What if "being" implies effect (living) within cause (process of dying)?
cannot
What can nothing? How could nothing? Where could nothing? Who could nothing? Why would nothing?
math
a) Addition (inception) Subtraction (death) Multiplication (intercourse for offspring) Division (being partial within whole)...mathematics based on perceivable oneness.
b) the inversion thereof represents suggested MATH, noun - "a moving; aftermath" based on adding, subtracting; multiplying and dividing from 0 (nothing).
c) suggested math is based on problems, perceivable math implies being the temporary problem (living) struggling to sustain self within ongoing solution (process of dying)
picture
Aka the suggestion of a captured moment, tempting those who consent to ignore the perceivable momentum of ongoing motion aka the perceivable moment aka "now".
Because you cannot into math. You didn't need the picture to tell us you are an idiot.
Consider WORLD (whole perceivable) VIEW (each perceiving partial). The few invert this by suggesting a worldview based on mass consensus.
What if "being" implies effect (living) within cause (process of dying)?
What can nothing? How could nothing? Where could nothing? Who could nothing? Why would nothing?
a) Addition (inception) Subtraction (death) Multiplication (intercourse for offspring) Division (being partial within whole)...mathematics based on perceivable oneness.
b) the inversion thereof represents suggested MATH, noun - "a moving; aftermath" based on adding, subtracting; multiplying and dividing from 0 (nothing).
c) suggested math is based on problems, perceivable math implies being the temporary problem (living) struggling to sustain self within ongoing solution (process of dying)
Aka the suggestion of a captured moment, tempting those who consent to ignore the perceivable momentum of ongoing motion aka the perceivable moment aka "now".