Yeah, Newsmax is another one of these phony "pay"-triot entities that sprung to prominence (I would say were "activated") after the 2020 election. Everyone is taking a while catching up to the idea that controlled opposition works precisely because you're a fan.
Here's one example among many that tip their hand:
Report: Newsmax CEO Donates $1 Million to Clinton Foundation (Breitbart 2/19/2015)
I think the offer was legitimate, and here's my analysis.
The West in 2019 was many years into their Russophobia program and took every opportunity--real or manufactured--to bad-mouth them. So suppose they suspected this was some was some kind of BS gambit, or maybe they were going to get mailed a bunch of welded-together parts for a '74 Lada. Why not take those damn Russkies up on it?
If they never come through, then it's, "Look at these untrustworthy liars!" If it's old car parts, then it's, "Look at this primitive nonsense! Also untrustworthy liars!" For that matter, if they get a missile that goes Mach 10 and hits like Jesus, then it's, "Look at this primitive nonsense! Also untrustworthy liars!"
But no, they didn't see any advantageous scenario here so they flushed it down the memory hole. To me, it was yet another instance where Russia was trying to avoid what finally, in Ukraine 2022, proved ultimately to be unavoidable. I wonder how many Western "volunteers" have gotten smoked by Kinzhals?
I think that when he said "spending", he really meant that billions and billions wouldn't end up in the right pockets:
Russia offered to sell Trump hypersonic weapons – Putin (RT 9/5/2019)
WTH kind of arms race can you have if your "enemy" just hands you the equipment to keep it even?
I suppose I'd be worried if I thought for one second that any other military in the world threatened the people of the United States of America or their rights. Note that this is distinct from the "national interests" that everyone talks about, but which bear no correlation to any--let alone every--ordinary American.
It seems that now several do, in fact, threaten the Western neo-imperialist agenda, of which the US military is the main enforcer, and for which the US taxpayer is forced to finance. In that case, "They" may have something to worry about.
I'm reminded of Richard Pryor, who said "nigger" all the time, excessively. I never heard him confirm this aloud, but years later I came to the conclusion that this was his personal program to diminish and destroy the power of the word. I would say he got us a lot of the way there.
Where would we be as a society if he'd had the long and illustrious career he should have? Of course, no one like him would be allowed to exist anymore, and I think we can see why.
PS: Pryor famously went to Africa at the height of his fame, long before Chappelle did so. One of the remarks he made when he came back is that he looked around and didn't see any niggers, because there were no niggers there.
Can anyone think of any voice in the popular culture telling blacks to stop thinking of themselves as niggers, and therefore not to react if someone calls them that? Me neither. Rather very much the opposite, yes?
The fertility rate in the United States dropped below replacement in 1971, over half a century ago:
US Births Dip to 30-Year Low; Fertility Rate Further Below Replacement Level (NPR 5/17/2018)
This fact seems to be virtually unknown in the popular conscious. (One should also note that NPR was publishing such material that runs directly contrary to the Establishment narrative less than five years ago.)
As for Roswell, we have to put a fine point on it. It wasn't that a UFO crashed, and it wasn't that nothing happened. The government hoaxed a UFO crash and then manufactured both a coverup and an exposure.
It's not like it was a one-off, either, The Battle of Los Angeles was another government hoax, and I am heavily suspicious of both the 1952 DC UFO flap and Rendlesham Forest,
You don't need any occult sources to figure out the most important parts of the truth about this. In fact, I've never learned anything of value from any occult writings. The best I've seen are corrupted and distorted versions of tiny elements of the truth, so far off you'd have to already know the truth to unwind them correctly.
It's all a very, very, very long story, but if I could put the pieces together I think anyone else can do the same. I might be wrong about that, though, who knows?
As far as the Babalon Working, I consider it just more occult narrative invented to fascinate the underinformed with nonsense. The city of Babylon, however, is key.
I've noticed that Babylon comes up incredibly often, as it just did, but that it stops right there. I never hear anyone press further, or even put together two sensible sentences about it. It may as well be Mordor or Tatooine.
The question that should arise (but doesn't) is: what's so important about Babylon that it keeps coming up over and over?
And the answer can't be, "Because it's mentioned so many times in the Bible." That just brings up the question, "Why is it mentioned so many times in the Bible?"
