No Whites Allowed, Britain's MI5 Tells Applicants
Apply implies "join or combine"...white implies "pure light" which allows each ray within to join or combine with one another.
Nature doesn't require application...artifice does.
discriminate against white
Discriminate aka dis (to divide) cernere (to distinguish)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/discriminate
White (pure light) generates a spectrum which divides each distinct ray within from one another...only a ray (race) within spectrum (color) of light (white) can choose to turn against one another.
Artificial laws of the UK (united kingdom) invert natural dis (inception towards death) crimination (life), hence artificially uniting together what nature divides and distinguishes apart from one another.
Furthermore...if white (motion) > color (momentum) > ray (matter); then "white lives don't matter".
a white country
Country/count - "to sum up"...few suggest countries to summon up many aka herding the cattle within an enclosure.
White > spectrum > ray implies a process of specification aka separation aka dismissal...the opposite of a summoning.
Only nature sets native free...joining any country holds one (native) accountable to another (foreigner).
Jobs that hold power
Job implies a "piece of work" aka each particular power (native) within all work (nature)...holding onto anything deprives power.
The currency suggested as compensation for a job done implies a moving current, which cannot be held onto...yet those depriving themselves of power by seeking compensation from another lack the power to discern that.
Holding onto a paycheck tempts one to ignore to "check yourself before you wreck yourself"...
white...racism
White > spectrum > ray (race) implies internal division...ones consent (-ist) to a suggestion (-ism) implies an external unification.
free housing, food and Healthcare that the good ol whiteys pay for
White (pure light) sets free each ray within...few suggest housing; food and healthcare to tempt many to freely choose to pay entrance into bondage aka to sell themselves out.
If you get housing; food and healthcare from another; then you're imprisoned.
a) Declare aka division (de) of clarity (clare) implies all perceivable dividing each ones perception from one another...any declared suggestion tempts one to ignore that, because consenting to a suggestion implies a unification (synthesis); not a division (analysis).
b) "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is NO NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
There's only all perceivable moving through each ones perception NOW...nothing new.
c) Only nature produces, which allows each native to reproduce.
d) ILL implies all (inception towards death) for each ones HEALTH (life) within. SICK implies to SEEK from one another.
Illness sustains health; sickness tempts one to ignore that.
e) All cannot create only transform each one within. Few suggest creationism (creatio ex nihilo) to conserve ignorance among many during transformation.
d) God > chicken > egg implies delineation...not a circle.
Egg (body formed within female) implies matter transformed within momentum (female) of motion (male).
Thrembo
Six/seco (to divide) + seven (split even) implies all dividing each integer (life) within an even split (inception towards death). Holding onto a fictional number like 6 or 7 establishes a thrembo/thrombos (lump) like for example a blood clot thrombosis during covid.
David Her
Aka to divide (cleave) her (shekhinah) aka analysis of a living metaphor... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjr9b37yCjA
a) Any suggestion one consents to represents an advertised layer obscuring ones perception. That's also why the internet started with ones consent to "log in"...
b) Demo aka DEMON-stration aka demonic (to divide/provide) strata (layer).
Notice "Vanderbilt" in the background....
- The progenitor of the Vanderbilt family was Jan Aertszoon or Aertson (1620–1705), a Dutch farmer...
- Dutch East India Company (1602–1799)
Now you know why Dolly (female pet) sells vaccine/vacca (cow) for a farmer.
Freemasonry's master plan
Tempting free will of choice into religion aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind), while distracting from Gods plan with walls (ignorance); bricks (information) and mortar (consent).
insurgency of muslims
Islam (submission) and muslim (one who submits) contradicts insurgency/insurgere - "to rise up".
into the west
A circular conflict (west vs east); designed by the use of compass (logic) and square (norms) to tempt two sides to mutually prevent each other from insurgency.
end game of freemasonry
Beginning (inception) and end (death) imply ongoing motion for each temporary matter (life) coming into being within... freemasonry designs games to tempt choice to gamble on chance; thereby sacrificing self towards an outcome.
A free mason doesn't gamble...he builds the house that always wins for gamblers to lose in.
High level masons choose to
To (towards) implies the plan (level) of God moving form (life) within flow (inception towards death); thereby establishing choice within balance.
