▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes of course it will. We were not part of the cosmos but designed and built from it. Form came out of flow and has imparted within this form the natural ability and desire to do the same. Sin disconnects our understanding of the relationship between the self and others.

▲ 1 ▼
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Faith is a journey. There are plenty of confirmations of the core truths. It is made evident through the internal transformation of the individual.

Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1

Sin separates us from God. It interferes with the way things were designed to work. Faith in the divinity and sacrifice of Christ will save folks from the consequences of their sin. It will also transform their hearts and minds.

You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. James 2:22

I know many Christians who are scientists and critical thinkers. We’re taught to trust but verify. We’re called to critically examine the prevailing consensus:

Do not be conformed to this age, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may discern what is the good, pleasing, and perfect will of God. Romans 12:2

▲ 7 ▼
KiloRomeo 7 points ago +7 / -0

We will want to hold the line as long as possible or they’ll just move the front

by Epona
▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

You’re free to post about those things that you think are “real”.

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

My take on it is that it’s more of a zombification than mind control. Some of the social media tech is more mind control. Either way, both effect seasoning and dopamine response pathways and over time can lead to conditioned responses. TV, light, sound, and temperature pulses cause a sync in neural activity which is perceived as relaxing / rewarding. The blockchain aspect suggests a more direct conscious reward ie operant conditioning being combined with the classical associative conditioning of v1.0

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

If we put these all on a timeline and mapped those involved we’d discover some interesting patterns.

▲ 1 ▼
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

This should be enough evidence to clearly cease the trials for use in children. Yet they continue which indicates intentional harm.

▲ 8 ▼
KiloRomeo 8 points ago +8 / -0

“Antisemitism point of no return” … how is detachments from reality all the sudden antisemitic? This document didn’t even have internal credibility.

by nanobot
▲ 1 ▼
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

They’re less covert but arguably important:

  • supersize me - effects of sugar and gmo on systemic decline in health
  • hot coffee - the systemic attack in court systems replacing the right to a truck with the right to arbitration
▲ 1 ▼
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sort of except behavior in one area of life (eg driving record) does not factor into social capital here. It’s really more similar to “Whose line is it anyway?” where the rules are made up and the points don’t really matter

by pkvi
▲ 16 ▼
KiloRomeo 16 points ago +16 / -0

-4.2 hp / wk for 26 wks (permanent)

+2 charisma for 6 wks (temporary)

▲ 3 ▼
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Social capital is different than social liberties. They’re connected, sure, but separate. The system needs to vet social capital to ensure things such as commitment and professionalism. These things increase the quality and capabilities of engagements and therefore increase the ability to share ideas.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that GMO 2.0 is their next step after pandemic 1.0/2.0.

by pkvi
▲ 3 ▼
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Behold “them” are the kings of the black and brown peoples. They seek to earn your trust through capitalizing upon public events to increase personal notoriety.

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well when I see it all laid out on a timeline like that… wow. They’re at least reasoning this thing to say the least.

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

You bring up a good point though I’m not sure that even hubris can explain this and here’s why: “new and improved vax provides super immunity. Engineered to target all aspects of the virus”

They could make more money here -and- offer it under auspices of increasing “safety and efficiency”. So, it seems irrational unless the intent is to harm.

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is crazy they’re clearly engineering a failure state for the economy. Skyrocketing labor costs caused by vax mandates and handouts. Now massive surge in cogs due to oil price manipulation….

▲ 2 ▼
KiloRomeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

News flash: the Chinese don’t care about his son’s artwork. Once they take power all these traitors that think they’ll be wealthy will actually just be seen as liabilities.

▲ 3 ▼
KiloRomeo 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is something more pointless than not trying to stand up and fight back, and it's standing up and fighting back only to end up being fucked horribly,

Was thinking about this yesterday. The point is not to be boisterous but rather to be stubborn. Just insist on maintaining status quo and force the burden of proof and responsibility back into the aggressor in so doing reflecting as much energy back towards them as possible. In this way the power of numbers will drain the resources of the despots.

▲ 1 ▼
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well this is not financial advice but I’m using these principles:

  • Companies that produce things will have lower margins
  • Commodities will go up esp. oil

  • Shipping costs will go up

  • Manufacturing costs will go up

  • Relative value of USD will go down so long ad we have trade deficit in oil and oil is increasing
▲ 1 ▼
KiloRomeo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not mine.

Re: prions- the spikes are toxic proteins and they are capable of causing damage to DNA. Even if they are not technically prions they may have ostensibly similar capabilities and side effects. Thus the distinction between a toxic protein and a prion may have little practical importance. Treating them with similar techniques such as through the use of antioxidants seems to be helpful.

▲ 5 ▼
KiloRomeo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Believing in science by definition means you don’t trust the science …

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›