What needs to happen is people refuse to pay taxes
That implies ones want to hold onto a currency (flowing, running, passing) suggested by others. Consider what happens if one (life) fuses with that which flows (inception towards death) instead of resisting it?
IRS
INTERNAL (living) REVENUE (adaptation) SERVICE (process of dying)
- living implies "within" the process of dying, hence internal within eternal.
- re-venue aka responding (life) to that which comes (inception towards death)
- service aka performed (living) at the command of a superior (process of dying)
virtuelles Lexikon...großlogenunabhängig und keiner freimaurerischen Institution verpflichtet....Auf dieses Weise will es auch den im Internet kursierenden zahlreichen Falschdarstellungen und abstrusen Verschwörungstheorien engagiert entgegentreten.
- A virtual Lexicon...not bound to great lodges and not obligated to freemasonic institutions...in this way it will also dedicate itself to oppose false representations and abstruse (remote from comprehension) conspiracy theories on the internet".
operator...Bernd Brauer; Brack 11A; 21129 Hamburg
a) BBB aka bbb aka 666.
b) 11A (111); 21129 (6) = 3x6 = 666.
Sie stehen für das Motto "Einheit in der Vielfalt.“
- they (freemasonry) stand for the motto: "unity within diversity"
Aka e pluribus unum (out of many one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states; united nations; european union; uniformity aka equality (same) through diversity (different) aka replacement migration aka the melting pot aka compound interest aka collectivism etc.
Nature sets itself apart...from whole (same process of dying) into partial (different living), the few suggest the inversion to tempt the many to destroy themselves by consenting.
The issue...it's easier to blame the phone; the ones suggesting it or you for suggesting to not buy/use it, then it is to question the weakness within self of consenting to suggested temptations by others.
That's three layers of justification for shirking responsibility...
Now you're just asking silly questions
a) what if there's an ongoing solution underneath all temporary questions and answers? How could one describe the solution to those who put questions and answers first?
b) if silliness represents "weakness of understanding", then what if I put out only questions I can already answer?
c) what if I utilize question and answer together? Would others then engage or feel left out of communication?
Philosophy is...
...a suggestion by others about what was perceivable beforehand, hence tempting one to ignore what was perceivable for what others suggest it is.
the writing on the back of the cereal box
A justification to feel better about oneself while consenting to consume the suggested poison within the cereal box. Ever held the box, thinking how stupid the games, jokes and riddles are, while shoveling the cereal down your hatch? Imagine viewing this from the perspective of those suggesting the cereal...they see you physically consuming poison; while feeling mentally superior over the distractions on the box.
a) REDEMP'TION, noun - "deliverance (free will of choice) from bondage (balance)"...what if that represents the status quo of being alive?
Remember the video-game "Red Dead Redemption" aka living (red) dying (dead) responding to obtain (re-deem) within action (-tion)? The original game was called "Red Dead Revolver" aka living (red) dying (dead) responding to be turned (re-volve)...
Obtaining what one wants (suggested) or the need to adapt to being turned (perceivable)...balance (need/want) for free will of choice.
b) where in nature does one perceive completion? Being "one" implies partial within whole, hence the opportunity to grow (living) within loss (dying). Only as a frag-ment (broken mind) can one be aware (conscious) of input.
What could be put into a complete state? What would one be aware of while being complete?
unnameable and ineffable
a) one cannot spell unable without able...
b) what if unable represents ones choice to ignore being enabled?
c) what if perceivable sound doesn't "need" a spoken name; but tempts those within to "want" to speak names to each other about perceivable sound?
What if suggested words mark those who consent to them, hence tempting one to willingly etch them into ones mind/memory when consenting?
Look at your surrounding...do you think about what you are perceiving or about what the suggested labels mean that you already consented to? Try looking at an "apple" from the perspective of a worm that doesn't perceive the label "apple"...what do you see?
