2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

hides the forever

Nature EVER FORwarding being cannot be hidden unless a being chooses to hide from it within the mental state of inversion.

"Though so profound a double-dealer, I was in no sense a hypocrite. Both sides of me were in dead earnest; I was no more myself when I laid aside restraint and plunged in shame, than when I labored, in the eye of day, at the furtherance of knowledge or the relief of sorrow and suffering."

~Robert Louis Stevenson, "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde," 1886

Dr. Jekyll (judica ël) and Mr. Hyde (to hide) aka "hiding from Gods justice"...ones consent to any suggestion of another represents the double-deal aka entering into a dual contract; thereby hiding from the singular expansion of ones perception (effect) within all perceivable (cause). That's how few gained more energy than many can ever produce.

forever battery

a) Battery; noun - "the unlawful beating of another"...consenting to any suggestion implies taking a beating from another while ignoring natural law. Only ignorance can beat ones free will of choice.

b) Battery as an electric cell fueled by the discharge of electricity implies the incarceration (cell) of choice (elect) by establishing a retreat (consent to suggested) within charge (perceivable generating perception).

If a being consents to any suggestion from another being; then a beings perception retreats from the natural charge of perceivable aka nature using motion to spiritually (momentum) animate essence (matter).

c) The protege of Edison was named WILL-I-AM MASON...

d) Thomas/toma (twin) Alva/al (to grow; nourish) Edison (son of edict)...an edict implies a "proclamation having the force of law" cause only within the force of natural law can an artificial claim be shaped.

Claiming (consent) from another (suggestion) implies a two-fold deal aka a twin engine for the nourishing growth of a chosen one and ones loss deprived choice.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a replacement of the French

France/frank - "free"...only free will of choice can replace itself mentally by consenting to a suggestion by another.

French population

If the opposite of population implies "choice; elect; elite".... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/population.html then one cannot be free (France) while taking part within a population.

voters believe France is witnessing

To vote a representative by free will of choice prevents one from witnessing...so does holding onto any belief.

replacement by...non-european

European aka phonetic U AR A PEON aka you are a peon (serve; slave)...if one permits another to replace ones mind with suggested information; then one becomes a slave to another within perceivable inspiration.

In short...flooding the third world into the first world makes many peons to few.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's a pro-war jew

War implies pro vs contra aka two sides of gentiles turning against one another. A chosen one suggests both sides to tempt ones choice off-center and thereby into imbalance aka conflict.

If Shapiro is pro-war; then where's the other side? Hidden in plain sight...shapiro/shapir - "lovely" aka make love; not war.

A jew always operates from both sides because nature implies balance...gentiles ignore nature by choosing artificial sides which imbalances choice.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everything “popular” is a jewish...

Everything (cause) generating each thing (effect) implies privatization. A jew suggests populism to tempt gentiles into a common-consensus aka artificially making public what nature makes private.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

judge ordered

Natural order judges being, hence "judge not (artificially) lest ye be judged (naturally)".

The issue here...entering a court (formal assembly held by a sovereign) by free will of choice implies ones misjudgment of natural law for artificial law. Sovereignty of another requires willing subordination by self.

custody battle

  • Custody; noun - "a keeping, a guarding, safe-keeping, protection, defense" from root custos/(s)keu - "to cover, conceal"

A being cannot keep anything in custody within the process of nature. Taking anything into possession conceals a beings potential.

The so called judge revealed this by exposing the child held in custody to injection from outside and through the will of the custodians.

Without entering an artificial court and joining an artificial battle over artificial custody because an artificial bond broke...it wouldn't be so easy for outside forces to penetrate children.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

nice name (god)

a) Consider Aristotle's descriptions "unmoving mover" + "prime mover"...what if motion itself cannot move its status? What if motion was primary to any matter, while continuing to move through any matter coming into being within motion?

b) Name/nombre/number - "the designation of a unit" from Latin unitas/unus - "one".

What if sharing names tempts one another to ignore singularity?

c) Have a Dune quote: "'A process cannot be understood by stopping it. Understanding must move with the flow of the process, must join it and flow with it"...what if attaching names to anything tempts one to mentally attach measurements, while ignoring the process dividing each thing from one another?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who is really in control? thoughts

Artificial control confines thought within reality. Control aka con (together) trol (to roll) implies circular thinking aka logic, which prevents ones mind from thinking straight.

the same people with a different mask

People implies plural; being implies singular...viewing another being as part of a people masks a beings perception (singularity) under suggestion (plurality).

