2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

So now "hate speech" and "inciting violence" are not only allowed, they are morally praiseworthy, as long as i's against Russia and The Devil Putin. So when the Leftys previously condemned such things and persecuted their enemies for it, that must have been based on the moral principle that... that....

Oh, I get it. It's not that Leftys have a different set of moral principles, it's just that they don't actually have any at all.

by pkvi
3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

When you read the New Testament to see who got the worst condemnation from Jesus, you'd have to say it was either organized Jewry or hypocrites. But then what Jesus thought was worst in organized Jewry was that they were a bunch of hypocrites. So I guess we see clearly what Jesus was trying to tell us..

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey bud, member that 600 bucks I fronted you? Yeah, I'm gonna need that back. Love, Joe Biden aka "The Big Guy"

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you've seen some of these Civil War sites, you may be interested in this: American Civil War a Photographic History

The question is, "Just how fake is this major event in American history?" It's a rabbit hole I backed out of. Not because the evidence isn't there and isn't compelling, it was more like, "Okay, I'll have to come back and integrate this later. I just cannot handle it right now." LOL

5
Primate98 5 points ago +5 / -0

Quick, vote these heroes a few more billion US dollars! What a shame this didn't come in time to show behind "Big Z" at the Grammys. Maybe we can send these brave peacekeepers some of Trump's "cages for kids", since we don't need them to protect our "territorial integrity". /s

Seriously, it's quite baffling trying to figure out what these "people" are thinking. Can they actually be so deluded or misinformed that they think Ukraine is going to prevail militarily, and they're going to get a medal for this? Or are they just sociopaths, not able to do anything constructive so they just do what they can to vent their hostility and frustration? Puzzling.

For those who think the 2nd Amendment may one day come into play in the US, it's already in play. It's why this isn't happening in the US already.

6
Primate98 6 points ago +6 / -0

I found a mudflood building right in the small town I've lived in my whole life. More precise to say I finally recognized it for what it was, walking by one night. I was like, "Oh, so that's why there's a ramp down to a basement door right in one the middle parking spaces in front of the building."

It's all real, been there the whole time. We just never noticed how much of the world we never noticed, so now it all seems surreal.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

How could you say that? The "liberals" LOVE democracy! You know, we just all take a vote. And if it so happens that it doesn't go their way, well fuck that, that's not democracy at all.

8
Primate98 8 points ago +8 / -0

Could they make it more obvious that the endgame is close at hand? You know, with all the obviousness.

by bakahed
2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just FFed through the video, so I don't think he showed this, but on Alex's (first?) appearance on Rogan, Joe said, "Hey, let's get this out of the way. Look into that camera and tell everyone you're not Bill Hicks." So Jones smiles and launches off into a rant for like three minutes straight.

And never says he's not Bill Hicks.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know, if you told your parents or your best friend that you planned on marrying someone and they told you that they forbid it, you might say something like, "Thanks for your input and I'll think about what you said, but I'm an adult and can make my own decisions and take responsibility for this." You might even say something less polite.

So who exactly asked any government anywhere to regulate this for us? And why? And if you think you need to be controlled, do you think everyone else can't control themselves just like you?

3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ah, you reminded me of something I forgot to mention. I said the "volume" algo would be hard to detect, but you can compare the comment count to a hand count. Of course, no one ever does that, right? But if it's low it's easy and I've seen a number of times where displayed comments were less than the count. Must have been naughty boys and girls trying to say things that just weren't true!

Or maybe the comment counter is a Dominion voting machine.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

BHO was what I call a "simulant", with parts of his life real, and part Intel creation. The manufactured part was far larger in Obama than most.

That Frank Marshall Davis was "secretly" his "real" father was a part of the legend. They look nothing alike. Obama's biological father was Muhammad Subuh, founder of the Subud cult of Indonesia. Take a look a pics of him as a young man and he's a dead-ass ringer.

Loretta Fuddy, the State of Hawaii official who finally "produced" his birth certificate, was the highest-ranking American member of the Subud. Remember when she was the sole victim of that small plane crash?

And that brings up Stanley Ann Dunham, CIA and a member of Subud of course. Her actual name was almost certainly Ann Stanley Dunham. That links her to the Stanley family, which includes people like the Governor General of Canada the Stanley Cup is named after, to John Lennon's mother, to the "Dr. Livingstone, I presume" guy, and many others. See the work of Miles Mathis for more.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Makes you wonder if his marriage to Katy Perry was just another fake. If you're a hetero male, Katy should be enough to get your motor running but I never really detected any heat between them. Then again, she's probably frigid herself.

BTW, I wonder what JonBenet Ramsey would have looked like all grown up?

