The chutzpah to not only push all this "China bad" propaganda over jewish Hollywood, but to only mention the jews in the role of the miraculously persecuted...this time even by children. https://img.gvid.tv/i/38tq2LBj.png
a) the few suggest information to tempt the many to ignore being within inspiration. The former tempts one to accumulate and hold onto, while the latter inspires one to resist.
b) information (within form through action) + inspiration (within spirit through action)...as form (life) one needs to adapt to flow (inception towards death) by breathing (Latin spiro, spirit), hence resisting incoming velocity.
c) nature doesn't need to be stored by those within, everything inside (partial) represents nature (whole). The whole (perceivable) is always available for each partial (perceiving)...even when ignored for suggested information.
d) conscious memory tempts one to accumulate wanted information, yet needs to be used for on the fly adaptation to perceivable inspiration. Memory represents a requirement to allow temporary (life) to be able to make a choice within ongoing (inception towards death), hence establishing a moment (um) aka balance for those within to consider their choices.
Without memory one couldn't contemplate implications (if/then) of making choices while being moved.
Consider this to be perceivable... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3e7RQuPP.png then consider if suggested -isms tempt one to ignore that?
prevent electricity from existing
What if magnetic resistance (life) exists within the momentum of electric velocity (inception towards death)?
they lose all their power
What if the willing consent of the many to the suggestions of the few represents the power the few are wielding over the many? If each one of the many ignores to "resist" then the few chosen ones wield most of the resistance within velocity.
Electricity is magic. It has no source.
Those (perceiving) within the source (perceivable) can be tempted (suggestion) to ignore where they are. Lack of self discernment may be perceived as the secret operations of natural causes (magic)...
How can an enemy with advanced tech, infinite money and the control of the minds of most humans be defeated?
a) perceivable nature "advances" all life from inception towards death...suggested TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] aka ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural" tempts one to ignore that.
b) finite (living) within infinite (process of dying) can be tempted to ignore its own potential when consenting to suggested "infinity and beyond" aka "money, money, money...always sunny...In the rich man's world".
c) consent to suggested gives willing control over suggested information within ones mind to those suggesting it.
d) suggested defeat tempts one to overthrow the status quo, while ignoring to be the temporary center (living) within the ongoing status quo (process of dying).
extermination
EX (expression) TERM (boundary) -ATION (action) aka impressing action (process of dying) causing momentum (balance of motion) as the boundary for the expressing choices (living) at the center.
Resistance (life) can only exist within terminal velocity (inception towards death)...ignoring this allows others to exploit ones self destruction.
to bribe
Aka choice (suggested bribe) to choice (consent to be bribed by suggested) contract law...the inversion of being choice (reaction) within balance (action). A bribe is a consideration suggested to a person, to induce him to decide a cause...consenting to that implies ignoring that choice represents the effect caused by balance...not by the suggesting choices of others.
genocide
GENE (give birth; to beget) CIDE (killing) aka nature giving birth (inception) and killing (death) all the life within. What does it imply to be within a generator (process of dying)...it implies to be a reactor (living) hence having the free will of choice to re-generate or SUI (self) CIDE (killing).
have advanced tech
The few suggest tech (artificial) to tempt the many to ignore being within perceivable advancement (natural). The more one consents to artificial, the less one resists natural.
- MULTI; noun (Latin multus, many) + POW'ER, noun (Latin potentia; exert force)
If each one of the many utilizes free will of choice to exert the force of consent to the tempting suggestions of the few, then the few can wield the exerted force (power) of the many (multi).
Or is this more info that is publicly available
Perceivable inspiration represents "publicly available", while others suggest information to control "private availability" through choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
If one resist suggested information by adapting to perceivable inspiration, then one can reverse engineer all the suggested information without being controlled by others who define, redefine and contradict the meaning of the suggested, as to deceive the ones consenting.
to piece together?
Perceivable inspiration represents the "whole", each perceiving one within represents the "partial", hence allowing the partial (living) to grow within the whole (process of dying).
Others suggest information to tempt one to put the pieces together, while ignoring the whole solution (perceivable) for every partial problem (perceiving). The few suggest the many to puzzle with pieces, while the many ignore that the puzzle-box implies the whole picture...a sleight of hand for being a piece within the finished picture.
spiritual aggressor
Offense (process of dying) generates Defense (living), which implies defense needing to adapt to offense by Spirit (Latin spiro, to breathe).
Spelling is just manifesting, making up
The few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) or what you call "making up", as to tempt the many to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything) aka shaping within, out of and in response to perceivable base as the perceiving ingredient.
Transmutation of form (life) out of flow (inception towards death) implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death)...temporary ingredient out of ongoing base alchemy.
Words are made up.
Mimic the ongoing sound by humming, then make up words while continue to hum. Notice that others can be tempted to ignore the ongoing (perceivable) for the temporary (suggested) if consented to, which gives you the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning as an overlay upon the predefined, perceivable sound.
An S can make a word a sword
The only "weapon of choice" represents ones free will of choice to weaponize everything else...or resist the temptation of doing that.
Witches also can cast a spell
WITCH (phonetic which) one casts the spell (suggestion) and WITCH one consents to it?