Probably none is this is a good answer. Just ranting late on a Saturday night, I suppose!
Thanks for the link! Talking about secret messages, have you seen this one?
(Hint: the circle is now complete!)
Yeah, it's fake all right, but a pretty good one as fakes go. I'll add in a couple of items to your analysis:
-
Roberts and Maxwell are both casting shadows slightly down and to the viewer's right. Andrew is casting no shadow at all, even though his should be the most plain and sharp against the white wall behind him.
-
There's black line on his belly next to Roberts, even though nothing is black in that area: his light blue shirt, her white top, the white wall.
I suppose my conclusion would be that Roberts was a limited hangout. Her accusations always seemed quite tame to me: sexual contact that was not strictly legal in the country they were in at the time.
Andrew can't admit to this, of course, but neither did he specifically say the photo was faked, which I now find a crucial point. He said he never met her, so why not just say someone faked the picture?
Well, that brings to our consciousness that "someone" exists who did the faking. We should go looking for that person, right? But that's not what They wanted. They just wanted us endlessly and pointlessly discussing what a jerk and a perv and a liar Andrew is, and how the Elites always get away with it.
And what does Maxwell's comment mean? I've long suspected that Maxwell turned state's evidence, and she knows the deeper truth about Andrew and many others.
Many would ask why she and her handlers don't just come out with it? Because the vast majority of people "can't handle the truth". Anyone disagree? Just show this picture around telling people it's fake and see how many say, "Oh yeah? You're right! Well, what do you think is going on?"
The smoke surrounding this story is beyond blinding.
What could be the complaint about living conditions for 400 people in a ship that hasn't been afloat since 2017? Is it supposed to be a big deal to live in a 95% empty skyscraper lying on it's side? And how does it compare to when it's at sea with 6000 people crammed on board and a mini-airport on the roof?
But who knows what the truth is, because there are almost no facts or lies to go on.
You should also take a step back and wonder why architects and historians aren't asking exactly the same question, or are satisfied repeating trite, obviously incorrect "explanations".
I would suggest the conclusion is that the forces responsible for the destruction of the society that created these structures all across the globe does not want us consciously aware of that destruction.
Further, the fact that the silence and obfuscation persists to this day is evidence that the same forces of destruction just mentioned are active to this day.
I can understand why they want to control Vitamin C so bad.
A few years back during the the Ebola scare, Jim Stone did a writeup on how Ebola and other "hemorrhagic fevers", as terrifying as they are supposed to be, were really just acute cases of scurvy. They could be cured by massive ingestion of Vitamin C or if very bad, taken intravenously.
Since Vitamin C costs pennies and even intravenous treatments can be done by any med tech for a handful of dollars, well, we can't have this kind of info being spread around, can we?
That there was staging was obvious from Day One, in a way that I have never seen analyzed publicly.
Think of two scenes: one of the intruders sitting calmly around Pelosi's office, and the other of the chaotic scene in front of the doorway where Ashley Babbitt was murdered. Got those in your mind's eye?
Here's the thing: Nancy Pelosi's office is about halfway up the hall behind those glass doors. So try to work out exactly when those "insurrectionists" were hanging out in the office.
Are we supposed to believe they walked in far ahead of the crowd, browsed around unmolested for a while, walked back out, and only then security decided to barricade the doors, reacting with literally terminal intensity?
Please do reply if you believe such a thing, because I'm sure we'd all like to note down your username for future reference.
When was all the footage of QAnon Buffalo and all those other crisis actors really taken? Could have been any time, but definitely not January 6th.
I believe there are certain other, deeper factors at work, but in the immediate circumstance, as put by John Taylor Gatto, the ultimate imperative of the "educational system" is the extinction of the human imagination. Evidence for this is borne out in the following:
Didn't think something like that could come from NASA, didya?
I wouldn't worry about this too much. The far bigger problem, in my view, is that people do not examine the evidence available that counters all the official narratives.
Worse, they have no skills to do so. and believe that only a person anointed "expert" by the mainstream possesses the skills to render a judgement, and that such judgment may not be questioned by anyone for any reason.
Worse, they live in atavistic fear of a world where the grownups are not taking care of running it's affairs, as they have no confidence in themselves to cope with it otherwise.
