Within (perception) deed (perceivable) or within (consent) debt (suggested)...it's ones free will of choice.
Karl/carl - "bondsman; common man" + Levi/lewi - "to join"
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consent from gentiles. Consenting to any suggestion binds one into common consensus by joining another.
Marx/mark - "to trace out boundaries" refers to ones free will of choice putting self into bondage to another when consenting to a suggestion.
The name itself represents the revelation of method to those with eyes to see.
at the center of a growing enviromental debate
a) Debate implies one side turning against the other, hence tempting ones choice off-center and towards a side.
b) En (within) viro (circle) ment (mind)...that implies circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason), while ignoring linear progression.
c) Debate doesn't grow...it tempts ones growth into a loss vs loss conflict.
463 million gallons of water
That implies taking measurement, while ignoring that natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) gives all through each one by separation.
A being within nature cannot use up (L)and (A)ir or (W)ater...being implies temporal; nature implies ongoing. Taking artificial measurements tempts a being into ignoring nature.
drawing concern
Con (together) cern (to perceive)...all perceivable separates each ones perception from one another; others utilize suggestion to draw consensus together.
to win the game is to not play
Winning vs losing...that's the game ones plays when choosing either side. Why a game? Because taking a side implies sacrificing choice to take a chance.
(M)icrosoft (A)pple (G)oogle (A)mazon...
Notice also...anthropic (pertaining to a human being) as opposed to artificial intelligence.
the single darkest secret isn't a single thing...it's a pattern...to obscure origin.
Each ones perception within all perceivable implies each single thing originating within singularity. Ones consent to any suggestion by another implies a pattern obscuring origin.
open source
Source opening (inception) and closing (death) ingredient (life), hence being opened (perception) by source (perceivable).
Consenting to any suggestions closes ingredient from source...for a price of admission.
attempting to be diplomatic
Di (to divide) plo (to fold) aka two-fold magic. Having free will of choice implies "immunity"...alas temptation.
You are right...I'll keep circling back to the disinformation
Right vs wrong implies turning against one another (reason), based on circular thinking (logic) shaped by ones consent to suggested information (logos), which dis (to divide) informs those within flow.
temple
a) Temple (matter) within spirit (momentum) of holy/whole (motion).
b) While holy/whole implies ongoing motion; each matter within implies temporal/tempus/temple from tem - "to cut", hence a cutting apart aka a divine/division.
resemble
Matter within motion implies differential within sameness...semblance (likeness) tempts one to ignore being differ (divine/divide) enti (entering) al (all).
In other words...all perceivable moving through each ones perception implies internal differentiation (analysis). Suggestions by another tempting ones consent into mass-consensus implies external unification (synthesis).
Semblance distorts difference.
exodus
Aka solemn (inception towards death) departure (life) aka each ones expression (ex) during the way (hodos) of all.
Odus/hodos/holy - "whole", which also implies one and only aka sole/soul.
design
Aka marking out (to designate) + pointing out (to indicate)...that's suggested ideals tempting ones consent to hold onto idols.
Motion allows matter to shape...holding onto designed shapes tempts one to ignore motion.
The TEMPory TEMPle needs to resist wanted TEMPtation...
the opposite (of prove) is DISprove.
a) Disprove implies the division (dis) of prove/pro-bhwo (being forwarded)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prove hence prove/proof being in the pudding/putting.
b) Prove vs disprove implies both sides against (contra) one another...hence contra-diction.
You are contradicting me.
Free-will-of-choice doesn't upvote or downvote, hence not taking any side within any conflict against (contra) another. That's ones struggle to remaining free from one another.
Analysis (taking words apart) allows one to see the contradictions others are synthetically holding onto by consenting to a suggestion.
you don't believe doing so is bad
a) Bad vs good implies ones consent to suggested moralism, hence believing by giving faith and taking for gospel (good spell).
b) Believing binds ones "free" will of choice, hence religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind).
c) You vs me; do vs don't; believe vs disbelief; good vs bad...that's four conflicts of reason aka contradictions is such a short sentence. Four times you chose to hold onto a side against others...how is that good?
That's your side.
How does writing...love vs hate, hence versus/verto - "to turn"...imply taking a side? Where did I (life) turn from the straight path (inception towards death) of nature?
according to your philosophy
a) Accord aka ad (to) cordis (heart).
b) Phi-lo-sophy (love-logic-knowledge).
