Would united states invade united states if united states could invade united states?
If united states could invade united states then united states would not invade united states, nor would united states liberate any other of the invaded countries either.
The invasion already happened...consenting to suggested "united states" allowed those suggesting to invade the memory of those consenting, and the choice which consents to being invaded also represents the liberator of ones own ignorance...if one chooses to resist ignorance.
No, it wouldn't. If there was another continent to conqueror then the United States would break away from the United States and have a Declaration of Independence. All over again.
The declaration to be IN (within) DEPEND (to be sustained by something above) represents being choice at the center of balance aka "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
DECLAR (to make clear) -ATION (through action) implies for the reaction (perceiving) within enacting clearness (perceivable).
Sleight of hand from Pennywise...
"Take all that you've read...And all you've heard said"
"Take every little bit of info...Clogged up in your head"
"Then play sane game...Ream out your crowded brain"
"You'll feel much better...When you clear your head"
Clearing your mind represents the "declaration of independence".
"I know it's a bitch, you gotta try...You lose control and would like to know...the reason why"
"I know it's a bitch to clear your head...You lose control...Then life is over, you are dead."
a) STATE, noun - "point from which the next movement is regression" is being suggested to tempt one to ignore being the expression (living) within progression (process of dying).
b) UNI'TED, participle - "joined; made to agree; cemented; mixed; attached by growth"...one implies disjointed from all other ones. Agreeing (want) vs disagreeing (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to being moved. One isn't cemented; but within the ever changing moment (um) of motion. One implies apartheid from other ones: not mixed aka staying apart implies staying partial (living) within whole (process of dying). Living represents the temporary growth within ongoing loss (process of dying).
invade; liberate; tyranny
One doesn't need to invade; everyone already exists within all there is to exist. One doesn't need to liberate; each one already represents "Latin libertas, from liber, free" aka free will of choice. Consenting to the suggestions of others subjects one to their power of choice...that's self inflicted tyranny.
Would united states invade united states if united states could invade united states?
If united states could invade united states then united states would not invade united states, nor would united states liberate any other of the invaded countries either.
The invasion already happened...consenting to suggested "united states" allowed those suggesting to invade the memory of those consenting, and the choice which consents to being invaded also represents the liberator of ones own ignorance...if one chooses to resist ignorance.
No, it wouldn't. If there was another continent to conqueror then the United States would break away from the United States and have a Declaration of Independence. All over again.
Waits until they colonise Mars
The declaration to be IN (within) DEPEND (to be sustained by something above) represents being choice at the center of balance aka "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
DECLAR (to make clear) -ATION (through action) implies for the reaction (perceiving) within enacting clearness (perceivable).
Sleight of hand from Pennywise...
"Take all that you've read...And all you've heard said"
"Take every little bit of info...Clogged up in your head"
"Then play sane game...Ream out your crowded brain"
"You'll feel much better...When you clear your head"
Clearing your mind represents the "declaration of independence".
"I know it's a bitch, you gotta try...You lose control and would like to know...the reason why"
"I know it's a bitch to clear your head...You lose control...Then life is over, you are dead."
a) STATE, noun - "point from which the next movement is regression" is being suggested to tempt one to ignore being the expression (living) within progression (process of dying).
b) UNI'TED, participle - "joined; made to agree; cemented; mixed; attached by growth"...one implies disjointed from all other ones. Agreeing (want) vs disagreeing (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to being moved. One isn't cemented; but within the ever changing moment (um) of motion. One implies apartheid from other ones: not mixed aka staying apart implies staying partial (living) within whole (process of dying). Living represents the temporary growth within ongoing loss (process of dying).
One doesn't need to invade; everyone already exists within all there is to exist. One doesn't need to liberate; each one already represents "Latin libertas, from liber, free" aka free will of choice. Consenting to the suggestions of others subjects one to their power of choice...that's self inflicted tyranny.