Christianity ALWAYS teaches that "carnality is a sin"
Citation needed. I'm pretty it has been quite pro-carnality, what with promoting having lots of children and all. It's against purposeless sex, which plenty of anthropological, psychological, and socialogical research over the decades, along with the current day consequences of that having gone by the wayside, makes seem like a good way to be. At least, if you like a functional civilization.
to the Goyim
A term with no real meaning within Christianity.
Christianity is the One World Zionist Religion spread since Ancient Rome
Then why are all the globalist types, most of whom are pro-one-world-government, so against it, just like they seem to be against white people?
On foot, and usually by animal power, yes. By operating a motor vehicle, technically in some states, but not most. It will also be costly to prove it, even if you can, and win.
Then, there's still the general drivers license problem, in that you need one for all kinds of things, and in many states, mine included, RealID has been part of that for years, now. I moved a couple of years ago, FI, and I needed to update my ID. Now, I already had RealID, as I wasn't aware of it when it was rolled out. But, as of that change of address, there was no way to get a new valid non-RealID state ID, and I needed it updated. Unless I wanted to go live like the Amish...
So, don't legally drive? That's kind of a problem, if you didn't get a long-term ID, that will likely last your remaining lifetime, and made sure you wouldn't move, many years ago.
The chips, though, no. But, those will remain opt-out, thanks to the Constitution and Book of Revelation.
It has crossed my mind. But. I also think that MAGA and related ideas are now working with hiveminds separated from their creators. People have been waking up to how screwed up everything is, lately. The plandemic ripped the blinders off of many that would never have thought about any of it. The political class now has to deal with large leaderless populist movements. Some are using it, some are fighting against the tide (some with enough money to have success at it), and others are trying to get out of the way.
If there are no victims or perps, there is no crime. So let it all out, or let it go. While I firmly believe she's pathologically antisocial, an international intelligence asset, and perpetrator of vile crimes...the legal system's ability to prosecute victimless crime, and operate effectively secret courts, in the name of protecting accusers, and keeping those secrets indefinitely, is unconscionable. If efforts to fix those systemic issues, and move us towards a transparent and accountable government get her out, so be it. She's prob safer in jail, today, anyway, than out of it.
Nobody is outside much at those temperatures. Especially over 40C - even fully covered, with breathable wicking clothes, which historically would be normal, in the ME, you'd best be drinking and sweating a lot, to stay cool. If not, it could be deadly.
Also, temperatures don't cause sunburn, but heatstroke. So, WTF does that have to do with anything? Sunburn is about UV-B overexposure, mostly, and which skin pigmentation is a very good proxy for resistance or sensitivity to that.
You can get seriously sunburned when it's only about 80F/27C, on a a UV heavy day (which have been getting more common, lately, as Earth's EM field has been weakening). As a descendant of mostly central and western Europeans, I know first hand.
But where is the evidence that 1 and 3 are close? Nothing public has gotten close to AGI, to date.
4 presupposes we tear apart bureaucracies, because oil and energy will be more important than who the first moyse to get to the cheese is, and China is so far ahead of everyone else that I don't think we catch up.
IMO, they want AI to look good enough to start removing human accountability, more or less calling their own goals, as implemented through AI models, unbiased, fair, and necessary. Because if they fail at that, a lot of their blood will be spilled.
I don't think they're intentionally throttling any of it. You've got known knowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns. Then, you gave different goals. They keep hitting new unknown unknowns, as they advance.
The military guys need to prevent hallucinating, and that's hard. It's known unknown in general, but the devils in the details are unknown unknowns, and they playing whackamole with them. They want the learning capability, but want to stay in control of the controls. A lot of the MIL AI work is using AI on top of already proven deterministic software and hardware, too, and with narrow development focii. The same software isn't being used to waste 100Wh giving you a crab boil recipe, then turning around and using that for summarizing SEA metal markets.
FI, flying in the air should actually be easier than driving busy streets, by orders of magnitude. They had pre-AI tech that do that pretty well. The same is likely going on in big pharma, gluing AI, as a way to dump data in, and filter results, 10000x faster than before, with their old software designs at the core. It not that military AI, or any other software based technology, is way ahead of the private sector. It's that they're not trying to do the general cases LLMs and the like are, but have more targeted goals. It's not way ahead, so much as it is designed for a task, where what we get is tech companies throwing more spaghetti at more walls, with bigger spoons. I would daresay it's likely more dangerous than most of what the military is doing, though, as it's threatening to tear apart the few trusted communication channels we have left, after COVID showed us how bad the old ones were.
