meaning to Occultists
Meaning implies a measurement taken, which occults all given.
Freemasons...Occultists
Given freely...occulted by taking.
The only place we have the ability to change is our mind
Change enables mind. Only during change can mind memorize. Placement implies spreading of mind within change.
Beliefs cause behavior
Believing tempts being into having aka into being able to hold in possession, while ignoring that effect (potential) within cause (procession) cannot hold onto anything without establishing a contradiction.
control belief
Be (being) lief/lieve/leubh (to care, desire, love)...being implies apart from one another, choosing to care; desire or love anyone else implies con (together) trol (to roll).
Why the circular roll? Because love implies versus hate...a circular conflict.
That we need Government
One (singular) doesn't need we (plural)...wanting to join permits others to govern ones mind.
delay death
Delay implies stretching life during the process of dying. It's not the outcome which gets delayed, but the potential during the process.
Pete Hegseth is lying.
Which is empowered by whoever believes it to be true aka "Pete Hegseth is tempting believers to empower others".
This is an attempt...
Lie and truth tempts ones choice off-center while empowering a chosen one.
Don't be fooled
Being implies rise (life) during fall (inception towards death)...others suggest don't (doing nothing) to fool one into ignoring that.
Fool ignoring fall aka jest ignoring just.
On the expulsion of migrants in general, in Europe in particular
General (inception towards death) generates particular (life) aka pulse expressed within action (ex-puls-ion).
Migration vs remigration implies a circular conflict aka a synthesis of two sides repressing each others expressing pulse. This conflict puts particulars against one another while distracting from general.
I have this idea
It's called idealism, and was suggested by a jew to tempt thought among gentiles into a conflicting consensus.
When right wing parties finally get in charge
a) Each wing responds to being charged (balance). Right vs left implies a discharge (imbalance).
b) The inversion of singularity (part) into plurality (parties) permits an analytical few to govern many through synthesis.
invaders
Migration by invitation, hence by mass consensus to suggestions by few. Few shape singular consent into plural consensus to get access to privacy.
Migration implies passing from one place (inception) towards another (death), which represents the status quo of being alive. It's gentile consensus about the jewish suggestion of nationalism; socialism; communism etc. which tricks many to believe a place can be held onto, while being moved.
European
YOU ARE A PEON...that's few using a sleight of hand to disclose servitude to many.
expel the invaders
If that didn't work on a jew, why would it work on gentiles?
minority status
Minority vs majority implies a mutual conflict grinding down the status of each participant within aka a synthesis; amalgamation; mixing together; melting pot; union of europeans...tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).
no advantage over Genghis Khan
It's genghis (genesis) khan (ruler, sovereign) which advances anything within. A jew tempts gentiles to ignore this by seeking advantages over one another.
There cannot be any advantage over "genesis sovereignty", but the suggested label "genghis khan" can tempt gentiles to situate themselves under a leader, while following misdirection.
Another such misdirecting label represents "jesus" aka je suis (I AM)...a taking possession over self, while ignoring the genesis sovereignty of procession. Nature implies process; being implies potential...possession corrupts potential by distracting from procession.
How do you think that transpires?
Few transplant (suggested information) thoughts to distract many from what transpires (perceivable inspiration)...hence trans (across) spirare (to breathe).
all it takes is one leader who stops giving
All moves; gives (inception) and takes (death) from each one (life) within, and passes through. Few suggest leaders to tempt many to follow while becoming "passed over".
nothing else matters
Else/al (other) implies each matter divided from one another while everything moves. Nothing implies ones denial of being moved for one another.
We are to evangelize all nations
a) Nation implies each native within all...we implies a summation of natives.
b) Evangelize aka ev/es (essence; being) + angel (divine messenger aka released by division)...essence (life) released by division (inception towards death) that's what evangelize implies aka being a witness.
