If everything represents the process of dying, and everyone within represents the living, then "everything burns everyone", hence the status quo of being (living) within (dying) implying a "burned offering" (holocaust).
Living within the process of dying implies each one to represent a "holocaust survivor" and therefore everyone's ancestors died in the holocaust...one cannot question the holocaust without ignoring reality.
Now about the suggested trademark "holocaust"...
We should be disinfo agents
a) the process of dying represents the agent (action), while those living within represent the regent (reaction).
b) consenting to suggested information (want) or suggested disinformation (not want); both ignore perceivable inspiration (need).
c) nature communicates itself as whole (perceivable) towards partial (perceiving) as inspiration (action) for adaption (reaction)...others suggest information to tempt one to consent to stagnation through the ignorance of adaptation.
d) to be implies one (partial) within oneness (whole)...others suggest we (plural) to tempt one (singular) to ignore self. "we" cannot react; only "one" can react by ones free will of choice.
Any effort put into "ChatGPT" will be used against those putting in less effort...a ponzi scheme which only benefits the few suggesting the many to consent to "ChatGPT".
GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer)
a) the ongoing process of dying represents the generating base; while temporary living represents the transmuted ingredients within. In other words...temporary form (life) is being transmuted by ongoing flow (inception towards death) as the generator.
b) TRAIN, verb [Latin traho, to draw] - "to draw along"...living needs to resist the process of dying, others tempt one "to draw along", hence "training" one to ignore resisting.
everything burns
If everything represents the ongoing process of dying, and everyone within represents the living, then "everything burns everyone"...
KNOW what you hate
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...what if perception (need) is being ignored when consenting to want (love) vs not want (hate) suggested?
per the Joker
"I said the joker is a wanted man...So I'll tell you all the story...'Bout the joker (want over need) and the thief (suggestion over perception) in the night (ignorance of perceivable for suggested)"
If you can convince everyone that the franchise they put their faith on is worthless and we can eat each other for what's worth, you win. Full stop.
a) if the process of dying represents perceivable value, and living within represents perceiving evaluation, then the suggested values by others can tempt the perceiving evaluation to ignore the perceivable value.
b) what if being represents everyone (evaluation) consciously existing within everything (value)? What if others suggest one to want to "win prices", instead of the need to adapt as evaluation to value?
c) what if there cannot be a "full stop" for those temporary living within the ongoing process of dying? What if others suggest "full stop" as the inversion of "partial within whole" + "constant change"?
a) if resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying); then the momentum (balance) of velocity represents the "ground" for ones resisting free will of choice...
b) EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka regenerating power (living) within generating power (process of dying) aka temporary growth within ongoing loss.
sacrifice
If everything (perceivable) is already offered (sacrificed) to everyone (perceivable), then does consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need) represent self sacrifice?
ritualistic
a) which rite comes first...following suggested orders or resisting the perceivable (natural) order?
b) do the living first have to follow each others suggestions or do they need to resist the perceivable process of dying?
c) does free will of choice represents a service (rite) to suggested choices (want vs not want) or to perceivable balance (need/want)?
original Talmud
a) TALMUD; noun - "instruction". What represents the original instruction...suggested information or perceivable inspiration?
b) IN (being within) STRUO (set by) - ATION (through action)...what if reaction (living) implies being within and set by enacting (process of dying)?
shaman
SHAM'AN, noun - "a wizzard or conjurer" + CONJURE, verb - "to bind by an oath" aka choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law...hidden underneath RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
to usurp entire civilizations
What if ones consent to the suggestions of another represents the "domestication" of ones free will of choice, and what if the suggesting few then rebrand it "civilization" to deceive the consenting many from comprehending what they are doing?
Teach a dog to respond to a spoken word and it's called domestication; do it to one another and it's called civilization...
Is it really usurpation if the many willingly consent to follow the suggested orders by the few?
got corrupted many centuries ago
a) who suggested you to count "centuries" and does motion (ago; go; to move) need to be counted by those (life) being moved (inception towards death)?
b) CORRUPT, verb - "dissolve; to separate the component parts of a body, as by a natural process"...what if nature separates itself from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living)? What if partial (growth) needs to resist being dissolved by whole (loss)?
It's nothing new.
a) what if perceivable "was" before one can shape a suggestion about what "is"?
b) what if "everything" was before one can shape a suggestion about "nothing"?
c) if everything was perceivable, before one can shape suggestions within it, then how could there be anything "new"?
fasting would help connect us to the spiritual realm
a) resisting want (appetite) inspires need (hunger)...the former represents suggested material (partial); the latter implies ones adaptation to the perceivable spiritual (whole).
b) others suggest one to want to CONNECT, verb - "to join or unite", which tempts one to ignore the need to sustain apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying). How? By struggling to resist wanted temptations...
proved
- PROVE, verb [Latin probo.] - "to try" + TRY, verb - "to exert strength; to endeavor; to make an effort; to attempt".