A mason uses compass (logic) and square (norms) to build a circular conflict called reason (high vs low) to tempt choice into imbalance.
There's no such thing as a high or low level in nature...only each beings free will of choice IN-BETWEEN rising (living) while falling (dying).
shriner
Shrine/scrin - "arc of the covenant" implies the consensus of many to any suggestion by few establishing an arc (one bowing to another) of a covenant (contract), which permits the one suggesting to use the memory of the one consenting as a repository aka a shrine.
A shriner represents a consensus farmer who utilizes the mind of another for the storage of deception.
Competition?
Aka com (together) petit (to strive; seek) ion (action). In nature...action divides reaction from one another; few suggest artifice to tempt many to seek together, hence the resource competition amongst many.
You are resisting...I am.
I AM (je suis; jesus) and YOU ARE (judah) represent a competition, which tempts one to ignore being resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death).
complex Undoing
Nature undoing (inception towards death) each native (life) implies analysis; natives weaving (plex) together (com) artifice implies synthesis.
Synthesis (suggestion) tempts one to ignore analysis (perception)...if consented to.
For competition is embedded in Earth society
FOR (forward) implies nature dividing (inception towards death) each native (life) from one another...few suggest society to tempt many in competition against each other. To be part of a society...one has to enter willingly; thereby embedding self among others.
Nature isn't a resting place (bed)...it's an ongoing force of velocity tempting ones temporary resistance to seek shelter in rest. Alas...no rest for the wicked.
Rest aka cessation of motion implies ones ignorance of being (life) moved (inception towards death)...not the lack of motion. Few planted stop signs all over the world to distract many from discerning that.
Here's a sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Mcfadden-and-whitehead-aint-no-stoppin-us-now-lyrics
basic tenets
Tenet/tenere - "to hold, keep, grasp" tempts one to ignore that the base of existence moves.
ideal
Mentally holding onto implies ideal; physically holding onto implies idol...few suggest idealism and idolatry to tempt many into a consensus; held together by individual consent given.
It is deep within the language of every subject matter.
Language/lingo - "tongue" implies matter subjected to motion, hence being animated to utilize the tongue to articulate words within natural sound. Doing so a) forks the tongue in-between natural and artificial, while permitting few to write (spell-craft) the lingua franca of many spell-bound by it, and b) buries those who ignore sound to bury themselves deep underneath words.
Example...holding onto a word based DEF-INITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka deaf to phonics (sound).
Oneness as a principle abhors competition
Principle aka prin (first) cip (to grasp) contradicts oneness, which divides all (cause) internally into each one (effect)...few suggest principles (affect) to distract many from discerning this.
As for abhorrence aka ab (away) hor (to tremble)...the natural way (inception towards death) of life moves forwards. If one ignores that by holding onto anything mentally (ideal) or physically (idol); then one feels trembling aka emotion aka a shaking apart.
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Kc-and-the-sunshine-band-shake-shake-shake-shake-your-booty-lyrics
- Don't fight your feelings, give yourself a chance
- Shake, shake, shake, shake, shake, shake
will speak first
Sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) moves will into instrument (mind structured within) first before speech can be articulated...
needs to be undone and then identify places where it holds fast.
Undoing need (inception towards death) generates each wanted place (life)...identification tempts one to hold onto matter, while ignoring discernment within motion.
Once you fully accept the Truth of Oneness
Oneness (cause) sets each one within (effect) apart from one another...acceptance of truth to one another tempts affection, which generates competition (truth vs false) against one another.
Oneness forces (inception towards death) adaptation (life)...it doesn't require acceptance or denial.
your body. It is singular.
A divided unit (body + mind) within singularity...tempted by one another to physically (idol) and mentally (ideal) hold onto.
If one says what IS singular; then one ignores that singularity WAS before each single unit within can come into being by internal separation from one another.
You are One
YOU and I are in competition with one another. It's suggesting another what oneness is, which tempts competition (is vs isn't) among one another.
Nature works...it doesn't require explanations, definitions and labels from any native within to do that. Trying to explain nature tempts natives into idolatry (physical) and idealism (mental) aka ones FREE will of choice into bondage to another.
one part of you at the expense of the other part always harms the whole of you.