In reality...each being within the same nature is being differentiated from one another.

aliens

Alien/alius - "another"...the same nature differentiates each being from one ANOTHER. Each being represents a native within nature...surrounded by aliens.

The military made a deal

Militancy (fighting, engaged in warfare) implies a beings consent to a side within a suggested conflict. It's consenting to any suggestion which represents the deal of selling self out to another.

Few suggest sides to tempt many into conflicts against one another. Logic represents the circular confinement of thought before choosing a side; while reason represents the circular conflict against others after choosing a side.

Example...the arrows next to any comment tempts one first into logic (upvote OR downvote); than into reason (upvote VS downvote). That's how simple it is to establish a military within a digital battleground.

change and save us

a) Change (process) cannot be (potential) saved (possession)...without sacrificing potential in the process.

b) Change divides..."us" represents a unification tempting one to ignore dividing change.

the same way the evil elites tell us about everything they do before they do it

Aka revelation of method aka sleight of hand. The trick...there's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. Nature can only reveal being. It's ignoring perceivable nature for whatever artifice another suggests, which makes the trick work.

The end justifies the means

Beginning towards end implies the just way for each odd wanderer within...it's holding onto meaning (measurements) which tempts one to ignore that.

Nature doesn't offer affixed meaning, but each moving mind able to measure.

illusion of choice

Only within balance can there be choice...ones choice consenting to a chosen ones suggestion tempts ones choice into imbalance.

Anything others offer one to choose from implies OPTIONAL...only natural balance giving each being choice implies PRIMARY.

Few shape optional illusions to trick many to ignore primary actuality.

But how else do you corral sheep or cows without sheep dogs and cattle prods?

God (phonetic gad)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/gad

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Most Evil Platform

Platform implies the plane (inception towards death) of form (life)...only within that platform can form choose a side within a conflict (most vs less or good vs evil), while submitting to a suggested authority (the-ism) of another.

reddit...platform

If you reddit (read it); then you read what another wrote into the plane of form. It's the shape of the written which distracts the reader from the flat/plat/plane of animating motion...only within which one can write and read.

reddit targeted

Target/zarge - "border, edge, frame"...being implies in-between border (choice within balance); edge (at the edge of known) and frame (from; forwarded). It's ignoring ones state of being (center) for another (circumference) which puts the target on ones back.

With a target on ones back...others can drive one towards the borderlands; use the edge of a sword to threaten one, and picture one out of frame.

harassment

Harass/harier - "to draw, drag"...suggestion draws the mind to give consent, while giving consent by free will of choice establishes an attachment for others to drag ones mind.

Few tempting many together establishes attachment...the foundation for harassment. If one attaches to love/truth, then one permits another to harass by hate/lie etc.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

no one can explain this conversation

Because converse implies "turning together", which no ONE can explain without contradicting the other.

grown...rather than engineered.

Engine implies "within generation" aka growth within loss. Growth can be tricked with other growth to ignore loss...which represents social engineering.

almost like a recipe

All generates each one...few trick most of many to respond alike by joining together which represents recipe/recipere - "to take, hold, contain".

Artificially putting together what nature sets apart represents the alchemy of synthesis, which requires recipients to take and hold the synthesis together during the natural process of analysis.

we know that when you put in the flour, the eggs, and the milk...you'll get out the cake.

That's Cameron Bergstein suggesting tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka distracting gentiles from nature dividing the flour; the eggs, and the milk from one another for analysis, by suggesting the synthesis of "cake" which represents a tempting outcome.

"Let them eat cake" because "The cake is a lie"...

we know...nobody understands

Because understanding corrupts knowledge...one cannot be at the edge of known, while standing under another.

Anthropic

Aka entrophy; noun - "measure of the disorder of a system"...system represents fiction; disorder implies reality; and measure implies many holding onto suggestions, which permits few control over systems (synthesis) during disorder (analysis).

what we have right now are powerful systems which are fundamentally mysterious

Aka artificial systems making the natural foundation of mind (fundamental) a mystery for powerless gentiles, wasting their power holding onto suggestions, by each powerful jew.