Israel is a nation
God WAS before isreal aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) comes into being...suggesting one another what IS distracts one from discerning self to be native isreal within God.
the most creative evangelism
a) Only within God can one measure most vs least, which turns one against one another and away from God.
b) God implies all...creation implies more than all out of nothing. God implies transformation of all into each one...few suggest creationism to tempt many into denial (nihilo; nothing) of God (everything).
c) -ism implies a synthesis aka a consensus among being, which contradicts ev (being) angel (released by division). Only during divine/division can each being analyses differences.
Plus no cancer formed against me shall prosper.
a) Plus applied to God implies more than God...a contradiction of almighty God. Addition (inception) and subtraction (death) implies division of God into each living being.
Only within division can there be addition and subtraction, and it's the divided which by intercourse for off-spring can be fruitful and multiply.
b) My aka taking possession over self implies cancerous growth, which God (procession) prevents from prospering (potential)...if held onto.
Who cares
God charges which carries forth being. This charge animates being to re-charge by resisting the temptation to carry aka to burden self aka to sin/syn - "together with, jointly; alike".
Shit makes no sense but sounds beautiful
a) NO (aka nothing) can't be sensed, yet using it to discredit the senses of others seems to be fair game. Why is that?
b) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder aka the being holding onto it aka the one who chooses to take a measure of another into mental possession as a measurement.
That's not how sound works. Sound moves through each instrument and cannot be taken. Any instrument responds to given sound.
c) An edge implies a separation of for example everything perceivable and each ones perception thereof. Only in-between flow (inception towards death) can form (life) come into being, hence living on the edge.
What's the difference between EDGE and LEDGE? Edge implies the being in-between; ledge/leggen (to place; lay) implies nature laying being. That's how knowledge works.
d) Notice that you began with ugly (shit) and ended with beautiful...
Paul
Saul
the love of money is the root of
Love or hate implies taking a side, hence uprooting the choice in-between...
all evil
All separates each one within from one another, which tempts one another to choose a side and turn against (good vs evil) one another.
barter society
Society implies holding together; barter implies trafficking in-between partials. That's why any society centralizes any bartering attempts of many under control of few.
Nature sets each being apart from one another as "free" will of choice...bartering has to be free; not within the confines of any society.
swapping coin form by weight is sound.
Sound implies flow; form implies instrument. Weight implies measurement by instrument, and coin the manipulation of measuring.
It's the fictitious value on the coin which distracts a) from real moving value, and b) from the weight others can clip off. Measuring weight while distracted permits the merchant to put his finger on the scale...
the fragile thread between elite and peasant -- electricity
Elect implies ones choice; French élite (selection) implies ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion.
That's the deception underneath electric (to elect by choice) and magnetic/magh (to be able to choose)...if elect (ones choice) makes a selection, then another elect (chosen one) becomes enabled.
Nature moving being implies a dynamic force...being selecting one another, while being moved, implies a static force. That's how each dynamic (wandering) jew shapes gentiles into statistics.
biological...synthetic
Bio implies linear procession of life from inception towards death...logic represents synthetic circular thinking turning into conflicts of reason against others.
It's the synthetic circle which prevents bio from thinking straight.
emf (electromotive force)
Nature implies the motive force (inception towards death) generating each elect (life) within...others shape an inward (logic) and outward (reason) circuit to invert elect (ones choice) into select (chosen one).
Vibe Frequency Tug Of War
a) Vibe aka vibration implies ones choice at the center of balance being moved to and fro.
b) Frequency implies how often choice adapts to balance.
c) Tug of war implies imbalance aka choice holding onto a side while wasting resistance to tug at the other side.
Being in a tug of war (reason) lowers ones frequency, while generating hostile vibration aka friction against one another.
The physical game "tug of war" with one marked center; one line and two teams tugging inverts reality...one real line moving forward; each one within frequently vibrating apart from one another, and two artificial sides tempting one off-center.
fake videos
Any vi (to see) deo (god) or au (to hear) dio (god) shown by another cannot be real...
the probability of a terroristic action would be very high
Higher than living in a fallen world? It's like a jew wishing Christians a good fall, while cautioning about stuff falling on them.
