There are multiple antigens to which our body could build antibodies. Let’s suspend disbelief related to the safety of mRNA vaccines for a moment so that we can ask this question. Even if we agreed with the mRNA approach then why builds a vaccine to target the toxic antigen instead of the neutral antigens? I’ve asked doctors this same question and they’re like 🤷♂️ ask the scientists.
Nucleocapsid (N) protein is present in the core of the virus and antibodies to it are found within IgG immune cells of cured hosts. So clearly natural immunity is targeting these antigens. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-83108-0
Things are even worse - natural immunity rarely tuned to spike proteins of viruses with spikes like adenoviruses, coronaviruses etc. Mostly it target capsid proteins or proteins that reside in place where spike binds to capsid.
Adding the fact that SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated so there are no way to prove that SARS-CoV-2 is a cause of COVID-19, no way to figure out and study real proteins of the presumable virus to find best protein to attack and absolutely no way to create conventional vaccine from the weakened virus, and adding the fact that all vaccines are some "new techology" with goal to somehow deliver a substance posed as "spike protein" into human body, it become clear that it is not about some virus at all. It is all about that "spike protein".
Delivering something that is posed as "spike protein" into human bodies is the real goal of vaccines. If we imagine that artificially created SARS-CoV-2 really exists, we could suppose that it was created as a way to deliver that "spike protein" to humans. But that artificial virus was so badly engineered, that it does not fullfiil its task of delivering "spike protein" to most people. So, they run in a hurry into plan B - use vaccination to deliver that "spike protein" to the population who can't become infected with that poorly designed virus .
That "spike protein" is the real key to all that madness.
May be "prohibited" medicines like HCQ destroy that "spike protein", that is why they prohibited. Masks could somehow (oxygen deprivation?) rise the efficiency of "spike protein" or lower body ability to destroy it, that is why they pushed heavily even for vaccinated. Vaccines "did not work" because their goal is not to prevent a disease, but to deliver "spike protein". And so on.
TLDR: "Spike protein" itself is a pathogen/bioweapon/poison. Virus was designed to deliver that shit into humans "naturally", without obvious links to perpetrators. Virus completely failed, it was not contagious, nor effective in delivering shit. So they run out vaccines in attempt to deliver that shit to most people.
Because its not about a virus.. ((they)) want worldwide dictatorship
There’s a chance that research was so early that they chose the most obvious antigen: the protein responsible for binding the virus to the cell, which, one could infer, would be recognized by the body. But you ask a good question. Apparently the mRNA tech is easily customizable, and they could develop instructions for ANY antigen. So why not choose something less toxic (pmid:33284859, pmid:33053430, pmid:33232769)? I can only imagine that a marketing campaign built around numbers relating to safety would be more effective than the current “if you don’t take it you’re an antivaxxer and probably a nazi hick” strategy they’re implementing now, but I don’t believe they have those numbers to advertise. So they COULD develop a new one, but haven’t. It would be BENEFICIAL to develop a new one, but they haven’t. If they are not doing something that is both possible and good, what are we to think?
You bring up a good point though I’m not sure that even hubris can explain this and here’s why: “new and improved vax provides super immunity. Engineered to target all aspects of the virus”
They could make more money here -and- offer it under auspices of increasing “safety and efficiency”. So, it seems irrational unless the intent is to harm.
Exactly, that’s what I was trying to say. It’s totally within they’re capability to create a vaccine that is safer, but they don’t. Which means that there is something about this one/set they are committed to. Obviously it’s not because of it’s effectiveness. Sigh.
I have thought about this and the most charitable explanation I can come up with is maybe they targeted the S protein because it was the novel/dangerous part. Having the immune system pointed solely toward this protein induces mutation in this protein, or at least provides a hurdle where mutation here is favored.. Mutation is disorder and almost all mutation makes things less effective. Maybe it was an attempt to funnel the variants toward less effective spike protein?
The only way to make the vaccine more damaging than the virus itself was to roll out experimental mRNA treatments.
Covid is a biological attack plan created by an advanced alien race which is helping the "globalists" convert Earth into an easily conquerable colony planet. Only problem is, the plan was written for a planet whose inhabitants are more technologically advanced than us. The globalists believe they can gain world domination by following the interstellar radio instructions, but then think they can somehow hold off the alien onslaught... They can't, and they won't; the traitors will die with the rest of us.
They have, but those vaccines don't get approved....
GOOOOOD question… all the distraction is in regard to the S protein being the only thing to worry about.
Ifthe S spike protein was modified and weaponized, why wouldn’t the N protein be?