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bargaining chip? Maybe. A 3-star man would be worth a lot.

OTOH, I wonder if the Russians have any "black sites" used for "enhanced interrogation". Obama told me there's nothing illegal or even immoral about that. If this guy has been floating around Syria and Ukraine and who knows where else for the last decade, he must have some juicy intel just dripping out of that bald head.

This may be the last the world hears of the good General.

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've come to the conclusion that another hidden bonus feature on Reddit is something I think of as "volume". We know about banning and shadowbanning and "something went wrong" when trying to post, but all these are explicit or readily detected.

I think the "volume" feature limits engagement for users they don't care for. So if they turn down your volume to 20% for a while, your post or comment is shown to only 1 out of 5 others users that would otherwise have seen it. I don't think there would be an easy way to detect this externally.

I've posted some pretty spicy comments that got through okay, while at other times, I'll post the first comment with a long, thoughtful answer to an obviously sincere post asking a direct question, and then get neither reply nor upvote while there's all kinds of BS engagement posted afterwards.

I can certainly imagine programming this, so I have to imagine they have too.

11
Primate98 11 points ago +11 / -0

The interpretation that occurred to me is that the story was manufactured as another psyop to promote the narrative, "The shots are so safe! Didn't you hear about that dude that got 90? He's totally fine! They're just so crazy in Germany and Florida."

You can see that in the stupid wording: "allegedly had himself vaccinated". Well did he get 90 shots or did he not? Even if he did, no one has to "allege" that because it isn't a crime. The CIA needs a better scriptwriting intern.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

When the subject of documentation of the Holohoax comes up, Exhibit #1 is always the Protocol produced during the Wannsee Conference of 1942. They even made a propaganda movie about it: Conspiracy (2001 film). Kenneth Branagh and the other top Nazis plan the dirty deed right before your very eyes!

SPOILER ALERT: There was a conference, but they're lying about what was discussed and concluded (see The Wannsee Conference Myth). And the "sole surviving copy of the Protocol" is phony (see The Wannsee Conference Protocol: Anatomy of a Fabrication).

Bet nobody here saw that coming!

EDIT Just noticed this in the page for Evidence and documentation for the Holocaust:

The Nazis used figures of between 9 and 11 million for the Jewish population of Europe, as evidenced in the notes of the Wannsee Conference.

They just cannot quit!

4
Primate98 4 points ago +4 / -0

My guess is that this "brave Ukrainian soldier" is an American military contractor employed by the CIA for Zelensky's PSD (and also to make sure he doesn't run off before they're done with him). He doesn't give a rat's ass about the flag as long as the deposits show up in his account.

by pkvi
3
Primate98 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, there's quite a bit floating around out there. Here's one example: Nazi High Command Dead in Failed Zelensky/CIA Rescue Attempt (warning/graphic)

Once you get a look at actual people dead on a battlefield, you realize just how fake and ghey all the "victims" are in the various psyops. When you see it, you know why soldiers really do not like talking about their battlefield experiences. It's disturbing in a way that can't be described in words, and very alien to normal human existence.

9
Primate98 9 points ago +9 / -0

Everyone in the Ukrainian military leadership, by the time they got to assess the damage, would have known for a fact that the situation was militarily hopeless--totally unrecoverable--by the end of the first day. Of course they would have communicated this to the political leadership, who should have immediately asked the Russians for a ceasefire and their terms.

A clear demonstration of this is the numerous examples of professional Ukrainian soldiers of the regular military simply changing clothes and walking off the job. They knew there was no conceivable way to prevail, and probably very little worth fighting for.

All the blood, including so much from the Ukrainian people, is on the hands of the Ukrainian leadership, the oligarchy, the rabid neo-Nazi dogs, and their Neo-Liberal masters. They show absolutely no remorse, and seek only the continuance of bloodshed. It's distressing to know such monsters walk among us.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was going to say "Ashkenazi Jew", because every person I know who's gotten tested just so happens to be partially Ashkenazi Jew. But I guess that's not a genetic predisposition. Scientifically speaking, it's "being the Chosen People of G-d".

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Them"? Looks like "one", and he was released the same day. I also said "early funders", and you're not really showing us either ""early" or "funders", are you?

But I think we're all still waiting on your definition of "Nazi". Maybe I just missed it in your jpg.

1
Primate98 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you may have missed the point that his behavior changed dramatically right after the Russian intervention. I would also disagree that they threatened his life right after installing him into the presidency. But thanks for your careful read and insights.

2
Primate98 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps you should give us your definition of "Nazi" and then describe how they do not satisfy it. (Here's a secret: Hitler got his early funding from Jewish Zionist bankers)

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›