Logic implies a mental conflict of reason (love vs hate)...which tempts one to ignore all knowledge moving through each ones heart and mind.
How does a heart choose a side to hold onto?
Saying things does no such thing
a) Saying NO shapes suggested nihil-ism into consenting de-nial of everything perceivable.
b) Only within motion can matter be shaped...holding onto a shape (mentally or physically) denies motion.
c) How could "no" do anything? Explain to me the origin of NOTHING? Where did you get "nothing" from? What gives you the authority to wield "nothing" over others? Why do you feel so comfortable to base your responses on "nothing"?
You are inverting words into something with mystical magic power
a) Only sound can be turned into words. Sound/sanus - "entire; whole".... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/sound
Nature doesn't turn sound into words...sound delineates (inception towards death) instruments (life).
b) Ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words implies mystical/myein - "to close, shut"...nature opens all (perceivable) to each one (perception).
Ask yourself if mystical implies "missing all" when listening to one another?
c) Magic/magh - "to be able" implies towards (inception towards death) being (life) enabled by nature. The issue is "make-belief" aka disabling self by consenting to the suggestion of another.
Also...sorcery implies source (perceivable) enabling ingredient (perception).
d) Power/poti - "potential" implies ones possibility within all energy. Power implies the expression of matter within impressing motion. Words suppress ones expression within impressing sound....if held onto.
Through suggested words others gain ones power by consent.
Words are just tools
a) Tool implies instrument aka "mind structured within" sound.
b) Just aka "righteous in the eyes of God" implies all natural law...not judging one another. "judge not less ye be judged".
It's few who suggest many to JUST DO IT...
Stop picking your car apart and drive the car.
That which gives (inception) and takes (death) apart (life) cannot be stopped...it moves.
Living within process of dying implies being driven aka derive; verb - "to flow, pour out; originate".
Wherever one drives his car...there's only one final destination for each one within all. Why are you driving a car? To reach your destination faster...could that have a natural implication to think like that, while being moved from inception towards death?
How does one build a car without synthesizing parts, and how could parts come into being without analysis? What comes first...the car; the parts to build the car, or the whole separating parts from one another?
Stop picking words apart and talk normally.
The norm aka the consensus; the standard; the mainstream narrative; the orders to follow; the place where everybody knows your name... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXED2AVlbR0
Anyway; norm/gnōmōn - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/norm It's freemasonry and circular logic represents the compass.
To commit aka com (together) mittere (send)...being implies send apart from one another....That must be a bad thing, in your opinion. Why??
a) Good vs bad reasoning is based on your circular thinking (logic)...I describe the linear motion of nature separating matter into each being.
b) Procession separates potential, hence sending each one free from one another. Sending together implies binding together aka restricting potential.
Notice inter-course (synthesis) for off-spring (analysis)...notice furthermore that one needs to resist the want to synthesize, hence corrupting sex/seco (to divide) with lust (loss).
c) Are you more than one? Can you be more than one? If you're joining others, then are you more than one or are you counting others, while ignoring self?
Can you describe the natural states of ZERO and TWO? How does ONE perceive those?
It tempts free-will-of-choice to hate memes for no reason.
Again...love vs hate implies a conflict of reason based on your circular thinking.
Free will of choice needs to utilize implication (if/then) while resisting the wanted temptation of reason (vs) aka balance instead of imbalance.
Instead of loving or hating memes...I simply describe what mimicry implies.
To meme/mimic/mock ignores what nature offers, which is why beings get offended by one another during meme-warfare.
the definition of idolatry is prioritizing thibgs above God.
Definition aka to affix (definit) action (ion). God implies all action (perceivable) for each ones reaction (perception) within. It's consenting to the suggestions of one another, which tempts one to ignore all perceivable.
All perceivable (inspiration) moves through each ones perception and cannot be held onto, which is why anything suggested (information) tempts ones consent to hold onto ideals/idols...like words within sound.
As for definition aka DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound)...yet again spell-craft; thinly disguised from those with eyes to see.
above God
God implies as above/so below aka the balance for each ones free will of choice in-between. It's seeking understanding (standing under), which imbalances many below under few above.
Something prioritized above God.
a) Prior/pri - "before", hence forwarded (inception towards death) being (life)...not a conflict between before vs after or priority vs irrelevance.
b) Something implies "sum of things" aka a synthesis of what everything separates into each thing for analysis.
