▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

controlled by elites

ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection, choice"...who selected the few by free will of choice? Who made the choice to select "elite" as a description for others?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

COURSE, noun - "a passing; a moving, or motion forward, in a direct or curving line"...can life have another course than from inception towards death?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The religion of Atheism is essentially Transhumanism.

a) religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) represents ones consent to suggested -isms by others.

b) consenting to suggested (abstract) tempts one to ignore perceivable (essence).

If there is no soul or spirit...

...then one wouldn't have the free will of choice to consent to suggested, while ignoring to adapt (by breathing aka Latin spiro; to breathe) within perceivable.

the only way to transcend

The only way (inception towards death) generates transcendence (life) aka ongoing loss generating temporary growth.

through the machine

If one consents to suggested MACHINE, noun [Latin machina.] - "an artificial work", then one ignores perceivable aka natural work. A machine implies temporary ingredients put together to mimic an ongoing system...well; oneself represents a temporary ingredient (living) within an ongoing system (process of dying). Suggested machines tempt one to ignore that.

virtual reality

VIR'TUAL, adjective (Latin virtus, vireo; virtue) - "potential" implies oneself aka temporary growth potential (living) within the ongoing loss of potentiality (process of dying).

Consenting to suggested "headset" sets suggested fiction into ones head, while one pretends to have virtue within reality.

AI is their idol.

INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) implies "standing under" the suggestions of others by consenting to them...who are the few standing under? Who is suggesting the few to consent?

What if it's each one of the many who consents to stand under the artificial suggestions of the few, while ignoring to grow within natural?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) RAN'DOM, noun - "motion or course without direction"...motion (inception towards death) implies direction for those within (life).

b) the few suggest random to distract the many from freedom (free will of choice within dominance of balance).

currently looking at this product

Current (inception towards death) produces ability to look (life)...

Svarowski

Swarowski aka Daniel Swarowski aka Daniel Shwartz

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aliens/Anunnaki/Reptilians

a) Latin alienus, from alius, another...everyone represents another to one another.

b) AN (heaven) A-NUN-NA (offspring) KI (earth)...out of flow (inception towards death) springs form (life).

c) REP (repetition) TILE (cover)...repetitive choice (reaction) within the cover of balance (action) aka frequency of resistance within velocity aka ones adaptation to being moved.

was created

a) transmuted out of origin to deceive those within perceivable (reality) with suggested (fiction)...one cannot shape fiction without using reality as the foundation.

b) suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of; within and in response to everything).

by DrLeaks
▲ 14 ▼
free-will-of-choice 14 points ago +14 / -0

surrounded by snow...no water

"Born and raised by those who praise control of population"..."Dream of Californication"

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

1700...1000...1023...2023...3...

a) suggested numbers tempt one to ignore perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun [Latin unus; unitas, unity.] - "one".

b) to be one (partial) implies within oneness (whole), hence perceiving partials (living) within perceivable whole (process of dying)...others suggest one to count units (ones) as 2,3,4...(till infinity and beyond) as to distract one from oneself.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

are 2000yr old texts fake if 200yr old ones are?

Take a stopwatch and ask yourself every minute "do I exist before; after or now?"...continue this exercise until you comprehend that one can only exist now (perceivable reality)...not before or after (suggested fiction).

Comprehension destroys ignorance; ignorance curtails comprehension.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

civilizations that were just as advanced

a) one (life) needs to resist being advanced (inception towards death)

b) an advanced mind resists being domesticated (civilized) by the suggestions of others, while expressing comprehension (growth) within perceivable (loss).

c) if I teach a child to consent to suggested words it's called "civilized", yet if I teach a dog to consent to suggested words it's called "domesticated"...how many civilizations have to collapse upon themselves before mankind wises up to the trick played upon them?

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those with eyes to see and ears to hear can discern between suggested FAIR (clear; free from spots; beautiful; pleasing to the eye) and perceivable FARE (to go; to pass; to move forward)...