Reading implies sentences; words, letters...who put these into ones mind? Does the mind of a baby not work without such sentences; words and letters? How then can a mother "read" the mind of a baby?
to force 'biometric unlocking' of phones...
....implies ones consent to suggested phones beforehand.
Who else besides you would?
Can others suggest you to put something in there? Can everything perceivable inspire you to put something in there? Without you putting something in there...would it be empty? What about you taking something out without residue?
It's your consciousness.
Being conscious implies being aware of...so how could something that is yours be defined by what's coming in from outside?
in your own head
If one cannot prevent input coming in, then does one still own it?
The "chosen ones" are as small (petty) as one and as big as the choices of others consent them to grow.
On the other hand...what one should consider (petty) is being the one wielding free will of choice.
a) before suggestion (marketing/advertising) exits temptation (choice of want over need)...
b) while being (life) used (inception towards death) one cannot own; only RE (respond to) USE (being used by).
Owning represents the temptation to want what isn't needed...those who want to own can be tricked to pay a price for that which is given towards "free" will of choice.
c) not "percent", but PER (preposition, denoting through, passing, or over the whole extent) SENT (drive by force to a distance), hence living (per) within the process of dying (sent).
Only way to stop
The only way (inception towards death) cannot be stopped by one (life) within.
them is for the People to stand up.
The power of the chosen few represents the choice of the many who consent to stand under the suggestions of the few.
I always say it
a) AL'WAYS, adverb [all and way] - "Continually; without variation"...each one (life) represents the variation within the same way (inception towards death). Suggested "all and way" tempts one to ignore being perceiving one within perceivable way.
b) SAY, verb - "to utter in words"...what if others suggest words to tempt one to ignore that the way communicates itself as perceivable sound towards perceiving resonance (need) or dissonance (want)...depending on choice?
Good is stronger than evil but it needs to rise.
a) what if suggested good (want) or evil (not want) tempt one to ignore perceivable need?
b) from the moment to rise (inception) to the moment to fall (death) implies momentum (life)...being within that momentum implies rising (temporary growth) while falling (ongoing loss).
c) the process of dying is stronger than living within...which one represents good or evil?
Aging increases your risk of death over time.
a) if age increases, then why does life reduces while aging?
b) what if there's a choice of perspective in-between suggested "risk of death" and perceivable "opportunity of life"?
c) if one is given birth, one lives and one dies, then what does the increase/reduction of ONE represent?
d) could others suggest one to count numbers to distract ONE from perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit" aka U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one"?
How does nature designate "two"?
increases risk of death
Prêt-à-Jeter (ready to throw away) aka planned obsolescence...
A labeled seed implies being stuck within a package instead of growing within soil...
Love yourself, Love others, Love life
Love (want) implies versus Hate (not want) and is shaped by ones consent to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested). Ones struggle to sustain self, life and others represents the need to resist wanted temptations, hence balancing (need/want) as free will of choice.
Try aiming your love (want) or hate (not want) against thirst or hunger to be able to comprehend that you NEED to quench your thirst and still your hunger...no matter if you love or hate it.
Delusion is trusting words written by men in power.
a) solution (inception towards death) concentrates (life)...concentration (resistance) needs to resist wanted solution (temptation). Ignoring to resist solution, dilutes concentration.
b) perceiving choice exits at the center of perceivable balance (need/want), while being tempted by suggested imbalance (want vs not want)...once again ones need to resist want.
c) consenting to the suggestions of others, while ignoring perceivable, represents want and not want; trust and distrust; belief and disbelief; faith and doubt; submission and defiance; agreement and disagreement etc. Ignorance by consent to suggested represents the foundation of delusion; deception; misleading etc.
d) suggested words are shaped by free will of choice out of perceivable sound...representing spell-craft.
e) to write represents suggested symbolism; which tempts others to ignore perceivable symmetry. Motion represents enacting symmetry; everything within represents asymmetric reactions, struggling to sustain self (life) within symmetrical motion (inception towards death).
f) male (motion) to female (momentum) to trans (transmutation) sex (division).
g) power of temporary growth (resistance) within the power of ongoing loss (velocity) aka living within the process of dying.
