I took a quick look at the subject and studied these key sources: Melchizedek and Sydyk.
Very long and convoluted story short, I wouldn't waste too much time on this issue because I suspect most or all of the scholarship on it is erroneous and misleading. SPOILER ALERT: Sydyk is the son of who we know better as Satan.
However, if you're really interested I'd be happy to answer any questions!
I think Trump was on to the shenanigans to some extent. I never researched the details, but the key fact was that he was something like an hour late starting his speech. On his big day, right? Doesn't add up.
I think this delay threw a monkey wrench in the works, because it turned out they kicked off the "rioting" before any Trump fans who had stayed to the end of his speech had time to walk to the Capitol.
And of course, Trump himself never went, even after he said something like, "Now let's walk down to the Capitol and...." (<-- "us", first person plural).
Here's something surprising: the Nazis didn't actually burn any books, so Zelenzky & Co. is already topping them. I documented this in a thread where I was commenting on Amazon "virtually" burning books. You can see me arguing with a dumbass that prefers his preconceptions over researching history:
One of my favorite quotes about Killary is from way back in 1974, when that young, fresh-faced go-getter was hired as a staff attorney for the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate investigations. She was fired by her supervisor Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat. Oh, but why, Jerry, why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
Hillbeast's Wiki page sums it up this way:
By then, Rodham was viewed as someone with a bright political future.
Well, if you think about, you can't say they're wrong, can you?
Shocking Revelations about Hillary Clinton's Watergate Committee Job 4/2/2008
For anyone pursuing this angle to the conflict, you may want to look more closely into why Russia held the capture of Chernobyl to be a primary military objective. They've been pretty closed-mouth about it, though, and you'll have to scrape hard.
The same applies to the even more mysterious Snake Island. Why would anyone fight over some dumb rock in the Black Sea with no weapons installations evident on it? Something under there someone would like to share with the class?
Yes, that's the quote. The operative phrase that everyone glosses over is:
...who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins....
C'mon, what could he be hinting at, right?
I watched Childs' entire presentation and could not find a thing to disagree with. That he reveals it to be cloaked Satanism was no surprise to me, but he compiles a hell of a lot of evidence for anyone who doubts it. So then past that, behind Satanism is that one faction of Anunnaki. With study you find that the "paganism" and "polytheism" of the Bible also just cloaks that same faction of the Anunnaki. The more you study, the more the see the intersections and the harder it gets to dismiss.
If you're wondering, I've considered the possibility that TPTB just planted all the evidence I've amassed in an effort to derail people such as myself. I find it ridiculous to think that They put so much effort into trying to deceive the one out of a million people that not only encounters the evidence, but give it credence and pursues research on it. I may even be overestimating that it's one in a million.
For resources, I would recommend the classic researcher Zecharia Sitchin. Now interestingly, I've only read a couple of paragraphs of his work and watched a couple of his short presentations, which was all very, very good. I don't know if you want to bother with the same path I did, but I knew he was controversial so I intentionally avoided his work to come to my conclusions independently. AFAIK, we came to the same conclusions, which would be shocking were it not simply the truth.
I would also recommend this researcher and his classic, Lloyd Pye - Everything You Know Is Wrong -The Hidden/Suppressed History of the Human Race. Also very good is the work of Michael Tellinger, but he may have went off the rails a little in the past few years with the "mud fossil" material. Although IDK, maybe he's completely correct.
The big operative change for me, and for you if you pursue these ideas, is that when you accept the "Anunnaki hypothesis" as possible, you'll begin to see the evidence you encounter in a new light. There is much evidence concerning the Anunnaki that is simply misinterpreted by the mainstream. I've collected many hundreds of pieces of such evidence from mainstream publications.
Anyway, good luck with your studies. Always happy to hear from a fellow research any time, so don't be shy!
100%, although the link may be indirect in a certain fashion.
I have positively identified the entity we know as "Satan" (and by many other names) to be one of the Anunnaki. So any sort of Satanic ritual is ultimately, in a technical sense, service to this faction of the Anunnaki.