What if perceivable balance towards perceiving choice natural law, can be inverted by choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law? What if the few utilize contract law on a mass scale to bind the consenting many anew to the suggestions of the few through RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew"?
All words are made up.
Shaped out of perceivable sound and suggested towards consent as words to one another...it's called spell-craft. Those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics,sound), while those who consent to suggested words as definitions represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
The few suggest "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore perceivable IN SANUS (within sound) and PER SONOS (by sound), which imply being within, by, out of and in response to perceivable sound, as the reacting resonance (need) or dissonance (want)...depending on ones free will of choice.
What will one choose...need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information)?
fight me
Consenting to want or not want suggested information tempts one into the conflict of reason aka want versus not want. There's no fight between perceivable whole and each perceiving partial...only if the partial ignores the whole for the suggestions of other partials can there be a fight.
As resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) one represents the temporary growth of resistance within the ongoing loss of velocity, while being tempted by others to spend resistance against one another instead of for the sustenance of self.
If each one of the many willingly ignores to resist, then the few can exploit them while facing less and less resistance...until velocity generates the next batch of resistance.
So afraid of natural processes, one must artificially create
One can only pretend to create (out of nothing) by a) ignoring to be within the natural process when "creating out of nothing" and b) others have to consent to believe the suggested creation, while also ignoring the perceivable natural process.
Inability to process the concept of two choices
It's ones choice within perceivable balance (need/want)...both need to resist and want to be tempted by are based on the same momentum of motion for each different choice within.
While we are on the topic of language...the concept of a choice between two options.
a) nature communicates sound, those within represent the choice to adapt (resonance) or ignore (dissonance) the same origin of sound.
b) OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, from opto, to wish or desire.] represents ones choice of want over need, hence the wish/desire to ignore need for want.
no choice when it comes to gender
a) choice represents the reaction within enacting balance, therefore balance GENerates choice aka action generating reaction.
b) GEN'DER, noun (Latin genus, geno, gigno; Gr.to beget, or to be born) + NATURE, noun (Latin born, produced), hence generator (process of dying) producing/giving birth to reactors (living).
Whats gonna be?
To be implies within; out of and in response to, hence the internal/inherent power within EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka the WHAT, pronoun - "relative (whole) and substitute (partial)".
Who is really the fearful person here?
Whoever one consents to suggested outcome over perceivable origin, because fear implies of outcome, while overcoming the temptation of fear implies resisting origin, hence growing ones resistance (living) within temptation (process of dying).
In short...death tempts fear, resisting being moved towards death grows resistance, hence life.
the person who questions nature
The nature of a PER (by) SONOS (sound) implies the "origin" of sound, while every suggested question tempts one seek "outcomes" in suggested answers.
Nature represents the ongoing solution (process of dying) for each temporary problem (living) within, hence ones struggle to sustain self (life) while being dissolved (inception towards death) by.
basic of decisions
Balance (momentum of motion) represents the base, each choice within represents the "transmuted" ingredient at the center of balance.
"free" will of choice within the "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom aka temporary free (living) within ongoing dominance (process of dying).
going head on against nature
Inception towards death implies "velocity" aka forward motion, while life implies "resistance" within velocity, hence struggling to resist being moved (temptation) towards death (predefined outcome) since inception (origin).
The issue...consenting to want or not want suggested tempts one into a want VERSUS not want conflict (reasoning), while ignoring to be choice at the center of perceivable balance (need/want)...no conflict in-between need/want...only choice.
Resistance (living) isn't against nature (process of dying)...it represents the center of nature, the partial within the whole; the potential within potentiality; the reaction within action; the temporary within ongoing etc.
focus on actual real problems
Being the reacting problem (living) within the actual (enacting) solution (process of dying), hence ones perceiving viewpoint reflecting (focus) all perceivalbe.
Ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore that.
false identity over one self.
"one" implies being different from other ones. Others suggest IDEN'TITY, noun "sameness" to tempt one to ignore perceivable differences.
Sameness (whole process of dying) generates differences (partial living); hence ones struggle to sustain temporary apartheid (living) within ongoing wholeness (process of dying).
trying to change what you were born as
Each one (life) was born into and by constant change (inception towards death), hence the constant need of the temporary partial to adapt to the ongoing whole.
"first my mind had to be erased"...
...continues with recollection of alleged memories.
Try shutting off the suggested screen...how long can you keep looking at it without ignoring the perceivable reality all around it? Afterwards question what others are suggesting that draws you to keep looking at the screen while ignoring the perceivable reality all around it?
the only user
a) what does one use the suggestions of other ones for?
b) how can something suggested on the screen tempts you to believe in ONLY, adjective - "this and no other", when everything perceivable surrounds oneself?
c) if one chooses to respond to a suggested screen, then that implies one "re-uses" it. How can choice ever use if it implies a reaction to?