It's ones consent to any suggestion of one another which shapes a "something" out of each thing within everything. That's tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law (puzzling pieces into whole) aka creatio ex nihilo (something out of nothing).
A jew tempts gentiles together, hence amassing a sum aka a quantity aka an amount (mount zion) etc.
perceivable vs suggested
Perceivable implicates (if/then) aka if all perceivable, then each ones perception. Suggestion turns one away from perceivable (logic) and against (versus) one another.
It's suggested vs suggested, while ignoring perceivable. Perception cannot be turned against anything; suggestion turns one from perceivable, hence from linear thinking into circular thinking.
To believe implies holding onto a side, while nature moves...which establishes circulatory rotation aka shaping matter during motion into tumbleweed.
avoid contradictions
A VOID implies "nothing" aka ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable. That's the contra-dict-ion aka the dictated turning within action.
A being cannot avoid nature.
You cannot ignore contradictions
CAN NOT...what can nothing do? Can/gno - "to know"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/can
To know implies each things perception within everything perceivable...what if nothing was suggested to you by others? Could that be used to exploit your ignorance?
own self
Self implies perpetuation of potential through one another during procession...owning implies taking possession, which contradicts the aforementioned.
A being cannot take nature into possession, or in other words...potential cannot take procession into possession.
You imply mockery
What's the origin of YOU? One taking possession over self as "me; myself or I", which labels anyone else into a "you".
Where's the mockery? I AM aka je suis (jesus) shaping YOU (phonetic jew).
Jesus (taking possession over self) contradicts Christ (to anoint aka being separated from one another within all/oil.
what's INSIDE the vase
a) Motion > momentum > matter...momentum implies the vessel (vase) for matter (flower) within motion (nature).
b) What's INSIDE the vase implies matter (suggested information); ones INSIGHT originates from the momentum of motion (perceivable inspiration)...insight has to be drawn by self (analysis); inside is drawn by others (synthesis).
Only within motion can a vase be shaped and a flower grown, and only within motion can a vase be shattered and a flower be cut.
Ignoring to be a vessel with INSIGHT for wanting INSIDE information about a vase...that implies a vasectomy aka vas (vessel) ectomy (to cut out).
It's circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason), which tempts ones free will of choice towards a SIDE, while SIGHT implies linear thinking.
word games got you again. You keep missing the point
Game implies to gamble aka to take a chance by giving choice. Chance implies towards outcome; choice implies in response to origin.
Point implies "end of sentence"...being implies life sentenced from inception towards point of death. Gambling corrupts ones sentience/sentence by inverting perceivable origin with suggested outcomes.
In short...If you write "point"; then you choose to play a game of chance by risking point (death) of sentence (life).
Try this...hold your breath and make a point, then wait a minute or so until you're being forced to let go of what you#re holding onto. If nature continues to move, then why are you trying to make points within it?
What comes first...point or line?
what people are saying
Just as saying (articulation of sound) implies a synthesis; so does people (collective body of persons)...what I'm doing is analyzing the nature of it aka the sound which separates each person (per sonos; by sound) from one another.
Whatever others are saying implies an artifice shaped during the ignorance of nature.
- People talking without speaking
- People hearing without listening
- https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
Why is it that a jew can write this for millions of gentiles to hear, but the implication remains ignored?
"yU wAnt rePliCatiOn!1!" Nope, never said a thing like that.
a) Replying to a meme implies replication to imitation...
b) Thing implies everything separating each thing from one another...not alike; but diverse.
c) Nope/never aka nothing/nihilo aka suggested nihil-ism is replicated by ones consent. Nature doesn't give "nothing", being within nature give (nihilism) and take (denial) from one another, while ignoring everything perceivable for each others suggestions.
for proving
Prove/proof is in the pudding/putting, hence FOR implying being for-warded.
What's the opposite of prove? Contradict! That's the real obsession...thinking in opposites, while contradicting oneself against one another.
ThiNg i HatE iMpliEs tuRniNg aGaInSt oNe aNothEr!
Love vs hate, hence versus/verto - "to turn". One cannot choose a side without turning against another.
No, no, and no. You are not committing idolatry using memes
a) https://genius.com/Destinys-child-no-no-no-part-1-lyrics
- You be sayin', "No, no, no, no, no"
- When it's really, "Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes"
What could be more idolatrous then inverting the child of origin (life) into the child of destination (death)?
b) To commit aka com (together) mittere (send)...being implies send apart from one another.