Only within whole (cause) can particular (effect) come into being...to be implies each essential (particular) within holistic (whole).
Few suggest putting parts together to make whole again aka mosaic law (puzzle) aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together)...many represent the parts few tempted together aka the unwashed masses.
society was originally set up to benefit a few at the expense of the masses
Society aka soc (together) i (within) al (all) implies all as the origin of each one within...few suggest social-ism to tempt many into societies aka together. Doing so is for the detriment of many and the benefit of a few chosen ones who remain apart.
As for expense...nature sets each native free (will of choice); a chosen one tempts ones choice to invert itself by paying an artificial price to get access to everything nature offers for free. Paying implies selling self out to another aka inverting ones choice into a chosen one by making a selection (French; elite).
any thought or belief system that brings anxiety
Nature isn't a sys (together) stem (to stand)...nature dividing native implies an analytical process generating the potential to express self among one another. Few invert analysis into synthesis by suggesting systems to manipulate each being analytical perception aka self dis (to divide) cern (to perceive) ment (mind).
Belief implies ones consent holding onto any suggestion of another, while anxiety implies the fear of suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin.
even if well hidden
Nature reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception)...any suggestion by another tempts one to hide from all.
Everything reveals; nothing is hidden...many are hiding; few operate to curtain of mass ignorance through deception.
words are the offspring of...
...artificial spells crafted within natural sound. Sound fertilizes instrument; instrument aborts self by sharing infertile words with one another.
all of life
Only within all can each one live aka "life of all".
your internal chatter...
...isn't yours, but an accumulation within oneself of crafted spells by another. Nature doesn't shape words; natives shape artificial words to distract from natural sound shaping each instrument. Why? To permit few to instrumentalize many through words.
seek joy rather than satisfaction
Seeking tempts one towards suggested outcome, while ignoring perceivable origin. It's few who suggest both joy and satisfaction to tempt many on a ride.
Nature implies value (perceivable) generating evaluation (perception)...misusing evaluation to define value as joyful or satisfactory devalues self, while permitting few to set values for many who keep chasing for joy and satisfaction.
"Seek and ye shall find" implies that there's a foundation (perceivable) one ignores when seeking (suggested)...only within a foundation can one seek.
the second one suggests that you live in each moment and in that moment, choose what suits you.
First motion; then momentum; then matter...the division of momentum into matter implies second/seco - "to divide". Only matter within momentum can perceive "moment". Momentum represents the suit each naked matter wears.
First perceivable; then perception; then suggestion... perceivable implies primary; perception implies secondary; suggestion implies optional. Choosing optional sacrifices ones choice to a chosen one.
Once you gracefully accept each now moment, you will find yourself closer to peace.
Matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) implies each piece/peace of whole motion....it's acceptance, which tempts denial aka war among pieces.
There can be only now (perceivable momentum) and each one within (perception)...few suggest before and after to distract many aka by tempting free will of choice off-center with optional choices.
enough
Aka en (within) nough (to reach). Being implies choice (life) within balance (inception/death)...reaching towards either side imbalances choice.
Being implies IN-BETWEEN (life) each side (inception/death), while unable to hold onto either without losing ones position.
Everyone else
EACH thing (one) within EVERYthing (oneness) aka internal division from one another aka cause > effect aka action > reaction aka velocity > resistance aka motion > matter aka all > one etc.
changed your ideas
All implies change; each one within the adaptation to change...few suggest ideas to tempt many to hold onto them which inverts adaptation into stagnation.
a different outcome
Same entrance (inception) and outcome (death) for each difference coming into being (life) within.
the weight of all your opinions being lifted
It's each beings free will of choice which imposes the burden of optional opinion (suggested information) while ignoring primary input (perceivable inspiration).
new “now”
new, néwos, now...same origin, different meaning!
Is humanity truly losing the war against the TPTB?
Ongoing loss represents the linear process giving humanity the potential to temporary grow...TPTB tempt humanity to turn against each other within a circular war (true vs false).
call center
Being implies the center (life) of all (inception towards death)...cALLing one another tempts one to ignore all while off-centering oneself.
mass-apply
Applying (joining) a mass permits a chosen few to remain unattached.
bonuses that can bring you up
The more many are bringing up; the deeper into debt to few they fall. Few suggests bonuses to tempt many into mutually exploiting one another.
teleology will stitch your eyelids shut.
