1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Mean/men - "to think"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mean

Asking for the meaning of anything implies thinking...no matter the answer.

b) Think/tong - "to think; feel"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/think + Feel/pel - "to thrust"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/feel

Thrust implies being (life) thrust (inception towards death) aka the motion tempting ones e-motion to respond to, which implies...

c) Free will of choice aka free emotions within the dominance of motion aka will/want within need aka of motion into emotion aka choice within balance.

d) Ones free will of choice needs to respond to what all motion makes perceivable to each ones perception...others utilize suggestion to tempt ones emotion to want to ignore that.

e) Thinking straight implies ones perception adapting by free will of choice to all perceivable moving through as inspiration, while holding onto suggested information tempts one to think circular (logic).

This circular thinking is why you asked for the meaning of something, hence submitting your free will of choice to whatever my free will of choice answers or not.

In short: Nature doesn't give meaning...it thrusts all through each ones free will of choice for adaptation. One wants to think; one needs to adapt...

Ask yourself...how often have I mentally thought about something instead of physically doing it? Meanwhile...your heart doesn't think; it adapts to whatever goes through it.

Next...what if the words I think in represent the information suggested by others to tempt me to ignore adaptation to perceivable inspiration?

Thinking about what others are suggesting binds ones "free" will of choice to the suggested...

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

own all the tech

a) All implies nature; tech/tekhnē implies artifice shaped within all of nature.

b) To own implies taking into possession...few suggest technology to tempt many to take artifice into possession, while ignoring that nature moves and cannot be taken into possession.

own all of our data

Data/do - "to give"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/data

Isn't it hilarious that many believe that few own data, while ignoring that data implies given to many? The aim of spell-craft is about inverting the thought process of others.

As for the origin of data...only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) being (life). There's nothing to give or take from one another, which nature not already offers for FREE will of choice.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the profession of mass genocide

Profess aka per (forward) + bha (to speak)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/profess

A jew professes a suggestion...consenting to it becomes suicidal for each gentile, and genocidal to one another. It's also ones consent to the suggestion of another which "amasses" many under few.

enslaving entire civilizations

a) To civilize implies to domesticate one another, which is based on giving private consent to public civil law by FREE will of choice.

By consent...a slave selects a master.

b) What's the opposite of civil? Foreign! Nature privatizes each being by separation from one another. Hence...every other one being a foreigner to ones privacy.

It's a jew who distracts gentiles from discerning this by suggesting CIVIL to mix FOREIGN together, while permitting each jew to remain PRIVATE.

the system is maintained in Europe

System/systēma - "organized whole" refers to gentiles aka to EU-R-O-PEON (your are a peon). Nature implies whole separating into partials...organization implies internal instrument aka only a partial can organize each other by ignoring whole.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dumb vs smart represents a conflict of reason among gentiles...which a jew controls from both sides by suggesting what the gentiles think is dumb or smart.

they win awards inside that system

Win vs lose reasoning represents the jewish system for gentiles to fight each other in.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the sorcery of the jews is everywhere

The sorcery (suggestion) of the jews is everywhere (perception)...if one consents to it.

Suggestion cannot be the source, because the one suggesting represents outcome aka coming out of source.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

...does not cause

a) Only CAUSE causes. Effects within cause are affecting each other.

b) Vaccines imply an artificial effect within a natural cause...utilized to affect one another, while distracting from cause.

finds no link

Foundation doesn't link together...it funds (matter) by action (inception towards death) aka a process of internal separation.

Consenting to a suggestion by another...like vaccines...establishes a link in-between consent and suggested or in other words...consent permits suggested to be injected into one.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get that jews hate Whites

a) Mixing white and black establishes gray...that's the gray area of uncertainty within the minds of gentiles, which a jew hides within.

b) Reasoning (love vs hate or white vs black) implies versus/verto - "to turn"...that's the mixing.

browner

Brown/brun - "dark" from root bher - "bright"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/brown

The crafted spell "brown" distracts one from being within bright/dark.

too on the nose

Ignorance breeds insolence. Whenever jewish insolence emerges...gentile ignorance grew.

Jesuits at work looking to overthrow their competition.

  • "Competition is a sin" ~John D. Rockefeller

To compete implies "to enter or be put in rivalry with", which is why jesus aka je suis (i am) establishes YOU ARE, hence tempting one (I) into competition against one another (YOU), and you represents phonetic "jew".

Furthermore...a jew doesn't overthrow; a jew tempts gentiles to understand (stand-under).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its more about the cave, less/nothing about him.

a) Nothing implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of everything perceivable...this denial/ignorance implies the cave.

b) Less implies ongoing loss (inception towards death) for temporary growth (life)...others tempt one to build a cave of ignorance/denial within self to corrupt that growth.

c) Him implies the suggestion of another to conceal how spreading (plato) and fitting together (artistocles) influences oneself from within.

tl;dr...nature reveals everything; few within use names like Plato + Artistocles to conceal from many what nature reveals.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plato/plat - "to spread" hence spreading suggestion to tempt consent into the "cave" of ignorance.

