If relativists could admit that what they support is merely a stand in for reality rather than reality itself, I would be OK with that. At that point, we are having a scientific discussion. But to claim such a logically inconsistent theory, detached from fundamental laws of physics, which has no real physical model for its primary actor of space / spacetime, is gospel truth, just makes you a religious zealot of the worst kind.
A theory in science is always considered provisional and not divinely inspired. It therefore has an expiration date. So their adherence to it necessarily means subscribing to a false religion. And perhaps this love of relativity is downstream from their love of moral relativity? Hey that's "his truth" man, hey that's just "his frame" if he wants to have a different accounting of "time" than you it's just as real as anything man. It even has a dash of "we can be as gods" going back in time and being outside of time itself. God being sovereign over all time and space thwarts that notion.
In Relativity, the entire universe conspires such that any beam of light you see only appears to have a certain speed. Even though there is no stationary reference frame that knows your velocity. Ok. But then space bends in one stationary spot. Hmmm. And space bending has no real physical meaning, but sounds cool. Nice. Great theory. Truly the most real description of physical reality yet \s.
Nonsense. No one is, "relativist," except in your head, and the heads of teachers embodying the old adage of not being able to do anything else. The theory of relativity is going many steps ahead of Newton, tying together good work done my many scientists (Einstein was in the right place at the right time - he didn't come up with it all, but did work out how many other efforts were connected).
From the very outset, Einstein noted problems with his theory, the gravitational constant being the one that made him lose sleep at night. Other things have been found, over time. As we more closely study space, and get a better handle on quantum mechanics (quantum computers are much less about computing than poking and prodding spacetime in a controlled way), more problems will be found, and suspicions confirmed or denied.
Relativity got us many technological advancements, and if civilization doesn't fully collapse, in the coming decades, we will exceed that understanding, and find new head scratchers to deal with.
To be clear, we have no fundamental laws of physics. Even conservation of energy has come into question, over the last many decades. We are far from knowing reality as it is, and anyone that thinks otherwise should not be paid much attention.