Because looking for tele (conclusion) within logy (circular logic) makes one blind to ongoing delineation. Only within a line can a circle be shaped.
Why do we have atoms?
Atom/atomos/tomos/tem - "to cut" aka motion generating momentum to cut matter into pieces. Both pluralism (we) and possessionism (have) tempts one to ignore that.
One has to let go of one another to ATONE (atom) for ones SIN (syn). Atone implies "at one"; syn implies "together" aka splitting the atom.
more stable than
Only within fluidity (inception towards death) can stability (life) come into being...more vs less implies instability among being. That's a sin/syn.
the first war
THE (theos; God) implies first...each one within implies second/seco - "to divide". Ignoring the divide into each one (atone/atom) represents the sin/syn of coming together in conflict (war).
There were two ways
There can be only one way (inception towards death) for each one within (life)...two implies counting together what the way of life sets apart from one another.
everything that came next
Everything (cause) was before each thing (effect) can come into being...anything next (affect) tempts ones free will of choice into a nexus/ned - "to bind".
saturn emasculates his father to rebel against the old order
Aka momentum emasculating motion when bringing matter into being...matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) implies rebellion (to rise up against) the old order of motion.
Saturn; the son of Caelus (the sky) and Terra (the earth) aka water (motion) > air (momentum) > land (matter) aka natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) consuming its own children.
Museum Hosts
Museum/muse/me - "to think"...nature hosts the thought of each native within motion; museums distract thought with artifice from being moved.
A museum represents a deceptive host. Nature as the revealing host doesn't invite (summon together) but dismisses (send apart).
This is "crime" and not "conspiracy."
Vaccination represents the crime; avoidance thereof in first trimester represents the rhetorical conspiracy to sell the crime despite "side" effects.
new revelations
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is NO NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
RE (to respond) VE (veil) AL (all)...all authenticates each ones response; responding to one another veils auto (self) hentēs (being).
Being implies within (perception) revelation (perceivable)...struggling with a veil (suggested).
Few suggest future to shape a consensus among many about imagination. Nature neither shows future nor past...only presence. Imagination distorts presence.
As for killing fields...compare alleged world population of 1975 (4.08 billion) to 2026 (8.3 billion). Death on the field seems to have a rejuvenating affect. It's as if dying causes the effect of living aka flow (inception towards death) generating form (life).
false memory syndrome
Syndrome implies "a number of symptoms occurring together"...so the dichotomy of true vs false; recollected within memory, represents a false memory syndrome.
The natural use of memory requires adaptation to perceivable inspiration within a line...not commemoration of suggested information within a circle.
false
True vs false implies fiction...God > fall (inception towards death) > rise (life) implies reality.
connecting the dots
If inception sentences life towards POINT of death; then connecting the dots con (together) nects (to bind) life to death.
Instead of connecting the dots...try regaining sentence/sentience. A being has to be sentinel; not punctual.
atlantic records
Aka respond by heart (re-cord) to bear heaven (atlantic/atlas)...instead of calling to mind enter-tain-ment.
a) Proxima Fusion... https://img.gvid.tv/i/28y5sUG3.jpg
b) Resisting con-cern grows dis-cern-ment.
sad reality
Sad/seto/sa - "to satisfy"...form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot become satiated aka nourished to the full.
Sleight of hand: "I can't get no satisfation...cause I tried and I tried and I tried and I tried". The continuous trying represents the seeking of happiness for satisfactory relief, which nature prevents yet which artifice tempts one to ignore.
Happy implies happenstance (taking a chance) which represents the inversion of being given choice.
- I can't get no satisfaction
- I can't get no girl reaction
That girl refers to shekhinah aka mother nature aka the balance ones choice penetrates unless ignored for chance. A chosen one doesn't take a chance...a chosen one chooses the cleave (dividing balance) of shekhinah.
