The total amount of evidence leaning on it being a nato job is enormous.
However, I am convinced it does not matter who did it one bit, what matters is that it is done.
This means that neither party will leverage the accomplishment meaningfully one way or the other. Suggesting Russia will not use it to retaliate against nato, zog/nato will not be able to effectively use it against Russia.
It is just a piece of something that happened now.
Well, you may not want to accept it, but you will have to as it is unlikely you will be able to change my opinion.
There is plenty to suggest that there will not be a reference point now or in the future where we can say, this is in retaliation for. No one else will say it, for the claim to be made would be hyperbole.
Basically, this is normal it may be an escalating point in rhetoric and the like, but by itself there is no expected response available in the chain of logic.
More likely it is just another click on the ratchet when it comes to the Russian perspective.
If we see Russia destroy some comparable infrastructure in any region of the world at all, I would be absolutely amazed.
The fact we will continue to see the attacks on ukraine has nothing to do with the pipeline, even if somehow the ukranians themselves are on video doing in the pipelines.
by itself there is no expected response available in the chain of logic.
Oh, you mean nothing equivalent with which Russia can retaliate? I dunno. They can shut off all their other pipelines until the EU legally recognizes their ownership of formerly Ukrainian territories. They’re not going to bomb anyone else’s pipelines simply because that’s not how they roll, sure.
The total amount of evidence leaning on it being a nato job is enormous. However, I am convinced it does not matter who did it one bit, what matters is that it is done.
This means that neither party will leverage the accomplishment meaningfully one way or the other. Suggesting Russia will not use it to retaliate against nato, zog/nato will not be able to effectively use it against Russia.
It is just a piece of something that happened now.
Yeah, I can’t accept that.
How so? Nothing suggests this.
Well, you may not want to accept it, but you will have to as it is unlikely you will be able to change my opinion.
There is plenty to suggest that there will not be a reference point now or in the future where we can say, this is in retaliation for. No one else will say it, for the claim to be made would be hyperbole.
Basically, this is normal it may be an escalating point in rhetoric and the like, but by itself there is no expected response available in the chain of logic.
More likely it is just another click on the ratchet when it comes to the Russian perspective.
If we see Russia destroy some comparable infrastructure in any region of the world at all, I would be absolutely amazed.
The fact we will continue to see the attacks on ukraine has nothing to do with the pipeline, even if somehow the ukranians themselves are on video doing in the pipelines.
Oh, you mean nothing equivalent with which Russia can retaliate? I dunno. They can shut off all their other pipelines until the EU legally recognizes their ownership of formerly Ukrainian territories. They’re not going to bomb anyone else’s pipelines simply because that’s not how they roll, sure.
Not really, I mean Russia will not retaliate, along this vector.