Plato was a nickname upon Aristocles, son of Ariston, from aristo/ar - "to fit together"

What if this isn't about a guy named Aristocles; nicknamed Plato, but about revealing for those with eyes to see, while hiding from the profane, the implication of "spreading (suggested) to fit (consent) together"?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

slaves to the system

Few suggest systems to tempt many into consenting to being a part of it...giving consent enslaves oneself, while permitting another mastery of any suggested system.

The word system/synistanai - "to place together" tempts one to ignore that nature places each being apart from one another.

undeniable reality

Free will of choice implies having the choice to deny reality (perception) for fiction (suggestion), which the "chosen ones" are exploiting.

designed to make us sick

De (to divide) sign (to mark)...it's consenting to suggested designs which artificially marks the natural divided. That's what makes sick.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Power of the Word...

...empowers those who suggest it; while weakening those who consent to it. Power implies potential to express; words tempt one to ignore actual (sound) for holding onto fictional (word), which suppresses oneself, while permitting others to oppress one.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

enigmatic

Enigma/aenigma (riddle) from ainos (tale, story; saying, proverb)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/enigma

Nature doesn't tell; store; say or put forwards (pro) words (verbum)...it moves sound.

Riddle/rid - "to set free" implies setting oneself free by choosing to resist suggested tales; stories; saying and proverbs. Only nature sets each being free from one another, which consenting to any suggestion contradicts.

A chosen one utilizes suggestion to invert ones choice within perceivable, thereby making a riddle out of free will of choice.

fatal

Fatal/fate/fari/bha - "to speak"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/fatal + https://www.etymonline.com/word/fate#etymonline_v_1153

Nature does not speak...it moves sound. Each jew within articulates sound into words (spell-craft) to distract gentiles from the natural (sound) into the controlled environment of artifice (word).

Sleight of hand...fatality > flawless victory

interest

Aka artificial interest (legal claim or right; a concern; damage; loss; harm) distracting from natural inter (within) esse (essence; being).

oppressed by the aspect of the present and embarrassed by his anxiety for the future

Aka artificial past; present; future distracting ones perceiving presence from perceivable now. Before and after aren't natural states, but artificial words shaped to distract one from being (be) moved forward (for) from behind (aft) within sound, hence life being moved from inception towards death.

to elucidate the jewish question

Elucid aka exlucidus (out of light) implies origin...question (seeking action) implies towards outcome, while ignoring origin.

Both suggested questions and answers tempt ones perception to ignore the only perceivable solution (inception towards death) for each problem (life).

The origin of jew (phonetic you) implies one claiming self as "me; myself or I" thereby ignoring origin of being by holding onto something that nature moves. Once one chooses to let go of "me; myself or I" the behavior of each jew/you becomes apparent to oneself.

From a different perspective...being implies respondent, not claimant. Claiming self ignores response (ones choice) while making one despondent to another (chosen one).

What's the opposite of despondent? Happy (merchant)...

the individuals of this Race

Individual (divided into two) contradicts race/raddix/radius/ray (apart from one another). A jew suggests individualism to tempt consenting gentiles into a dualistic contract (consent + suggestion), while joining together with others into for example races, which a jew also suggests as race-ism.

Nature simply implies all light dividing/divining into each ray, hence allowing being within the visible spectrum of light by separating (bending) each ray apart from one another.

The jew, what is he?

The inversion of ME implies YOU (phonetic jew). If one claims self as ME, then every other one becomes a YOU, hence a chosen one (jew) opposing each anointed one (christ).

he is a torment

Ones consent to any suggestion by another twists (tor) ones mind (ment) from all perceivable.

May God free us

a) Being within God implies being set as free will of choice...choosing to consent to suggested pluralism (us) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore all perceivable from God.

b) US implies united states...an inversion of God dividing/divining each unit within from one another. This process of dividing implies anointment (to christen)...

c) May/magh - "to be able, have power"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/may

May implies God enabling each being with free will of choice...if one chooses to ignore perceivable for suggested, then a chosen one is being permitted to utilize magh/magic freely as a magi of free-masonry.

O God, do not forget

God implies forgive aka giving life forward at inception and forget aka getting the forwarded life at death. Only God gives and gets each forwarded being.

Do not implies ones consent to suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting one to de-nial perceivable for suggested.

In short...do nothing denies God doing everything.

God didn't give nothing...God gives each thing the free will of choice to deny everything perceivable for each others suggestions.

If God does all, then each one within can re-do self.

the jew killed your prophets

Gentiles believing in prophet/prophanai (forwards spoken)...makes profit for each jew aka income derived by transaction. Ones consent to any suggestion implies a transfer of ones choice to a chosen ones offer, hence filling a chosen ones coffer (bank), while putting self into a coffin (debt) through transfer (trust).

Destroy Israel

Ignoring isreal/yisra'el - "he that strives with God" destroys self, because being implies ones struggle (living) within God (process of dying).