You are hard (life)...she is wet (inception towards death) aka solid within fluid aka penis within vagina aka sexual passage.
national security minister
A nation is based on adaptation to change; a ministry is based on holding onto belief while ignoring change. Using a ministry to foster belief makes outsiders maladaptive, while securing natives.
hunger games
Hunger implies the ongoing process of dying for each temporary life within. Hunger is always there, but eating tempts those within it to ignore that.
A game tempts one to gamble given choice by taking a chance aka holding onto instead of adapting to change or in hunger terms...gambling tempts one to continue going for the next bite.
Can form (life) within flow (inception towards death) be melted by using a coil/coillir aka co (together) + legere (to gather)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/coil
Are few gathering many together? If so...why does anything many hold valuable keeps melting away into the (((rubbing))) hands of few?
Tesla aka tessela - "mosaic work"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/tesselation
Energy isn't mosaic (uniting partials together to make whole) but the opposite (whole dividing each partial within) aka en (within) ergy (work).
A jew utilizes mosaic law to tempt gentiles to play puzzle within energy instead of discerning self as reactor within (en) generator (ergy).
Notice furthermore the etymology of tessela/tessera - "die; cube; mosaic tile"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/tessera
What's the masonic trade of die-casting about? What about the cube of allah (kabb alah)? What binds masonic/mosaic tiles together? What cues (cu) being (be)?
Have you ever seen an acrobatic or circus performer do an act where they balance
a) One cannot see action...because ones sight implies a reaction to all given to it.
b) Performing (by form) implies within flow. Few suggest performance to distract many from sustenance through flow aka adaptation to natural animation.
c) Acro (to rise up) bat (to go) aka nature going (inception towards death) allowing native to rise up (life). Living in-between inception/death implies as choice within balance.
A jew as director of performance tempts gentiles into circular (circus) confinement (tent) to misdirect from sustenance.
They balance by putting both feet out to the sides and adjusting as necessary to stay balanced.
a) Holding ones breath while balancing quickly shows that the so called "balance act" is optional, and that only the primary force of natural animation directs necessity through secondary adaptation by each native.
b) Nature (cause) implies singularity for each single native (effect) within..."both" represents an artificial measurement taken into possession by consenting to suggested dualism aka an AFFECT (suggestion) distracting EFFECT (perception) from CAUSE (perceivable).
Can you show me an example for BOTH (dual) without each ONE (singular) having a different position from one another?
Your idea of balanced is not engaging in either side, but hopping off entirely.
a) Idea implies mentally holding onto thereby imbalancing ones choice. Few suggest idealism and idolatry to tempt a consensus among many as imbalance for choice mentally and physically.
b) Not (nihilo; nothing) implies ones de-nial of everything perceivable for suggested nihil-ism. Another imbalance.
c) En (within) gage (pledge) ment (mind) implies ones consent to a suggestion of another, which artificially binds ones FREE will of choice. You may heard of engagement under the name of re (to respond) ligio (to bind) aka religion, which requires ones pledge (faith) to enter.
Being implies en-breach-ment, hence being given a break to think freely.
d) One cannot hop off entirely...only within entire (whole) can one (partial) hop aka spring forth. Few suggest an on vs off conflict to confine the minds of many into a circle while using the hope of getting out or the fear of not getting out as enticement to continue fighting each other.
You're not in the middle of a set of binary choices if you reject both sides
a) Binary implies ONES lack of self discernment within singularity. Another set a binary into your singular mind by tricking you with optional choices to ignore your secondary choice within natures primary balance.
Primary (perceivable balance) > secondary (perceiving choice) > optional (suggested choices)
b) One can only reject optional sides...primary (inception towards death) moving through secondary (life) implies INJECTION.
c) Life in-between inception/death isn't binary, but singular motion moving through each single unit of matter. Optional sides tempt one to incline away from ones natural position in the middle as choice within balance.
Optional sides tempt ONES CHOICE to consent to the suggestion of a CHOSEN ONE. By choosing another one inverts ones choice.
d) Example: if another suggests food; then ones secondary choice faces the option of want or not want, while ignoring the primary need...HUNGER.
make up your own side and hold onto that
Free will of choice cannot hold onto any SIDE without establishing imbalance....it's balancing in-between as choice which sustains ones SIGHT.