That being said, we should be very careful to understand precisely what we are dealing with when confronted by any type of "Satanism". That is, the local edgelord that dresses in black, wears an upside-down cross, and constantly shows the mano cornuto is just a horny dumbass who wants to bang hot goth chicks who hate their fathers. Is that Satanism or service to the Anunnaki? Not really, in my book, although I do think it's corrosive to the human spirit.
OTOH, even at highest levels of our "leadership", they may believe that through ritual and sacrifice, they serve a divine entity from another realm who grants them power through magic and is known as Lucifer. Well, the Anunnaki are neither divine, nor from another realm, nor possess magical powers (but simply advanced technology). But we're very close to what we might properly call "Satanism".
I will say that I do not know whether, at the very highest levels, our "leaders" are aware of what I just told you. I theorize that at every level except the highest, they are given a set of lies to believe. The dumb ones believe, and the smart ones make themselves believe.
Look up Saul Alinsky's dedication of his book "Rules for Radicals" and read it very, very closely. Saul knows at least something about what's up.
Yeah, they keep talking about these new gun control laws to prevent people from getting shot, but doesn't everyone think they should just make laws against the unjustified shooting of people? Then everyone would have to follow that law.
Ole Dammegard has talked a lot about this "one shoe" phenomenon.
On a personal note, I was once expressing my doubts about the Holocaust(tm) to someone. She replied, "I've been to the Holocaust Museum and they had a huge pile of shoes from the victims. It definitely happened." I said, "Do you think there's been a murder every time you see a loose shoe laying around?"
Well, maybe yes. Perhaps the CIA discovered during MK-Ultra that there's an anomaly in the human psyche where "lone shoe = dead person" or something like that, and they've been exploiting that flaw ever since.
First, I would say that I don't consider the Nephilim a separate alien species, since they were the hybrid offsring of humans and Anunnaki. But you're correct that it's very important to make the distinction.
Also, I have little to go on but some or all Dracos or Reptilians may be Anunnaki in their more natural form. I'm still up in the air on that since there is very little to go on. I think when the Anunnaki lived among humans it was held to be extremely taboo to portray them accurately. But do look up the "Ubaid figurines", which may have been made before this rule came into force.
It may sound disappointing, but no, I don;t think we'll have any Star Trek type scenario any time soon. But on the flip side, I think they're already around and some walk among us.
If you study giants, you'll find that they existed in historical times, the recent past, and even now. These people are giants because they contain some amount of Anunnaki hybrid genetics. So you could technically say they're aliens walking among us. The same seems to go for anyone with the Rh- blood group (like my mother!).
We also have the "conehead" people. I haven't been able to fit them into the scheme yet, but they most certainly existed. Look up the "Paracas skulls" to get started there. Research the pharoah Akhenaten, who seems to have been one of them. Also look up a high-level banker named Karen Hudes, who reports having been in meetings of "people who run the world" types where a conehead was present.
The best other example of an alien I know is the "Starchild" skull, which seems to be neither human nor conehead.
I have been an incredible fan of sci-fi my entire life, but I found reality far stranger and more fascinating.
Not quite what you're looking for but this may point you in a fruitful direction and save you some time: the Anunnaki are real, while Roswell and the Battle of Los Angeles were fake. Most people will tell you the opposite
I should clarify and and say that both Roswell and LA were real in the sense that they were actual hoaxes put on by the military in Intelligence.
Feel free to AMA, of course :)
The plot thickens. I clicked around for a while and, long story short, I suspect someone faked the Robb school calendar.
Robb is about 4.6 times larger Batesville, it's sister school in the same district (source). I compared the two calendars and found them both to be very sparse. The Uvalde HS calendar is crammed with events and looks totally legit.
With Batesville there are many events listed as being at the school itself. For Robb, I had to go back to 3/31 for the 1st Annual STEM Fair.