The natural foundation of mind implies balance, which is why lessening the power of ones choice fills the power of a chosen one.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Berlin Kreuzberg

Text from 1997: https://matchlyric.com/die-zillertaler-turkenjager-kreuzberger-nachte + https://www.vidlii.com/watch?v=7Q2_hV-_3IA

  • Ich gehe hier durch Kreuzberg in Berlin
  • Und kann nur Zecken und Alibanden sehen
  • Ich weiß nicht mehr wie lang ich das ertrag
  • Weil ich weder Türken noch Autonome mag
6
free-will-of-choice 6 points ago +6 / -0

https://www.bitchute.com/video/1sWbxVUbOQIQ ...Jake Shields talking with the son of Alex Jones about the lawfare angle behind the take down of InfoWars.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The boomer generation won't...the next generation has very little tolerance left.

Boomer vs zoomer represents the very same conflict designed by a jew to turn gentiles against each other. Versus represents a mental (logic) and physical (reason) hamster-wheel one cannot leave by choosing either side.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a group of military leaders

Military implies a group of followers...a leader cannot join groups without jeopardizing ones leading position. The leader represents the advocate for directions to follow...it's the followers who by joining together become militant.

A jew utilizes advocacy of direction to tempt gentiles into militancy against one another aka shaping a circle (militancy) within a line (advocacy of direction).

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

operation trust...to stop the communist takeover

a) Trust implies the takeover aka ones consent taking over the suggestion of another while holding onto it.

b) Only nature operates aka exerts force by thrusting (inception towards death) potential (life) forwards...it's trusting which corrupts potential with possession.

Trust (holding onto) contradicts thrust (letting go)

c) Nature cannot be stopped...any being within nature can be tricked with artificial (suggestion) to stop acknowledging natural (perception).

d) Com (together) + uni (apart from one another)...-ism implies a suggested consensus tempting one to join together with another.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aka the all seeing eye among the eyes that cannot see all (perceivable) because they watch each other (suggested).

Any information suggested as logos (words); held as logic (circular thinking) and fought over as reason (turning against each other)...makes one near-sighted aka blind to the pharisee (far I see).

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a new era of deterrence based on AI is beginning

  • Deterrence aka de (to divide) + terrence (to frighten)

Being implies in-between division...fear implies leaning towards suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin.

Palantir

  • Palantir aka palan (far) tir (to watch over)

If one tries to understand suggested information by holding it near (within memory); then one permits another to watch over one from afar.

technocratic

If one holds onto suggested information; then one gives another the cratic/kratos (power) of techno/tekhnē (artifice). Holding onto weakens being within reality, which becomes the strength for exploitation by artifice.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Dividing above from below implies transformation (transfer of form within action)....creation implies out of nothing.

b) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder aka the being which holds onto...holding onto creation tempts a being to ignore transformation.

c) Firmament (form a mind)...few suggest creationism to tempt the formed mind of many to hold onto, while ignoring transformation aka being (life) let go (inception towards death).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It feels like we are living in a scripted reality

Nature bringing into being so that being can react to nature...that's scripted reality. If a being ignores reality for emotion (feels); similarity (like), and pluralism (we); then that's scripted fiction.

A script can only be written within a line...

in the line of fire

Instead of watching "in the line of fire" try discerning self as fired (life) within a line (inception towards death)...

there was a movie

There was motion before matter came into being...it's watching captured moments (pictures) as moving pictures (movies) which corrupts ones perception of what WAS with the suggestion of what IS.

simpson

a) Son of simplicity (free from duplicity, upright, guileless; blameless, innocently harmless)

b) Familiar; adjective - "demon, evil spirit that answers one's call; a friend, intimate acquaintance, companion"

c) Homer/homeros - "hostage; blindly going with a companion"

d) Marge/margin/merg - "edge; border; boundary"

e) Bart/bartholomew aka bar (son) talmay (furrow)...a furrow represents a draining ditch in-between edges; borders; boundaries.

f) Lisa from el-is-a-beth (God is my oath)

g) Maggie from margaret/meregrot - "sea pebble".

h) Abraham aka abh (father) raham (multitude)

i) Flanders/vlaanderen aka vlakte "plain" + wanderen "to wander"

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Has not given us (plural)...but one (singular)"

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be implies singularity; loyalty implies to natural loyal/legal/lex - "law"...not to one another. Few shape suggestions to tempt consent into dualism, hence into a dual/duel against one another.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

made invisible air visible

In (within) visible (perceptible to sight)...few tempt many to ignore this by suggesting that invisible implies "not perceptible to sight".