Doesn't living within the process of dying imply one to "exert strength; endeavor; make an effort, attempt", hence representing a trial?
a) "sweet dreams are made of these"... https://pic8.co/sh/U4QALg.png "who am I to disagree?"
bill gates
BILL (formed document) - "formed docked mind" aka ignorance of being formed mind within flowing input.
GATES (openings) aka flowing input (perceivable) for the opening (comprehension) of formed mind (perceiving).
The few suggest BILL as a doctor aka DOCKED OAR; to tempt each one VESSEL among the many to ignore the open GATE...free will of choice represents the vessels OAR, noun - "an instrument for rowing boats", so what will it be....ROW or WAIT? Oh shucks..roe vs wade was overturned and billy wasn't a doctor.
- CHRIST - "the anointed one"; from MESSI'AH, adjective (Heb. anointed) + ANOINT', verb [Latin ungo.] - "to consecrate (set apart)".
Nature sets itself apart, hence from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living). Apartheid needs to struggle to sustain self within wholeness. Ignoring to be the "anointed one" within perceivable, for consenting to the suggestions of the "chosen ones" represents the "anti-christ", hence the one against the sustenance of self.
you're severely underrated
a) RATE, noun (Latin ratus, reor, retor, redor, or resor; ratio; reason) - "the proportion or standard by which quantity or value is adjusted"
The few suggest the many to rate each others suggested values, while ignoring to be evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).
b) nature doesn't need to be rated; it represents the whole value (process of dying) for each partial evaluation (living) within. Adjustment implies adaptation of mind (living) to that which just is (process of dying).
c) notice that the few suggest the many the tools to rate each other (up vs down-vote); then notice that free-will-of-choice neither up-votes (want), nor down-votes (not want), hence adapting to balance (need). I also don't offer (suggestion), hence "post score: 0", which in return allows me to adapt to everything offered (perceivable).
Most don't seem to understand what you're saying
a) how could one grow within perceivable if one consents to "stand under" suggested?
b) most lack to comprehend that perceivable nature doesn't SAY, verb - "to utter in words" anything....it communicates sound for response by resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
c) trying to find meaning in words shapes one into the play-toy for those suggesting the meaning of words.
reality-altering
AL'TER, verb transitive [Latin alter another. See Alien.] - "to make some change in; to make different in some particular"...what if reality represents constant change (process of dying), making different particulars (living), which in return can RE (respond to) MAKE (being made by)?
What if fiction (suggested information) represents ones consent to ignore reality (perceivable inspiration)?
They manipulate our reality-altering methods through language.
Does slapping a label (word) on a moving system (sound), to tempt those within to ignore being moved, change the moving system or does it represent the impropriety of "turning a blind eye" to ones response-ability (choice) within a balance based system (momentum of motion)?
What if one cannot manipulate (manual operation) the natural order (automatic operation)...only tempt the temporary chaos within to ignore manually sustaining self (living) within the automatic order (process of dying)?
...ism was a specific reaction to ...ism
a) what if every -ISM implies the consenting reaction of the many to the suggested -ISM by the few?
b) what if those living within the process of dying can only react (perceiving) to enacting (perceivable)?
c) could reacting to suggested over perceivable tempt one to ignore the latter for the former?
d) who specifies the -ism...those suggesting or those consenting to reason about the suggested specifications thereof?
it said that Nazism is just judaism
Can you show me any -ISM controlled by the many over the few?
Secular jews don’t exist. They’re all religious.
a) if the term "jew" was suggested to you, and you consented to the suggested by using it, then you were bound anew by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
b) SEC'ULAR, adjective - "living within the world without being relegated", hence without consenting to being bind anew by the suggestions of others.
Ask yourself this...are the so called "jews" bound to any term suggested by you or are you bound to the suggested term "jews"?
What if the few represent the secular (chosen ones) among the religious many (bound by consent to follow suggested choices)?
Secular vs Religious
a) RELIGION, noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the inversion of perceivable (balance) to perceiving (choice) natural law.
b) the few suggest secularism to tempt the many to ignore perceivable SEC'ULAR, adjective - "living within the world without being relegated, hence without consenting to being bind anew by the suggestions of others.
It's ones consent to the suggested -ISM, which tempts one into consent to contract law (religio). Nature doesn't suggest...it communicates everything perceivable to every perceiving one aka enacting towards reaction.