Also odd were things like the 3/10 entry for the 3rd Grade School Dance with no time or location, and no entries for 2nd or 4th Grade dances. Seems ageist.
But a final twist on Batesville: Google Maps lists it as "Temporarily closed". Yet it still had more events on site that the much larger Robb?
PS: If you're really researching this I noticed something on street view that I haven't seen anyone mention. The school is constructed like the ones I went to where there are few or no interior hallways, just covered walkways next to and between buildings. So for one, you can't move from room to room without being outside. Also, someone hears gunshots outside and props open the door to their classroom?
The silence informs you it was a real incident. It actually doesn't even matter that the elements of it don't serve the narrative, the problem is that because they're not making it up they don't control all the elements. Now compare to Buffalo and Uvalde.
This is consistent with Jim Stone's reporting on actual events that morning. The pasty showed up in the parking lot and fired one shot at the school, then (this being Texas) a concealed carrier shot him. This was covered by the local Fox affiliate in a report since vaporized, but see Jim's site for a screenshot.
This would have been the patsy's medevac flight.
I've personally never seen an interview with single "white supremacist", not even a fake one. I think they're petrified that someone they're trying to label "white supremacist" may say something that makes sense, if given a chance to speak freely on his views.
Going back about three decades, some may remember "Daniel the KKK Guy" from the Howard Stern Show. On one episode, they were trying to actually get at his psychology, for why he didn't like black people. Daniel finally said, "Oh no, I don't dislike black people. I just like white people."
Going by today's standard, though, such admission may be deserving of summary execution.
I guess we gotta go with completely fake. Someone just posted this: Receipts of the Active Shooter training held at Uvalde High School jus two months ago and Robb Elementary school having been permanently closed.
Remember when they showed us photos of the Sandy Hoax kids evacuating the school, which had obviously been staged the previous fall? They didn't even bother with those kind of photos with Uvalde. Should we be insulted?
I just saw a headline today that said something like, "Trump takes veiled shot at Abbott in speech," so the read would be that he knows more about Abbott and is trying to low-key wave people off, or maybe even message to Abbott to straighten out.
Funny story about Rogan: Adam Curry from the No Agenda podcast says that he felt bad about Rogan miving. The reason was that, by talking up Austin so much to Rogan over the years he'd lived there, that he convinced Joe to move. But right when Rogan was moving in, Curry was moving out because the place was by that time unbearable.
Off topic, but a fun fact about the Vietnam War and in honor of Memorial Day, I submit a tiny correction to Tracey's tweet: the first casualty of that war was September 26, 1945. You read that right, not even two months after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
There are a couple of kickers, one being that he was an Army officer but worked for the OSS (CIA). The other should hit you like a kick to our collective balls:
Just before Dewey left for Saigon airport to head home, he filed his last report on Vietnam. In a hauntingly ominous observation, he wrote: 'Cochinchina (South Vietnam) is burning; the French and British are finished here, and we ought to clear out of Southeast Asia.'
Just think what might NOT have been. I'm sure chickens were sacrificed to Moloch that he didn't make it home. Anyway, the full story is told here:
A. Peter Dewey: The United States’ First Casualty in Vietnam
I got an entire "education" through a bachelor's degree without ever hearing the term "non-falsifiable", and that included an entire college-level course specifically called "Critical Thinking". I just checked my textbook and it's not even in the index.
In retrospect, I conclude that this was by design and not by accident, and it's what allows Scary Poppins and a hundred thousand others just like her and worse to make these kinds of claims quite freely.
Good old Vladimir Vladimirovich made a somewhat related comment a few years ago. He was asked if Russia would launch a response if attacked with strategic nuclear response, and--if so--what would be the point?
'Aggressors Will Be Annihilated, We Will Go to Heaven as Martyrs,' Putin Says
Ukraine will surely demand a full, international investigation, as they were previously quite suspicious of the work of the Red Cross: Ukraine pleads with Red Cross not to open office near its border in Russia (3/28/2022)