Can one measure ones birth without others? If not, then why use others to measure...especially since your example shows 2025 years of conflicts over correct measurements?
What comes first...coming into being as ONE or numbers suggested by others?
Jesus clearly died on Wednesday.....it's in the text if you look at it. The Jews had a special "high day" in the middle of the week which they call a Sabbath. That is what throws people off. You should read the Messiah Codes by Luis Narciso. Very interesting.....
I think the "side note" was added after I wrote. In my experience, the largest two camps of people who look at it put Jesus's death in 30 or 33 AD, and I'd like to say 33 is the larger camp but I can't prove that. There is also a small camp who put his birth in 1 BC. When looking at other views I don't find any that answer all my reasons for proposing exactly 4 and 33 (age 35.5, or 18 months more than OP proposes).
Ignored.
That's Anno Domini, heathen.
Can one measure ones birth without others? If not, then why use others to measure...especially since your example shows 2025 years of conflicts over correct measurements?
What comes first...coming into being as ONE or numbers suggested by others?
Jesus clearly died on Wednesday.....it's in the text if you look at it. The Jews had a special "high day" in the middle of the week which they call a Sabbath. That is what throws people off. You should read the Messiah Codes by Luis Narciso. Very interesting.....
AI slop that can't even name eras correctly? Meh.
Counterpoint.
I think the "side note" was added after I wrote. In my experience, the largest two camps of people who look at it put Jesus's death in 30 or 33 AD, and I'd like to say 33 is the larger camp but I can't prove that. There is also a small camp who put his birth in 1 BC. When looking at other views I don't find any that answer all my reasons for proposing exactly 4 and 33 (age 35.5, or 18 months more than OP proposes).