This could be a coincidence, but I wonder if they manipulated the numbers to get another 666. It's sourced to a CDC report, and it should be clear to everyone now that they manipulate data. Perhaps a joke by a satanist / illuminatus who works there.
Glorious 144p.
The question of whether or not he's a fraud relates to whether or not the Kennedies, in general, are controlled opposition. Fritz Springmeier names them as an illuminati family and Miles Mathis gives evidence that the death of both JFK and RFK were staged. In the case of JFK he points (among other things) to photos of the reactions of bystanders. Those don't make sense, anyone in that position would photograph the president who had just been shot instead. That suggests it's a psy-op. Also, most people in the footage are very still and it's been suggested (by others) that those are mannequins, that'd also explain how 100+ of them were dead two years later: they were simply identities that were phased out. (Although I'm sure a lot of people were actually murdered as part of the cover-up as well, but not the bulk of them.) And regarding RFK: in this photo of his alleged assassination, the man is laying his hand beneath RFK's head, but he hand is completely invisible, that's the clearest evidence that it's been tampered with. But see Mathis's paper The Hidden Kings for more information. This paper was narrated perfectly by someone on Bitchute called Redline Aviator but he changed his name and I cannot easily find it now, but luckily we don't mind reading things ourselves.
Only a few cips where you cant see their feet (Suggesting they may be on trampolines), where they "jump".
No, they were hanging from threads in those scenes. They used the same method that's applied in theatre productions sometimes.
We should counter this by making an antisemitic bot.
More like Dalai Lame.
Your quotes address the point: over time it became equated with individual gods, and Hadad most prominently. Although it does remain somewhat mysterious which god is being worshipped in the modern day. Clinton mentioned Moloch instead of Baal / Hadad in the Podesta emails. Freemasons worship Lucifer (and all the signs in OP's picture are Masonic signs). So 'Baal worship' may not be precisely the right term, although it's in the same spirit.
After 0:51 when she mentions them meeting over several years, Billy shakes his head but not in denial of what she's saying, rather as if to say: don't go there. He can demand that of her. The whole interview is held just to give people a semblance of having critical media. When an independent journalist tries to interview Klaus Schwab, he goes: "no, thank you," that's a more telling moment of the real situation. That's what you get when you allow spy agencies like the CIA to exist.
They've had a hidden political control for thousands of years, but traditional values are in fact antithetical to what the illuminati want; they keep them out of people's daily lives. Furthermore, it's like calling for Nuremberg 2.0: a flawed concept upon scrutiny, but it's about the sentiment that's being conveyed. Explaining the details can be reserved for a later point in time. We have to use rhetorics to reach the masses first.
Straight from the WHO.
Straight from the WHOrse's mouth.
Can you just post the picture? I don't have an Instagram, and neither should you.
Here's another hashtag people can use to counter the NWO: #OldWorldOrder, representing an allegiance to traditional values.
Thanks. Kind of ironic that Youtube is still the most functional. I feel like more videos should be uploaded to Dtube for better permanence.
It starts with bigfoot. Soon they'll 'discredit' real, important footage simply by having AI fill in some gaps. (Or the opposite: they'll point to a few details and convince people that it's an AI glitch and the whole video is a deepfake, when it's real.)
Check out a pleasant surprise I encountered when I typed "was 9/11 an inside job" on Yahoo. That search engine still feels like it remained in the '00s, including in terms of results. That link is a bit of a limited hangout compared to what we know in this community, but the results are miles ahead of the propaganda Google feeds you. Brave Search is decent as well.
It isn't a bad idea to use the CDC's data, this way you take it straight from the horse's mouth. The problem is that they aren't interpreting the data correctly.
Projecting a life expectancy based on an average age people die is very misleading. If you can comprehend this text, your life expectancy is above average because you didn't die as a baby. Likewise, if you've taken multiple shots, but the last one was more than a month ago, it seems that it didn't kill you in the short term. The average age for people in your category may be 55, but your life expectancy is still higher than that. The anomalies drag the average down significantly. In my opinion they should separate the people who didn't die within a month of receiving the last booster from the ones who did. Presumably the others have a lower life span because of immune system damage, but we don't know yet by how much that shortens their lives.
Your content was not found.
By claiming that he'll probably get away with it, you're vibrating the energies that make it a reality. Check out this talk by Mark Passio.