Worse, it is beyond the power of their imagination to believe that they are being deceived on such a grand scale, and they simply lack the ability to conceptualize it, let alone evaluate the evidence.
As a reminder, this is in a city where, not even two years ago, there was a military presence at least twice the size of that in the Battle of Fallujah. But here, not a single cop car has it's lights on.
Also, there appear to be no service vehicles or personnel. I'm no HVAC expert, but I would think the night watchman would call Facilities before something really got out of hand.
You know how people are, especially the notably easily triggered liberals infesting DC: the police and local news would have been flooded with calls from citizens concerned that this was the "MAGA Apocalypse" they'd been warned about over and over.
Final note: the lights were on in the 7th floor, where all the bigwigs reside.
Will we even get an official lie? I doubt it. It was too serious and "They" want consciousness of it to evaporate like steam.
My guess would be more mysterious explosions at the FBI. And mysterious explosions at other locations. And a sharp increase in mysterious military activities and sounds mysteriously similar to gunfire.
Even with all this virtually everyone will move along with their lives as normal because they don't know what else to do. The only question on their minds will be, "Does any of this mean I don't have to go to work in the morning?"
I would connect this to cybernetics and the "Sentient World Simulation" project:
THE SENTIENT WORLD SIMULATION: UPLOADING YOUR MIND TO A DIGITAL WORLD
In short, the Dark Luciferians wish to control the world and everyone in it as if it were a giant machine. Crucial to that is the ability to model that world. Today that would be done in a computer, but you can see the same idea traced back centuries in the "Domesday Book", but it certainly goes all the way back.
There are a couple of levels of insight which we may gain here. One was brought up in the movie "America: Freedom to Fascism". Aaron Russo mentions that the Elite never want to do anything so ordinary as watch a football game. Why? Because they don't know the outcome. And that, of course, is pretty much the only reason an ordinary person wants to watch. So I would say the Dark Luciferians are interested in "knowing the outcome" of the entire world.
On a far deeper level, I believe that They live in an atavistic fear of the future that they are unable to relieve. What are these chaotic Sheeple going to do next, and will they turn on us and rip out our guts? The only way to escape that crushing psychic pressure is to be able to predict and control with certainty what will happen. I believe this is one of the main functional drivers of Their program.
Readers of this site may wish to compare and contrast that analysis to the information brought forward in this article:
Regime Change In Riyadh? The CIA Has Just Publicly Dumped MbS (10/28/2018 originally at ZeroHedge)
Of course, FT, ZeroHedge, SGT Report, and even the reader may still agree that he is certainly a pitiless murderer. That agreement may not be quite so certain after reviewing this:
The Jamal Khashoggi Hoax (6-pge PDF, and yes I know well that MM is disinfo, but everyone is free to validate the evidence brought forward for themselves)
So then one must explain to oneself why--if MbS is indeed an asset and a dictator--there is all this lying and hoaxery surrounding him? Simply to confuse us? I would submit that anyone who holds a view advanced endlessly by the mainstream is indeed confused.
My best guess: FBI traitors are working late into the night down in the basement, shoveling documentation of their treason and corruption into the incinerator so fast that it's causing the boiler to overheat, and the extreme overpressure has to be released explosively by a relief valve on the roof.
Clearly, someone told the police and fire to back way off. In fact, they were told to keep it so on the downlow that there aren't even any cops visible to tell passersby, "Move along, just a normal series of explosions in the nation's militarized capital. Don't you have an extended series of explosions to watch at home? Nothing to be seen here, move along."
The subject of the dating of the Shroud--and thus it's authenticity--comes up in the book "Tsar of the Slavs" by Russian academician Anatoly Fomenko, but in a quite unexpected way.
In Chapter 1, he closely examines the hypothesis that Jesus was born in what we call the year 1152 AD, and was crucified in what we call the year 1185 AD. He takes a very, very close look at the work done on dating the Shroud and finds that the original results were consistent with 1185 AD. These results, however, were later rejected and obfuscated, presumably by those who were looking for other dates to confirm other hypotheses.
This all sounds quite ridiculous until you examine the 5 other independent lines of strong evidence he exhibits supporting the 1152-1185 AD dates. For those familiar, this ties in with Sylvie Ivanowa's presentations indicating that the "Middle Ages" were in fact just a few centuries after the birth of Christ.