The suggesting few are wielding the power of consent by the ignorant many aka if each one of the many consents by free will of choice to the suggested choices of the few, then that shapes the few into the "chosen ones".
Absolutely not.
a) a contradiction in terms, hence absolute (everything) not (nothing).
b) using "no; not; nothing; nothingness" implies ones consent to suggested creationism, from CREATE, verb - "to produce; to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist".
c) nature represents producing from within everything, hence the whole (process of dying aka loss) producing each partial (living aka growth) within itself.
d) production of partial (form) within whole (flow) represents transmutation, hence flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death)...alchemy.
A book...
a) ...binds those who consent to the suggestion thereof; while tempting one to ignore that nature sets free will of choice as perceiving partial into perceivable whole.
b) suggested words are shaped by free will of choice out of perceivable sound.
c) those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound), while those who consent to suggested word-based "definitions" represent DEAF PHONETICIANS.
d) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) binds the former to the latter, hence RELIGION, noun (Latin religio; to bind anew)...contract of consent among choices as the inversion of being choice (reaction) within balance (action).
e) rhetoric represents the mimicry of flow (sound) through form (words), hence spell-craft.
If you are...then you lack
If you are (temporary growth), the you are within (ongoing loss)...lack represents your choice to want more (suggested) than need offers (perceivable).
bot
Aka Robot (Latin robur, strength)...the strength of temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) implies resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
Ask yourself why you use the suggested term "bot" to dehumanize others? Why not express humanity within perceivable instead of trying to dehumanize others by suggestion?
free will
Suggested free will tempts one to ignore being "free will of choice". Consenting to suggested "free will" implies ignoring to both have a "choice" and having it "of" origin.
FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance)...can you describe the foundation for your choice?
You will respond
I need to adapt to perceivable inspiration, while resisting the want/will to respond to suggested information. I write so much because I choose to draw from inspiration instead of reasoning against others about information.
You will respond with definitions
I dismantle suggested definitions, which in return helps me to resist the temptation of being a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one who willingly ignores perceivable sound for suggested words.
LACK FREE WILL AND FREE CHOICE
a) lacking implies being within an origin that offers, hence one being able to perceive abundance and lack, which further implies having free will of choice in-between abundance (growth) and lack (loss).
b) can you give me an example of having free will "without" free choice?
You have now been blue-screened.
You only get jew-screened on windows...and if you look through suggested windows, then you view the world "through the looking glass"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Through_the_Looking-Glass
The Impaler
Mouth to Ass or Ass to Mouth?
- Title: Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
- Distribution Statement: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
- https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA333462.pdf
- When a man's an empty kettle (lack of comprehension)
- He should be on his mettle (adaptation to perceivable)
- And yet I'm torn apart (perceiving within perceivable)
- Just because I'm presumin' (consenting to suggested)
- That I could be kind of human (suggestion over perceivable)
- If I only had a heart (motion; pulsation)
Straw-man: "If I only had a brain..."
to draw their own conclusions
a) nature draws initiation (inception) and conclusion (death) for every expression (life) within...
b) DRAW, verb - "to cause to move forward"...self discernment allows one to comprehend being the effect, caused to move forwards.
the way it works
a) EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal/inherent power"...that's work.
b) Inside work exists the way (process of dying) and the wanderer (living) aka ongoing loss and temporary growth in balance with each other.
c) sleight of hand: "Arbeit (energy) macht Frei (free will of choice)" aka work will set you free.
If the process of dying generates the living, then the cost of death sets the price of life...
a) "free" will of choice implies confinement within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom...free (living) within dom (process of dying).
b) consenting (belief; creed; credit) to suggested currency (flow) puts one into debt (debitum, contracted), hence choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. That represents the prison of the consenting many to the suggestions of the chosen ones.
Only perceivable nature sets every perceiving one within "free" (will of choice)...