Do you think it's all the same, or different factions?
a) everything (process of dying) represents sameness, everyone within represents differentiation (living).
b) nature sets itself apart, hence from wholeness (process of dying) into apartheid (living). Living represents ones struggle to sustain apartheid while being dissolved back into wholeness.
c) the few represents apartheid (israel), while suggesting the many togetherness aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); e pluribus unum (out of many; one); equality (sameness) through diversity (difference); united nations; united states; european union; usmca (formerly nafta); uniformity; university; unilateral etc.
ISRA'EL; from SARA (contention; resistance) EL (god) aka partial (living) resisting whole (process of dying) to sustain apartheid within wholeness.
d) FAC'TION, noun [Latin factio, from facio, to make or do.] - "acting in union"...the few suggest the many to shape factions, as to tempt each one of them to ignore being the partial reaction (living) within the enacting whole (process of dying).
One cannot "make"; only RE (respond to) MAKE (being made by). One cannot "do"; only RE (respond to) DO (being done by). Others can suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt one to ignore being reactor (life) within direction (inception towards death).
If one consents to suggested "actors", then the perceiving one (life) ignores to "react" to the perceivable direction (inception towards death) inspiring one to resist.
reject hedonism and materialism
Accepting (want) or rejecting (not want) any suggested -ISM, tempts one to ignore adaptation (need) to perceivable, while resisting suggested temptation (want).
Aren't the secular Jews the more Socialist ones?
SO'CIAL, adjective [Latin socialis, from socius, companion.] - "the publice as an aggregate body"...the few suggest socialism (togetherness) to tempt the consenting many to ignore perceivable apartheid (aka being partial within whole).
If each "one" of the many ignores to represent free will of choice within perceivable; for consenting to the suggested choices of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection; choice".
In short...being one (apart from others) contradicts being social (togetherness). Suggested society represents the domestication of each "ones" free will of choice to follow the suggested choices of the few, hence CHATTEL, noun - "movable goods" slavery by consent of the (freehold) cattle aka those with "free" will of choice.
talmud
TALMUD (instruction) for MiSHNAH (perceivable inspiration) + GEMARA (suggested information)...it represents ones free will of choice to resist want (suggested) for need (perceivable). That implies the want to be instructed by a book suggested by others, which tempts one to be bound (contract law) by volume (book) to the choices of others.
It's not about what's written in any book, but about what the composition of form within flow implies...nature doesn't use words to communicate itself. The few suggest words (information) to tempt the many to ignore sound (inspiration).
Those adapting to sound represent PHONETICIANS, from PHON'ICS, noun [Gr. sound.] , while those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words are controlled by "definitions", hence representing DEAF PHONETICIANS. This is called spell-craft.
- FOOD, noun - "whatever is eaten by animals for nourishment"
Animation (inception towards death) nourishes (cause to grow) ment; mentis; mind (life). Therefore..mind within animation needs to re-animate self, which allows the animated (living) to draw nourishment from the animating (process of dying).
Ones DIET, noun - "manner of living" isn't about what one eats, but if one resists the temptation to want from others over the need to grow for the sustenance of self.
Resisting suggested (want) to grow within perceivable (need)...it's a choice.
Vaccine warning from 2019
Dr. Benjamin Jung - 'Verbot der Kuhpoken-Impfung für meine Familie' (prohibition of the cowpox-vaccine for my family)...published 1864.
media is basically laughing at us
- ME'DIA; noun (Latin medius, middle)
a) the process of dying represents the "base"; living within represents the "middle" aka the center aka CENTRIFUGAL, adjective - "tending to recede from the center"...hence the struggle of the living (temporary center) to sustain self within the process of dying (ongoing base).
b) those who ignore the perceiving center within perceivable base, can be tempted with a suggested middle (media) to ignore ones placement.
c) comedy (living) can only exist at the center of drama (process of dying). Schadenfreude represents the insolence of others towards ones ignorance to sustain comedy within drama...ignorance tempts insolence.
fucking journalists
Suggested journalism tempts ones consent to suggested JOURNAL, noun (Latin diurnum; daily) - "a diary; an account of daily transactions and events"; while ignoring perceivable JOURNEY, noun (Latin diurnus, dies) - "the travel of a day" aka ones (life) passage from one place (inception) towards another (death).
The difference? The few tempt the many to "follow" suggested journalism, while ignoring to "resist" the journey from inception towards death...
- polio vaccine side-effects....difficulty with breathing or swallowing; loss of appetite
Maybe he didn't take it... https://pic8.co/sh/BSILLG.jpg
Are there examples of "truth" held by gentiles? Is there any "truth" the many can hold onto without reasoning about the validity of it? Try it like this...left side: lies the jews control (everything) + right side: truth the gentiles control (?).
What if every suggested word (information) can be deleted, because the perceivable sound (inspiration) underneath represents constant change, yet those consenting to suggested words (fiction) are willingly ignoring perceivable sound (reality)?