I have this idea that I've been thinking about lately. When right wing parties finally get in charge of western Europe, and start expelling the Mohammedian invaders, it's going to be akin to the religious turmoil of the "reformation" that lasted for about 200 years, thereabouts, and involved numerous wars and massacres and particular in Elizabethan England, a level of social control (oaths, fines, etc.) that made the Global War on Terror seem like a school yard play.
There has been a failure to replace the populations...the elite who planned the replacement will shift 180 and go all in on the social control necessary to track down and expel the invaders.
This is a win/lose scenario.
And no, Europe won't go the way of South Africa or Rhodesia. White people there were 5% of the populace in Rhodesia and 8% in South Africa. Such minority status doesn't exist in mainland Europe.
General (inception towards death) generates particular (life) aka pulse expressed within action (ex-puls-ion).
Migration vs remigration implies a circular conflict aka a synthesis of two sides repressing each others expressing pulse. This conflict puts particulars against one another while distracting from general.
It's called idealism, and was suggested by a jew to tempt thought among gentiles into a conflicting consensus.
a) Each wing responds to being charged (balance). Right vs left implies a discharge (imbalance).
b) The inversion of singularity (part) into plurality (parties) permits an analytical few to govern many through synthesis.
Migration by invitation, hence by mass consensus to suggestions by few. Few shape singular consent into plural consensus to get access to privacy.
Migration implies passing from one place (inception) towards another (death), which represents the status quo of being alive. It's gentile consensus about the jewish suggestion of nationalism; socialism; communism etc. which tricks many to believe a place can be held onto, while being moved.
YOU ARE A PEON...that's few using a sleight of hand to disclose servitude to many.
If that didn't work on a jew, why would it work on gentiles?
Minority vs majority implies a mutual conflict grinding down the status of each participant within aka a synthesis; amalgamation; mixing together; melting pot; union of europeans...tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).