It's astute to realize that they're representing multiple "opposing" viewpoints.
a) consenting to suggested allows those suggesting to shape the viewpoint of those consenting.
b) consenting to want or not want suggested shapes a want vs not want conflict of reason, which gives those suggesting the power to control both sides, while shaping viewpoints.
try to create a smokescreen
a) reasoning over suggested represents the smokescreen over adaptation within perceivable. Why? Because watching perceivable through the "screen" of suggested makes ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested the "smoke" clouding ones comprehension.
b) ones consent to suggested creationism (out of nothing) allows others to suggest created information, which tempts one to reason over its validity against others. Nature doesn't make suggestions.
a) nature communicates itself from origin towards momentum...those within perceive perceivable nature as the ever changing moment (um).
b) others tempt one to ignore this by suggesting progressivism (towards outcomes).
c) if one consent to suggested outcome over perceivable origin, then those suggesting can shape the moment towards the outcome aka ones hopes and fears towards suggested outcomes are being utilized to shape outcomes to the detriment of oneself.
In short...ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) tempts one to want more suggested...hence getting "3 more moths" + "2 more weeks" and "it's gonna happen" + "watch out for" + "if you don't..., then shit's gonna go down" etc.
break away society
a) SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin socius, a companion.] - "a number of persons united"...doesn't breaking away contradict uniting together?
b) if the few are breaking away from togetherness (society), then why are the many desperately trying to come together as to overcome the few?
c) what if suggested "breakaway" tempts one to ignore being the perceiving break (life) within the perceivable way (inception towards death), hence the division (break) of whole into partial through direction of motion (way)?
ruling class
- CLASS, noun - "a number of persons in society, supposed to have some resemblance or equality" + RULE, noun -"authority for direction"
What if direction (inception towards death) sets itself apart (life), hence from whole sameness (process of dying) into partial differences (living)? What if others suggest the inversion thereof as equality (sameness) through diversity (differences)?
What if ones consent to suggested "representative government" by another one, shapes the suggesting one into the ruler and the consenting one into a class under the ruler?
If others suggest one to go this way or that way...does that change the only perceivable way (inception towards death) for everyone (life) within?
a wiki search engine
a) if one tries to search within others...Wi-Ki aka WE KEY (phonetic), then can one be locked within self?
b) if others suggest an EN'GINE, noun [Latin ingenium.] - "artificial instrument, composed of different parts" and one consents to use it, then can one be tempted to lose self while searching within the suggested engine composed by others?
c) what if suggested engine (artificial instrument, composed of different parts) tempts the perceiving instrument (partial) to ignore the perceivable sound (whole)?
Could a perceiving partial (living) be tempted to ignore perceivable whole (process of dying) through the engine of suggestion by others?
NOT artificial intelligence
"I asked Chatgpt/Dan" implies "I consented to stand under artificially suggested while ignoring naturally perceivable".
- ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural"
- INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)
That being said...suggested NOT(hing) tempts one to ignore perceivable everything.
wired
One represents resistance (life) within current (inception towards death)...others suggest WIRE, verb - "to bind with wire" as to contain resistance within directable (anagram for creditable) current (like currency)...
a) when you run the world economy so frugal that you don't even have enough to grow hair...
b) E'RA, noun - "affixed point in time"...free will of choice implies within ongoing balance...ignoring this for suggested "free will" without choice affixes one within imbalance aka reasoning against other choices.
spokesperson
Perceivable sound doesn't speak...a PER (by) SONOS (sound) within ignores that when speaking, hence when uttering suggestible words within perceivable sound.
Gelatin's 'The B-Thing'...
a) suggested uniformity (sameness) tempts "one" to ignore perceivable UNI (Latin unus; one) FORM (differentiated through flow).
Same flow (inception towards death) generates different form (life)...suggesting form to behave the same tempts each one to ignore perceivable differences, hence ignoring to sustain difference (living) within sameness (process of dying).
Cultivating death by suggesting life to mimic its behavior...how?...by suggesting progressivism aka going with the flow, following orders, attaching oneself to the chain of command, being lead by others, hope towards outcomes; adhering to the main-stream etc.
b) consenting to suggested gives those suggesting the power to conceal it. Meanwhile...nature reveals everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving).
c) if the many consent to the suggestions of the few, then the selected few (elite) will stand out as the "chosen ones" from all the other ones, which the few conceal by setting substitute authority in-between themselves and their followers, hence those who suggest "in the name of" the few.
Among the many who ignore to see perceivable, those suggesting in the name of others have to be "seen", hence standing out differently among all those who behave the same. Meanwhile...anyone among the many standing out will be easily seen by the few (tallest nail gets the hammer) and resented by the many who just want to follow suggested orders and behave like the "norm".
I love...
Aka I want what another suggests, which implies I consent to a conflict of reason between all those who want vs not want what others are suggesting. This conflict gives those suggesting the power to define (international world cup); redefine (nation vs nation) and contradict (black vs black) what others are reasoning over, while controlling both sides of the conflict.
This way the many can be tempted by a few to become willing spectators of controlled conflicts of reason, while ignoring that the few use their ignorance to attack on international level, from within nations and to the point of replacing the spectators who are still looking at the distraction because they "enjoy things"...
consume your life
Living implies within the process of dying, hence ones partial struggle to resist being consumed by the whole.
Consent gives others the power to suggest "in nomine" (in the name of)...