The tech bro side of things can accept some breaking of things, and hallucinating, if the overall results improve. They are working with technology they can't even understand, open source or not, now. As long as it looks to be able to depress wages better, or get closer to destroying the fact vs fiction distinction in video and audio content, they go full steam ahead. Even there, like most tech, they show demos that are carefully crafted, to make investors think the product is better than it really is.
Eh, most people are at the least being influenced by demons. Some get possessed by bad choices, or trained weakness (childhood trauma and all), but some people don't like being alone in their own heads. The degeneracy of our elites very much hints at childhood trauma, so no big stretch. Is this really a big secret, except to hard-line atheists?
That said, I don't believe for one second that demons are why they can commit evil acts. Maybe for regular folk, that seem to have mental breaks, but not movers and shakers doing well-planned stuff. Humanity is capable of great evil, with no extradimensional help at all. Being aligned with other evils does not absolve them, IMO. More likely, IMO, the demons are able to aid them in gaining more worldly power. At low levels, there are stories voices have helped people get drugs, money, sex, and more. If you're stable enough to not let the secret out, and smart enough to look to the future, then they can help get you good stocks, foreign connections, and property deals, instead. You just have to give in to what you see as minor demands. They clearly are bound to space and time, but now how we are, and have knowledge of at least some short-term future events.
The death hypothesis, maybe. How our elites are obsessed with youth and immortality is weird, given that most of us just aren't, and most of them have children. It would also match up with voices (demons not getting to to the point of possession, not oppression, but mental influence) not caring if someone they're messing with dies, even though they seem to feed on their living, "energies."
What argument have they tried to use, to get AI regulation away from the states? I mean, constitutionally. Conner would not work. Copyright could, but that's can of worms that needs to be opened ASAP, for AI, and they're not opening it.
Just ignore that he was half-Jewish,if you going to go there, and ignore those others that weren't, at all, and easily contributed far more, over their careers. Not to knock McCarthy's work, but Claude Shannon vs John McCarthy is like comparing square footage of both WTC towers vs building 7.
ChatGPT
Is a for-profit software as a service project, invested in by those who already had deep pockets and connections. So, what are the chances it will be made and run by Jews? 80%, on the low end, easily. The conspiracies went on many steps behind the technology, and the results are incidental to the technology.
I'm sure travelling around the world fucking ALL the girls and doing ALL the drugs while people throw themselves at you in adoration is really super depressing. .
You mean stimulating yourself to try to forget your lack of a home, and meaningful relationships, while being managed by predators pretending to be friends? It works fine for some, but for many, that whole lifestyle itself is escapism and cope, which leads to more of the same.
Nonsense. No one is, "relativist," except in your head, and the heads of teachers embodying the old adage of not being able to do anything else. The theory of relativity is going many steps ahead of Newton, tying together good work done my many scientists (Einstein was in the right place at the right time - he didn't come up with it all, but did work out how many other efforts were connected).
From the very outset, Einstein noted problems with his theory, the gravitational constant being the one that made him lose sleep at night. Other things have been found, over time. As we more closely study space, and get a better handle on quantum mechanics (quantum computers are much less about computing than poking and prodding spacetime in a controlled way), more problems will be found, and suspicions confirmed or denied.
Relativity got us many technological advancements, and if civilization doesn't fully collapse, in the coming decades, we will exceed that understanding, and find new head scratchers to deal with.
To be clear, we have no fundamental laws of physics. Even conservation of energy has come into question, over the last many decades. We are far from knowing reality as it is, and anyone that thinks otherwise should not be paid much attention.
And I move on. When I've given it chances, it's been so laughably off base so often that I just can't take anyone trusting its output. Not saying there aren't good use cases, especially when matters of specific correctness are not involved (I rarely have a use for anything like LLMs, unless I'm trying to find something that I cannot through normal means). But, no doubt there is an artificial push towards treating such tech as as a mouth of truth, rather than a language-based probability filter.
Already, I meet people that are replacing their need to think with it. When neutral implants become a big thing, they will go from NPCs to unscary real world versions of Agent Smith.