Why is the pool closed? Because you could get wet!
the spiritual phenomenon we feel
Feeling refers to the emotions in-between the material, while spiritual implies the animation (zoe) of each material (bio) from one another.
Phenomenon (that which can be seen) can be manipulated as artificial (suggestion) within natural (perception).
I don't trust any of the many various bibles or clergy to tell me what God is.
God WAS before anyone within can suggest what IS...what is requires trust; what was doesn't. Trust implies holding onto one another aka ones consent to any suggestion of another. God implies all separating each one within from one another.
"In God we trust" implies within (in) singularity (god) plurality (we) is held together (trust)...
I can just connect with the all
Before one can claim self as "me; myself or I"...all separates one from one another. All implies procession; each one within implies potential..."I" implies possession, which diminishes potential if held onto.
No own fucking knows what it is.
a) No (nihilo; nothing) implies suggested nihilism tempting one to de-nial perceivable for suggested.
b) Own implies taking into possession what procession gives.
c) Fucking/fuck (from German Fuge) implies "masonic joint" and it's being used as a rhetorical profanity to artificially join together potential within the process of nature. That's why the English (angular; by angles) language uses masonic joints for manipulation.
d) To know implies each ones perception within all perceivable, which among one another's suggestions, puts one at the edge of knowing.
Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics
- There's something wrong with the world today...I don't know what it is
- Something's wrong with our eyes...We're seeing things in a different way
- And God knows it ain't his
a) Bridging the gap between rendering (suggestion) and reality (perception)...oneself represents the gap; ones consent to another represents the bridge.
b) Notice that "photo-realistic lightning" uses light twice (lightning + photo). Why? Because photo-realism represents the fictitious filter shaped within real light.
c) DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling)...a sample aka "something which confirms a proposition or statement, an instance serving as an illustration" represents a beings consent to the suggested illustrations of another, which in return permits another the deep learning from above (super) each sampled one.
d) What's "visual fidelity"? Ones faithfulness; devotion; trust in suggested visuals by another, which implies a "breakthrough" of perception by suggestion.
e) Requiem aka "mass for repose of the soul of the dead". Soul implies the process of dying animating each life within...few are amassing many by reposing each into consenting to join a consensus with one another.
f) What's a "resident"? An inhabitant. How could one inhabit "evil"? Inversion permits one to LIVE within EVIL...
h) What's "bio"? To live! What's "hazard"? To take a chance in life! Taking a chance inverts being given choice, which is how evil resides within live/life.
Makes counter intuitive argument about the availability of brick making machinery
Have you watched the video? He calls BS on Sears. Also notice the name of the machines (wizard; money-maker; the big six etc.) and question how long it takes for concrete to harden, while adding the extra time frame for it to be usable under pressure. At the 18 minute mark they even have three (3) guys showing of three (3) stages of production...
sears catalogue
Aka to sear - "dry by burning and making insensible" also seer - "one to whom divine revelations are made" + cata (down) logue (logic)
Jon Levi becomes controlled opposition?
A jew suggests the con to roll gentiles together into opposing each other. Jon Levi represents an influencer who informs, which cons viewers to oppose the information among each other aka a jew using fluid (influence) to dry form (information) for bricking gentiles.
planned obsolescence
Planned (to spread) ob (away) sol (whole) escence (essence; being)...planned obsolesce implies flow (inception towards death) producing form (life).
Products that tried to defeat planned obsolescence
Nature bringing forth being implies "product"...a jewish merchant tempts gentiles to buy products during natural planned obsolescence, which implies selling self out, while mutually defeating one another.
The issue isn't about how long can a product endure, while a jew manipulates endurance, but how much resistance a gentile wastes holding onto artificial products during natural production of being.