It's consenting to suggested words like "invisible", which prevents one from analyzing the implication of division. Consent implies synthesis...natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) implies division for analysis.

shock waves

Only agitated matter within calm motion can be shocked, and only within a line (inception towards death) can a wave be raised (life).

heat

Only during a cooling process (dying) can heated potential (living) come into being.

turbulence

Division of nature into being implies tranquility...commotion among being implies turbulence.

nothing but a light and a razor's edge

Few suggest nothing (nihilo) to tempt many into nihil-ism and de-nial of everything perceivable aka as living within the edge of knowing as a particular ray (matter) within the visible spectrum (momentum) of whole light (motion).

Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics

  • There's something wrong with the world today
  • I don't know what it is
  • Something's wrong with our eyes
  • We're seeing things in a different way
  • And God knows it ain't His
  • We're livin' on the edge

block the refracted light

Coming into being within nature implies the refraction of light...ignoring perceivable for suggested represents the block.

density becomes color

Become implies "coming into being"...only within light (motion) can color (momentum) come into being (matter), which implies diffusion; not density.

Ignoring how all perceivable diffuses each ones perception, by consenting to any suggestion, establishes density within oneself.

Too close to the aether?

a) Aether (motion) > spirit (momentum) > essence (matter)

b) TOO CLOSE implies essence holding onto one another; TO implies spirit moving towards essence thereby animating it; THE AETHER implies God (theos) moving (aether) spirit through essence.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

MASSIVE Global weather warfare

Globe implies a mass, yet a mass can only be shaped during a pass. Only if motion passes matter can matter be amassed into a globe.

As for weather warfare...if weather implies direction of wind; then confining weather within a circle (globe) establishes warfare aka two sides waging war against each other during a linear fare (journey; ones passage in life).

Notice that few can only control the weather if many are distracted by warfare aka logic (inward circle) and reason (outward circle).

Furthermore...reconsider solar wind (linear) generating globe (circular) while causing disturbance.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

jews are at the end of their ropes

Rope/reif - "ring"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rope

a) A jew shapes a ring inside (logic) and outside (reason) of gentiles by tempting free will of choice into a consensus. Joining any consensus implies the rope aka ones attachment to another aka the string one attaches to self while permitting another to puppeteer.

b) Nature implies linear progression (inception towards death) of being (life)....logic implies circular thinking turning into circular conflicts of reason. A circle can only be shaped within a line by holding beginning and end together, thereby representing the mythological ouroborous.

There can never be an end to nature...only beginning (inception) and end (death) of each being (life) within nature.

jewish propaganda is realistic.

a) A gentile willingly choosing to hold onto jewish propaganda establishes fiction within reality.

b) Propaganda implies "cause to multiply"; nature generating being implies "cause to divide"...a jew suggests propaganda to invert the perception of each gentile into gentiles multiplied by consensus.

Example: Believers represent a consensus of gentiles... individually consenting to jewish propaganda.

jewish Rabbis call the shots

Rabbi/rabh - "master"...it's ones consent to any suggested call by another which implies slave establishing master by taking a shot.

A jew becomes a rabbi only when a gentile shoots himself, like for example the onlyfans rabbi being established by gentile fans shooting their loads to suggested whores.

that's a fact

Fact implies F(icticious)ACT. Everything acts; each thing reacts...calling out facts to one another establishes a fiction within reality.

Rabbi is the most evil person

If Rabbi implies "master"; then choosing a side (most vs less + good vs evil) makes one person a slave to a conflict against other persons. It's the slaves entering conflicts against each other which permits anyone outside to be the master over both sides fighting.

Example: a slave believes boxing represents winner vs loser; the master suggests the ring within which two losers fight each other about who loses less, while waiting for the master to declare the winner from outside the ring.

Theoretically speaking

Only within sound (praxis) can speech (theory) be shaped. A jew practices within sound while tempting gentiles to theorize within speech. The former represents operative masonry; the latter speculative masonry.

If you take out ALL

All gives (inception) and takes (death) each one (life)...a jew tricks gentiles to give up (to sell) self by taking (to buy) from one another.

