4
HonestTruth 4 points ago +4 / -0

lol? shut up loser, I have no problem with shemites. Use your head if you want to speak to me.

You are clearly incapable of understanding the post, It is highly likely you are not worth communicating to.

2
HonestTruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your communication is hard to follow.

Perhaps you are mixing the statement up. Read it again?

2
HonestTruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't know. I think sometimes they are just doing as they are told.

Where the globalists above them have instructed them on what they can do and say, nothing makes sense. The whole shit is stupid. If they wanted to put an end to this shit, they first need to stop being so pusillanimous.

1
HonestTruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol, it was a joke.

Technically I feel it is feasible.

I think what happened is the obvious most likely thing. The people training in the area setup the scenario and the remote activity was enacted on the timeline, easy pie.

1
HonestTruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, you may not want to accept it, but you will have to as it is unlikely you will be able to change my opinion.

There is plenty to suggest that there will not be a reference point now or in the future where we can say, this is in retaliation for. No one else will say it, for the claim to be made would be hyperbole.

Basically, this is normal it may be an escalating point in rhetoric and the like, but by itself there is no expected response available in the chain of logic.

More likely it is just another click on the ratchet when it comes to the Russian perspective.

If we see Russia destroy some comparable infrastructure in any region of the world at all, I would be absolutely amazed.

The fact we will continue to see the attacks on ukraine has nothing to do with the pipeline, even if somehow the ukranians themselves are on video doing in the pipelines.

4
HonestTruth 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hey, good thing that it isn't happening here huh?

...

This forum is already pushing a large percentage of utter crap. Getting harder to sift through it.

3
HonestTruth 3 points ago +3 / -0

The total amount of evidence leaning on it being a nato job is enormous. However, I am convinced it does not matter who did it one bit, what matters is that it is done.

This means that neither party will leverage the accomplishment meaningfully one way or the other. Suggesting Russia will not use it to retaliate against nato, zog/nato will not be able to effectively use it against Russia.

It is just a piece of something that happened now.

6
HonestTruth 6 points ago +6 / -0

I did not vote on it, but noone had much to say.

Everything is conjecture and propaganda at this point, we can conceive anything we want and there is no issue speaking on either side.

At the end of the day, everyone knows who did it, who told them to do it and why. It is all pretty much cast in stone long ago. There is no random, nothing is random, everything happens for a reason. The more complex the happening the more in power the reasoning body is.

2
HonestTruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nuclear power blows economic asshole.

Well.. not sure about that claim. Nuclear power is great for building plutonium. It has good longevity, depends on your 'alternative'

If you are speaking of how it is done in the west, it is clearly like everything else. Contaminated with manipulation and corruption.

2
HonestTruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, good details.

I don't think anyone can explain the reasoning used in the west, so I will not bother trying to make stuff up about how they come to the rationale presented.

But, fear is likely the main contender and from this stems the desire to control all systems and reduce threat capability from everything.

1
HonestTruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

Russia is far more advanced in nuclear fuel processing technologies than any Western country

There are many proofs of this, such as westinghouse work in the ukraine. Basically inferior product to put it plainly.

2
HonestTruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

What a picture.

That disgusting implant is clearly still on his most recent bender. What a disgusting society where this is the state of things, we have some corrupted human leading the other corrupted humans.

1
HonestTruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

heh, thanks for your efforts. Appreciated. But I generally wait for the state approved version with built in subtitles. I get to hear his voice and context and it helps.

1
HonestTruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, by that accord we should have no issue with any forces gathering land about anywhere no?

Might is right?

You are complaining that the weakened USA is being overrun by illegals I say it is being invaded by a plan, same plan Russia is dealing with.

The difference is that, it would be like USA stopping all the refugee from storming thru Mexico.

Basically in all of America we see the same activity, it is destruction.

1
HonestTruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

From a legal perspective, they aren't Russians.

I am not convinced this is correct, in the example of any bilingual country, you have the right to identify as of origin from a given country, in this example with Russian speaking people if they choose to identify as Russian people in Ukraine then that is their prerogative, can they legally claim to be Russians? I think that is a function of the declarations made on their passport. Regarding the spoken language and historical beliefs we can easily see the divisions form.

When the historical timeframe is pulled in, it is nearly impossible to find solid anything as all the claims go in all directions. Would we start in the 1500's? sooner? later? why?

2
HonestTruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it is all perspective. If you accept the rhetoric from the ukranian leadership regarding the status of the citizens, I think it is easy to suggest that there are Russian ukranians. If you view the actions of the ukranian regimes militant activity, it should be accepted they are dealing with Russians not ukranians.

So, given that they have the history I think it makes sense to say we see such a divided people. I think that given the nature of the split, being so ideologically divided for so long (since the 1940's at least, but much before that) It is hard for some to rationalize borders and such when you live in the region and have such vast history.

The job of the country is to remain united to protect the civilians that live in it and provide prosperity. When that is no longer the case then nothing else matters. This is the prelude to war.

1
HonestTruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is too early, I cannot handle this voice nor the translation. I will wait for subtitles.

1
HonestTruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

which pushed this relativistic nonsense

Are you implying that Russia pushed this nonsense on us? That is surely what is read, but it is incorrect. Absolutely false. While some of the khazarians pushing this shit on the west may be of Russian descent, they are not Russians perse, but khazarians, as the evidence shows. Given the fact we have such a huge spread of them over the generations all linked together to the origin makes it pretty clear.

We know who installed communism in Russia and then into China. The Russian stuff did not hold, lost control. The same people that installed the corrupted beliefs in the west.

Who destroyed our culture? The Russians? hahahah, not a chance, we can see clearly who is destroying all cultures that are not their own, everyone can. This is the end game.

2
HonestTruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

People been talking about that forum for a bit now, I checked it out a while back. Between the shitty posts and the shitty look and feel, I never bothered to return.

by pkvi
2
HonestTruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Would united states invade united states if united states could invade united states?

If united states could invade united states then united states would not invade united states, nor would united states liberate any other of the invaded countries either.

2
HonestTruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am confused, which forum do you speak of?

this one: https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/

?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›