Each one within all implies yisra'el...one's choice selecting a chosen one inverts ones position.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

main stream alternative

a) Being alive implies alternation during main stream (inception towards death)...there's no alternative for being.

b) If Alex Jones implies mainstream, then any alternation thereof implies the deluding of the same poison. Try comparing the alternation of suggested information with "stretch-triggered drug delivery"...

c) Media implies poison because mediation by another distorts ones poise...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also who is this woman?

A medium to anyone permitting others to mediate for one.

She offers nothing new

Nature offers everything (perceivable) to each being (perception)...any suggestion shaped within implies "offering nothing new".

original ideas

Ideals/idols (suggestion) can only be shaped within origin (perception)...

speeding up...Is this the future?

Suggested progressivism tempts ones perceiving presence towards the end of the line.

Speeding up or slowing down life...distorts sentience.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

they wouldn't be in business if nobody did drugs.

Buy & sell aka consent & suggestion...the origin of self deception. Nature isn't a business between buyers and sellers, but the business of each beings free will of choice within all of nature.

Those who buy...are just as guilty

Guilt/gylt/gieldan - "to pay for, debt"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/guilt

Those who are selling aren't guilty (buying)...but freeing themselves of guilt by tempting FREE will of choice into selling self out by buying into.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

What the hell is wrong with the Germans?

a) German/germanus - "brother"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/german aka "any one closely united; an associate; as a band of brothers; one that resembles another in manners"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Brother

b) Deutschland implies land of the deutsch/dutch/dish aka yid-dish...

c) Bundesrepublik Deutschland implies a commonwealth (republic) of jewish sovereignty (yid-dish-land) held in bondage... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundism

d) What opposes closely united in bondage? Anglo-saxon (divided by angles)...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

either the Antichrist or Armageddon

Armageddon implies the ongoing flow of nature (inception towards death) for each form (life) within aka "deluge".

Antichrist implies any anointed one (christ) turning against (anti) one another.

Being implies christ during armageddon, while being tempted to ignore pro (being moved forwards) for anti (turning against one another).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Abraham Alliance

AB (father) RAHAM (multitude) ALLIER (combine)...all father doesn't combine into multitudes, but into each singular one within.

The separation of all father (motion) into each off-spring (matter) implies mother (momentum).

Is This Biblical Prophecy

a) Prophecy aka PRO (forwards) BHA (to speak) implies those shaping words in the name of all sound to distract one from it.

b) Bible/biblios - "book" implies others using words to bind together what sound divides apart from one another.

c) Few writers tempting many readers implies a biblical prophecy (book spoken forwards) to combine (alliance) a multitude (raham) within father (ab).

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here are 8 terrifying insights

Ones sight (perception) within all (perceivable) was before another can suggest "8 terrifying insights" about what it is...consenting to a suggestion distorts ones sight, hence making one into an onlooker/beholder/idolater.

open ai

Nature opens (inception) and closes (death) the opportunity for being (life)...ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion) requires ones consent to an invitation, hence opening oneself up to another, while shutting down within all.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Freedom is an illusion

Dom (balance) generates free (choice)...choosing one another makes balance appear illusive.

under a new terms of service

A term implies a boundary aka free (choice within the boundary of dom (balance)...ignoring this for one another's suggested choice puts one into bondage to one another, and since suggested can only tempt consent to bind itself...consenting implies understanding aka standing-under a master, while in servitude.

Service implies the attendance of a servant aka ones willing consent to any suggestion by another.

The world didn't end

Being implies in-between (life) beginning (inception) and end (death) aka a temporary growth within an ongoing loss.

Few suggest world/vault to trick many to ignore linear progression for circular logic, which established a vault of suggested information within the mind/memory of a willing servant.

This vault represents a depository for the death aka for corpus-oration aka for the language of death (words) shaped within that which silences life (sound).

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

If logic implies circular thinking, then predicting the course of a circle implies waiting for what comes around again, and again, and again...

What if few tempt many into logic to establish a predicament (predictable mind)?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) The center of balance implies free will of choice...

b) Building a hedge between ones understanding and the known-ledge makes it harder for one to see the foundation.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ambrose of Milan

Ambrose/ambrosios - "immortal" of Milan/medios - "middle"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Ambrose + https://www.etymonline.com/word/Milan

Reasoning (worth vs worthless) tempts ones choice off-center, hence from middle into circumference, while ignoring to be one IM (within) MORT (subject to death) of AL (all).

The jews are the most worthless of all men

a) Each jew (singular)...not the jews (plural). Pluralism is utilized to herd gentiles together.

b) Men cannot be ALL...only within one can there be men and wo-men. Calling the collectivization of men "all" represents a jewish trick to tempt the gentile mind to synthesize together what nature analyzes apart from one another.

c) A jew suggests artificial worth to tempt a gentiles FREE will of choice to ignore to evaluate (perception) natures worth (perceivable).

It's gentiles consent to suggested worth, which established a conflict of reason (worth vs worthless) among gentiles.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›