Consider the artificial want to hold onto and the natural need to let go of through for example "inter-course for off-spring" aka be fruitful and multiply. And where does one plant the seed? In-between the soil!
Your rejection of the two choices isn't a balanced position.
What's TWO all; everything; entire; whole; motion; cause; action; origin; energy; God? From one to another one...what's the binary of singularity?
Can you offer two choices to me without aiming at ones free will of choice to choose in-between? How could one offer two to another one without contradicting singularity?
What if second isn't two, but seco - "to cut; divide" aka the internal division of each one from one another?
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Papa-roach-last-resort-lyrics
What if I don't reject two choices, but discern ones choice (matter) injected into balance (momentum) by motion?
You've gotta work on your presentation
EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/energy hence being within (en) work (ergy).
Therefore action (work) presenting reaction (employment) aka EMPLOY=IMPLY....that's why I freely choose to represent implication to those bound to reason.
You say things, but you're not engaging what I say.
Sound doesn't engage...it disengages each instrument within from one another. Few orchestrate many instruments together with spell-craft aka with the articulation of words within natural sound.
I adapt to everything (cause) dividing each thing (effect) from one another...you permitted another to affect you with nothing (not) which you willingly hold together by consenting to suggested nihilism, hence writing "you're not". How could anything within everything be nothing?
You don't come across like you understand some kind of deeper meaning to words.
a) Being implies coming (life) across (inception towards death)...coming across one another implies double-crossing (union jack aka jacking unity).
b) Understanding implies "standing under" hence the deepening (submission). Being implies in-between aka as above/so below, which is why one has the free will of choice to heighten or deepen ones situation.
c) Only within sound can a word be shaped...holding onto the meaning of the latter/letter drowns one within former.
learning how to have a conversation
Con (together) vers (to turn) implies war...which is good for absolutely nothing.
- Ooh, war
- Is an enemy to all mankind
- The thought of war blows my mind
Here's any example for converse from mathematic (math-a-magic)..." In mathematics, an opposite proposition; thus, after drawing a conclusion from something supposed, we invert the order, making the conclusion the supposition or premises, and draw from it what was first supposed. Thus, if two sides of a triangle are equal, the angles opposite the sides are equal: and the converse is true; if these angles are equal, the two sides are equal."
It's a trick to turn many against one another by inverting the natural order.
If conversation stops among natives; then does nature stop working? If you shape a circle (conversation) within a line (natural work); then could the shape shift your attention away from the one and only way of life?
You're not avoiding...
Void aka emptiness implies ones denial of perceivable (natural) for suggested (artificial). Nature implies fullness aka the ongoing fall (inception towards death) for each temporal rise (life).
by following an if > then sequence
Effect (life) needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow cause (inception towards death)...it's few who utilize suggestion to tempt a consensus of many to follow.
Implication (if > then) implies adaption to linear procession...not following along. For this to make sense requires ones self discernment as resistance within velocity...the latter tempting the former to ignore resisting.
A linear progression in nature wraps back around itself
Only within a line can a circle be shaped...try it. Pro (forwards) gress (to walk) ion (action)...action moving forwards allows reaction to walk for example in circles.
Wrap/wer - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/wrap TO implies the natural delineation; TURN represents the artificial circle shaped within it.
in the shape of
Only within flow (inception towards death) can form (life) be shaped...mentally (ideal) and physically (idol) holding onto a shape like a circle tempts form to ignore flow.
spiral
Spir (to twist) al (all) aka few putting the spin on many aka inversion.
Your attempt at taking words apart
I resist the temptation of holding letters; words; meaning together in synthesis by analyzing each apart from one another.
- Meaning...a measure taken within mind while ignoring given.
- Words...articulation shaped within natural sound.
- Letters...ones consent "letting" another suggest "letters".
to dissolve a contradiction is an attempt at logical thinking
Dis (to divide) solve (to loosen) implies analytical thought...contra (against) dic (to speak) tion (action) implies synthetic thought.
Synthetic thought TURNS one away from analytical thought, hence shaping a mental (logic) and physical (reason) circle about spoken words (logos).
Back to dissolve...nature implies a solvent (inception towards death) generating each division (life) within aka the natural solution to each native problem.