Mimicking/memeing each other tempts one to ignore origin...that's idolatry aka holding together what is being set apart.
Idol/eidos - "form, shape; likeness, resemblance"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/idol
Nature implies the flow which forms each unique being...ignoring flow (perceivable inspiration) for form (suggested information) implies idolatry.
Mimicry implies mockery...
Exactly
Exact/exigere - "to drive or force out"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/exact
Only nature drives and forces...each being within is driven and forced. Ex-act (acting out) inverts ones reaction within all. That's the power of a suggested word tempting one to invert the status quo of being.
All you do
All does one, so that each one can re-do self within all. Speaking in the name of ALL ignores the first commandment...
obsess with words
FREE will of choice contradicts obsession. I take words apart, which those who take words into possession view as obsession.
making stuff
Stuff/stopfon - "stop" contradicts being FREE will of choice. Nature moves; a being within cannot stop nature from moving...yet consenting to suggested information stuffs ones mind full of garbage, which tempts one to ignore being moved.
memes
Aka mime - "imitation; artifice; mimicry" hence using memes as artificial ideas/idols to tempt others into idolatry. "monkey see; monkey do".
On one hand you want stuff made, on the other you seek replication...a designed contradiction within your line of thinking.
showing
The show (suggested) must go on (perceivable), because all perceivable moves through each ones perception, which the suggestions shown by others are mimicking/memeing.
why word analysis is so great.
a) Great vs small reasoning implies a synthesis, hence turning against one another. Being set apart from one another implies the analysis one ignores when reasoning.
b) Word implies synthesis of LETTERS. Ones consent to any suggested word implies LETTING another shape artificial words within natural sound.
All separates each one from one another (analysis) before one can let another shape (synthesis)....breaking synthetic words apart frees ones analytical mind as the in-stru-ment (mind structured within) sound.
analyze...artifice
Only within nature (analysis) can artifice (synthesis) be shaped.
post your findings here
About free-will-of-choice...Post Score (0)
Zzzzzzz
Sleeping on a conspiracy forum about awakening self...
analyze CNN
a) Analysis implies setting apart; "network" implies a synthesis aka a weaving together.
b) Notice that the letters of the CNN logo are shaped within one line...are you ABLE to C that?
a) All perceivable moving through each ones perception implies a division (de) of mind (ment)...dementia implies the status quo of being.
b) The suggest word "forget" tempts one to ignore that being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) prevents getting/ghend - "to seize".
Matter cannot hold onto motion...only onto each other, while ignoring to be moved. Filling ones mind with suggested information, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto...that's what impairs memory, while being perceived as memory loss.
To seize (consent to any suggestion) implies seizure...a jew uses dia-gnosis (division of perception) to distract gentiles from self inflicted seizures.
c) The ziploc isn't the issue, but using ones FREE will of choice to consent to suggested ZIPPING and LOCKING.
a) Il-lume-nati aka native within light...claiming membership contradicts that.
b) Gang, noun - "a going, journey, way, passage"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gang
Light sends rays on the journey of radiance...aka a separation from one another like natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) not an artificial "ganging" together. Now rethink...gangster vs law.
c) Selling tempts those who buy to serve (to render habitual obedience to, owe allegiance to), hence selling self out when buying into temptations.
d) Coin aka quoin; noun - "in architecture and masonry, cornerstone, external solid angle"...https://www.etymonline.com/word/quoin
Being implies centerstone aka internal solid curvature...
Trump; verb - "fabricate, devise, deceive, cheat, impose upon"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/trump hence trumping a quoin...
Who speaks in the name of others? Who tells history? Who suggests measurements?
What if holding onto measurements reduces attention span?
half of everyone born was dead
If being implies one (living) within all (dying), then being implies "half of everyone born was dead".
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...
- https://genius.com/Body-count-born-dead-lyrics
- https://genius.com/Silverstein-born-dead-lyrics
- https://genius.com/Death-born-dead-lyrics
- https://genius.com/Gates-nj-born-dead-lyrics
Fast forward
Forward implies balance (inception towards death) for choice (life)...slow vs fast implies imbalance for choice.