In short...the few suggest FAIR to sugarcoat FARE (inception towards death) for the consenting many, who indulge in the former, while ignoring to resist the latter.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) one road (inception towards death) for everyone within (life).

b) all suggested roads (plural) tempts one (singular) to be lead to ROAM; verb - "to wander; to walk or move about from place to place without any certain purpose or direction", hence ignoring perceivable for suggested.

c) "cross" implies from inception towards death (vertical), while balancing in-between need/want (horizontal).

d) crossroads (plural) represents the suggestions of others tempting one to ignore balance (need/want) for imbalance (want vs not want). This represents the contract (consent to suggested) signed at the crossroads.

e) consenting to suggested (want or not want), while ignoring perceivable (need/want) tempts one to be stuck within a conflict of reason (want vs not want), hence nailed to the cross.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a new Kaaba for them called Al Mukaab.

a) notice the inversion...the Kaaba represents dark while drawing around, the AL Mukaab represents light while drawing into. The former represents ignorance of center, while the latter represents ignorance of surrounding aka the former represents the mental prison, while the latter represents the physical prison.

b) the real KAABA (cube) - "the product of a number multiplied into itself, and that product multiplied into the same number" aka ONEs (partials) multiplying within ONE (whole) aka living within the process of dying implies oneself...Addition (inception); Subtraction (death); Multiplication (intercourse for offspring) and division (being partial within whole).

As for the physical cube...oneself as the center implies up/down; left/right and forwards/backwards perspective, hence a cube.

from the older religion into the consumerist hedonist one

a) RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies ones choice to want the suggested -ism of another, hence a self-indulgent choice (hedonistic), and furthermore...ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) implies ones consumption of everything offered for wanting even more through the suggestions of others.

In short...religion implies both consumerism and hedonism (and all the other -isms).

b) old (not want) vs new (want) tempts one to ignore now (need). Ones belief/disbelief is being willingly upheld "now"...not before (old) or after (new). Only "now" can one choose to change belief to disbelief or vice versa. Reasoning about old vs new tempts one to ignore now, which others are exploiting by reshaping it with suggestions.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

currency status... everyone will want to hold

CURRENT, adjective - "to flow or run"...form (life) cannot hold onto flow (inception towards death) only grow its own resistance within or ignore doing so...holding onto suggested currencies tempts one to ignore resisting.

▲ 6 ▼
free-will-of-choice 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because nothing says submission to the prophet and the almighty more than consenting to a jewish mastercard...

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

DE (separated from) SERVE (work for)...living implies being separated from, while working for the process of dying.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

One cannot hide under the hood of "victim" without pointing the finger of "persecution". If others aren't at fault, then oneself would be exposed...

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) DIS (separated from) ORDER (ordered by) aka temporary chaos (life) separated from the ongoing natural order (inception towards death). Therefore; every mind/memory (ment) represents a disorder.

b) GEN (process of dying) TRANSmutes generated (living), hence everyone within everything representing a "transgender" aka generated through transmutation of whole (ongoing) into partial (temporary).

c) every -ism represents the suggested temptation to ignore perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information). Consenting to any suggested -ism, gives those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict it at will.

d) every -ist (psychiatrist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (scientism), which represents ones ignorance of perceivable SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, scio, to know.]

e) change (inception towards death) cannot be contained (claimed) by those within (life). Everything changes; everyone is contained within change.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lem...Moon

Kirk LeMoyne "Lem" Billings (Kennedy's Boyfriend) + Moon (buttocks) = a sodomite joke.

▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

not sure

Babylon Bee aka BE BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder"...

by DrLeaks
▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

who wants to implant

To choose want (suggested) over need (perceivable) gives others the consent to implant suggested information within ones mind/memory...

by DrLeaks
▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

SA'FETY, noun - "freedom from danger or hazard"...to be free (living) implies within the dominance of hazardous danger (process of dying). Suggested safety tempts one to ignore resisting hazardous dangers perceived.

by DrLeaks
▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

CHIP; noun (Saxon ceapan, cypan) - "to buy or sell" aka "cheap"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/chip

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since the "LIBERTY" of ships became a hushed topic, most vessels became vassals...

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Libertarianism is as aspirational and utopic—in doctrine—as communism.

a) -ISM implies ones consent to the suggestions of another, which tempts one to ignore LIBER (free), hence being free will of choice, and then allows the suggesting few to collect the consenting many, hence building communes of order followers.

b) aspiration aka aspirating to be implies suggested progressivism (towards outcomes). Life, while being progressed from inception towards death needs to resist the temptation to follow.

c) utopia is based on suggested idealism, once again tempting one to seek outcomes form others, while ignoring to adapt to origin.

d) as for doctrine (from doctor)...one doesn't represent a docked (doct) ore (or), but a vessel (life) with free will of choice to row within flow (inception towards death).

tl; dr...all the suggested words used by the many to communicate are corrupt, are defined, redefined and contradicted by the few, and represent the inversion of perceivable sound and its behavior.