You often appeal to the etymology of words
Appeal/appellere from ad (to) pel (to thrust)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/appeal
Only nature thrusts towards (inception towards death) which allows each native to re (respond) ject (to throw)...I try to break artificial etymology and words apart to dissolve the distortion.
Appeal vs rejection is only a conflict among natives if nature is being ignored and versus/verto (to turn) implies logy (circular thinking).
often link to the etymonline.com website to back up what you say
a) It's called a "link" to tempt those within the world wide web into artificially chaining together what nature divides from one another.
Notice also link/khlink - "to bend, turn"...once again shaping a circle.
b) Only nature fronts (inception) and backs (death) being (life)...few suggest "backup" to invert frontup and backdown.
You're not consistent with your use and appeal to that website
Con (together) sta (to stand)...being implies standing apart from one another. You seek consistency; I represent free will of choice aka variability aka adaptation to change.
You're creating
Creation implies out of nothing (creatio ex nihilo) which represents the jewish inversion of the transformation (transfer of form within action) of each within all.
"The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
All perceivable transforms each ones perception...few "create" suggestion to transform the consensus of many.
your own
FREE will of choice cannot own (take into possession) without ignoring being set free within given procession.
By avoiding taking a side and choosing not to take a side, you create another layer of agree vs disagree and is vs isn't.
How does one choose a side? By free will of choice. What generates choice? Balance. Where is choice situated in balance? IN-BETWEEN...not on either side, which represents the imbalance of choice.
Holding onto either SIDE distorts ones SIGHT in-between.
Try this...if you stand and lean to either side; then you fall. Why? Because balancing implies ones choice in-between...not ones choice holding onto either side.
You're saying your etymology for beast is, and mine isn't
I break etymology apart to show that nature WAS (need) before a native can argue about what IS (want) or ISN'T (not want) artificial.
I didn't utter any sound of those words to you
Sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) implies the foundation for each one within to articulate words...not just the noise one utters for another to hear.
Here's a sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Simon-and-garfunkel-the-sound-of-silence-lyrics
- People talking without speaking
- People hearing without listening
- No one dared...disturb the sound of silence
Did you read it out loud or something like that?
You holding a SUM OF THINGS (something) together establishes friction among things, hence making a noise, which distracts you from discerning self as an instrument within the sound of silence.
Sound moves, which divides each thing within apart from one another...summoning things together orchestrates noise to harm one (harmony) by putting ones together (symphony).
When I said The Great Vowel Shift, this is what I was referring to...history
a) Nature moves...few suggest history to tempt many to store matter (information) while ignoring motion (inspiration).
b) The manipulation of oral and written is based on jewish law aka phonetic for few; littera vocalis (vocal letter) as didactic instruction (talmud) for many. That's where The Great Vowel Shift chapter of history fits into just like changing Latin to Pig Latin (english).
Why the effort? To shape DEAF PHONETICIANS (definitions) aka many deaf to sound while bound to words like an insane (in sanus; within sound) person (per sonos; by sound).
you've not presented anything worthwhile to interact with.
I re-present the internal re-action of all worthwhile action...using "not" (nihilo; nothing) implies ones de-nial of all for one another.
If you look at my profile you see Comment Score (16033) Post Score (0)...only nature offers; which allows each native to respond to what nature offers or not.
I didn't say stuffing, I said you're making stuff up
Nature moves which a verb (stuffing) denotes; making stuff up implies a made up noun aka an artifice shaped within nature. I try to describe the verb; while taking the nouns and adjectives apart.
what stuff means in the context I said it
Con (together) text (to weave)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/context that's the stuff you're stuffing together, which I unravel.
you expose your shortcomings
Ex (out) pose (position)...ones outwards position implies coming (inception towards death) short (life) within, hence the struggle to sustain length of duration.
So you agree with me that the etymology of beast isn't astute being?
You used etymology as a synthesis of etymo (actual) + logy (logic) which shaped circular conflicts within your mind (agree vs disagree + is vs isn't).
I analyzed etymo+logy in a linear sense (if > then), therefore without choosing a side within a conflict, which allows me to see that one has to be astute to be able to shape the word "beast".