One cannot fast forward nature...only manipulate each being within to ignore nature, which permits others to shape artificial measurements taken into a slower or faster mind.
organic and free range
Being implies free (life) within range (inception towards death), hence an instrumental organ within sound. Branding anything outside of self as organic or free ranging manipulates ones self discernment.
30...1840...35...35
aka 3+1+9+4 (8) 3+5 (8) 3+5 (8)...888... https://biblehub.com/hebrew/888.htm
Science negro just made the audience his beesh/be-aysh aka BITCH...
blocking all
One within all cannot block all, since all moves each one apart from one another.
So what's blocking about? "to transmit power and change the direction of motion by means of a rope"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/block aka suggestion roping in consent by tempting others to transmit power, while reshaping linear motion into circular thinking (logic).
hellbent
Being implies bent (life) during straight (inception towards death)...reason (heaven vs hell) tempts one to incline to one side over the other, while ignoring to think straight.
Side corrupts sight...if chosen.
entities who infiltrated
Entity implies "being"; infiltrate implies "within fluid", hence being (life) within fluid (inception towards death). There can be no non-infiltrating entities within nature.
starve at the soul
Soul aka sole implies "one and only"...it's seeking nourishment from one another, which imbalances all given through each one. Starvation implies a self imposed distribution error.
Nature supplies soul-food for each "one and only"...sharing among one another tempts one to ignore that, which distributes the shares into few sellers and many buyers, hence permitting few to utilize starvation/famine/food shortages/fast food etc. against many.
Here and there within everywhere, hence schizo/schism...
a) POLL implies a synthesis aka enumerating one by one together...WILL implies an analysis aka each ones free will of choice set apart from one another.
b) Pardon implies "papal indulgence; forgiveness of sins or wrongdoing"...seeking pardon from one another tempts one to ignore Matthew 23:9 "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. "
c) Increasing (max) will (well) on the jizz (ghis) lane.
Being implies jizz (life) within lane (inception towards death) able to increase/decrease (balance) by will (choice)...unless ignored by blowing ones load/vote onto one another...like onto a robber (robert) of max well (will).
Bankruptcy aka the lender's exchange table (bank) + breaking (rupt)...hence jesus aka je suis (I am) flipping and breaking the table of the money ex-changers.
a) To lend implies "granting temporary possession of" aka a jew suggesting consenting gentiles to take a loan.
b) Natural exchange implies ones expression (perception) within all change (perceivable)...artificial exchange implies taking (to buy) what another grants (to sell).
c) Sleight of hand for breaking... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/judaspriest/breakingthelaw.html
"You don't know what it's like"...because knowledge implies different perception within same perceivable, which is how natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) breaks apart.
"All inside it's so frustrating as I drift from town to town"...aka consent drifting from suggestion to suggestion as a frust/frost aka frozen asset within perceivable, while ignoring ones perception.
"I've had every promise broken"...because perceivable breaks any suggestion apart. Notice also promissory note aka noting/nothing aka an empty promise.
you can't just magically "make more
a) Hydro-GEN + oxy-GEN implies each water and air particle within the whole process of generation.
b) Few suggest the synthetic words hydrogen and oxygen to distract consenting many from GEN dividing HYDRO and OXY from one another, hence allowing analysis or in this example "hydrolysis".
c) Reasoning (more vs less) tempts one to ignore the implication of being one within all aka partial within whole aka potential within procession aka generated within generation aka growth within loss aka temporal within ongoing etc.
d) Magic/magi/magh - "to be able"...nature enabling being implies natural analysis; being enabling each other implies artificial synthesis.
As in...all perceivable separating each ones perception (natural magic) or ones consent holding onto the suggestion of another (artificial magic).
Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Bay-city-rollers-you-made-me-believe-in-magic-lyrics
- I've no strength to carry on
- Thought my world was upside down
- You made me believe in magic
Teach others to look beyond pols
Teaching others shapes students into a public affair aka a body politic. In nature...learning for self implies teaching self and vice versa aka body private and the self discernment of each analytical mind.
true authority
Author/auctor/autour/autor - "father"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/author
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven" ~Matthew 23:9
Having free will of choice implies being authorized...choosing to authorize disqualifies ones free will of choice.
All (pa) honey (mela) bondage (bondi)...
Aka manufacturing consensus...an artificial synthesis (consenting to suggested) corrupting natural analysis (being perception within perceivable).
Slow vs fast reasoning represents the game distracting from the subtle (plain, simple, direct) work of nature.