Any product in any store represents a want or not want option for a gentile who ignores the need to resist want. So the only product in any store represents the gentile entering and exiting it...
add to the list
a) List/leizd - "border; band"...listing anything binds free will of choice. Only in-between balance can choice add/subtract from all onto oneself.
b) List; verb - "to tilt, lean, incline to one side" earlier spelled LUST... https://www.etymonline.com/word/list
when it comes to genetics.
Consider the deliberate use of eugenics and dysgenics upon genetics...
coinclipper (does that even work anymore?)
Public coinbase running on private servers for a cut...
the world continues to repeat itself despite claims to the contrary
If the world continues linearly, then claiming anything within shapes a circular contradiction, which tricks the one claiming to repeat the same loop over and over again.
Few establishing such loops within many represents the artificial circumvention of natural law... https://forward.com/culture/books/695530/elana-stein-hain-circumventing-jewish-law-loophole-eruv-chametz/
the fact that people can be so utterly oblivious to the nature
Fact implies fictitious act, which when held onto...contradicts natural acting > being reacting.
the nature of their own
A being (potential) cannot own (possession) nature (procession) without shaping a contradiction.
Take for example
Taking doesn't amplify expression...it represses. The rhetoric "take for example" represents the propaganda used to distract ones discernment thereof.
Zionism is about the state of Israel....not about jewish supremacy
Israel aka yisra'el "he that striveth with God" implies each beings struggle within all of nature. Zionism represents the propaganda used to trick gentiles to believe that israel represents the jewish homeland instead of the state of each being within nature.
Holding onto any belief permits the one shaping it a supreme position over one.
The truth is...
...the foundation of lies if held onto.
filled with antijew rhetoric
Like the bible warning about those who call themselves jews but are not?
anti american rhetoric
Isn't that based on the pro jew rhetoric used by the alleged representatives of America?
the blatantly lopsided view
Are Muslims using loopholes to corrupt views by tempting infidels to incline towards sides within conflicts of reason?
Sounds jewish...just like blatant/blatire (to babble) aka Babylon.
- By the rivers of Babylon...There we sat down
- Yeah, yeah, we wept...When we remembered Zion
- Let the words of our mouth...Be acceptable in thy sight
the Hebrew text it was built on
Text/teks - "to weave"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/text One can only weave together what nature separated from one another before. No text can ever be a foundation to build upon.
As for hebrew...only within flow can form be brewed (fermentation by mixing and boiling).
An important instruction is to stir up (or fan into flame) the spirit within you
Hence few suggesting texts to artificially ferment natural spirit within a consensus among many, with consensus representing the cauldron aka the kettle to boil the cattle.
a) Only within a line can a sphere be shaped...notice the line going through each sphere and the deviation from the center line.
b) Consist implies "standing together"...if a sphere can only be shaped within a line, then only after delineation can spheres stand together by connecting them with one another.
c) What's the consistence of AIN (nothing), which btw implies phonetic EIN (one)?
If creation implies out of nothing (creatio ex nihilo); then what acts upon internal (inter-act)?
What if Da'ath aka Death aka the process of dying (inception towards death) implies the line for each life within? What if spheres of influence tempt one another to ignore delineation? What if ignorance represents the myth/mist within ones mind?
One implies division from one another, hence singularity giving each unit within freedom from one another. A jew suggests tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka mosaic law to unite divided gentiles together aka artificially mixing together what nature sets apart from one another.
One implies singularity; them implies plurality...few suggest plurality to tempt each one among many to join together aka con (together) nect (to bind) aka tempting free will of choice into bondage.
LETTER implies ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape LETTERS into crafted spells by arranging them in customary order (alphabet) through the use of the ABC (Latin abecedary aka abracadabra)...that's how HE BREWS aka imbibes a gentiles mind by fermentation (mixing and boiling).
All implies everything and nothing else...addition; subtraction; multiplication and division can only work upon each one within all.
One cannot add to all...without contradicting all within oneself.