumed the passengers were homeless because they were unclean and unkempt and wore tattered clothes. And once they set foot inside the portentous lair, they never came out.
We saw the footage, eerie, surreal. Looked like they were in a trance, maybe drugged. The NIH guided them off the bus inside, and call me crazy, but I don’t think they were really there willingly. So, the individual who got the video, well, tracked the lab for a week, and he says they never left it,” our source said....
The man recounted a macabre tale to the Marines. The NIH had exposed the homeless to an aerosolized smallpox-hemorrhagic fever mutation. Over days, they developed boils and pustules that ruptured, and their organs shut down, and they bled out through every orifice on their bodies....
In closing, he shared a final tidbit of info: “The prisoner says that FEMA abducted the homeless off the streets of San Francisco ahead of Xi Jing’s visit. Our investigation is ongoing.”
"Co-opt Jesus"? Your type clearly thinks you own Jesus. Fuck me, maybe you think you are Jesus. Revolting.
For any sentient humans still reading this crap, let me take the opportunity to illustrate something. You see the mindset, how impervious it is? It didn't reason it's way into this and will surely never reason it's way out.
Take a step back and think about the Gaza Nakba. You ask yourself, "How could such an inhuman mass murder possibly be taking place, causing untold human suffering? How could anyone possibly be in support of it? Do you think it's all just down to campaign contributions and secret tapes of politicians fondling little boys? Of course not, that's absurd.
The real answer is simple: it's the pure thoughts and heroic deeds of the brave soldiers of the Almighty who are carrying out the will of God on the Earth and upholding His Law. They have not the slightest doubt that's exactly what they're doing, and that they will be blessed for it.
Imagine this brave warrior for Christ parked in front of John Hagee, getting pumped full of the Spirit of the Lord about blessing Israel. Why would anyone question themselves? God has commanded them and moved the souls and the hands of the Righteous. Now imagine 70 million such Christian Zionist fanatics just in the United States.
People wonder why Trump doesn't speak out against Israel. Look what I dealt with. Do you think it would be easier for Trump to suggest to those Zionist minions they just might possibly not be quite 100% on the money on an item or two?
Of course not. You can;t fix a fractured and malfunctioning persona with a tweet or two, or several social media posts as we have seen. This freak surely is now even more charged up, having suffered persecution in the name of Jesus. See how it works? See the problem we all have?
Anyway, I've never once used the "block" feature on any social media site in many years. If I have to use it now, just let me know.