A jew establishes a marketplace within everything where gentiles are buying and selling "nothing".

he is the framework and embodiment of evil

Work (motion) frames (momentum) body + mind (matter)...good vs evil enslaves mind (logic) and body (reason) within material conflict.

jews are lately screwing up left and right.

Left and right cannot be screwed without bringing imbalance to choice in-between. It's choosing to hold onto a side which screws one.

Life cannot perceive its inception and death, because SIDES represent fiction, while ones SIGHT in-between represents reality.

willing to destroy the whole

The destruction (division of structure within action) of whole gives each partial within free will of choice.

Elimination of occupying

Eliminate aka ex (out) limine (threshold) implies nature moving being out (life) of threshold (inception towards death)...which cannot be occupied (taken into possession) since it moves.

the jewish problem would be completely

Complete implies "finish together"; problem implies "thrown forward"...nature throws each being forward, while a jew suggests gentiles to seek artificial completion.

gone forever

Aka ever forward (inception towards death) for each one (life) going within...it's a jewish trick to make gentiles believe that "gone forever" represents vanished from existence aka cast into nothingness.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

To a psychopath people are only means to an end.

There can be only one psycho (animating spirit) path (passage way) towards end for anyone coming into being within. It's using the word "psychopath" for psychoanalysis aka to measure others, which establishes a consensus among people. It's ones consent to any consensus which represents the taking into possession of meaning.

In nature...spirit animates each person during the way of passage. A people represents an artificial construct aka a lumpenproletariat as in lumping together animated progeny.

People who think...

...imply each person lumped together within a consensus of thought shaped by another. A hivemind doesn't think...it tanks thought.

Ultimately, the Rothschild satanic families

Ultimately, God...and nothing else.

It could be they want it (israel) destroyed

Nature destroys; being needs to resist want as to be able to build during destruction. Israel aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies each beings struggle in needing to resist wanted temptation.

at some point

Point implies end of sentence; being implies sentenced at inception towards point of death. Summation (some) of being shortens the sentence of each.

either way

There can be only one way...forwards.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been telling people (plural)...

...while ignoring person (singular)

to this date the only one...

...was oneself; the singular being resisting the temptation of plurality. You represent the one willingly stepping out of the deception, while trying to get others to follow you, yet following isn't a strength of ones will, but the weakness of joining the will of others.

The power of a chosen one is based on how many are following; the power of ones choice is based on discerning the inversion aka ONES CHOICE / CHOSEN ONE...only then can one choose to resist the temptation to follow another.

don't want to lose

Lose isn't a want vs not want option, but the needed origin forwarding ones wanting will. Being implies growth (life) within loss (inception towards death). No matter if one wants or not wants to lose life...one needs to.

universal and resounding

Resounding implies ones response to all sound; universal implies one turning against one another within all.

Uni (one) vers (to turn) al (all)...that turn hidden within the crafted spell represents the deception turning one from all against each other. A jew suggests universalism to deceive the singular gentile into a plurality, which is how each jew becomes the "master of the universe".

consider themselves "rEd PiLLeD"

Consider (siding together) aka red vs blue siding against one another within the same inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle...representing the mythological ouroborous eating its own tail.

bRoKe FrEe FrOm MuH tHe MaTriX

Only within the matrix/matri (mother) can one be free by breaking apart (off-spring) from one another. Where's the father? THE aka theos (god)...

giving up their own children

Off-spring implies separation from one another aka seed (male) through soil (female) for fruit (off-spring)...nothing within that process can be owned.

A jew suggests buying and selling to trick gentiles into selling self out by buying into anything to gain ownership over it. Doing that represents the artificial (possession) inversion of natural (procession).

It's procession (inception towards death) which sets potential (life) free from one another.

freedom in exchange for security

Free (life) within dominance (inception towards death) implies ones expression within all change (ex-change)...which isn't secure (free from danger); but unsteady (free withing danger).

Only DANGER (dying) is secure, while the AUSTERE POWER (living) struggles within... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH_JRjJtNSw

don't try to drag me

It's ones attachment to any suggestion of another which drags one across perceivable. The natural trial implies choice (life) balancing in-between push (inception) and pull (death).

love triangle

Love vs hate implies dualism...it's a chosen one suggesting the -ism who gains triangular control over the angles of conflict with the help of compass and square (freemasonry).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›