You use -isms to describe something, while ignoring that all the -isms are defined by the few, while the many are busy reasoning about the meaning thereof. This represents division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).

I don't try to tell others how to behave, I rip apart what restricts ones free will of choice behavior, hence the suggestions by others.

live and let live

LET, verb - "to permit; to allow; to suffer"...the ongoing process of dying permits and allows temporary living to suffer ones struggle as resistance within temptation.

It ain't other life that allows living, it's the process of dying....loss (inception towards death) lets one grow (life). "live and let live" represents a suggested inversion thereof, a rhetorical suggestion tempting one to fight against others, instead of struggling for the sustenance of self within origin.

It would be nice

You represent the "being"; tempted by suggested "it" to ignore self for "nice" things...

Sleight of hand: "You know it seems the more we talk about it...It only makes it worse to live without it"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfhaA65aM-0 This isn't a pop song, it's ideological warfare, spell-craft, mass deception etc...yet it can be just a pop song if one so chooses...

It would be nice if people had perfect information of the entirety

a) each one of the people represents a partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable), while struggling to sustain apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).

Perfection and entirety is being suggested to tempt one to ignore being imperfect and partial.

b) information implies IN FORM...form (life) implies within flow (inception towards death). One represents form within flow, hence the need to adapt to IN (being within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe).

The few suggest information to tempt one to ignore perceivable inspiration. You are tempted to want to accumulate the entirety of information, while ignoring to exists within the entirety of inspiration.

Information represents that which you uphold within your mind/memory, while inspiration represents the perceivable flowstate you need to adapt to aka the moving differences surrounding you.

the market

a) M'ARK, noun (Latin mercor, to pass), hence the mark (life) of the beast (inception towards death) aka the Passover of life from inception towards death. The mark aka the visible effect (living) of force or agency (process of dying).

b) ignoring the perceivable mark for the suggested "market", tempts one to buy (suggested information) and sell (consent to suggested information) under contract law.

c) merchant implies MER (sea) CHANT (to utter a melodious voice) aka MER (perceivable inspiration) CHANT (suggested information). The happy merchant of temptation is gonna sell you as much information as you want, but you don't need any...a Faustian deal.

at any given moment so as to make the most informed decision

a) motion gives momentum, momentum gives form (living) into flow (process of dying)...form (life) perceives flow (inception towards death) as the ever changing moment (um).

b) does one need to decide to breathe or is one forced to adapt by breathing?

It would be nice if everyone perfectly obeyed the mechanics of voluntarism

Suggested voluntarism represents "acting by choice", which represents the inversion of reaction as choice to being within an enacting balance (need/want) based system.

One cannot choose to have a choice, one represents the response-ability (free will of choice) within balance, with the choice to adapt (need) or ignore (want) it.

non-aggression principle.

Defense (living) within offense (process of dying), hence aggression (Latin gradior; gressus, Hebrew; to descend) aka to descend as temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).

PRIN'CIPLE, noun [Latin principium, beginning.] aka inception towards death...a descend of life.

Why do the many lack to comprehend this? Because each one consents to suggested "non" (nothing). How could one comprehend how everything works if one willingly believes in the existence of nothing?

not how the world works

Again with the suggested nothing, tempting one ignore perceivable everything, which just works...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". It's not hard to comprehend work, it's hard to resist ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).

needed responsibility,’ in order to bring...

One represents the response-ability (free will of choice) within the natural order (balance), hence struggling as choice to balance in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested).

One cannot BRING, verb - "to produce; to procure as a cause", one represents the effect of NATURE, noun -"born, produced" as the cause.

actions we need to take...

...ignores reaction each one represents. Life can only react to being directed from inception towards death, hence reacting within an enacting system.

Others suggest "actors" under "directors" as the inversion thereof...

to cleanse society

Society represents suggested collectivism, which represents the inversion of nature setting itself apart from whole (process of dying) into partial (living). The many keep dying because they willingly want to be "part of" collective society, instead of struggling for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).

Coincidentally; the so called jews survive apart, while not just suggesting the collectivism of societies, but as APART WITHIN them, hence mimicking partial within whole.

Consider if the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) cleanses every chaos (living) within...not matter what those within are up to?

prevent us from doing so

If everyone else suggests one "thou shall not kill", then does that prevent one from utilizing free will of choice to "try" to kill another? You are alive...how are you prevented from living?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›