Logos (word) > logic (circular thinking) > reason (turning against one another) tempts one to ignore foundation (sound) for surface (word).
Notice also logos/leg - "to collect; gather"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*leg-#etymonline_v_52572 Sound moves and cannot be gathered...gathering words represents a distortion within sound.
you twist the topic through word etymology and what you imply from them
The twist is within your view of etymo (actual) + logy (logic) as a synthesis. Logic implies circular thinking, which contradicts the actual linear procession of nature and it's implication (if > then).
I take words apart to try to dissolve the circle (contradiction) within the minds of those who cannot think straight.
did you grasp what was said
Sound moves and cannot be grasped...few shaping artificial words within natural sound to tempt many to grasp; seize; take possession of implies spell-craft for spell-binding.
I resist the temptation of grasping, which allows me to see how what was said besmirches the surface of the sound foundation underneath.
The Great Vowel Shift, you twist it into vow + El
- The implies theos (God) as in theism (belief in a god).
- Only within God can each being grow (great).
- Vow/votum - "a promise to a god"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vow
- El implies all, hence el-o-him (all of him)
- Shift/skipta - "to divide, change, separate" implies Gods divination.
Vowel/wekw - "to speak"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vowel implies ones articulation within "the great vowel shift" of nature.
You're making stuff up through your implications.
Stuffing implies synthesis (together); implicating implies analysis (apart)...nature sets each native apart from one another; few artificially stuff many together.
Perceivable inspiration moves through ones mind...suggested information stuffs ones mind if held onto.
Stuffing drags one down with burden; implicating lifts one up by unburdening stuff.
you're going to need to go back to the word
Only within sound can a word be shaped, hence sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all". Shaping words implies the articulation of natural sound aka spell-craft.
Sound implies need; word tempts want vs not want.
if you want to dissect what...means
Meaning implies a measure taken by ones mind while ignoring all given. Sharing meaning tempts one to ignore dissection (analysis) for combination (synthesis) aka natural for artificial.
Nature dissects want (life) within need (inception towards death)...artifice tempts want vs not want into combined conflict.
personal interpretation
- Per (by) son (sound) al (all)
- Inter (internal) pret (pass over) ation (action)
Personal interpretation implies the status quo of each being "by all sound" and "internally passing over action"...not about information shared with one another.
Words are utilized to hide how sound moves in-stru-ment (within structured mind). Sound moves through ones mind and cannot be held onto...words tempt ones mind to hold onto meaning, while ignoring sound.
The word changed
Sound implies change...only within natural change can a word be articulated. Holding onto the meaning of any word tempts one to ignore the change of all sound.
during the time
Time implies a measurement taken while ignoring all given. Notice how form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot perceive its beginning or end...yet suggested time can affix any date into ones mind if consented to.
Notice that during/durare/deru - "be firm, solid" implies being formed within a liquid flow.
Great Vowel Shift
VOW (to promise; pledge; wish; desire) EL (God)...it's God the greatest who pro (forwards) mise (to release) each shift (partition) within.
That's how sound works...releasing forwards each partitioned instrument. The suggested "great vowel shift" hides this within language/lingua (tongue) by forking the tongue within natural sound with the articulation of words.
That's also why there's an oral torah before the written torah.
Middle English
What's the middle of an engl/angle? A vertex from vertere/wer - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vertex
Nature delineates (inception towards death) being (life)...artifice turns beings against each other mentally (logic) and physically (reason).
animals (opposed to man)
Animal aka all (light) animating each hue (color) of man (ray) within...that's how animal delineates human aka OP (in the direction of) POSE (to place)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/oppose
Only within animal (animation) can there be human (appearance)...using the labels animal and human upon one another distracts from animation while distorting appearance.
The lie and deception is claiming the etymology of BEAST is BEing ASTute.
One cannot be astute (discerning) by claiming; lying or deceiving...each of which implies a synthesis aka artificially putting together what nature sets apart for analysis.
I didn't claim that beast means being astute...I used implication (if > then) to show how only after being astute can one brand another discernible being as a beast.
One cannot make the discernment between man and beast without BEING ASTUTE (discerning) before.
Designed for entertainment... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDitzatrWyA